Attachment_2_-_Past_Perf_Questionnaire.pdf

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

PAST / PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION:

Contractor’s Name: _________________ Telephone Number: ____________________

Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________

__________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________*

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: _________*

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: _______________________*

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________

Address: _____________________ Telephone Number: ___________________

_____________________________ Fax Number: _____________________

_____________________________ Email Address: _____________________

C. RETURN COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO:

AFICA/KGQ

ATTN: Capt John Sidor 66 Kenney Ave, Building 5576 Barksdale AFB, LA 71110 john.sidor@us.af.mil

Fax (318) 456-7861 Phone: (318) 456-8983

Active Vehicle Barrier Maintenance Minot AFB, ND

FA6800-14-Q-S017

Attachment 2 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_215.htm http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_000.htm mailto:christopher.hardcastle.1@us.af.mil

D. Performance Evaluation:

Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. Please provide a narrative explanation for any rating of

Marginal (M) or Unsatisfactory (U).

E G S M U N

Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

FA6800-14-Q-S017

Attachment 2

Active Vehicle Barrier Maintenance Minot AFB, ND http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_215.htm

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor: E G S M U N

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

5. Followed approved quality control plan.

6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

9. Identified problems as they occurred.

10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

12. Developed realistic progress schedules.

13. Met established project schedules.

14. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.

15. Was responsive to contract changes.

16. Provided adequate project supervision.

17. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.

18. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

19. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

20. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

21. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?

22.

Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES

NO

23. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” YES

NO

24. Is the contractor rated in CPARS?

YES

NO

FA6800-14-Q-S017

Attachment 2

Active Vehicle Barrier Maintenance Minot AFB, ND

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ____________________________________________________

CONTRACT NUMBER: ______________________________________________________

Remarks:______________________________________________________________________

FA6800-14-Q-S017

Attachment 2

Active Vehicle Barrier Maintenance Minot AFB, ND