FA5205-15-R-0002_Atch4__PPQ.pdf

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

SOLICITATION NO.: FA5205-15-R-0002

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:________________________________________________________________________

B. Contractor Cage Code: _________________________________

C. Contract number: ______________________________________

D. Contract type: ______________________________

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

J. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name: __________________________________________________________

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________

Attachment 4 Solicitation No. FA5205-15-R-0002 O&M of Draughon Range

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other

Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name: __________________________________________________________________

B. Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ________________________________________________________

Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract: ____________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE RATING

E EXCEPTIONAL - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded many of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at a superior level.

Performance was accomplished with very few minor problems, and the contractor took immediate and effective corrective actions for those problems that did occur.

VG VERY GOOD - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded some of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed very well. Performance was accomplished with some minor problems, and the contractor took timely and effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

S SATISFACTORY - During the entire period, the contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level. Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

M MARGINAL – During the entire period, the contractor did not always meet some of the requirements of the contract and intervention was required to continue performance.

There were instances where performance was at a less than acceptable level;

performance was accomplished with some problems and some corrective actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – During the entire period, the contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There

Attachment 4 were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know.

When responding to the questions listed below, please place an “X” in rating box for the scale of (E) to

(U) that accurately describes the contractor’s performance. If a question is not applicable, select “N/A”.

If more space is needed, use the back of the questionnaire or attach additional pages. Handwritten responses to this questionnaire are acceptable. However, if responses are handwritten, please print legibly.

Operations Support E VG S M U N/A

O1. Ability to implement current standard practices for range operations and maintenance.

O2. Ability implement current standard practices for daily flying operations support

O3. Successfully responded to unscheduled and/or late-notice situations

O4. Ability to manage large information technology, wide and local area networks, to include servers, switches, routers, desktops, laptops, and monitors.

O5. Ability to manage and operate diverse data, video, and communications networks

O6. Ability to manage COMSEC

Sustainment Support E VG S M U N/A

S1. Quality & repeatability of operations & maintenance

S2. Ability to apply logical solutions to unique requirements (i.e. support for foreign sourced material, and non-nomenclatured & command support systems)

S3. Ability to implement current standard practices for maintaining GFE spares, repair parts, support equipment and items not part of government

Sustainment Support E VG S M U N/A supply system.

S4. Effectiveness of material management (including Government furnished equipment).

S5. Ability to provide maintenance and sustainment support for unique rrequirements.

Transition/phase-in E VG S M U N/A

T1. How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel?

T2. How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts?

Employee Retention/Attraction E VG S M U N/A

E1. How effectively was the contractor able to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort?

E2. How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort?

E3. How effective was employee compensation towards quality of work?

Cost Performance E VG S M U N/A

C1 How accurately did the contractor forecast contract costs?

C2 How well did the contractor meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs?

Cost Performance E VG S M U N/A

C3 How successfully did the contractor alert the Government of unforeseen costs before they occurred?

C4 How sufficient and timely was the contractor’s cost reporting?

Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or U

(Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___

No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Attachment 4

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address: 35 CONS/LGCP

Attn: Ms Miyako Fujimoto

Unit 5201

Bldg. 656, Misawa Air Base

APO AP 96319-5201

E-Mail to: miyako.fujimoto.jp@us.af.mil