FA6800-24-R-0008_Combined Synopsis Solicitation_9May24.pdf

FA6800-24-R-0008

Combined Synopsis/Solicitation

For

AFGSC Missile Alert Facilities - Refueler Maintenance Services

(i) This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice.

This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; proposals are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued. Simplified procedures as outlined in FAR Part 13.5 will be used for the acquisition of this commercial item.

(ii) This solicitation is issued as a request for proposal (RFP). Submit written proposals (oral quotes will not be accepted) on RFP reference number FA6800-24-R-0008.

(iii) This solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-82.

(iv) This solicitation is 100% a small business set-aside. The North American Industry

Classification System (NAICS) code is 488190 - Other Support Activities for Air Transportation with a Small Business Size Standard of $40M.

(v) The purpose of this combined synopsis and solicitation is to advertise the requirement to have an Offeror perform full preventive maintenance inspection (FPMI) and repair in accordance with equipment manufacturer's specifications/recommendations, industry standards, and Air Force

Technical Orders. Contractor shall respond to service calls 7 days each week and will respond to emergency calls as needed. Contractor shall perform periodic inspections, and be responsible for repair and replacement of all worn or failed components and parts. Replacement parts and interface shall be fully compatible with existing systems. During any scheduled FPMI, the contractor shall immediately service any system that is not operating properly. If the inoperable systems cannot be repaired during the inspection, the contractor shall notify the COR and Fuels Service Center (FSC) within one (1) hour of determining the irreparable status of the refueler. Additionally, contractor shall provide the COR and FSC with the refueler expected time in commission (ETIC) date. The contractor shall also stock and maintain a benchstock of parts needed to complete repairs. Offerors are not required to provide pricing for the CAP, Materials, and Benchstock CLINs. The bid schedule and the contract CLIN schedule are as follows. NOTE: An excel version of the bid schedule is attached for your convenience.

ITEM

NO

SUPPLIES/SERVICES QTY UNIT UNIT

PRICE

AMOUNT

CLIN

On-Site MAF Refueler Services IAW the PWS.

(BASE)

FFP

Services Includes labor, scheduled maintenance, unscheduled maintenance, tools, vehicles, and

12 Months http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/12.htm#P292_49018 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/13.htm#P427_61446 travel to the MAF-R sites.

CLIN

Contractor Acquired Parts, Materials, and

Benchstock. (BASE)

Contractor Acquired Parts/Materials expenses provided under this CLIN are those furnished by the contractor that are: (i) validated in advance by the COR and then subsequently authorized by the

PCO; (ii) not furnished by the Government and;

(iii) required for performance of or incidental to work.

1 LOT DO NOT

BID

DO NOT

BID

CLIN

On-Site MAF Refueler Services IAW the PWS.

(OPTION I)

12 Months

Benchstock (OPTION I) the contractor that are: (i) validated in advance by the COR and then subsequently authorized by the PCO; (ii) not furnished by the Government and;

DO NOT

BID

CLIN

(OPTION II)

Benchstock (OPTION II) the contractor that are: (i) validated in advance by the COR and then subsequently authorized by the

PCO; (ii) not furnished by the Government and;

(iii) required for performance of or incidental to

1 LOT DO NOT

BID

DO NOT

(OPTION III)

Benchstock (OPTION III) the contractor that are: (i) validated in advance by the COR and then subsequently authorized by the PCO; (ii) not furnished by the Government and;

DO NOT

BID

CLIN

(OPTION IV)

Benchstock (OPTION IV)

Contractor Acquired Parts/Materials expenses provided under this CLIN are those furnished by the contractor that are: (i) validated in advance by the COR and then subsequently authorized by the PCO; (ii) not furnished by the Government and; (iii) required for performance of or incidental to

DO NOT

Total Proposed Price:

(vi) Refer to the attached PWS for a detailed description of requirements for the service being acquired.

(vii) Period of Performance is anticipated to be as follows:

CLIN 0001

CLIN 0002

CLIN 1001

CLIN 1002

CLIN 2001

CLIN 2002

CLIN 3001

CLIN 3002

CLIN 4001

CLIN 4002

30 Jun 24 – 29 Jun 25

30 Jun 24 – 29 Jun 25

30 Jun 25 – 29 Jun 26

30 Jun 25 – 29 Jun 26

30 Jun 26 – 29 Jun 27

30 Jun 26 – 29 Jun 27

30 Jun 27 – 29 Jun 28

30 Jun 27 – 29 Jun 28

30 Jun 28 – 29 Jun 29

30 Jun 28 – 29 Jun 29

(viii) 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors -- Commercial, applies to this acquisition. With the following addendum:

52.212-1 Addendum

The Offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 90 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers.

PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of the proposal, the Offeror must follow the instructions contained herein. The proposal must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation. The response shall consist of three (3) separate parts: Part I – Price Proposal, Part II – Past Performance Information and Part III – Technical

Proposal.

B. The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and, if in the contracting officer’s opinion adequate price competition exists, no additional cost information will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists Offerors may be required to submit information other than cost or pricing data to support a determination of price reasonableness.

C. Specific Instructions:

Documents submitted in response to this solicitation must be fully responsive to and consistent with the following:

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_000.htm#P1403_190669 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/15.htm#P587_118401

1. Requirements of the solicitation (Item Numbers) and Performance Work Statement

(PWS), and government standards and regulations pertaining to the PWS.

2. Evaluation Factors for Award.

1. PART I – PRICE PROPOSAL - Submit one (1) copy.

(a) Complete the Solicitation Bid Schedule in paragraph “(v)” above. The completed schedule must be returned with the solicitation as part of the Price Proposal. Any offer received without the completed schedule will be determined non-responsive and will not be considered for award.

(b) Insert proposed unit and extended prices in the Bid Schedule. Unit prices must be whole dollar values (e.g. $10.00). The extended amount must equal the whole dollar unit price multiplied by the number of units. The proposal(s) must be submitted for a 1 year base plus four

(4) Option Years.

(c) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in provisions and submit with final proposal.

(d) Include the total dollar value of your proposal at the bottom of the bid schedule.

2. PART II – PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION - Only references for same or similar type contracts are desired. Submit one (1) copy.

(a) Quality and Satisfaction Rating for Contracts Completed in the Past Three Years: Provide information currently available (letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.)

which demonstrates customer satisfaction with overall job performance and quality of completed product for same or similar type contract. In addition, explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, etc.

(b) Past Performance References: The Government will evaluate the quality and extent of the

Offeror’s performance deemed relevant to the requirements of this solicitation. The Government will use information submitted by the Offeror and other sources such as other federal government offices and commercial sources, to assess performance. Provide a list of no more than three (3) of the most relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies and commercial customers within the last three years. The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the instant acquisition. Furnish the following information for each contract referenced:

(i) Company/Division name

(ii) Product/Service

(iii) Contracting Agency/Customer

(iv) Contract Number

(v) Contract Dollar Value

(vi) Period of Performance

(vii) Verified, up-to-date name, address, FAX and telephone number of the contracting officer

(viii) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions

(ix) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, provide complete information as to the arrangement, including any relevant and recent past/present performance information on previous teaming arrangements with same partner. If this is a first-time joint effort, each party to the arrangement must provide a list of past and present relevant contracts.

(c) Subcontractor Consent: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime Offeror without the subcontractor’s consent. Provide with the proposal a letter from all subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor.

3. PART III – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL – Submit one (1) copy & one (1) redacted copy.

A) Subfactor 1. Technical Approach - This sub-factor assesses the Offeror’s overarching strategy to execute the MAF Refueling System Maintenance, to include regular periodic inspection and maintenance, and emergency repair for 16 Missile Alert Facility Refueling

Systems. Through your responses to the requirements stated in the PWS, illustrate understanding of the Government’s requirements and ability to provide technical capabilities to successfully provide fuel system maintenance and support. Within the overarching strategy the following technical areas shall be addressed: full preventive maintenance inspection and repair, repair and replacement of all worn or failed components and parts, approach to responding to routine, urgent, and emergency service calls, and environmental compliance. Also include a vehicle listing and identify type and quantity of vehicles being proposed to perform the work. (It is recommended the contractor consider the weather and driving conditions in these areas and propose accordingly).

B) Subfactor 2. Manpower/Staffing Plan. Submit a plan outlining the proposed labor mix, including position descriptions and skill level for each employee required to accomplish services

IAW the PWS. Ensure that all certifications, résumés, and/or training verification for employees are included with the Technical Proposal. The Government anticipates that a minimum of one full-time equivalent (FTE) will be required at each location, with the exception of Malmstrom

AFB, MT, which may require two FTEs due to the size of the area needing coverage. (See PWS

4.5.) The Offeror may propose the labor mix and hours it feels necessary to accomplish the mission requirement. Offerors are cautioned that these locations are known to be hard-to-fill, austere locations and proposals should be reflective of this. The Government intends to incorporate the Manpower/Staffing Plan into the resultant contract and will hold the awardee accountable for maintaining full staffing.

C) Subfactor 3. Transition Plan - Provide a plan to facilitate full performance at the completion of the mobilization period, provide a detailed mobilization strategy with corresponding timelines to: a) recruit, b) train, c) qualify and/or certify maintenance personnel and, d) transition personnel to the base locations, provide badging, as well as a plan to perform maintenance at the beginning of the performance period to include providing a fully stocked bench stock as listed in the PWS. This subfactor also includes the contractor providing a quality control plan IAW PWS

4.6. This section is mandatory.

Note: Failure to address any one or more areas of the technical proposal subfactors above will render your technical proposal unacceptable, and therefore, unawardable.

(End of Addendum)

(ix) 52.212-2 – Evaluation – Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition as follows:

52.212-2 -- Evaluation -- Commercial Items (Jan 1999)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible

Offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors will be used to evaluate offers:

1) Technical Acceptability

2) Price

3) Past Performance

Technical acceptability and past performance, when combined, are approximately equal when compared to price.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful Offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the

Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of Provision)

52.212-2 Addendum

BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This is a competitive best value source selection in which competing Offerors’ past performance history will be evaluated on a basis approximately equal to cost or price considerations. By submission of its offer, the Offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors. All technically acceptable offers will be treated equally except for their prices and performance records. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined technically unacceptable. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The evaluation process will proceed as follows:

A. Technical Acceptability. Initially, the government technical evaluation team will evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable/unacceptable basis assigning one of the ratings described below for the technical factor. If the technical factor is evaluated as “Unacceptable,” it will render the entire proposal unacceptable and, therefore, unawardable. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award. However, the Offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion. The term

“technical” as used herein, refers to non-price factors other than past performance. The purpose of the technical factor is to assess whether the Offeror’s proposal will satisfy the government’s minimum requirements. IAW DoD Source Selection Procedures Appendix A, paragraph A.2.1.1, Table A-1, the Government will use the following table to assess the contractor’s technical acceptability:

TECHNICAL RATINGS

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

The following Technical Capability factors will be evaluated:

Technical Approach. The Offeror will receive an acceptable rating for this subfactor if the Offeror’s technical approach and overarching strategy to execute the MAF Refueling

System Maintenance, to include regular periodic inspection and maintenance, and emergency repair for 16 Missile Alert Facility Refueling Systems meets the minimum standards outlined in the PWS.

Manpower/Staffing Plan. The Offeror will receive an acceptable rating for this subfactor if the Offeror’s manpower plan details the labor mix, including position descriptions and skill level for each employee to accomplish services IAW section 4 of the PWS and those personnel meet the minimum certifications and/or training requirements described in the PWS.

Transition Plan. The Offeror will receive an acceptable rating if a plan is provided that indicates it can facilitate full performance at the completion of the mobilization period to include establishment of a benchstock. (Storage of benchstock on base will be provided)

B. Price Evaluation. Next, the government will rank all technically acceptable offers (and unacceptable offers with correction potential) by price, including any option prices if applicable.

An Offeror’s proposed prices will be determined by multiplying the quantities identified in paragraph “(v)” of the combined synopsis/solicitation by the proposed unit price for each

Contract Line Item Number to confirm the extended amount for each. The price evaluation will document the reasonableness and affordability of the proposed total evaluated price. As part of the price evaluation, the Government will evaluate the Option to Extend Services under FAR

Clause 52.217-8 by adding one-half of the Offeror’s final option period prices to the Offeror’s total price. Thus, the Offeror’s total price for the purpose of evaluation will include the base period and all option periods including the potential six-month extension of services period.

Offerors are required only to price the base and option CLINs. Offerors shall not submit a price for the potential six-month extension of services period.

C. Past Performance. The contracting officer will seek recent and relevant performance information on all Offerors based on (1) the references provided by the Offeror and (2) data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources.

1. Relevant present/past performance is defined as effort involving a similar scope and similar magnitude of effort and complexity as this solicitation requires. The government reserves the right to seek information on higher priced Offerors if none of the lower priced Offerors receive a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment rating. The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to assess the degree of confidence the Government has in the Offeror’s ability to supply the Missile Alert Facility – Refueler (MAF-R) Maintenance Services that meet users’ needs, based on the Offeror’s demonstrated record of performance. The assessment process will result in an overall performance confidence assessment rating of Substantial

Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, No Confidence, or Unknown

Confidence as defined in the table below. Past performance regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or sub-contractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement will be considered as highly as past performance information for the principal Offeror. Offerors with no relevant past or present performance history or the

Offeror’s performance record is so limited that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned will receive the rating “Unknown Confidence”, meaning the rating is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably. Performance Confidence will be evaluated in accordance with the following Table:

PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENTS

Rating Description

Substantial Confidence

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_215.htm#P1090_189861

2. In evaluating past performance, the government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this solicitation. Relevancy will be evaluated in accordance with the following table:

PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY

Rating Description

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

3. If the lowest priced evaluated offer is judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance rating and the Offeror is determined to be responsible, that offer represents the best value for the government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award will be made to that Offeror without further consideration of any other offers.

4. If the lowest priced Offeror is not judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment, the next lowest priced Offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order by price) until an Offeror is judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment or until all Offerors are evaluated. The Contracting Officer will then make an integrated assessment best value award decision.

5. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in the proposal preparation instructions to permit a meaningful assessment of past performance.

Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal or respond to adverse past performance information to which the Offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond.

Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. Communication conducted to resolve minor or clerical

Limited Confidence

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No

Confidence

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has no expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence

(Neutral)

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the

Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

errors will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision.

(End of Addendum)

(x) Include a completed copy of the provision at 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and

Certifications -- Commercial Items, with your offer.

(xi) Clause at 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions -- Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition.

(xii) Clause at 52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement Statutes Or

Executive Orders -- Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition with the following clauses cited within the clause applicable to this acquisition:

52.203-6, Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the Government (Sept 2006), with

Alternate I (Oct 1995) (41 U.S.C. 253g and 10 U.S.C. 2402)

52.204-10, Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards (Jul

2013) (Pub. L. 109-282) (31 U.S.C. 6101 note)

52.209-6, Protecting the Government’s Interest When Subcontracting with Contractors

Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment. (Aug 2013) (31 U.S.C. 6101 note)

52.219-6, Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside (Nov 2011) (15 U.S.C. 644)

52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns (May 2014) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(2) and

(3))

52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting (Nov 2011) (15 U.S.C. 637(a)(14))

52.219-28, Post Award Small Business Program Rerepresentation (Jul 2013) (15 U.S.C.

632(a)(2))

52.222-3, Convict Labor (June 2003) (E.O. 11755)

52.222-19, Child Labor – cooperation with Authorities and Remedies (Jan 2014) (E.O.

13126)

52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities (Feb 1999)

52.222-26, Equal Opportunity (Mar 2007) (E.O. 11246)

52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Veterans (Jul 2014)(38 U.S.C. 4212)

52.222-36, Affirmative Action for Workers with Disabilities (Jul 2014) (29 U.S.C. 793)

52.222-37, Employment Reports on Veterans (Jul 2014) (38 U.S.C. 4212)

52.222-40, Notification of Employee Rights Under the National Labor Relations Act

(Dec 2010) (E.O. 13496)

52.222-54, Employment Eligibility Verification (Aug 2013). (Executive Order 12989).

52.223-18, Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving (Aug

2011) (E.O. 13513) http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_000.htm#P1479_204463 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_000.htm#P1760_244281 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_000.htm#P1959_284871

52.225-13, Restriction on Certain Foreign Purchases (Jun 2008) (E.O.’s, proclamations, and statutes administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the Treasury).

52.232-33, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer— System for Award Management (Jul

2013) (31 U.S.C. 3332)

52.222-41, Service Contract Labor Standards (May 2014) (41 U.S.C. chapter 67.)

52.222-43, Fair Labor Standards Act and Service Contract Act—Price Adjustment

(Multiple Year and Option Contracts) (May 2014) (29 U.S.C. 206 and 41 U.S.C. 351, et seq.)

(xiii) The following additional clauses and provisions apply to this solicitation and are included by reference. Clauses with an asterisk indicate they will be incorporated by full text in the actual contract award (contact the CO with any questions you may have pertaining to the fill-in data if you feel it may have an effect on your proposal):

52.203-3 -- Gratuities (Apr 1984)

52.203-12- Limitation on Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions (Oct 2010)

52.203-16 -- Preventing Personal Conflicts of Interest (Dec 2011)

* 52.217-8 -- Option to Extend Services (Nov 1999)

* 52.217-9 -- Option to Extend the Term of the Contract. (Mar 2000)

* 52.222-42 -- Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires. (May 2014)

52.222-50 -- Combating Trafficking in Persons (Feb 2009)

52.222-17 -- Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers (May 2014)

52.222-62 – Paid Sick Leave Under Executive Order 13706

52.232-23 -- Assignment of Claims (May 2014)

52.232-8 -- Discounts for Prompt Payment (Feb 2002)

52.323-18 -- Availability of Funds (Apr 1984)

52.232-34 -- Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer (Jul 2013)

52.232-40 -- Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business Subcontractors (Dec

2013)

52.237-2 - Protection of Government Buildings, Equipment, and Vegetation (Apr 1984)

52.233-1 -- Disputes (May 2014)

52.233-3 -- Protest After Award (Aug 1996)

52.246-4 -- Inspection of Services (Aug 1996)

* 52.252-5 Authorized Deviations in Provisions (Apr 1984)

* 52.252-6 Authorized Deviations in Clauses (Apr 1984)

252.203-7000, Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DOD Officials (Sep

2011)

252.203-7002, Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights (Sep 2013)

252.204-7003, Control of Government Personnel Work Product (Apr 1992)

252.204-7012, Safeguarding of Unclassified Controlled Technical Information (Nov

2013)

252.209-7004 Subcontracting with Firms That Are Owned or Controlled by the

Government of a Terrorist Country (Dec 2014)

252.226-7001, Utilization of Indian Organizations, Indian Owned Economic Enterprises, and Native Hawaiian Small Business Concerns (Sep 2004)

252.232-7003, Electronic Submission of Payment Requests (Jun 2012)

* 252.232-7006 Wide Area Workflow Payment Instructions (May 2013)

252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments (Dec 2006)

252.237-7023 Continuation of Essential Contractor Services (Oct 2010)

252.243-7002, Request for Equitable Adjustment (Dec 2012)

* 5352.201-9101 Ombudsman (Apr 2014)

* 5352.223-9000 Elimination of Use of Class I Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) (Nov

2012) (No substances identified)

* 5352.223-9001 Health and Safety on Government Installations (Nov 2012)

* 5352.242-9000 Contractor Access To Air Force Installations (Nov 2012)

*5352.242-9001 Common Access Cards (CAC) for Contractor Personnel (Nov 2012)

The following additional clauses and provisions apply to this solicitation and are included by full text:

52.252-2 Clauses Incorporated By Reference (Feb 1998)

This contract incorporates one or more clauses by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. Also, the full text of a clause may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vffara.htm http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vfdfara.htm http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vfaffara.htm

(End of Clause)

(xiv) Reserved http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vffara.htm http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vfdfara.htm http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vfaffara.htm

(xv) Proposals are due by 1300 hours Central Time on 31 May 2024 via DoD Safe to the contracting officer, Capt Natalie Norlock, natalie.norlock@us.af.mil. Request for DoD Safe

Drop off Link shall not be entertained any earlier than 27 May 2024. As this is a competitive acquisition, unsubstantiated late proposals will not be considered for award. Substantiated late proposal inclusion is at the digression of the contracting officer.

(xvi) If you have any questions about this solicitation, please submit them in writing no later than

1500 CT on 18 May 2024. Please send questions to the contracting officer, Capt Natalie Norlock, natalie.norlock@us.af.mil.

(xvii) List of attachments:

Attachment 1: MAF-R PWS Dated 28 September 2018

Attachment 2: Wage Determination FE Warren, WY

Attachment 3: Wage Determination Malmstrom AFB, MT

Attachment 4: Wage Determination Minot AFB, ND

Attachment 5: MAF Schematics

Attachment 6: Bid Schedule (Excel)