Solicitation Amendment FA570323R00040001 SF 30.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

Created On: 08 Aug 2023, 05:01 AM Central Standard Time

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Section J - List of Attachments

The following attachments were added:

Attachment 7 - DD 1354 (Updated)

The following attachments were deleted:

Attachment 7 - DD 1354

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors shall follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or sub-factors. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of two (2) separate parts:

Part I - Price Proposal and Part II - Technical Proposal

B. The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer's opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional data will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists; offerors may be required to submit cost data to the extent necessary for the contracting officer to determine the reasonableness and affordability of the price.

C. Specific Instructions:

1. PART I - PRICE PROPOSAL - Submit electronically (via email) to angelomykael.cabuang@asab.afcent.af.mil

(a) Complete blocks 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, and 20 (A, B, and C) of the RFP Section A, SF1442. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the RFP Sections A through K. These sections constitute the model contract.

(b) Insert proposed unit and extended prices in Section B for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN). The extended amount must equal the whole Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD) unit price multiplied by the number of units.

(c) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in Sections I through K. Section K shall be returned in its entirety. For Sections C through I, the offeror shall submit only those pages that require a fill-in.

2. PART II - Submit electronically (via email) to angelomykael.cabuang@asab.afcent.af.mil or by request a DoD Safe Link (large files)

At a minimum, the submission shall be prepared in a form consistent with the evaluation criteria for award set forth in Section M of this Solicitation.

There page limitation assigned to each factor and sub factor. See below for page limitation. Any pages that exceed the defined page limitations will not be evaluated. To facilitate evaluation, Part II should be specific, detailed, and clearly demonstrate that the offeror has a thorough understanding of the requirements for the accomplishment of this effort. Statements that the offeror understands, can, or will comply with the Specifications, and phrases such as "standard procedures will be employed," or "well known techniques will be used" etc., will be considered unacceptable. Restating the project tasks from the Statement of Work (SOW) will not be accepted as thorough understanding of the requirement and the tasks to be accomplished. No data from a previously submitted solicitation or contract will be considered when mentioned by reference; all content must be specific to this project and written in full text within the technical proposal to be considered for evaluation.

FA570323R00040001

PROPOSAL PART REFERENCE TITLE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PAGES

I - Price

Evaluation Factor 1 Price/Cost (Submit on SF 1442)

II - Technical

Evaluation Factor 2 Technical, Management, and Logistical Capabilities

Sub factor 2.1 Technical Execution, Submittal Requirements (Page Limitation: 15 pages)

Table A: Technical Acceptability Ratings Rating Description Acceptability Proposal meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation Unacceptability Proposal does not meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation

Evaluation Factor 2: Specific Technical and Management and Logistical Capabilities The Offeror shall demonstrate how they intend to execute the requirements identified in the statement of work and associated attachments. Factor 2 its sub-factor will be evaluated based on the ratings in shown above. An Unacceptable rating any sub-factor will render the factor Unacceptable and the proposal deemed un-awardable. Page limitations are defined above. To facilitate evaluation, Part II should be specific, detailed, and clearly demonstrate that the offeror has a thorough understanding of the requirements for the accomplishment of this effort. Statements that the offeror understands, can, or will comply with the Specifications, and phrases such as "standard procedures will be employed", or "well known techniques will be used" etc., will be considered unacceptable. Simply restating the project tasks from the Statement of Work (SOW) will not be accepted as thorough understanding of the requirement and the tasks to be accomplished. Offerors should note that the data previously submitted under any prior or existing contract or solicitation will not be considered. Therefore, such data should not be relied upon, nor incorporated in the technical proposal reference.

Sub-Factor 2.1, Technical Execution, Submittal Requirements: (Page Limitation: 15 pages) The Offeror shall provide a narrative that demonstrates the design solution, construction work plan, schedule narrative, approach to construction site safety, and approach to quality control. At a minimum, the Offeror shall:

a. Submit a Construction Work Plan which provides a comprehensive narrative describing the construction activities as related to the primary construction work elements consistent with proposal pricing. The Offeror may provide drawings to illustrate and supplement the narrative.

c. Provide a schedule narrative that demonstrates efficient and logical sequencing of submittals, long lead time submissions/procurement, and execution of work priorities to meet the timelines and requirements of the SOW.

d. Provide a narrative that describes the Offeror's plan to maintain construction site safety as required in the SOW.

Format for Part II shall be as follows:

(a) The proposals will be 8 1/2" x 11" paper except for fold-outs used for charts, tables, or diagrams, which may not exceed 11" x 17".

(b) A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information.

(c) Font size shall be no greater or small than 12 point

(d) Elaborate formats, bindings or color presentations are not desired or required.

INFORMATION REGARDING SUBMISSION OF PROPPOSAL

(a) All proposals must be emailed to or sent via DOD Safe:

Email: TSgt Angelo Cabuang, angelomykael.cabuang@asab.afcent.af.mil

DOD Safe: Request a link by sending an email to angelomykael.cabuang@asab.afcent.af.mil

(b) Offerors are cautioned that Ali Al Salem Air Base has visitor control procedures requiring individuals not affiliated with the installation to obtain a J2 pass or admissions pass prior to entrance.

(c) Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 15.208(b), Submission, Modification, Revision, and Withdrawal of Proposals.

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

Section M: Evaluation of Offerors BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This acquisition will utilize the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection procedure in accordance with FAR 15.101-2 and 15.3 as supplemented by the DoD Source Selection Procedures referenced in DFARS 215.300 and the AFFARS Mandatory Procedures 5315.3 to make an integrated assessment for a best value award decision. By submission of its offer, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or sub factors. All acceptable offers shall be treated equally except for their prices and technical narratives.

Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined unacceptable. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

A. Price Evaluation. Initially, the government shall rank all conforming offers (and nonconforming proposals that are correctable) by price. An offeror's proposed prices will be determined by multiplying the quantities identified in Section B by the proposed unit price for each Contract Line Item Number or Subcontract Line Item Number to confirm the extended amount for each. If there is any difference between the offerors total price submitted in the proposal and the total price the source selection team computes, then the source selection team will ask the contractor to clarify pricing. The offeror's total evaluated proposed price determination will include the sum of all CLINS stated in section B Price Schedule. Offerors whose total evaluated price is unreasonable (in accordance with FAR 15.404 and FAR 31.201-3), unbalanced (in accordance with FAR 15.404-1), or unaffordable (not within any budgetary information included in the solicitation) may not be considered for award. The government will evaluate offerors for award by adding the total price for CLINs for the basic requirement.

B. Technical Acceptability. The technical acceptability evaluation include consideration of offeror's ability to meet minimum government requirement in accordance with the SOW. An "Acceptable" rating must be received on all Factors and Sub- Factors in order to receive an award. If the lowest priced offer does not receive an overall rating of 'Acceptable' the Government will continue to evaluate and repeat the process until an offeror is found to have an overall technical acceptability rating on all factors and sub-factors. Once the lowest priced, technically acceptable offeror is found, that offeror will be selected for award and the source selection evaluation shall stop, even if all offerors have not been evaluated for technical acceptability. The offeror shall ensure that the 15 page limit for Factor 2 and all subsequent Sub-Factors are adhered to. All pages in excess of the page limitation will not be evaluated by the Government.

C. Technical Acceptability and Evaluation Rating Technical Acceptability Ratings Rating Description Acceptability Proposal meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation Unacceptability Proposal does not meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation

Factor 2: Specific Technical and Management and Logistical Capabilities:

Sub-Factor 2.1: An offer is acceptable when the Offeror's technical, management and logistical approach/capabilities demonstrates a sound construction approach, risk management, logistical requirements, mobilization plan, environmental compliance, safety, quality control, and resolution of potential issues and challenges. The Offeror must demonstrate implementation of a working knowledge of the equipment, material, and construction disciplines required to complete this requirement and demonstrates a clear understanding of, and an effective, structured approach for meeting the technical requirements of the SOW.

APO AE 09855, UNIT 1 BOX 1

APO, AE 09855

UNITED STATES

Angelo Mykael Cabuang, Email: angelomykael.cabuang@asab.afcent.af.mil Telephone: 318-442-6781

a. Attachment 7 has been updated to reflect the correct form.

b. Section L and M has been updated to correct inconsistencies.

c. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.