Attch 2_Past Perf Ref List.pdf
PDF 111 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA520924Q0089
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Reference List for the solicitation FA520924Q0089, which is for an annual inspection of hoists and hydraulic lifts at Yokota Air Base and Tama Hills, Japan.
The key details are:
- The solicitation is seeking contractors to provide supervision, equipment, tools, materials, vehicles, and other services to perform annual inspections of hoists and hydraulic vehicle lifts in accordance with Japanese standards and regulations.
- The anticipated period of performance is a 12-month basic period with four 1-year options for a total of 5 years.
- Offerors must be registered and active in the System for Award Management (SAM) and licensed/registered to perform the services in Japan.
- A site visit will be held on September 26, 2024 at Yokota Air Base.
- The contracting agency is the Department of the Air Force Pacific Air Forces.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation No. FA520924Q0089 Attachment 2
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE LIST
Name of Offeror:
The following Three (3) contracts are the most relevant contracts (similar in scope, size and complexity) performed for US Government agencies, Government of Japan, and Commercial customers performed within the last 3 years of the solicitation release date, or is currently in progress (see Solicitation Provision 52.212-1):
Contract No. 1
(1) Company/Division name
(2) Product/Service
(3) Contracting Agency/Customer
(4) Contract Number
(5) Contract Dollar Value
(6) Period of Performance
(7) Verified, up-to-date name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and telephone number of the contracting officer (Point-of-Contact)
(8) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions
(9) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.
(10) Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and identify aspects (scope, magnitude of effort, and complexity) of the contracts deemed relevant and how they relate to the proposed effort.
Contract No. 2
(1) Company/Division name
(2) Product/Service
(3) Contracting Agency/Customer
(4) Contract Number
(5) Contract Dollar Value
(6) Period of Performance
(7) Verified, up-to-date name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and telephone number of the contracting officer (Point-of-Contact)
(8) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions
(9) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.
(10) Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and identify aspects (scope, magnitude of effort, and complexity) of the contracts deemed relevant and how they relate to the proposed effort.
Contract No. 3
(1) Company/Division name
(2) Product/Service
(3) Contracting Agency/Customer
(4) Contract Number
(5) Contract Dollar Value
(6) Period of Performance
(7) Verified, up-to-date name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and telephone number of the contracting officer (Point-of-Contact)
(8) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions
(9) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.
(10) Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and identify aspects (scope, magnitude of effort, and complexity) of the contracts deemed relevant and how they relate to the proposed effort.
| PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE LIST |
| Contract No. 1 |
| Contract No. 2 |
| Contract No. 3 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .