Attachment 6 - Instruction 52.212-1 and Evaluation 52.212-2 Addendum.pdf

Quotation Preparation Instructions:

A. To assure the timely and equitable evaluation of quotations, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors. Quotations submitted in response to this Combined Synopsis/Solicitation must address the evaluation factors which include a price quote and technical qualification. The response shall consist of two (2) separate factors:

Factor 1. Technical Qualification (Sub-Factor 1-Education, Sub-Factor 2-Exprience, Sub-Factor 3-Sample Ministry Plan)

Factor 2. Price Quote.

B. Factors for Award:

Factor 1. Technical Qualifications - Limited to no more than 20 pages. Technical qualifications as required in section 1.7 Contractor Eligibility Requirements of the Performance Work Statement.

(a) Sub-Factor 1. Education: Offeror shall submit a copy of Baccalaureate degree for each proposed member of the Ecumenical Youth Ministry team.

(b) Sub-Factor 2. Experience: Offer shall submit a minimum of two (2) years’ experience working directly with military connected youth in established youth organizations. A resume of education/experience AND one professional letters of reference for the team member must be provided.

(c) Sub-Factor 3. Sample Ministry Plan: Offeror shall submit a sample ministry plan that demonstrates how their company plans to effectively achieve all the stated objectives outlined in the PWS.

Factor 2. Price Quote

(a) Prices shall be all inclusive (i.e., all materials, transportation, labor, etc.) and shall be clearly illustrated on the Quote Sheet.

(b) Insert proposed unit and extended prices on the Quote Sheet. The extended amount must equal the whole currency unit price multiplied by the number of units. The quote must be submitted for both the base year and the option years.

(c) Quote Specifics. All quotes must include the following information:

1. Vendor's complete mailing and remittance address and contact information.

2. Offeror shall be enrolled in the System for Award Management (SAM) database (www.sam.gov) at time of quote submission and ready for future enrollment in WAWF, for payment and invoicing in electronic funds transfer - payable 30 days upon delivery.

Inability to receive EFT payment may disqualify a recipient from award consideration.

3. Quotes shall be quoted in United States Dollars ($) or British Pounds Sterling (£) and shall be valid through Tuesday, 01 August 2023

4. Quote sheet must be filled in entirely.

http://www.sam.gov/

5. Full Reps and Certs shall be accomplished in conjunction with SAM registration.

6. Discount for prompt payment, if applicable.

**Note: The Logistical Support attachment is at the time of this solicitation not approved. If approved, it will be incorporated through a solicitation amendment or a no-cost modification after award.

(d) POC Details: Quotes must be received no later than 2:00PM Greenwich Mean Time (GMT), Friday, 23 June 2023 by the 48th Contracting Squadron, via email to the following point of contracts (POCs): A1C Henry Kleemann at henry.kleemann@us.af.mil and Courtney Chiporo at courtney.chiporo@us.af.mil.

(e) Questions must be received no later than 2:00PM GMT, Friday 16 June 2023 to POCs A1C Henry Kleemann at henry.kleemann@us.af.mil and Courtney Chiporo at courtney.chiporo@us.af.mil.

(End of Addendum)

Evaluation Criteria:

Addendum to 52.212-2, Evaluation Factors The Government will evaluate quotes based on two primary evaluation factors (Technical Qualifications and Price). All factors will be rated on an acceptable or unacceptable basis. An unacceptable rating for any of the factors will result in an overall unacceptable rating for the entire quotation. A breakdown for each factor is as follows:

Rating Description Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings Acceptable Quote: clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation. All factors and sub-factors have passed the evaluation.

Unacceptable Quote: does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation. Each sub-factor must pass the evaluation in order for the technical factor to pass. Failure to address any sub-factor will deem an offer as technically unacceptable.

Factor 1. Technical Qualifications:

The contracting officer will develop the evaluation procedures for this acquisition IAW FAR 13.106-2, Evaluation of Quotations or Offers. The Government will evaluate quotes based on two primary evaluation factors (Technical Qualifications and Price). All factors and significant subfactors will be rated on an acceptable or unacceptable basis. An unacceptable rating for any of the below sub-factors will result in an unacceptable rating of this Technical Qualification primary factor. If any single area receives a rating of unacceptable, the entire plan will be rated as Unacceptable. Technical acceptability will be evaluated against the following sub-factors:

mailto:henry.kleemann@us.af.mil mailto:courtney.chiporo@us.af.mil mailto:henry.kleemann@us.af.mil mailto:courtney.chiporo@us.af.mil

(a) Sub-Factor 1 - Education: This sub-factor is met when an offeror thoroughly, completely, and accurately submits and fully addresses all the following criteria listed in this sub-factor. Submit a copy of Baccalaureate degrees for each proposed member of the Ecumenical Youth Ministry team.

(b) Sub-Factor 2 - Experience: This sub-factor is met when an offeror thoroughly, completely, and accurately submits and fully addresses all the following criteria listed in this sub-factor. Submit a minimum of two (2) years’ experience working directly with military connected youth in established youth organizations. A resume of education/experience AND one professional letters of reference for the team member must be provided.

(c) Sub-Factor 3 - Sample Ministry Plan: This sub-factor is met when an offeror thoroughly, completely, and accurately submits a sample ministry plan that demonstrates how their company plans to effectively achieve all of the stated objectives outlined in the PWS (i.e., developing a core curriculum, annual budget, calendar of events).

Factor 2. Price Quote:

Vendor must provide a price for each CLIN of the pricing table contained in Attachment section of the solicitation. Failure to quote on all CLINs will render this factor as unacceptable and the entire quotation as nonresponsive. The Government will evaluate all quotations based on a Total Evaluated Price (TEP). An offeror's TEP will be determined by multiplying the quantities identified within this request for quotations by the offered unit price for SLINs 0001AA, 0001AB, 1001AA, 1001AB, 2001AA, 2001AB, 3001AA, 3001AB 4001AA and 4001AB, then adding the total amounts of each SLIN together, giving the Government the vendors total. Additionally, the TEP will include the price for a FAR 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, six-month extension. The price for the six-month extension will be calculated by using half (50%) of the listed quantity for SLIN 4001AA and 4001AB combined and multiply it by the offered unit price for SLIN 4001AA and 4001AB combined. Evaluation of the option period will not obligate the Government to exercise the option. The total extended price for each CLIN/SLIN and the price for the six-month extension authorized by FAR 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services will be added together to arrive at the TEP.

The Government will award a contract resulting from the solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be the most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered in accordance with provision 52.212-2.

In accordance with FAR 13.106-2(b)(3), offers will be evaluated in an efficient and minimally burdensome fashion. Since formal evaluation plans are not required, the Government will simplify the process; offer will be rated as acceptable/unacceptable based on evaluation of technical factors. Afterword's, the Government will conduct a comparative price evaluation of offers based on market research and comparisons with the government's independent estimate.

The Government may award without interchanges and award based on initial offers.

However, the Government reserves the right to hold interchanges, if deemed necessary by the contracting officer. Furthermore, the Government intends to award a contract to the responsible offeror whose offer, conforming to the solicitation, is most advantageous to the Government, technical and price factors considered.

(End of Addendum)