Attachment_4_-_Dormitory_locks_-_Site_Visit_Q&A.pdf

PDF 178 KB Posted

Attached to
Dormitory Locks - RAF Mildenhall Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA558717Q0081
Issued by
Department of the Air Force United States Air Forces in Europe - Air Forces Africa

About this file

Q & A's

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Dormitory Locks - RAF Mildenhall, newest first.
File Type Posted
FA5587-17-Q-0081_COMBO_Dorm_Locks_amended.doc DOC document
Dormitory_locks_-_Site_Visit_Q&A_Amended.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_-_Statement_of_Work.doc DOC document
Attachment_3_-_Site_Visit_information.docx DOCX document
Attachment_2_-_Quote_Sheet_(Dorm_Locks).docx DOCX document
FA5587-17-Q-0081_COMBO_Dorm_Locks.doc DOC document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

48th FIGHTER WING (USAFE)

7 September 2017

MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD

SUBJECT: Solicitation Number FA5587-17-Q-0081, Unaccompanied Housing Office

Dormitory Locks Site Visit at RAF Mildenhall.

1. A site visit for the subject solicitation was held on 29 August 2017 at 0900-1045 hours at

RAF Mildenhall. The following information will be posted on the Federal Business

Opportunities website. The following buildings were visited:

RAF Mildenhall

a. Building 107, Dormitory room.

b. Building 108, Dormitory room.

c. Building 111, Dormitory room.

d. Building 210, Dormitory room/ Kiosk room.

2. The following questions were asked and the answers are provided:

1) Question: Is this requirement to extend the existing system?

Response: Yes.

2) Question: RAF Lakenheath use a magnetic strip (the RF10), is this something that RAF

Mildenhall wants to do?

Response: No, RAF Mildenhall require the magnet strip in accordance with the current system capability. Please see attachment 1.

3) Question: Can the Government clarify the number of rooms in each building?

Response: Yes, please see attachment 1 (updated).

4) Question: Do you want the contractor to dispose of the current locks, once removed?

5) Question: Will maps be provided to the contractor?

Response: Yes, upon contract award.

6) Question: The industry standard for delivery/installation is 60-90 days, does this meet out timescale?

Response: Yes, 60-90 days ARO is acceptable.

7) Question: Is one kiosk required in building 210?

Response: Yes, only one kiosk is required. The kiosk is to be situated in the SOW dormitory where the CCTV camera is located. This must be a stand-alone machine for the key cards.

Step by step instructions on how use the kiosk, to get a card will also be required.

8) Question: What key card access do you want for residents?

Response: For the key card programming aspect, the residents will need access to a dormitory room, a laundry room and the recreational/day room.

9) Question: Do we require the contractor to quote for complete installation of all works?

10) Question: Can you confirm the number of existing Onity locks that are installed in the relevant dormitories?

Response: Yes. The total number of existing Onity locks are 126.

Additional Information

Room 111 –124 rooms and 11 extra rooms. A total of 135 rooms will require card access

(accessed via external doors). This includes laundry rooms and day rooms in the building. 1 main door is currently secured with a panic bar internally.

Room 107 – 144 rooms and 23 extra rooms (accessed via external doors). A total of 167 rooms will require card access.

Room 108 – 89 rooms – dorm rooms accessed internally. 6 Access swipes required for external entrances. 6 main doors are currently secured with a panic bars internally. We have a total of 21 extra rooms to include the 6 main doors. The 2nd and 3rd floor has two day rooms, also we would like to include the storage rooms, studies, laundry rooms, and janitor closet.

Dorm 111 = 135

Dorm 108 = 110

Dorm 107 = 167

Total = 402

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .