Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 48 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA5587-16-R-0006
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
Offeror’s Name:
Telephone Number:
Address:
Point of Contact:
Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________
Contract Name/Number:
$/£ Amount:
Contract Period:
Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.
B. CUSTOMER RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent:
Title:
Company/Organization:
Telephone Number:
Address:
Email Address:
C. E-MAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: 48CONS.FAST.FASTTeamOrgBox@us.af.mil.
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate evaluation of past performance information on the scale that most accurately describes the offeror’s performance or situation.
| Rating |
| Description |
| Acceptable |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element may have contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Unacceptable |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
Once completed this is Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| A |
| U |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements and adequate project supervision at the place of performance. |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, retain, and/or replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 3. |
| Passed health and sanitation inspections. |
| 4. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 5. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 6. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 7. |
| Performed services in a timely manner. |
| 8. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 9. |
| Offeror conducted effective Business relations (partnering meetings, etc). |
| 10. |
| Compliance with invoicing requirements. |
| 11. |
| Offeror’s staff were fully trained on the specific contract requirements. |
| 12. |
| Fair and reasonable prices for quality of service rendered. |
| 13. |
| Provided adequate number of personnel to carry out the requirements of the contract. (Allowing for leave of absence, etc.) |
| 14. |
| Offeror’s quality control process included an effective inspection system. |
| 15. |
| Offeror displayed ability to adapt to new technologies and/or equipment requirements. |
| 16. |
| Offeror exhibited effective performance through subcontractor teaming arrangements. |
| 17. |
| How would you rate the offeror’s overall performance? |
Remarks:______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________
**Once completed this is Source Selection Information – see FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .