Attachment 6 FY23 IPMPRedacted.pdf

PDF 1 MB Posted

Attached to
HERBICIDE TREATMENT OF INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES
Solicitation number
FA6703-24-Q-0010
Issued by

About this file

This document is a combined synopsis/solicitation for a commercial services contract regarding herbicide treatment of invasive plant species at Dobbins Air Reserve Base in Marietta, Georgia. The contractor shall provide all labor, materials, equipment, transportation, reports, and other documentation necessary to perform invasive species management through foliar spray application and cut stump/vine application of herbicide. This is a 100% Small Business Set-Aside with a $19M size standard under NAICS code 541620 - Environmental Consulting Services. The government intends to award a single Firm-Fixed-Price contract for a base year plus four one-year option periods. Quotes are due by 2:00 pm EDT on September 4, 2024. A site visit is scheduled for August 16, 2024 at 10:00 am EDT. The contract will be awarded to the responsible offeror whose conforming quote is most advantageous to the government, price and other factors considered.

View the file

Other files

Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Integrated Pest Management Plan

94 MSG/CEV

Dobbins ARB, GA

April 2018 (updated Dec 2023)

MARSHALL.STACY.

LYNN.1265397731

Digitally signed by

MARSHALL.STACY.LYNN.1265397

Date: 2022.02.01 14:56:21 -05'00'

BREIDENBAUGH.

MARK.S.1236024

Digitally signed by

BREIDENBAUGH.MARK.S.1236024

Date: 2022.01.27 13:21:12 -05'00'

MARSHALL.STACY.L

YNN.1265397731

Digitally signed by

MARSHALL.STACY.LYNN.1265397731

Date: 2022.12.12 14:09:17 -05'00'

BREIDENBAUGH.M

ARK.S.1236024551

Digitally signed by

BREIDENBAUGH.MARK.S.12360245

Date: 2023.02.06 00:04:14 -05'00'

MARSHALL.STACY.

LYNN.1265397731

Digitally signed by

MARSHALL.STACY.LYNN.1265397

Date: 2024.02.28 09:22:52 -05'00'

REMMERS.JENNIF

ER.LEE.1255620009

Digitally signed by

REMMERS.JENNIFER.LEE.12556

20009 Date: 2024.02.29 10:01:44 -05'00'

Dobbins ARB Integrated Pest Management Plan

1. INTRODUCTION 3

1.1. Mission 3

1.2. Installation 3

2. PEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITIES 3

2.1. Major Command (MAJCOM) 3

2.2. Installation Pest Management Coordinator 4

2.3. Pest Management Quality Assurance Evaluator (QAE) 4

2.4. Bioenvironmental Engineering 4

3. PEST MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES 4

3.1. Disease Vectors and Other Health-Related Pests 4

3.1.2. Yellow Jackets & Wasps 5

3.1.3. Honey Bees 5

3.1.4. Fire Ants 5

3.2. Household and Nuisance Pests 5

3.2.1. German Cockroaches 5

3.2.2. Spiders 6

3.2.3. Common Ants 6

3.2.4. Japanese Beetles 6

3.2.5. Bed Bugs 6

3.3. Real Property Pests (Structural and Wood-Destroying Pests) 7

3.4. Vegetative Pests 7

3.4.1. Nuisance Weeds 7

3.4.2. Invasive Species 7

3.5. Vertebrate Pests 7

3.5.1. Canada Geese 7

3.5.2. Birds 8

3.5.3. Rodents and Mammals 8

3.6 Endangered or Protected Species 9

3.6.1 Pink Lady’s Slipper Orchid 9

4. PEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM EXECUTION 8

4.1. Contracts and Support Agreements 8

4.2. Storage and Mixing 9

4.3. Authorization, Reports, and Recordkeeping 9

4.4. Certification and Training 10

4.5. Health and Safety 10

4.6. Disposal 10

4.7. Base Exchange 11

4.8. Aircraft Insect Control 11

APPENDICES

Appendix A: Pesticide Applicator Certifications and Licenses

Appendix B: FY2022 Authorized Dobbins Pesticides

Appendix C: Link to DD Form 1532 Pesticide Tracking Form

Appendix D: AFMAN 32-1053 https://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/af_a4/publication/afman32-1053/afman32-1053.pdf

DoDI 4150.07 http://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/415007p.pdf?ver=2017-09-15-121506-79

Appendix E: AFCEC guidance from December 9, 2022 http://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/415007p.pdf?ver=2017-09-15-121506-

1. INTRODUCTION

This pest management plan is designed to provide guidance necessary for Dobbins Air Reserve Base (DARB) to meet Air Force (AF) and Department of Defense (DoD) policy requirements outlined in DoD Instruction (DoDI) 4150.07, “DoD Pest Management Program,” and Air Force Manual (AFMAN) 32-1053.

The goal is to establish a safe, effective, and environmentally sound Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Program. IPM consists of the judicious use of both non-chemical and chemical control techniques to reduce pest population to an acceptable level.

The IPM plan is designed to prevent pests and disease vectors from adversely impacting Air Force military operations and missions, while using environmentally sound techniques to safely and effectively control them. The following steps provide the recommended process for addressing any pest problem in a manner that supports IPM:

• Analyze the pest problem;

• Implement short-term corrective action;

• Implement long-term preventative action;

• Monitor, document, and evaluate results; and

• Educate base personnel.

1.1. Mission

The primary mission of Dobbins ARB is to maintain combat ready units to deploy on short notice to support contingencies anywhere in the world. The 94th Airlift Wing (AW) is responsible for maintaining and providing access to the runways.

1.2. Installation

DARB is situated between the cities of Smyrna and Marietta in Cobb County, Georgia approximately 15 miles northwest of the center of Atlanta. Dobbins ARB is hosted by the 94th AW and supports more than a dozen tenants. The base occupies more than 1600 acres in the heart of Cobb County. Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company and the Lucius D. Clay Georgia National Guard Center (NGC) are adjacent to the base and share use of the runway.

2. PEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITIES

The responsibilities listed below highlight roles applicable to HQ Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) and Dobbins ARB. The complete list of responsibilities is included in AFMAN 32-1053.

2.1. Major Command (MAJCOM)

1) Implements pest management policies and programs for installation.

2) Performs annual reviews of installation Pest Management Plans for adherence to DoD and Air

Force Policy. Accomplished through MAJCOM Pest Management Consultant (PMC).

3) Collects annual Measure of Merit (MoM) data from installations, and provides the data to the Air

Force Civil Engineering Center (AFCEC).

2.2. Installation Pest Management Coordinator

1) Implements and coordinates the installation pest management program as outlined in this plan.

2) Represents, through official designation, the Base Civil Engineer.

3) Ensures only certified personnel apply pesticides on the installation.

4) Ensures only authorized pesticides are applied on the installation.

5) Ensures the Enterprise Environmental, Safety, and Occupational Health Management

Information System (US Air Force) (EESOH-MIS) computer pesticide database is being maintained and data from all pesticide applications are input.*

6) Prepares the annual MoM report for HQ AFRC using pesticide application data extracted from the

EESOH-MIS.*

*NOTE: On December 9, 2022, new guidance from AFCEC was sent via email. The data should now be tracked on DD Form 1532. Copies must be maintained in both electronic and hard copy versions. BOS KTR is tracking the pesticide/herbicide applications and shall provide the completed form to CEV on a monthly basis IAW AFMAN 32-1053, 3.12.5. CEV will complete the annual Measures of Merit from the information provided by BOS KTR.

2.3. Pest Management Quality Assurance Evaluator (QAE)

Dobbins ARB is not required to have a Pest Management QAE, since the installation falls below the required guidance threshold of 0.25 work-years under the base contracts. However, if the Installation Pest Management Coordinator has completed the appropriate training he may function as a qualified Quality Assurance Evaluator (Reference Section 4.4). Dobbins Storm Water and Natural Resource Program Manager, Stacy Marshall (GS-12), completed the QAE training in August 2020. Dobbins BOS contractor, Kimmiko DeFoor completed the QAE training in January 2022. The certificates of completion are located Appendix A.

2.4. Bioenvironmental Engineering

1) Determines the type, source, and prevalence of disease vectors and pests, which may affect the health and productivity of installation personnel.

2) Recommends preventative control measures to the QAE or Installation Pest Management

Coordinator for health-related pests that impact base personnel. Assists in monitoring the effectiveness of the contractor-performed pest management efforts on the pest populations.

3) Assists and supports the QAE or Installation Pest Management Coordinator in evaluations of potential occupational exposures and the adequacy of exposure controls to protect installation personnel, through on-site visits in areas where pesticides are applied.

3. PEST MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES

The general overall strategy for treatment of pests at Dobbins ARB is to use staged levels of response.

Physical or cultural control measures are emphasized as the preferred methods of control and are applied first. Chemicals are only used if necessary and are always minimally applied, as required, to control the pest. Integration of these levels of response will result in pest control with a minimum impact on the environment.

Insect and rodent infestations have been observed to be the primary pest concerns at Dobbins ARB. Based on historical data, ants are the predominant pest problem, with rats and mice as the second most prevalent pest, followed by cockroaches. The following discussions cover the various pests known to be present at Dobbins ARB but are not discussed in any order of prevalence.

3.1. Disease Vectors and Other Health-Related Pests

3.1.1. Mosquitoes

Mosquitoes are seasonal pests on Dobbins ARB. While they have not been reported as a major pest problem on the installation, mosquito breeding habitats may be found in roadway runoff holding ponds, drainage ditches, outfalls, and wetlands associated with the low floodplains along Poorhouse and Rottenwood Creeks.

94th AW has collaborated with Georgia Department of Public Health, Cobb County Entomologist, and GA Army National Guard Entomologist to survey and reduce mosquito population. While no cases have been reported on Dobbins ARB, major disease concerns with mosquitoes include Zika, encephalitis, and West Nile virus. In the short term, adult mosquitoes could require fogging for control. The long-term strategy is:

1) Eliminate standing water. Example activities include: drilling drain holes in downspouts, covering manholes, adding gravel under structures, placing larvicide pellets in drains and other locations with standing water;

2) Conduct periodic surveys of larval populations; and

3) Apply a larvicide to the breeding areas as necessary.

3.1.2. Yellow Jackets & Wasps

These insects are found on the installation on an infrequent basis during warmer months. No major disease concerns are associated with these insects, but the stings are painful and may cause allergic reactions to some people. The short term strategy is to use a contact spray in sensitive areas or a residual-type insecticide in problematic areas, as required. No long-term strategy is required.

3.1.3. Honey Bees

Honey bees are one of the most beneficial of all insects. They are important pollinators of almonds, apples, blackberries, blueberries, cantaloupes, cranberries, cucumbers, forage crops, kiwifruit, squash, and watermelon. The annual contribution to U.S. food production is more than $9 million. Due to their value, if a swarm or hive of honey bees appears on base, we will use the following steps to deal with it:

1) Do not disturb it;

2) If the swarm is in a remote location and not threatening people, wait for it to fly away on its own;

3) If the swarm poses a risk to people or facilities, a local beekeeper will be contacted to remove the swarm. Visit the following website:

(http://www.metroatlantabeekeepers.org/swarms.php) or call (404) 519-4141 for a volunteer beekeeper to remove the swarm.

3.1.4. Fire Ants

Fire Ants are common in the greater Atlanta area and are found in grassy areas at Dobbins ARB. The stings are painful and may cause allergic reactions in some people. Insect growth regulators such as Award or http://www.metroatlantabeekeepers.org/swarms.php

Logic or slow-acting bait such as AMDRO are the preferred agents to control these pests.

3.2. Household and Nuisance Pests

Ants, cockroaches, crickets, beetles, non-poisonous spiders, snakes, and bed bugs may require control.

3.2.1. German Cockroaches

Roaches can be a problem for building occupants and are usually prevalent in food preparation facilities.

In response to complaints from building occupants, the pest management consultant will survey to determine the extent of the problem.

Short-term strategy requires immediate response to positive surveys for cockroaches. Pesticide spot treatments are used when immediate control is required. Bait stations, growth regulators, contact, and residual pesticides may be used as needed depending on severity of the problem. Area-specific formulations may be used in areas where cockroaches reside, such as equipment voids, cracks, crevices, and other appropriate areas.

Long-term strategy focuses on the prevention of infestations through structural modifications and use of good sanitation practices. Structural modifications are relatively minor and consist of:

1) Caulking (or filling) minor cracks and crevices;

2) Patching holes in walls and floors; and

3) Screening, if appropriate, to eliminate small openings.

Good sanitation practices are most important to prevent infestations. These include, but are not limited to:

1) Cleaning up food preparation and eating areas after use;

2) Keeping food stored in sealed containers; and

3) Empting trash containers from the building daily.

3.2.2. Spiders

Spiders are often found in undisturbed areas in and around the various buildings. Few complaints are received regarding spiders. The short term strategy in the event of complaint is to survey the site.

Appropriate response actions typically include application of a contact pesticide. Depending on the circumstances, a residual pesticide may be applied. No long-term strategy is required.

3.2.3. Common Ants

Generally, the majority of complaints regarding the presence of ants are centered in food, lodging, or office areas. In the short term, on-site surveys are made in response to complaints. Based on survey results, the use of species-specific baits or gels may be used. Long-term control requires enhanced sanitation practices and physical control. External cracks and holes in the building should be covered or caulked. Ants are attracted to food, so the use of good food-sanitation practices should be emphasized. Granular bates should be used around the outside of structures if required.

3.2.4. Japanese Beetles

In order to control the Japanese beetle populations, Dobbins ARB institutes a three-pronged approach for control. This approach includes:

1) Introducing predatory nematodes to areas of Dobbins ARB where beetles are problematic;

2) Introducing Milky Spore on base to combat the Japanese Beetle grub population. This disease targets the grubs and does not pose any significant threat to other animal or vegetation on Dobbins ARB; and

3) Trapping adult beetles as necessary. More information concerning this approach to manage Japanese Beetles can be found at:

https://www.gardensalive.com/product/japanese-beetle..

3.2.5. Bed Bugs

Bed bugs have become a pest of concern to the military with the hospitality industry reporting a resurgence in such infestations. Surveillance should be ongoing by the housekeeping staff visually observing for signs. At the first sign of suspected bed bug activity, the room should be quarantined and all access should be prevented. If such a complaint is positive, non-chemical methods should be considered for cleaning bedding and mattresses first (such as heat treating/steam cleaning). In addition, the room should be isolated and treated by the pest contractor. Further direction is provided in the AFPMB’s TG44. In the event of bedbug heat treatment, Dobbins ARB requires a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) regarding adequate electrical source, equipment operation, and notification of CE, in addition to standard reporting of any chemicals used.

3.2.6 Snakes

Georgia has 40 non-venomous species of snakes and 7 venomous species. Snakes are an important component of the ecosystem in Georgia because of their major role as both a predator and prey. Snakes are economically beneficially because they eat rats, mice, and other animals deemed to be pests. Some snakes have been used as bioindicators to assess pollutants in terrestrial or aquatic ecosystems. Unfortunately, many species of snakes are declining as a result of human activities. Thankfully, of the snake species native to Georgia, only two are state-listed as threatened: the eastern indigo snake and the southern hognose snake.

The indigo is also federally listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. (All non-venomous snakes are protected by state law.)

If snakes are found on Dobbins Air Reserve Base, the observer should first determine, from a distance, if the snake is or isn’t venomous. The Georgia Department of Natural Resources (GDNR) has a brochure to assist. They advise to not attempt to handle the snake. Give it the space it needs. If a clearly identified venomous snake is in an area where it represents a danger to people or pets, the observer should consult georgiawildlife.com/preventing-wildlife-conflicts for a list of private wildlife removal specialists. Most bites occur when a snake is cornered or captured and defending itself. The rodent control program should remain in place to eliminate the food attraction for snakes.

https://www.gardensalive.com/product/japanese-beetle..

Non-Venomous Snakes in Georgia

• Eastern Green Watersnake

• Brown Watersnake

• Plain-bellied Watersnake

• Banded Watersnake

• Northern Watersnake

• Queen Snake

• Striped Crayfish Snake

• Glossy Crayfish Snake

• Black Swamp Snake

• Brown Snake

• Florida Brown Snake

• Red-bellied Snake

• Eastern Ribbon Snake

• Common Garter Snake

• Smooth Earth Snake

• Rough Earth Snake

• Eastern Hognose Snake

• Southern Hognose Snake

• Ringneck Snake

• Eastern Worm Snake

• Pine Woods Snake

• Mud Snake

• Rainbow Snake

• Black Racer

• Coachwhip

• Rough Green Snake

• Corn Snake

• Eastern Rat Snake

• Gray Rat Snake

• Pine Snake

• Common Kingsnake

• Black Kingsnake

• Mole Kingsnake

• Scarlet Kingsnake

• Eastern Milk Snake

• Scarlet Snake

• Southeastern Crowned Snake

• Florida Crowned Snake

• Eastern Indigo Snake

• Brahminy Blind Snake (non-native)

Venomous Snakes in Georgia

• Eastern Cottonmouth

• Florida Cottonmouth

• Eastern Coral Snake

• Eastern Diamond-backed

Rattlesnake

• Pigmy Rattlesnake

• Timber Rattlesnake

• Copperhead

3.3. Real Property Pests (Structural and Wood-Destroying Pests)

The Eastern Subterranean Termite has been reported as an intermittent pest at Dobbins ARB. For facilities of concern, the long-term strategy is to survey and monitor for infestation. Use of monitoring stations is authorized to assist in surveying for infestation. Either the Base Operations Support (BOS) contractor or their subcontractor will perform these surveys and inspections. The short-term strategy for infestations will be use of granular baits or contact pesticides, as necessary. Soil treatment for termite prevention will be conducted during building construction and major renovation projects. Proper coordination on all new construction and major renovation projects is necessary to ensure pest management problems are not built into facilities.

3.4. Vegetative Pests

3.4.1. Nuisance Weeds

A variety of nuisance weeds typically grow on landscaped areas throughout the base. The presence of weeds is an aesthetic concern, as well as a threat to the health of turfed areas and other planted shrubbery. Weeds are also a concern to facilities when they propagate along expansion and other joints in asphalt and concrete pavement on the base. The BOS contractor is required to perform corrective action for weed growth on base during the growth season.

The corrective actions consist of using both pre- and post-emergent herbicides. This strategy also includes the use of spot applications of non-selective herbicides applied to fences, curb lines, and sidewalk joints.

The 94th AW also has an active program to control weeds in asphalt and concrete expansion joints for the base roads, taxiways, apron, and runway.

3.4.2. Invasive Species

Invasive, non-native species are considered one of the most significant threats to natural communities and biodiversity today. These aggressive species typically occur on disturbed sites where past or current land uses have resulted in disturbed soils and loss of native vegetative cover. Further, invasive, non-native species have been intentionally introduced for erosion control, aesthetics, or wildlife food plots. A number of plant species documented at Dobbins ARB are invasive, non-native species and are listed as top ten exotic pest plants or other important pest plants by the Georgia Exotic Pest Plant Council (2004).

The most widespread and pervasive of these are:

• Chinese and Japanese privet (Ligustrum sinense and Ligustrum japonicum),

• Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica),

• Chinese wisteria (Wisteria sinensis),

• mimosa (Albizia julibrissin), and

• Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum).

Until the implementation of a base-wide eradication program several years ago, kudzu (Pueraria montana var.

lobate) was considered the primary nuisance species to occur at Dobbins ARB. Control efforts, however, have been extremely successful and little kudzu was observed during the 2004 spring or summer field surveys.

Continued monitoring and treatment has been implemented for the long-term control of this species, particularly along the shared Lockheed Martin border and Route 280, where it is still uncontrolled. Autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellata), English ivy (Hedera helix), princess tree (Paulonia tomentosa), sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), and tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima) are other, less abundant, non-native species have been documented at Dobbins ARB.

Total eradication of all of the invasive species would be extremely difficult because of the extent of their occurrence. Dobbins ARB has elected to focus control efforts on eliminating these invasive species in ecologically significant areas and preventing their spread to new areas as the more practicable alternative.

Invasive species in non-landscaped areas of the base were controlled through services provided by the U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers (USACE,) as part of the Dobbins ARB forestry program. However, for FY2020 to FY2022, funding has not been available for oversight from USACE. Herbicides had been applied seasonally in forested (unimproved) areas on the base as part of the Dobbins IPM approach to managing invasive plant species, and will be again, as funding has become available in 2023. At this time, the contracting office is in the process of obtaining bids for the work The type of herbicide applied and methodology vary depending on periodic surveys and success from previous seasons’ control measures. Long-term monitoring continues for these plant species. A prescribed burn is proposed for 2024 and will be implemented by the Wildland Fire Management Branch.

3.5. Vertebrate Pests

3.5.1. Canada Geese

With seven spill ponds and two lakes on Dobbins ARB, there are ample places on base for Canada Geese to reside during migration periods. Geese are considered a pest due to the Bird-Aircraft Strike Hazard (BASH) risk they pose. Corrective action for Canada Geese control is determined by the BASH team who utilize a variety of methods to minimize risk to aircraft from these animals. These methods may include trapping, pyrotechnics, or depredation as deemed appropriate by the BASH team IAW DAFI 91-212. Corrective actions taken will be in accordance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Dobbins ARB maintains a USFWS Depredation Permit for Canada Geese to be exercised as a last resort. Geese prefer open spaces so they can look out for predators, so keeping non-woody vegetation approximately 2 feet high and approximately 7 - 10 feet wide around ponds will discourage geese from gathering there.

3.5.2. Birds

Birds also present a problem by nesting in hangars. Effective management of hangar birds can include exclusion netting, roost diversion, avian aversion agent, or depredation shooting (See 3.5.1).

3.5.3. Rodents and Mammals

Preventative action for pests includes reducing the attractants for these pests by:

1) Proper solid waste management, especially within food service facilities;

2) Elimination of unnecessary debris around the exterior of facilities; and

3) Sealing pest entryways, when possible.

4) Controlling rodents.

Glue boards and snap traps can be used effectively to control both mice and rats. Mice and rodents will be controlled first with traps, then, if necessary, with rodenticides.

Other mammals are intermittent problems on the base. These include, but are not limited to raccoons, squirrels, and beavers. Additionally, coyotes, fox, racoons, river otter, and deer have been documented at Dobbins ARB. Management of these mammals includes a preference of live trapping and relocation, with depredation as a last resort, unless the animal is in the BASH Zero Tolerance Zone. However, in Georgia it is illegal to relocate coyotes. Stray dogs and cats are to be captured and removed from the installation and must be taken to the Humane Society of Cobb County. Dead animals found on-base or depredated animals must be disposed of off-base by the BOS contractor or the USDA biologist hired by the Safety Office.

Presently, carcasses must be taken off base and disposed of at Cobb County Animal Services during normal business hours. The Safety Office has proposed on-site burial of carcasses. At this time, a burial location has been determined. A dig permit would be required. Currently, it is not in the BOS KTR contract to dig the burial site, therefore, the Safety Office would be required to dig the burial site or hire a contractor to complete this task. A location map is provided in Appendix F.

3.6 Endangered or Protected Species

In 2017, Dobbins ARB completed a Natural Heritage Inventory to verify and document the presence of any federal or state listed threatened or endangered species. None were identified. However, the survey did identify one plant species on the installation, which is listed by the Georgia Department of Natural Resources as unusual status. This plant species is the Pink lady’s slipper orchid (Cypripedium acaule). A new TES survey was completed in FY22. The Gray Bat was detected acoustically on base, but their habitat is not located on base. The gray bat (Myotis grisescens) is federally listed as endangered. The Tricolored bat was also detected acoustically and is proposed by the USFWS to be listed as endangered.

Tricolored bats appear to inhabit landscapes that are partly open, with large trees and plentiful woodland edges. They are found in a variety of terrestrial habitats, including grasslands, old fields, suburban areas, orchards, urban areas and woodlands, especially hardwood woodlands. Any tree cutting that is proposed to occur must take place outside of the Tricolored bat maternity season (late spring and early summer), if they ultimately become listed as endangered.

3.6.1 Pink Lady’s Slipper Orchid

The Pink lady’s slipper orchid is a state-protected plant species. Five populations, ranging in size from less than 10 to more than 2,000 individuals, are known to occur in this community type at Dobbins ARB. Plant populations over 100 plants are recommended to be protected by establishing a buffer zone with a 50-foot radius. Pesticide applications under the forestry program for invasive species are required to ensure no pesticides/herbicides are applied within this protective buffer to maximize protection of these pink lady’s slipper orchid communities. For additional information on the location of the pink lady’s slipper orchid colonies, please refer to the Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP) for Dobbins ARB or contact the Natural Resources Program Manager for Dobbins ARB.

4. PEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM EXECUTION

4.1. Contracts and Support Agreements

Many pest management services, including herbicide application, for the 94th AW are contracted through the BOS contractor. Contract requirements are outlined in the contract’s Performance Work Statement (PWS) which allow for the flexibility to subcontract out all or part of the pest management responsibilities while complying with AFMAN 32-1053. In 2023, the Safety Office hired a USDA biologist for BASH purposes.

Monitoring and evaluation of pest management services is performed by the BOS Quality Assurance Evaluator (QAE). The BOS QAE monitors all BOS real property maintenance requirements including pest management and subcontracts. Dobbins ARB does not maintain a separate QAE for pest management since the installation performs less than 0.25 work-years of IPM operations annually.

Control for vegetative invasive species is contracted out separately and was completed most recently by NatureChem for unforested (improved) areas. Forested (unimproved) areas will have invasive species control in FY2024, once a contractor is determined. A prescribed burn is proposed for 2024 IAW the Wildland Fire Management Plan.

The 94th AW hosts a number of tenant organizations, but the 94th AW is not responsible for pest management operations for all tenant organizations. These tenant organizations are responsible for their own pest management in accordance with this plan and DoD guidance. Clay NGC and Lockheed Martin are separate institutions and have their own pest management program in place. As separate entities with independent IPMPs, they are not required to submit application logs to Dobbins ARB.

4.2. Storage and Mixing

Bldg. 509 of the Civil Engineering complex was designed as a pesticide mixing and storage facility, however is currently unused as the subcontracted pesticide applicator brings pesticides onsite via truck and any mixing or storage is performed on the contractor’s truck without using Dobbins ARB facilities. The herbicides and pesticides are only onsite during application days and are kept in the applicator’s locked vehicle with temperature control. All pesticides are properly rotated, by their expiration dates. Non-herbicide pesticides applied on base via any means are not allowed to be stored or mixed on-base.

4.3. Authorization, Reports, and Recordkeeping

Pesticides on Dobbins ARB are Hazardous Materials (HAZMATs) and are subject to authorization for use on base per the requirements of 94 AW Instruction 32-7086, Hazardous Materials Management Program.

Applicators using pesticides and construction contractors storing herbicides on Dobbins ARB are required to obtain authorization through the Hazardous Materials Management Process (HMMP) Team via the Enterprise Environmental, Safety and Occupational Health Management Information System (EESOH-MIS) prior to using any pesticides on base. Authorization is granted when OSHA regulations for hazardous materials are met and HAZMATs are approved for use per this plan. Since this IPMP includes pesticide Safety Data Sheet (SDS) and label information for approved pesticides by reference, specific information for the materials authorized on Dobbins ARB is available via the internet.

In addition to HAZMAT authorization requirements, pesticide application logs are required to be submitted to the installation pest management coordinator on a monthly basis. The application log (Appendix B) includes the following information: Name of Applicator (and Company if applicable), Date of Application, Facility, Target Pest, Product, Quantity, and Mixture. After receiving all application data for a given month, the pest management coordinator shall enter the information into the current version of EESOH-MIS software. This data is used to develop the annual MoM report for HQ AFRC.

4.4. Certification and Training

All personnel who apply or supervise the application of pesticides on the installation shall be trained and possess current certification in accordance with DOD or State requirements. Commercial pesticide applicators working under contract must be licensed by the State of Georgia for the type of pest control applications they perform. Georgia certification rules allow for individuals to apply under their supervisors’ license. Appendix A contains a list of certified pesticide applicators that apply pesticides at the installation and current licensure for each.

DARB does not exceed the 0.25 year threshold of total pesticide applications to warrant certification training for the Pest Management QAE. As a result, formal education and awareness activities are not scheduled to be conducted. E-mail-based case-specific awareness information may be disseminated for special circumstances (i.e., West Nile Virus awareness). Two DARB personnel and one BOS contractor currently hold PMQAE certificates.

4.5. Health and Safety

94 MSG/SGPB is responsible for ensuring that pest management activities are conducted in such a way as to minimize exposure to hazardous chemicals for all government employees at Dobbins ARB. In order to reduce potential hazards to personnel on the base and public off base, the following requirements are instituted under this IPMP:

• Pesticides are not applied outdoors when wind speed exceeds 10 miles per hour;

• Treated areas shall be posted in accordance with Rule 40-21-9, Application Posting, Georgia

Administrative Code;

• Pesticides will only be used in accordance with product label and instructions;

• “Self Help” pesticide applications are generally prohibited on Dobbins ARB. The BCE may make exceptions to this rule on a case by case basis along with concurrence and authorization from the CEV; and

• Qualified applicators should wear personal protective equipment (PPE) and use proper equipment when applying pesticides.

• Pesticides are used as a last resort after other methods of pest control have been implemented without satisfactory results.

4.6. Disposal

All pesticide related wastes will be handled and disposed of in accordance with the Dobbins ARB Hazardous Waste Management Plan, and in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations.

Excess Pesticides: Excess pesticides are not to be disposed of as waste. Pesticides brought on base by contractors that are still viable must be removed by the contractor as a viable product. Pesticides mixed for use on base shall be completely used as part of the application to prevent generation of excess pesticides and eliminate waste disposal issues.

4.7. Base Exchange

The AAFES Base Exchange (BX) Manager maintains pesticide inventory and offers general use insecticides, herbicides, and insect repellent products for sale to customers. All pesticides for sale at the BX must be registered by the manufacturer with the EPA and State of Georgia. Additionally, the BX must properly store these materials under cover, out of the sun or rain. Whenever necessary, disposal of expired or damaged materials must be coordinated with the 94 MSG/CEV. Current SDSs must be provided to CEV to coordinate disposal actions. No Dobbins ARB personnel are authorized to procure pesticides at the BX for use on Dobbins ARB.

4.8. Aircraft Insect Control

The 94th Airlift Wing is authorized to procure and use aerosol insecticides containing 2% d-Phenothrin for disinfection of military aircraft in accordance with U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and U.S.

Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) requirements applicable to flights originating from non- U.S. locations. Aircraft disinfection will be conducted in accordance with the policy listed in DoDI 4150.7.

Training is available from USDA, which allows USAFR personnel to inspect aircraft, once training is completed. According to AFMAN 32-1053, military personnel may apply approved aerosol insecticide for quarantine insect extermination on aircraft after receiving training from the CE pest management section.

Appendix A: Pesticide Applicator Certifications/PMQAEs

Appendix B: Authorized Dobbins ARB Pesticide List

Appendix C: Example Pesticide Application Log

Appendix D: AFMAN 32-1053 http://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/415007p.pdf?ver=2017-09-15-121506-797

APPENDIX B

FY2023 Authorized Dobbins Pesticide List

FY2023 APPROVED PESTICIDES FOR DOBBINS AIR RESERVE BASE

Ingredient Name(s)

(S)-HYDROPRENE (ZOECON GENTROL IGR CONCENTRATE)

1H-PYRAZOLE-3-CARBONITRILE, 5-AMINO-1-[2,6-

DICHLORO-4-(TRIFLUOROMETHYL)PHENYL]-4-

[(TRIFLUOROMETHYL)S, FIPRONIL (TERMIDOR SC TERMITICIDE /INSECTICIDE)

CHLORFENAPYR (PHANTOM TERMITICIDE/INSECTICIDE)

CHLOROPHACINONE (FLATLINE SOFT BAIT)

CYCLOPROPANECARBOXYLIC ACID, 2,2-DIMETHYL-3-(2-

METHYL-1-PROPENYL)-, 2-METHYL-4-OXO-3-(2-

PROPYNYL)-2- (PT WASP-FREEZE II WASP & HORNET INSECTICIDE)

DIFETHIALONE (FIRST STRIKE SOFT BAIT)

DINOTEFURAN (ALPINE WSG)

FLUMIOXAZIN (ALLIGARE FLUMIGARD SC)

GLYPHOSATE ISOPROPYLAMINE SALT,

ISOPROPYLAMINE SALT OF N-

(PHOSPHONOMETHYL)GLYCINE (ROUNDUP PRO CONCENTRATE HERBICIDE)

IMAZAPIC, AMMONIUM SALT (PANORAMIC 2SL/PLATEAU)

INDOXACARB (ADVION ANT BAIT ARENA)

ISOPROPYLAMINE SALT OF GLYPHOSATE (RANGER PRO HERBICIDE)

[1.ALPHA (S*),3.ALPHA.(Z)]-(+-)-CYANO(3-

PHENOXYPHENYL) METHYL ESTER, 3-(2-CHLORO-3,3,3-

TRIFLUORO-1-PROPENYL)-2,2-

DIMETHYLCYCLOPROPANECARBOXYLIC ACID (DEMAND CS INSECTICIDE)

2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID, DIMETHYLAMINE SALT (AMINE 4 2, 4-D WEE0 KILLER/WEEDAR 64

BROADLEAFT HERBICIDE)

ISOPROPYLAMINE SALT OF IMAZAPYR (ECOMAZAPYR 2 SL/HABITAT HERBICIDE)

AMINOPYRALID: 2-PYRIDINE CARBOXYLIC ACID, 4-AMINO-3,6-DICHLORO-2-PYRIDINECARBOXYLIC ACID, TRIISOPROPANOLAMMONIUM SALT OF AMINOPYRAL (MILESTONE VM)

IMAZAPYR (2-[4,5-DIHYDRO-4-METHYL-4-(L-METHYLETHYL)-5- OXO-1 H-IMIDAZOL-2-YL]-3- PYRIDINECARBOXYCLIC ACID), AMINOCYCLOPYRACHLOR 6-AMINO-5-CHLORO-2-CYCLOPROPYL4-PYRIMIDINECARBOXYLIC ACID, METSULFURON METHYL METHYL 2-[[[[(4-METHOXY-6-METHYL-L ,3,5- TRIAZIN-2-YL)AMINO]-

CARBONYL]AMINO]SULFONYL] BENZOATE (VIEWPOINT HERBICIDE)

APPENDIX C

Link to DD Form 1532

Pesticide Tracking Form https://www.acq.osd.mil/eie/afpmb/docs/standardlists/dd1532-1.xlsm https://www.acq.osd.mil/eie/afpmb/docs/standardlists/dd1532-1.xlsm

APPENDIX D

AFMAN 32-1053 and DoDI 4150.07

AFMAN 32-1053

https://static.eublishing.af.mil/production/1/af_a4/publication/afman32-1053/afman32-1053.pdf https://static.eublishing.af.mil/production/1/af_a4/publication/afman32-1053/afman32-1053.pdf

Appendix E

AFCEC Guidance for Pest Management

APPENDIX F

PROPOSED LOCATION FOR CARCASS BURIAL ON BASE

4.8. Aircraft Insect Control 11
APPENDICES
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Mission
1.2. Installation
2. PEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITIES
2.1. Major Command (MAJCOM)
2.2. Installation Pest Management Coordinator
2.3. Pest Management Quality Assurance Evaluator (QAE)
2.4. Bioenvironmental Engineering
3. PEST MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
3.1. Disease Vectors and Other Health-Related Pests
3.2. Household and Nuisance Pests
3.3. Real Property Pests (Structural and Wood-Destroying Pests)
3.4. Vegetative Pests
3.5. Vertebrate Pests
3.6 Endangered or Protected Species
4. PEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM EXECUTION
4.1. Contracts and Support Agreements
4.2. Storage and Mixing
4.3. Authorization, Reports, and Recordkeeping
4.4. Certification and Training
4.5. Health and Safety
4.6. Disposal
4.7. Base Exchange
4.8. Aircraft Insect Control
Appendix A: Pesticide Applicator Certifications/PMQAEs
Gregory C. Anderson (State Certified – exp 10/13/27)
James E. Powell (State Certified – exp 2/19/2025)
Timothy Cameron (State Certified – exp 9/13/2026)
Mark J. McTyre (State Certified – exp 12/8/2026)
Marshall, Stacy (Air Force Pest Management Quality Assurance Evaluator)
Defoor, Kimmiko (Air Force Pest Management Quality Assurance Evaluator)
Appendix B: Authorized Dobbins ARB Pesticide List

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .