ATCH 3 Past Performance Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 41 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Kenait Concessionaire
- Solicitation number
- FA5000-10-R-0029
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire Kenai Concessionaire Restaurant 10-R-0029
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Kenai Concessionaire Cancelled.pdf | ||
| img-701163019-0001.pdf | ||
| Amend 1 ATCH 6 Questions from Kenai Dinning Facility.doc | DOC document | |
| ATCH 2 Wage Determination.doc | DOC document | |
| SF 1449 Kenai Concessionaire.doc | DOC document | |
| ATCH 1 SOW - Kenai 14 Apr 10.doc | DOC document | |
| ATCH 4 Contractor Financial Questionnaire.doc | DOC document | |
| ATCH 5 Demographics JBER.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation: FA5000-10-R-0029
Attachment 3, 7 Jun 10
PAST AND PRESENT PREFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATIONS PARTS 2.101 AND 3.104
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
To:
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of ____________________________. This firm is currently being considered for a contract at Elmendorf AFB, Alaska.
Please complete the attached questionnaire and send to:
3rd Contracting Squadron/LGCB
ATTN: Jason Williams and Annette Wilson 10480 22nd Street, Suite 369 Elmendorf AFB, AK 99506-2500 Email: Jason.Williams@elmendorf.af.mil and Annette.Wilson@elmendorf.af.mil Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. Please direct questions to the above e-mail addresses or phone Jason Williams @ 907-552-4268 and/or Annette Wilson @ 907-552-8116.
Enclosure
Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION
COMPANY NAME: ___________________________________________________________________________ ADDRESS: __________________________________________________________________________________
COMPANY POINT OF CONTACT: ______________________________________________________________
PHONE NUMBER: ____________________________________________________________________________
SECTION 2: REFRENCE INFORMATION
COMPANY/INDIVIDUAL NAME: _______________________________________________________________
COMPANY POINT OF CONTACT: _______________________________________________________________
PHONE NUMBER: ____________________________________________________________________________
PERIOD OF PREFORMANCE FOR SERVICES: FROM ________________ THROUH ___________________
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES PROVIDED: _______________________________________________________
SECTION 3: COMPANY EVALUATION
PREFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose a number on a scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance. Please provide comments in which an Unsatisfactory or Exceptional Rating is given and as appropriate for all other answers. Space for your comments is provided in each area. If more space is needed, additional space is provided at the end of the survey or attach additional sheets to the end of the questionnaire and reference the respective question.
1 – Neutral. Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
2 – Unsatisfactory. Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) with the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
3 - Marginal. Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
4 - Satisfactory. Performance meets contract requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
5 - Good. Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.
6 - Exceptional. Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with nor more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
EVALUATION:
1. Overall, how would you rate their services?
Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________
2. Quality of work performed?
Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________
3. Quality of food or beverages served?
Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________
4. Promptness or timeliness of the services provided?
Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________
5. Appearance and cleanliness of the facilities?
Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________
6. Courtesy and attitude of staff?
Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________
7. Ability to meet established schedules or set deadlines? 1
Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________
8. Hours of operation meet customers’ needs?
Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________
9. Provided timely resolution of customer complaints?
Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________
10. Displayed imitative to solve problems or made suggestions for alternative approaches to problems?
Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________
11. Ability to effectively communicate with others?
Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________
12. Professionalism of management?
Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________
13. Ability to comply with all applicable laws and regulations? 1
Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________
14. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice for previous contractual work?
YES NO
If yes, explain outcome below.
Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________
15. Would you award another contract or work to the contractor?
YES
NO
If yes, explain below.
Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: ____________________________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .