PP Questionare FY 12-updated 7-25-11.doc
DOC document 67 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ICIDS II Alarm System
- Solicitation number
- FA5000-11-R-0028
About this file
Correct lanuage in Attachment 4 PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Answers and Questions.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA5000-11-R-0028 Amendment 0002 - Add FAR Clause 52.219-4.doc | DOC document | |
| FA5000-11-R-0028 Amendment 0001 to Correct Language in Attachment 4 PP Questionnaire - Page 1.doc | DOC document | |
| Final DD254.docx | DOCX document | |
| WD 05-2017 REV 15 06-13-11.docx | DOCX document | |
| PP Questionare FY 12.doc | DOC document | |
| PWS ICIDS.doc | DOC document | |
| FA5000-11-R-0028 ICIDS.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA5000-11-R-0028
ATTACHMENT 4
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation parts 2.101 and 3.104
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
TO:
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a Integrated Commercial Intrusion Detection System (ICIDS II) contract at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson (JBER), Alaska.
Please complete the attached questionnaire and send to:
673d Contracting Squadron/LGCB 10480 22nd Street, Suite 368
JBER, AK 99506-2501
lucian.reaves@elmendorf.af.mil Facsimile: (907) 552-7497
Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, I can be contacted at
1 Atch
Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________
Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________
__________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________
Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________*
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________* Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent:
_____________________ Title: ____________________________
Address: _____________________
Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________
Fax Number:
Email Address: _____________________
C. FAX COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: (907) 552-7497
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Please read the statements below, indicating your relative level of agreement in the box provided: (E, G, S, M, U, and N) PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Customer’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Customer’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship |
| 2. |
| The Contractor submitted accurate reports. |
| 3. |
| The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed. |
| 4 |
| The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract. |
| 5. |
| The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction. |
| 6. |
| The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price. |
| 7. |
| he Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis |
| 8. |
| The Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort. |
| 9. |
| The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates. |
| 10. |
| The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed. |
| 11. |
| The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the COR and/or Technical Point of Contact were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues. |
| 12. |
| The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner. |
| 13. |
| The Contractor promptly notified the Contracting Officer’s Representative, Technical Point of Contact, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues. |
| 14. |
| The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues. |
| 15. |
| The Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors. |
| 16. |
| The Contractor demonstrated an effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program. |
| 17. |
| The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance. |
| 18. |
| The Contractor did not frequently propose personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract that were clearly unqualified. |
| 19. |
| Rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 20. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER __________
Remarks:______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .