Attachment 12 - Solicitation Amendment FA520526Q00340001 SF 30.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

J

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

25 Aug 2026

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE

REQUISITION NUMBER

5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE FA5205

FA5205 35 CONS PK

UNIT 5201, APO AP 96319-5201

APO, AP 96319-5201

UNITED STATES

Katie Kershaw, Email: katie.kershaw@us.af.mil Telephone: 3152268035 Miriam Martinez, Email: miriam.martinez.3@us.af.mil Telephone: 3152268056

7. ADMINISTERED BY (if other than Item 6)

CODE

SCD: PAS:

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE: FACILITY CODE:

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

FA520526Q0034

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

24 Aug 2026

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER

NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; 1 or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (if required) See Section G - Contract Administration Data

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK

ONE

A.THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.)

SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

See Schedule

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Computer generated. Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA-FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Created On:

26 Aug 2026, 02:20 AM Central Daylight Time

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The purpose of this amendment is to update Playground Reference Maps, add Utility Map for both locations, to provide Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification):

site visit information, and clarify amendments to RFO 52.212-1 and RFO 52.212-2.

1. Made correction to Attachment 4, 5, and 6 Park Reference Map Playground to reflect the correct location.

2. Add Attachment 7 -75051 Main Base - Air Plane Park Utilities List

2. The site visit is scheduled for 31 August 2026 at 13:00.

3. Change the questions due date from 0800 JST 05 September 2026 to 0800 JST 09 September 2026.

4. Sub-Factor I: Comprehensive design for both playground locations that meets all requirements of this solicitation and SOO, rating table now describes an unacceptable rating as "Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and thus, contains one or more deficiencies."

5. Remove "all sub-factors shall be evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis based on the requirements listed in the SOO and Solicitation" from Amendment to RFO 52.212-1, 2(a)

a. Design will be rated on a subjective trade-off basis.

6. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged and in effect.

Solicitation/Contract Form

The following modifications were made:

Information From To Solicitation Number FA520526Q0034 FA520526Q00340001

List of Attachments

The following Header Attachment(s) were added:

Information Value Attachment Description Drawings Attachment Name Attachment 4 - 75084 North Base B1825 and B1826 Reference Map Date 26 Aug 2026 Number 04

Information Value Attachment Description Drawings Attachment Name Attachment 5 - 75084 North Base B1825 and B1826 Utilities Map Date 26 Aug 2026 Number 05

Information Value Attachment Description Drawings Attachment Name Attachment 6 75051 Main Base Airplane Park Reference Map Date 26 Aug 2026 Number 06

Information Value Attachment Description Drawings Attachment Name Attachment 7- 75051 Main Base Airplane Park Utilities List Date 26 Aug 2026 Number 07

The following Header Attachment(s) were deleted:

Attachment 4 - 75084 North Base B1825 and B1826 Reference Map Playground Attachment 5 - 75084 North Base B1825 and B1826 Utilities Attachment 6 - 75051 Main Base Air Plane Park Reference Map Playground

Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

FA520526Q00340001

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

Addendum to RFO 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors

A. Offerors will provide the below in addition to the required listed in RFO 52.212-1.

Responses shall consist of three (3) separate parts; Part I - Summary and Miscellaneous Data, Part II - Technical Proposal, Part III - Price Proposal. Offers must provide all required parts/items to be considered responsive.

B. Specific Instructions:

1. PART I - SUMMARY AND MISCELLANEOUS DATA. Submit electronic copy.

(a) The offeror shall provide a concise summary and master table of contents of the entire quote.

(b)Complete blocks 12, 17, and 30 of the RFQ SF 1449 Section A, along with acknowledging all associated SF 30 submitted by the USG if applicable.

Amendments will not be counted against the page limits.

2. PART II - TECHNICAL PROPOSAL. Submit electronic copy.

(a) The offer shall provide a technical proposal consisting of the below subfactors.

(b) There are no page limitations for this Factor. However, contractors are advised to keep information to that which is required and relevant.

i. Sub-Factor I: Comprehensive design for both playground locations that meets all requirements of this solicitation and SOO

Rating Description

Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength

Acceptable Proposal indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and thus, contains one or more deficiencies.

ii. Sub-Factor II: Statement of Work conforming to the requirements of the Statement of Objectives, providing the contractor's detailed approach to the installation of this requirement.

iii. Sub-Factor 3: Ability to have at least one (1) member of the offerors team present at all meetings and/or site-visits.

a. The site visit is scheduled for 31 August 2026 at 13:00.

b. If you require an escorted base pass, please make that request via email to the POCs below no later than 3 days prior to the site visit date.

3. PART III - PAST PERFORMANCE PROPOSAL - Submit electronic copy

(a) Offeror shall provide a listing of any recent and relevant contracts of similar scope. List shall consist of the following format project title, contract number, contract dollar value, location and if any quality issues. This is the minimum requirement. A contractor may submit additional columns if relevant.

(b) Recent is defined as contracts/sub-contracts performed and/or being performed for any customer within the past ten

(10) years prior to issuance of this solicitation.

(c) Relevant is defined as projects involving the design and installation of playground or equipment of similar scope, effort, complexity and or magnitude to this solicitation with a value of $500,000.00 and above. Provide a Minimum of one (1) and a maximum of five (5) prior projects.

Project Title Contract # $ Value Location Any Quality Issues

3. PART IV - PRICE PROPOSAL - Submit electronic copy.

(a) This part shall contain a completed Section B (Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs).

(b) Insert proposed unit prices and extended amounts in Section B for each Contract Line-Item Number (CLIN). The extended amount must equal the unit price multiplied by the number of units. It is imperative that mathematical calculations are correct; particular care should be taken to ensure the amounts match when using a spreadsheet program, such as Microsoft EXCEL. The unit prices and extended amounts are limited to two decimal places.

(c) Extreme care should be exercised to ensure that no price data of any kind are included in any other Part of the proposal.

C. Documents submitted in response to this RFQ must be consistent with the following:

1. Requirements of this solicitation (CLINs and SOO) and government standards and regulations pertaining to this SOO.

2. Evaluation Factors for Award in Section M of this solicitation.

3. If a Part in a proposal exceeds the specified page limit cited in the Part Content, the excessive pages will not be evaluated.

4. Format for proposal Parts I, II, III and IV shall be as follows:

(a) Each Part shall be submitted as a separate file from the others and contain a Table of Contents, and the List of Tables and Drawing (if applicable). Cover pages, Table of Contents, and Tabs will not be counted against the page limits. However, pages depicting tables, charts, graphs and figures will count toward the page limit. The number of copies of each part is specified in paragraph B, Specific Instructions, above.

(b) The proposals will be on 8 1/2" X 11" paper, except for foldouts used for charts, tables, or diagrams, which may not exceed 11" X 17".

(c) A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information. Two pages may be printed on one sheet of paper.

(d) All printing shall be single-spaced. Spacing characteristics are applicable to charts and graphs.

(e) Written entries shall not be less than 11 font size. Size of print is applicable to charts and graphs.

(f) Page margins shall be a minimum of 1 inch top, bottom, and each side.

(g) Offerors shall submit electronic proposals via e-mail. Larger files may be submitted via DoD Safe. No zip files will be accepted. Email the file(s) by the solicitation closing date and time to the following email address:

shanna.price.2@us.af.mil and kade.forrester.1@us.af.mil.

Proposals are due no later than 21 September 2026, 8:00 pm EST

Offerors are recommended to seek email acknowledging receipt of proposals submitted electronically.

(h) Each Part shall be complete in itself and shall not reference information contained in other Parts. Page 1 of a Part is defined as the first page after the Table of

Contents. All pages shall be numbered.

(i) Priced at a of any kind shall be presented only in the Price Proposal Part.

(j) Elaborate formats, bindings, and color presentations are not desired or required.

The following table summarizes the proposal submission:

PART TITLE PAGE LIMIT DUE DATE

I SUMMARY AND

MISCELLANEOUS DATA - See SF 1449 Block 8

II TECHNICAL PROPOSAL - See SF 1449 Block 8

III PAST PERFORMANCE

PROPOSAL - See SF 1449 Block 8

IV PRICE PROPOSAL - See SF 1449 Block 8

Evaluation Factors for Award

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

Addendum to RFO 52.212-2, Evaluation - Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Feb 2026)

The following is inserted as new paragraph (d) of the provision:

"(d) : This is a competitive Subjective Tradeoff (STO) best value source selection conducted in accordance with Revolutionary FAR BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD Overhaul (RFO) Part 12 and 15 in which competing offerors' Technical Capability will be evaluated on basis approximately equal to price. By submission of its offer, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, and representations and certifications, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. Failure to meet a solicitation requirement may result in an offer being determined unacceptable. The government reserves the right to award a contract to other than the lowest Total Evaluated Price (TEP). In that event the Contracting Officer will make an integrated assessment best value award decision using the TEP and the Technical Capability rating. The evaluation process will include the following:

(1) The government will rank all offers by price. The price evaluation will document the fairness and reasonableness of the TEP. The TEP is the Price Evaluation Factor.

total evaluated price of the offer, inclusive of all line items. The government reserves the right to perform price realism analysis. If the government elects to perform a price realism analysis, the government reserves discretion over the method within which it performs its price realism analysis. If the government elects to perform a price realism analysis and finds a proposal unrealistic, the government may withhold award to that offeror.

(2) Offerors shall provide a comprehensive Design and Statement of Work (SOW) IAW the Statement of Objectives (SOO) and Solicitation. Technical Capability Factor.

The contents of the plan shall be evaluated by the USG for a subjective determination based on the submitted proposal's conformance to the solicitation and SOO requirements. An assessment of each offeror's ability to accomplish the technical requirements; and evaluation of the relative strengths, deficiencies, significant weaknesses, and risks supporting proposal evaluation.

i. Sub-Factor I: Comprehensive design for both playground locations that meets all requirements of this solicitation and SOO.

Design Rating:

Rating Description

Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength

Acceptable Proposal indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and thus, contains one or more deficiencies.

ii. Sub-Factor 2: Statement of Work conforming to the requirements of the Statement of Objectives, providing the contractor's detailed approach to the installation of this requirement.

iii. Sub-Factor 3: Ability to have at least one (1) member of the offerors team present at all meetings and/or site-visits.

a. The site visit is scheduled for 31 August 2026 at 13:00.

b. If you require an escorted base pass, please make that request via email to the POCs below no later than 3 days prior to the site visit date.

QUESTIONS

All questions are due to the POC below by no later than via email. All questions must be submitted 0800 JST 09 September 2026 in an excel sheet capturing the relevant areas (document, page # & paragraph) the question is in regard to, the question, and any clarification requested. The USG will collect, combine and respond to all questions via amendment to SAM.gov posting.

POCs:

Shanna.price.2@us.af.mil

Kade.forrester.1@us.af.mil

Performance Quality Assessment:

Past Performance Factor: The government will evaluate recent and relevant performance information provided by offerors along with past performance information available via USG records/ databases, if available. Recent is defined as contracts/sub-contracts performed and/or being performed for any customer within the past ten (10) years prior to issuance of this solicitation. Relevant is defined as projects involving the design and installation of playground or equipment of similar scope, effort, complexity and or magnitude to this solicitation with a total value of $500,000.00 or more. The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to assess the degree of confidence the Government has in the offeror's ability to meet the solicitation requirements based on the offeror's demonstrated record of performance. Offerors will be evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. Offerors lacking past performance will receive a neutral rating.

Past Performance Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating:

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal consists of Recent and Relevant Information

Unacceptable Proposal does not consist of Recent and Relevant Information

Neutral No past performance available

(3) The government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective offerors. The government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest.

(4) Integrated Assessment. The government reserves the right to award a contract to other than the lowest TEP. In that event, the Contracting Officer will make an integrated assessment best value award decision using the TEP and the Technical

Capability of the offer. Offerors should note that the past performance evaluators may not rate an offeror that lacks recent, relevant past performance favorably or unfavorably with regard to past performance. Preference shall be given to offers with an acceptable rating over those with neutral.

(End of Addendum)