Minot_Barrier_Maintenance_Combined_Synopsis-Solicitation.pdf

Combined Synopsis/Solicitation

For

Active Vehicle Barrier Maintenance at Minot AFB, ND

(i) This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in USubpart 12.6U, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice.

This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; proposals are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued. Simplified procedures as outlined in 31TUFAR Part 13.5U31T will be used for the acquisition of this commercial item.

(ii) This solicitation is issued as a request for proposal (RFP). Submit written proposals (oral quotes will not be accepted) on RFP reference number FA6800-14-Q-S017.

(iii) This solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-75.

(iv) This solicitation is a full and open competition with no set-aside. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 811310 - Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance with a Small Business Size Standard of $7.5M.

(v) The purpose of this combined synopsis and solicitation is for regular periodic inspection and maintenance, unscheduled inspection and maintenance, and emergency repair for active vehicle barrier systems in accordance with the attached Performance Work Statement (PWS). The bid schedule and the contract CLIN schedule are:

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

CLIN 0001 Routine Maintenance, Minot AFB

FFP

Provide all personnel, labor, equipment, supplies, tools, materials, supervision, and other items and services necessary to provide regular (bi-weekly) periodic inspection and maintenance of Active Vehicle Barrier Systems at Minot Air Force Base, LA

12 Months

CLIN 0002 Unscheduled Maintenance, Minot AFB

FFP

Provide all personnel, labor, equipment, supplies, tools, materials, supervision, and other items and services necessary to provide routine and emergency unscheduled inspection and maintenance of Active Vehicle Barrier Systems at Minot Air

80 Hours NTE http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/12.htm%23P292_49018 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/13.htm%23P427_61446

Force Base, North Dakota.

CLIN 0003 Replacement Parts, Minot AFB

FFP

Replacement parts for Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota Barrier Maintenance Base Year. No G&A, Overhead or Profit will be allowed in support of this CLIN.

NOTE TO OFFERORS--NO BID IS

REQUIRED FOR THIS CLIN

10,000 Each $1 NTE $10,000

CLIN 1001 Routine Maintenance, Minot AFB

FFP

(Same description as CLIN 0001)

12 Months

CLIN 1002 Unscheduled Maintenance, Minot AFB

FFP

(Same description as CLIN 0002)

80 Hours NTE

CLIN 1003 Replacement Parts, Minot AFB

FFP

(Same description as CLIN 0003)

NOTE TO OFFERORS--NO BID IS

REQUIRED FOR THIS CLIN

10,000 Each $1 NTE $10,000

CLIN 2001 Routine Maintenance, Minot AFB

FFP

(Same description as CLIN 0001)

12 Months

CLIN 2002 Unscheduled Maintenance, Minot AFB

FFP

(Same description as CLIN 0002)

80 Hours NTE

CLIN 2003 Replacement Parts, Minot AFB

FFP

(Same description as CLIN 0003)

NOTE TO OFFERORS--NO BID IS

REQUIRED FOR THIS CLIN

10,000 Each $1 NTE $10,000

CLIN 3001 Routine Maintenance, Minot AFB

FFP

(Same description as CLIN 0001)

12 Months

CLIN 3002 Unscheduled Maintenance, Minot AFB

FFP

(Same description as CLIN 0002)

80 Hours NTE

CLIN 3003 Replacement Parts, Minot AFB

FFP

(Same description as CLIN 0003)

NOTE TO OFFERORS--NO BID IS

REQUIRED FOR THIS CLIN

10,000 Each $1 NTE $10,000

CLIN 4001 Routine Maintenance, Minot AFB

FFP

(Same description as CLIN 0001)

12 Months

CLIN 4002 Unscheduled Maintenance, Minot AFB

FFP

(Same description as CLIN 0002)

80 Hours NTE

CLIN 4003 Replacement Parts, Minot AFB

FFP

(Same description as CLIN 0003)

NOTE TO OFFERORS--NO BID IS

REQUIRED FOR THIS CLIN

10,000 Each $1 NTE $10,000

(vi) Refer to the attached PWS for a detailed description of requirements for the service being acquired.

(vii) Period of Performance is as follows:

CLINS 0001 – 0003 22 Sep 2014 – 21 Sep 2015 CLINS 1001 – 1003 22 Sep 2015 – 21 Sep 2016 CLINS 2001 – 2003 22 Sep 2016 – 21 Sep 2017 CLINS 3001 – 3003 22 Sep 2017 – 21 Sep 2018 CLINS 4001 – 4003 22 Sep 2018 – 21 Sep 2019

(viii) U52.212-1U, Instructions to Offerors -- Commercial, applies to this acquisition. With the following addendum:

52.212-1 Addendum

The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 90 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers.

PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of the proposal, the offeror must follow the instructions contained herein. The proposal must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation. The response shall consist of three (3) separate parts: Part I – Price Proposal, Part II – Past Performance Information and Part III – Technical Proposal.

B. The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and, if in the contracting officer’s opinion adequate price competition exists, no additional cost information will be requested and certification under 31TUFAR 15.406-2U31T will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists offerors may be required to submit information other than cost or pricing data to support a determination of price reasonableness.

C. Specific Instructions:

Documents submitted in response to this solicitation must be fully responsive to and consistent with the following:

1. Requirements of the solicitation (Item Numbers) and Performance Work Statement (PWS), and government standards and regulations pertaining to the PWS.

2. Evaluation Factors for Award.

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_000.htm%23P1403_190669 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/15.htm%23P587_118401

1. PART I – PRICE PROPOSAL - Submit one (1) copy.

(a) Complete the Solicitation Bid Schedule in paragraph “(v)” above. The completed schedule must be returned with the solicitation as part of the Price Proposal. Any offer received without the completed schedule will be determined nonresponsive and will not be considered for award.

(b) Insert proposed unit and extended prices in the Bid Schedule. Unit prices must be Uwhole dollar Uvalues (e.g. $10.00). The extended amount must equal the whole dollar unit price multiplied by the number of units. The proposal(s) must be submitted for a base year plus four

(4) Option Years.

(c) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in provisions. The provisions U52.212-3Ushall be returned along with the proposal.

2. PART II – PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION - Only references for same or similar type contracts are desired. Submit one (1) copy.

(a) Quality and Satisfaction Rating for Contracts Completed in the Past Three Years: Provide information currently available (letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.)

which demonstrates customer satisfaction with overall job performance and quality of completed product for same or similar type contract. In addition, explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, numerous warranty calls, etc.

(b) Past Performance References: The government will evaluate the quality and extent of offeror’s performance deemed relevant to the requirements of this solicitation. The government will use information submitted by the offeror and other sources such as other Federal government offices and commercial sources, to assess performance. Provide a list of no more than five (5) of the most relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies and commercial customers within the last three years. Relevant contracts include pop up or drop arm barrier maintenance service contracts. The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the instant acquisition. Furnish the following information for each contract referenced:

(i) Company/Division name

(ii) Product/Service

(iii) Contracting Agency/Customer

(iv) Contract Number

(v) Contract Dollar Value

(vi) Period of Performance

(vii) Verified, up-to-date name, address, FAX and telephone number of the contracting officer

(viii) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_000.htm%23P1479_204463

(ix) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, provide complete information as to the arrangement, including any relevant and recent past/present performance information on previous teaming arrangements with same partner. If this is a first time joint effort, each party to the arrangement must provide a list of past and present relevant contracts.

(c) Past Performance Questionnaires: Offerors shall send out Attachment 2 Past Performance Questionnaires to the references stated above for completion. The responsibility to send out the form rests solely with the offeror. The information contained therein shall be considered source selection sensitive and not releasable outside of the Government. Completed questionnaires shall be sent directly from the reference to this office via email to Capt John Sidor (31TUjohn.sidor@us.af.milU31T) or via fax to 318-456-7861 to the attention of Capt Sidor. Please call 318-456-8983 prior to faxing questionnaires. Offerors must ensure that completed questionnaires are submitted to this office no later than the proposal receipt date established in the solicitation.

(d) Subcontractor Consent: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor’s consent. Provide with the proposal a letter from all subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor.

3. PART III – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL – Submit one (1) copy.

(a) Subfactor 1 – Quality Control Plan. Reference PWS paragraph 4.9. Submit a proposed Quality Control Plan (QC Plan) in accordance with of the attached Performance Work Statement (PWS).

(b) Subfactor 2 – Manpower Plan. Reference PWS paragraphs 4.6 – 4.8. Submit a plan outlining the proposed labor mix, including position descriptions and skill level for each employee to accomplish services IAW the PWS. Ensure that all certifications and/or training verification for technicians are included with the Technical Proposal.

(Note: CPR Certification may be obtained after contract award, but is required before any electrical work is authorized)

UGeneral Information

FEDERAL HOLIDAYS:

The following Federal Legal Holidays are observed by this base:

New Year’s Day 1 January Martin Luther King’s Birthday Third Monday in January Presidents Day Third Monday in February Memorial Day Last Monday in May Independence Day 4 July mailto:john.sidor@us.af.mil

Labor Day First Monday in September Columbus Day Second Monday in October Veterans Day 11 November Thanksgiving Day Fourth Thursday in November Christmas Day 25 December

(End of Addendum)

(ix) 52.212-2 – Evaluation – Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition as follows:

52.212-2 -- Evaluation -- Commercial Items (Jan 1999)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

1) Technical Acceptability

2) Price

3) Past Performance

Technical acceptability and past performance, when combined, are approximately equal when compared to price.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of Provision)

52.212-2 Addendum

BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This is a competitive best value source selection in which competing offerors’ past performance history will be evaluated on a basis approximately equal to cost or price considerations. By submission of its offer, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors. All technically acceptable offers shall be treated equally except for their prices and performance records. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined technically unacceptable. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

A. Technical Acceptability. Initially, the government technical evaluation team shall evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable/unacceptable basis assigning one of the ratings described below for each subfactor. Any subfactor evaluated as “Unacceptable” will render the entire proposal unacceptable and, therefore, unawardable. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award.

However, the offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion. The term “technical” as used herein, refers to non-price factors other than past performance. The purpose of the technical factor is to assess whether the offeror’s proposal will satisfy the government’s minimum requirements. IAW DoD Source Selection Procedures Appendix A, paragraph A.2.1.1, Table A- 1, the Government will use the following table to assess the contractor’s technical acceptability:

TECHNICAL RATINGS

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

The following Technical Capability factors and subfactors will be evaluated:

(a) Subfactor 1 – Quality Control Plan. Reference PWS paragraphs 2.2 and 4.9. The offeror will receive an acceptable rating for the subfactor if the offeror’s Quality Control Plan includes procedures to identify and prevent defective services from occurring and reoccurring. As a minimum, the plan shall include quality control procedures that address the areas identified in Section II, Services Summary.

(b) Subfactor 2 – Manpower Plan. Reference PWS paragraphs 4.6 – 4.8. The offeror will receive an acceptable rating for the subfactor if the offeror’s manpower plan details the labor mix, including position descriptions and skill level for each employee to accomplish services IAW the PWS and those personnel meet the minimum certifications and/or training requirements described in the PWS. (Note: CPR Certification may be obtained after contract award, but is required before any electrical work is authorized)

B. Price Evaluation. Next, the government shall rank all technically acceptable offers (and unacceptable offers with correction potential) by price, including any option prices if applicable.

An offeror’s proposed prices will be determined by multiplying the quantities identified in paragraph “(v)” of the combined synopsis/solicitation by the proposed unit price for each Contract Line Item Number to confirm the extended amount for each. The price evaluation will document the reasonableness and affordability of the proposed total evaluated price. As part of the price evaluation, the Government will evaluate the Option to Extend Services under FAR Clause 31TU52.217-8U31T by adding one-half of the offeror's final option period prices to the offeror's total price. Thus, the offeror's total price for the purpose of evaluation will include the base period and all option periods including the potential six-month extension of services period.

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_215.htm%23P1090_189861

Offerors are required only to price the base and option CLINs. Offerors shall not submit a price for the potential six-month extension of services period.

C. Past Performance. The contracting officer shall seek recent and relevant performance information on all offerors based on (1) the references provided by the offeror and (2) data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources.

1. Relevant present/past performance is defined as effort involving a similar scope and similar magnitude of effort and complexity as this solicitation requires. The government reserves the right to seek information on higher priced offerors if none of the lower priced offerors receive a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment rating. The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to assess the degree of confidence the Government has in the offeror’s ability to supply the ATFP Barrier Maintenance Service that meet users’ needs, based on the offeror’s demonstrated record of performance. The assessment process will result in an overall performance confidence assessment rating of Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, No Confidence, or Unknown Confidence as defined in the table below. Past performance regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or sub-contractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement will be considered as highly as past performance information for the principal offeror. Offerors with no relevant past or present performance history or the offeror’s performance record is so limited that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned shall receive the rating “Unknown Confidence”, meaning the rating is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably. Performance Confidence will be evaluated in accordance with the following Table:

PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENTS

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral)

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

2. In evaluating past performance, the government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this solicitation. Relevancy will be evaluated in accordance with the following table:

PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

3. If the lowest priced evaluated offer is judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance rating and the offeror is determined to be responsible, that offer represents the best value for the government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award shall be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers.

4. If the lowest priced offeror is not judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment, the next lowest priced offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order by price) until an offeror is judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment or until all offerors are evaluated. The Contracting Officer shall then make an integrated assessment best value award decision.

5. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in the proposal preparation instructions to permit a meaningful assessment of past performance.

Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal or respond to adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond.

Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. Communication conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision.

(End of Addendum)

(x) Include a completed copy of the provision at U52.212-3U, Offeror Representations and Certifications -- Commercial Items, with your offer.

(xi) Clause at U52.212-4U, Contract Terms and Conditions -- Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition.

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_000.htm%23P1479_204463 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_000.htm%23P1760_244281

(xii) Clause at U52.212-5U, Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement Statutes Or Executive Orders -- Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition with the following clauses cited within the clause applicable to this acquisition:

52.203-6, Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the Government (Sept 2006), with Alternate I (Oct 1995) (41 U.S.C. 253g and 10 U.S.C. 2402)

52.204-10, Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards (Jul 2013) (Pub. L. 109-282) (31 U.S.C. 6101 note)

52.209-6, Protecting the Government’s Interest When Subcontracting with Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment. (Aug 2013) (31 U.S.C. 6101 note)

52.219-6, Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside (Jul 2013) (15 U.S.C. 644)

52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns (May 2014) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(2) and (3))

52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting (Nov 2011) (15 U.S.C. 637(a)(14))

52.219-28, Post Award Small Business Program Rerepresentation (Jul 2013) (15 U.S.C.

632(a)(2))

52.222-3, Convict Labor (June 2003) (E.O. 11755)

52.222-19, Child Labor – cooperation with Authorities and Remedies (Jan 2014) (E.O.

13126)

52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities (Feb 1999)

52.222-26, Equal Opportunity (Mar 2007) (E.O. 11246)

52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Veterans (Jul 2014)(38 U.S.C. 4212)

52.222-36, Affirmative Action for Workers with Disabilities (Jul 2014) (29 U.S.C. 793)

52.222-37, Employment Reports on Veterans (Jul 2014) (38 U.S.C. 4212)

52.222-40, Notification of Employee Rights Under the National Labor Relations Act (Dec 2010) (E.O. 13496)

52.222-54, Employment Eligibility Verification (Jul 2012). (Executive Order 12989).

52.223-18, Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving (Aug 2011) (E.O. 13513)

52.225-13, Restriction on Certain Foreign Purchases (Jun 2008) (E.O.’s, proclamations, and statutes administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the Treasury).

52.232-33, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer— System for Award Management (Jul 2013) (31 U.S.C. 3332)

52.222-41, Service Contract Labor Standards (May 2014) (41 U.S.C. chapter 67.)

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_000.htm%23P1959_284871

52.222-43, Fair Labor Standards Act and Service Contract Act—Price Adjustment (Multiple Year and Option Contracts) (May 2014) (29 U.S.C. 206 and 41 U.S.C. 351, et seq.)

(xiii) The following additional clauses and provisions apply to this solicitation and are included by reference. Clauses with an asterisk indicate they will be incorporated by full text in the actual contract award (contact the CO with any questions you may have pertaining to the fill-in data if you feel it may have an effect on your proposal):

52.203-3 Gratuities (Apr 1984)

52.203-12, Limitation on Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions (Oct 2010)

52.203-16, Preventing Personal Conflicts of Interest (Dec 2012)

* 52.217-8 -- Option to Extend Services (Nov 1999)

* 52.217-9 -- Option to Extend the Term of the Contract. (Nov 1999)

* 52.222-42 -- Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires. (May 2014)

52.222-50 Combating Trafficking in Persons (Feb 2009)

52.222-17, Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers (May 2014)

* 52.252-5 Authorized Deviations in Provisions (Apr 1984)

* 52.252-6 Authorized Deviations in Clauses (Apr 1984)

52.232-23 Assignment of Claims (May 2014)

52.232-8, Discounts for Prompt Payment (Feb 2002)

52.232-34 Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer (Jul 2013)

52.232-40, Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business Subcontractors (Dec 2013)

52.237-2, Protection of Government Buildings, Equipment, and Vegetation (Apr 1984)

52.233-1 Disputes (May 2014)

52.233-3 Protest After Award (Aug 1996)

52.246-4, Inspection of Services (Aug 1996)

252.203-7002, Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights (Sep 2013)

252.204-7003, Control of Government Personnel Work Product (Apr 1992)

252.209-7004 Subcontracting with Firms That Are Owned or Controlled by the Government of a Terrorist Country (Mar 2014)

252.226-7001,Utilization of Indian Organizations, Indian Owned Economic Enterprises, and Native Hawaiian Small Business Concerns (Sep 2004)

252.232-7003, Electronic Submission of Payment Requests (Jun 2012)

* 252.232-7006 Wide Area Workflow Payment Instructions (Jun 2012)

252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments (Dec 2006)

252.237-7023 Continuation of Essential Contractor Services (Oct 2010

252.243-7002, Request for Equitable Adjustment (Dec 2012)

* 5352.201-9101 Ombudsman (Aug 2005)

* 5352.223-9000 Elimination of Use of Class I Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) (Apr 2003) (No substances identified)

* 5352.223-9001 Health and Safety on Government Installations (Jun 1997)

* 5352.242-9000 Contractor Access To Air Force Installations (Jun 2002)

The following additional clauses and provisions apply to this solicitation and are included by full text:

52.252-2 Clauses Incorporated By Reference (Feb 1998)

This contract incorporates one or more clauses by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. Also, the full text of a clause may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

31TUhttp://farsite.hill.af.mil/vffara.htmU31T 31TUhttp://farsite.hill.af.mil/vfdfara.htmU31T 31TUhttp://farsite.hill.af.mil/vfaffara.htmU31T

(End of Clause)

(xiv) Reserved

(xv) Proposals are due 15 Sep 2014, at 1400 Central Time. Proposals are requested to be sent electronically via email to the contracting officer, Capt John Sidor, at: 31TUjohn.sidor@us.af.milU31T.

Proposals may also be delivered as a “hard-copy” to the following address: AFICA-KGQ, 66 Kenney Ave, Barksdale AFB, LA 71110. Any proposal that arrives to the contracting office after 1400 on 12 Sep 2014 will not be considered for award. UAn organized site visit will not be scheduled for this acquisition.

(xvi) Please contact Capt John Sidor at 318-456-8983 or 31TUjohn.sidor@us.af.milU31T with any questions.

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vffara.htm http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vfdfara.htm http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vfaffara.htm mailto:john.sidor@us.af.mil mailto:john.sidor@us.af.mil