Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 53 KB Posted
- Attached to
- UK Wide Custodial Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA5587-21-UKWideCustodial
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CUI - For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.
Attachment 3, Solicitation FA558721R0005: Past Performance Questionnaire (6 March 2021) The 48th Contracting Squadron, RAF Lakenheath, United Kingdom (UK) is in the process of competitively selecting a source for UK Wide Custodial Cleaning Services.
The Contractor shall provide all management, tools, equipment, and labor necessary to ensure that custodial services are performed at Royal Air Force (RAF) Lakenheath, RAF Feltwell, RAF Mildenhall, RAF Alconbury, RAF Molesworth, RAF Croughton, RAF Caversfield, RAF Blenheim Crescent, RAF Barford St John, RAF Fairford and RAF Welford in a manner that will maintain a satisfactory facility condition and present a clean, neat and professional appearance. The Contractor shall accomplish all cleaning tasks and be required to provide and replenish soap and paper products in all restrooms covering approximately 2.2M square feet. Maximum cleaning frequencies are established in Appendix A, Air Force Custodial Common Levels of Service Standards. All work performed by the Contractor shall be performed in accordance with all applicable US, and UK Laws and regulations, Headquarters Air Force (HAF) standards, instructions, and commercial practices.
One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.
Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later 3 June 2021.
To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to Byron.Irving@us.af.mil. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records.
Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.
Section 1: Contract Identification
A. Contractor (Company/Division):
B. Contractor Cage Code:
C. Contract Number:
D. Contract Type (e.g., Firm Fixed Price, Fixed Price with Incentive Fee, Cost Plus Incentive Fee, Cost Plus Fixed Fee, etc.):
E. Program Title:
F. Brief Program Description (please include an approximation of square footage):
G. Approximation of Square Footage:
H. Period of Performance
1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):
Beginning Date _________ through ____________
2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):
Beginning Date _________ through ____________
3. Reason for difference (if applicable):
I. Contract Dollar Value
1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $
2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $
3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):
J. Description of work performed:
K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No
L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel
Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last five (5) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.
Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification
A. Customer or agency name:
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):
Section 3: Respondent Identification
A. Respondent’s name:
B. Respondent’s title:
C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:
D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:
E. Other suggested points of contact:
Section 4: Performance Information
In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:
Code Performance Rating
E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.
| The Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
1. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
2. Followed approved quality control plan.
3. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
4. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
5. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
6. Identified problems as they occurred.
7. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
8. Displayed initiative to solve problems.
9. Met established mobilization plan (if applicable).
10. Was responsive to contract changes.
11. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
12. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
13. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?
14. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain.
EXPLANATION:
☐ Yes ☐ No
15. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.
EXPLANATION:
☐ Yes ☐ No
Additional remarks:
[click and pick the date]
Respondent’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
E-Mail to: Byron.Irving@us.af.mil CUI - For Official Use Only Page 6 of 6 image1.emf
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .