RFI Answers .docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Replace Security Poles at Tengan Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA527023R0010
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 23R0010 Amendment 02.pdf | ||
| PWM02388 SOW 1 Feb 2023.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFI Answers.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation Amendment FA527023R00100001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA527023R0010.pdf | ||
| 7-As-Built.pdf | ||
| PWM02388 SOW.docx | DOCX document | |
| 5-Torii standard.pdf | ||
| 6-Wiring Connection Diagram.pdf | ||
| 9-Location map.pdf | ||
| 10-Request for Information Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| 11-Site Visit Reservation Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-New Layout Plan.pdf | ||
| 3-Bollard Detail.pdf | ||
| 4-Duct section.pdf | ||
| 2-Removal Plan.pdf | ||
| 8-Statement of Work.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ANSWERS
Contract: FA527023R0010 – Replacing Security Poles
| Buyer: | SrA Tahj Guilford / 18 CONS/PKC, Bldg 95 |
| Email: | Tahj.Guilford@us.af.mil |
| Tel No.: | DSN: 634-3741 |
| Page |
| Section |
| Paragraph |
| Questions |
| 2of10 |
| II STATEMENT OF WORK |
| ELEC #6 |
| 既存電柱M-5はアクセスのしずらいBldg.308裏側の丘の頂上にあります。重機がアクセスできない場合は既存コンクリート柱は再使用、新設電源も架空配線とする事で考慮しても良いでしょうか？ |
The existing Pole “M-5” is located at the top of the hill behind Bldg.308, which is difficult to access with Heavy Machineries (Cranes, etc.). In the case when Heavy Machineries cannot access the location of the concrete poles, can we consider the reuse of the existing poles and overhead wiring for the new power supply?
Please confirm.
DPW Answer: No, Follow the SOW.
| 2of10 |
| II STATEMENT OF WORK |
| ELEC #6 |
| マンホール間のみ 予備管としてFEPx1本を提供する事で宜しいでしょうか？ |
Is it acceptable to provide one spare FEP conduit between manholes only?
DPW Answer: Yes.
| NA |
| Site Visit |
既存Pole M-1にSOWで示されない弱電の配管配線が立ち上がっています。おそらくBldg.308へ繋がるTV用のCoaxial Cableだと思います。SOWにこのTVケーブルの工事内容を示して下さい。
The existing Pole M-1 has a communication cable and conduit that is not indicated in the SOW. We think that it is probably a Coaxial Cable for the TV which is connected to Bldg. 308.
Please indicate the work detail regarding this TV Cable on the SOW.
DPW Answer: See attached corrected SOW. (Para 9)
| NA |
| Site Visit |
既存Pole M-1、M-2に架空の弱電ケーブルが敷設されています。おそらくTV用のCoaxial Cableだと思います。
既存弱電ケーブルがTV用のケーブルである事を確認して下さい。
＊Security用のケーブルでない事をDPW側でも確認して下さい。
There is currently an overhead communication cable installed on the existing Pole M-1 and M-2. We think that it is probably a Coaxial cable for TV.
Please confirm that the existing communication cable is a cable for TV.
*Please also confirm on the DPW side that the cable is not being used for Security purposes.
DPW Answer: Yes.
| 2 of 10 |
| II |
STATEMENT OF WORK
| ELEC #6 |
| The Wind Speed Calculation specified in the Building Standards Act for Japan-made Lighting Poles is 40ms. If a Japan-made product is to be requested, the maximum Wind Speed Calculation is only up to 40ms. Please confirm if acceptable. |
DPW Answer: Yes.
| 2 of 10 |
| II |
STATEMENT OF WORK
| ELEC #6 |
| The existing pole “M-5” is located at the top of the hill behind Bldg.308, which is difficult to access with heavy machineries (cranes, etc.). In the case when heavy machineries cannot access the location of the concrete poles, can we consider the reuse of the existing poles and overhead wiring for the new power supply? Please confirm. |
DPW Answer: No, Follow the SOW.
| 2 of 10 |
| II |
STATEMENT OF WORK
| ELEC #6 |
| Is it acceptable to provide one spare FEP conduit between manholes only? |
DPW Answer: Yes
| NA |
| Site Visit |
There is currently an overhead communication cable installed on the existing pole M-1 and M-2. We think that it is probably a Coaxial Cable for TV. Please confirm that the existing communication cable is a cable for TV.
Please also confirm that the cable is not being used for security purposes.
Section M
Please provide biding instructions. The solicitation indicates submission of price (CLIN?) only. Is this correct?
Please confirm if there are any bonding requirements (bid bond, bid guarantee, etc.).
DPW Answer: 18CONS Item.
Please extend the bid date 14 days from response to this RFI.
DPW Answer: 18CONS Discretion
| N/A |
| RFP |
Attachment#1 "New Layout Plan"
| N/A |
| The callout for "TH-308" structure, reads "Install new circuit breakers, NEMA 1 enclosure for security light and pavilion" |
Are circuit breakers to be installed in NEMA 1 enclosures independent of Panel LP, or are breakers to be installed in Panel LP?
DPW Answer: Circuit breakers shall be installed in NEMA 1 enclosures independent of Panel “LLP”.
| N/A |
| RFP |
Attachment#1 "New Layout Plan"
| N/A |
| Confirm FEP conduits is acceptable |
DPW Answer: Yes.
| N/A |
| RFP |
Attachment#1 "New Layout Plan"
| N/A |
| Confirm that both local-made and US-made WP SST pull boxes are acceptable |
DPW Answer: Yes.
| N/A |
| RFP |
Attachment#1 "New Layout Plan"
| N/A |
| Confirm that new security concrete poles will be erected in the same location as the existing poles? |
DPW Answer: Yes.
| N/A |
| RFP |
Attachment#1 "New Layout Plan"
| N/A |
| SOW is silent regarding removal of existing poles. Advise what the Scope requirement is for existing poles? |
DPW Answer: Existing poles shall be disposed by the contractor.
| SOW Page 2 |
| RFP SOW & |
Attachment #1 "New Layout Plan"
| N/A |
| "New Layout Plan" shows new poles are to be provided but this requirement is not stated in the SOW. |
If new poles are required per Layout Plan, SOW should include such requirement. Will SOW be revised to include removal?
DPW Answer: See attached corrected SOW (Para 10)
| N/A |
| RFP |
Attachment #1 "New Layout Plan"
| N/A |
| The callout to Pole "M-1" states to install a "Lighting Control Box" in NEMA 4X |
Request government define the purpose of this Control Box?
DPW Answer: See attached corrected SOW (Para 7)
| N/A |
| RFP |
Attachment #1 "New Layout Plan"
The callout to Pole "M-3" states to install a Safety Switch in NEMA 4X at the pavilion
Request government define the purpose of this Safety Switch?
DPW Answer: Follow the SOW.
| 1 of 10 |
| 1. Repair Work (K) of SOW |
| #4 of Civil |
| It stated that “Provide 75mm thick sand cushion all around secondary ducts”. |
From Contractor past experience, secondary electrical underground duct under AC pavement is usually installed in the concrete encasement to protect from vehicle loading.
Is concrete encasement of secondary underground ducts required under roadways where there will be vehicle loads?
DPW Answer: No, Follow the SOW.
| 7 of 10 |
| SOW |
| Ⅷ |
| It stated that “The contractor shall coordinate with the government for the availability of latrine. The contractor will be allowed to use the Bldg.#306 or #307, Naha Port.” |
Can contractor use a latrine in other buildings in closer proximity to the actual project site?
DPW Answer: See attached corrected SOW. (Para VIII)
N/A
Is there a specified wind load for the outside lights?
(60 m/90 m, etc.)
DPW Answer: Follow the regulation.
N/A
Is there a specified illuminance for outside lights?
DPW Answer: Follow the regulation.
Removal Plan/New Layout Plan
There are overhead lines between M-1 and M-2 and between M-2 and TH-308.
Should these overhead lines be removed and new underground cables be installed?
DPW Answer: Yes
| SOW 2 |
| II, A, Civil |
| 12 |
| Please advise how many steel guard posts are required. |
DPW Answer: Provide two for security light pole No.M-6.
| SOW 2 |
| II, A, Electrical |
| 7 |
| Does the lighting control also need timer control? |
(Photocell only?)
DPW Answer: No, Photo electric control only.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .