Amendment_0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SUMMARY OF CHANGES

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

S 1 14

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 24-May-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA4890-17-R-0013

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

02-May-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

24-May-2017

CODE

ACC AMIC/PKB

BLDG 664 - 129 ANDREWS ST., SUITE 110

LANGLEY AFB VA 23665-2788

FA4890 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA4890-17-R-0013

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

1. Remove the following language from Section 6 “Instructions to Offerors” (page 72 of Original

RFP):

Notice to Offerors: Funds are not presently available for this effort. No award will be made under this solicitation until funds are available. The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs.

2. Change Section F, paragraph ii, Aspect 3) Detachment 11 Academic/Training Database (page 78 of Original RFP) to read as follows:

Aspect 3) RQ-4/U-2 Academic/Training Database.

3. Revise Aspect 1) Training Workload Management Plan under paragraph 4.1.2. Subfactor B, Training Management and Approach (Section 7 “Evaluation Factors for Award, page 82 of Original RFP) to read as follows:

Aspect 1) Training Management and Approach.

4. Revise Aspect 3) RQ4/U-2 Academic/Training Database under paragraph 4.1.2. Subfactor B, Training Management and Approach (Section 7 “Evaluation Factors for Award, page 82 of Original RFP) to read as follows and delete paragraphs A through D:

Aspect 3) RQ-4/U-2 Academic/Training Database. The offeror’s proposed Academic/Training Database equipment/processes as described in PWS paragraph 1.7.10. This aspect is met when the offeror’s proposal satisfies the requirements of PWS paragraph 1.7.10.

� Meets Requirement � Does Not Meet Requirement

Proposal References:

Deficiencies:

Weaknesses:

Questions:

5. Incorporate revised Performance Work Statement, dated 15 May 17, Attachment 1.

6. All other terms and conditions of subject solicitation remain unchanged.

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

SECTION 6

SECTION 6 of the Solicitation - INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1 - INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (Jan 2017)

52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition. (Jan 2017) FAR Clause 52.215-1(d) Offer expiration date. Proposals in response to this solicitation will be valid for 180 calendar days.

1. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1.1. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of the proposal, the offeror must follow the instructions contained herein. The proposal must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation. The response shall consist of two (2) separate volumes; Part I –– Technical, and Part II– Price Proposal.

1.2. ONLY THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF INFORMATION REQUIRED TO PROVIDE FOR

PROPER EVALUATION IS REQUESTED. EFFORTS SHOULD BE MADE TO KEEP OFFERS AS

CONCISE AS POSSIBLE WITH THE EMPHASIS BEING ON PROVIDING INFORMATION

ESSENTIAL FOR PROPER EVALUATION. The proposal shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail to provide for adequate evaluation and for substantiation of the validity of stated claims. Submitted documents must contain adequate information to enable the evaluation board to fully ascertain offerors capability to perform contract requirements, must meet the requirements of the RFP, and must address the evaluation factors for award.

1.3 All information contained in the proposal that an offeror feels is “Proprietary Information” and therefore not releasable under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), should be labeled “Source Selection Information—See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.”

1.4. Offerors shall acknowledge awareness of all amendments to the solicitation by signing and dating Page 1 of each Standard Form 30, Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract, and including it in Volume 2, Price, of the proposal.

1.5 The Contracting Officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition for this acquisition so offerors are cautioned to submit their best pricing and technical information up-front.

2. FORMAL COMMUNICATIONS

2.1 Any formal communication shall be submitted in writing (via email) to the POCs below. It is the offeror’s responsibility to confirm receipt of all formal communications.

ACC AMIC/PKB

Ms. Imelda Reantaso and Capt Hannah Kosirog 129 Andrews Ave., Suite 110 Langley AFB, VA 23665-2788 Email: imelda.reantaso.1@us.af.mil and hannah.kosirog.1@us.af.mil Reference: Solicitation FA4890-17-R-0013

3. PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

3.1.The pre-proposal conference will be held at Detachment 11, 19351 McGregor, Bldg 1025, Beale AFB, CA, 95903 from 9:00 am – 3:00 pm, 10 May 2017. All potential offerors are encouraged to attend. Offerors desiring to attend the conference must pre-register by 5 May 2017, 12:00 pm Eastern Time (ET). Offerors that do not pre-register will not have access to the base/facilities. Full details pertaining to the conference can be found in Section 6 of the solicitation under clause AFFARS Clause 5352.215-9001 NOTICE OF PRE-BID/PRE- PROPOSAL CONFERENCE (MAY 1996). The Government will not be liable for any expense incurred by offerors prior to contract award.

3.2. Registration. The number of attendees shall not exceed 3 per company or 5 per joint venture/partner arrangement. The registration information shall include the company name, individual name(s), phone number and social security number of each attendee for security purposes and access to the base. The Government requests this information under the authority of 10 U.S.C. 8013. Offerors must submit their pre-registration notification by e-mail to Ms. Imelda Reantaso and Capt Hannah Kosirog.

3.3. Advance Questions. Questions concerning this solicitation should be submitted under separate cover, clearly marked as "Advance Questions" to include solicitation number, name of person submitting the question(s), company name and phone number. Each question should reference the specific section, paragraph and/or attachment number of the solicitation or PWS (as applicable). These questions must be received by ACC AMIC/PKB, NLT 3 May, 2017, 4:00 pm Eastern Time (ET) in order for an appropriate response to be given at the conference. Please submit your advance questions and registration information by email to Ms.

Imelda Reantaso and Capt Hannah Kosirog.

3.4. Remarks and Explanations. Remarks and explanations at the conference shall not alter the terms and conditions of the solicitation unless the solicitation is formally amended. Any oral statements by Government representatives shall not be binding upon the Government; the CO will make all necessary changes in writing via an amendment if required. If an offeror discovers discrepancies or omissions in any portion of the solicitation, the matter should be submitted in writing and provided to the CO as soon as the discrepancy is noted or not later than ten (10) days prior to the proposal due date.

4. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS

4.1. The original proposal and copies as specified in this document shall be sent to the issuing office listed in Block 9 of Standard Form (SF) 1449; Solicitation, /Contract/Order for Commercial Items; on or before the date and time specified in Block 8 of SF 1449. Please mark all packages as follows:

DO NOT OPEN IN MAIL ROOM

ATTN: Ms. Imelda Reantaso and Capt Hannah Kosirog

ACC AMIC/PKB

129 Andrews Ave., Suite 110 Langley AFB, VA 23665 Solicitation No. FA4890-17-R-0013, Volume # and Title

4.2. Offerors are cautioned to strictly comply with all instructions within this solicitation to ensure submission of a complete proposal. Failure to furnish a complete proposal at the time of proposal submission may result in the proposal being considered non-responsive to the Government and eliminated from consideration for award. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 52.212-1(f) “Late submission, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers.” If the proposal is received late, the Government will retain the unopened proposal. However, the proposal will not be evaluated or considered for award.

5. PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

5.1. The following instructions prescribe the format for proposals, and describe the approach to be used for the development and presentation of the proposal data. The proposal shall include all of the information requested in the specific instructions. Failure to include all information requested may adversely affect the evaluation and may result in a determination that the proposal is non-responsive. A proposal that merely reiterates or promises to accomplish the requirements of the PWS will be considered unacceptable. A proposal that is orderly and sufficiently documented will enable the Government to easily understand the proposal and perform a thorough and fair evaluation of it. The Government may incorporate into the contract by reference or full text portions of the successful offeror’s proposal as revised and supplemented through the Final Proposal Revision submitted in response to the solicitation.

5.2. Proposal Volumes. Proposals shall be prepared in two (2) separate and distinct volumes:

Volume I – Technical

Volume II –Price

5.3. Proposal Format. Specific guidance regarding format and content is discussed in the following paragraphs.

The Government will only read/evaluate the maximum number of pages allowed. The proposal content shall be formatted as follows:

a. Text: Single-spaced and printed on single-sided paper - no duplex

b. Font Size: Microsoft Office Word, Times New Roman, 12 font

c. Margins: One Inch (1”) left, right, top and bottom

d. Paper Size: 8½” x 11” with a background color of white or ivory stock only

e. Page Numbering: Sequential (i.e., 1 through 100)

Note: The font size requirement does not apply to charts, (i.e., Workload Manning Charts); however the font size must be reasonable and easily readable. Also, page numbering must be sequential throughout the entire document, and that new chapters/sections do not restart the page numbering.

5.4. Legal Size Paper/Fold-Outs. Any page within the proposal over the standard 8½” x 11” size paper shall be kept to a minimum, and only used where a table or other graph cannot be accommodated by a single 8½” x 11” page. Any text included in the fold-out shall be directly related to the fold-out contents. Fold-outs will be counted as the appropriate number of pages based on the number of folds (i.e., fold-outs with one fold shall count as one page; each additional fold counts as one additional page). All material shall be contained within the page limit identified for each volume.

5.5. Electronic Copies. Electronic copies shall be submitted on CD-ROM, CD-R or DVD using Microsoft Office 97 through Microsoft Office 2013 or Adobe PDF Version 8 or earlier, except for Volume II, Price, Section 3 of the RFP. Section 3 shall be submitted in Microsoft Excel format only. Offerors may use JPEG for charts or screen shots. Offerors shall name files using standard naming conventions (i.e., filename.doc for MS Word, filename.xls for MS Excel, filename.PDF for Portable Document Format, etc.). Do NOT submit any documents in PDF format that are copied as “images” or Windows Photo Gallery etc. PDF files shall enable textual search and copy functions. Each volume shall be in a single searchable, editable file and stored in a folder that corresponds to the proposal volume it represents. The files shall be named in an unambiguous manner, using plain language text, which facilitates the evaluator’s ease of accessing the files for evaluation.

Offerors shall insert the file name in the header of each document. All disks shall be virus checked prior to submission. Replacement disks will be required to update the final proposal resulting from any discussions should they occur. Electronic copy(s) of all proposal information is required for each volume. Information submitted in the electronic format shall not exceed the page limits stated below for each hard copy volume. If there are variances between the paper copy and the electronic copy, the paper copy will take precedence.

5.6. Copies and Page Limit. Evaluators will only read up to the maximum number of pages specified. All pages provided by the offeror in excess of the stated limitations will be returned to the offeror unread. Copy requirements and page limitations are as follows:

VOL TITLE PAPER

COPIES

CD ROM Page Limit Closing Date

1** TECHNICAL 6 1 100 7 Jun 17 2 PRICE 3 1 None 7 Jun 17

** Executive Summary shall be included in Volume I – Technical – limit is 2 pages

5.7. One copy of each Volume shall be marked “Original”. Page limitation is subject to exclusions stated in the paragraph titled “Exceptions” below. Further, the Government will not include the following in the page limitation:

Cover page(s), title pages or tables of contents, tab/section-divider pages, technical definition page(s), acronym list, cross reference matrix. Note: These pages will be counted if they contain any other information, (i.e., diagrams, extraneous data, etc). Pages marked “This Page Intentionally Left Blank” will also not be counted.

6. EXCEPTIONS

6.1. If the offeror finds it necessary to take exception to any of the requirements specified in this solicitation, clearly indicate such exception(s) in the appropriate volume along with a complete explanation of why the exception was taken and what benefit accrues to the Government. All substantive exceptions to the solicitation requirements and supporting rationale shall be identified as such and consolidated into an overview section of the subject volume.

An overview section is only required if the offeror takes exception to any requirement in the solicitation (the overview section will not be included in the proposal page limitation described above). While offerors may propose exceptions to the solicitation requirements, the Government is not obligated to accept or consider such exceptions. Further, exceptions could result in an unacceptable offer. Any change to the requirement as a result of accepting an exception shall be reflected within the resultant contract.

6.2. In the event the offeror takes no exception to the stated requirements, a statement to this effect is required at the front of each subject volume.

6.3. Additional Data. Contractor responsibility will be determined IAW FAR 9.104 and 9.105-2. For the purposes of contractor responsibility determination, past performance information may be obtained from sources such as the Government’s Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), the Defense Contract Management Agency, interviews with Program Managers, CO, and Award Fee Determining Officials, and other sources known to the Government. The Government reserves the right to obtain more past performance data from any source that it deems appropriate.

7. INSTRUCTIONS FOR VOLUME 1 – TECHNICAL

7.1. To facilitate the evaluation, the technical volume should be specific, detailed, and complete to clearly and fully demonstrate that the offeror has a thorough understanding of the requirements for the accomplishment of the effort. Statements that the offeror understands, can, or will comply with the PWS (including Air Force (AF) publications, technical requirements, etc.); statements paraphrasing the PWS or parts thereof; and phrases such as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used” etc., will be considered unacceptable. Offerors should note that data submitted prior to the proposal submission including data submitted for current contracts and other solicitations will not be considered in the Government’s evaluation. Therefore, such data should not be relied upon nor incorporated in the technical proposal by reference. Offerors shall address the requirements noted in this section by imperative verbs regardless of whether such requirements are preceded by “the offeror shall”. The offeror’s proposal shall at a minimum be prepared in a form consistent with the technical criteria set forth in Section 7, Evaluation Criteria, of this solicitation. All information that the offeror deems appropriate to address for this factor and its subfactors must be included in the proposal in an orderly format. The technical volume shall address all the technical subfactors.

7.2. Technical Contents

A. Table of Contents – A table of contents shall be included in Volume I. Each subfactor/aspect/section shall be clearly marked and tabbed for easy reference. The pages shall be numbered sequentially in a consistent manner as stated under Proposal Preparation Instructions.

B. Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms – Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used with an explanation for each. Glossaries do not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.

C. Executive Summary – Included in this volume is the offeror’s Executive Summary (limit is 2 pages).

D. Cross Reference Matrix – Each volume shall be written on a stand-alone basis so that its contents may be evaluated without cross referencing to other volumes of the proposal. Information required for proposal evaluation which is not found in its designated volume will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal. Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted where its use would conserve space without impairing clarity. The offeror shall fill out the cross reference matrix indicating the proposal reference information as it relates to the RFP, PWS, and CLIN references found therein.

F. Technical Section – The purpose of this section is to allow the offeror to set forth in the most comprehensive manner its understanding of the program requirements and to demonstrate its ability to meet the evaluation requirements of Section 7, Evaluation Criteria; Factor 2, Technical. In this section the offeror shall present a clear and concise description of how it plans to meet contract requirements. The offeror shall describe the performance standards that have been established in each area and explain how performance standards will be met or exceeded.

This section shall not contain any pricing data. The technical section shall be completed as follows:

i. Subfactor A: Manning Requirements and Analysis - The offeror shall describe their proposed understanding of the program requirements and demonstrate their ability to meet the evaluation requirement of, Aspect 1) Manning Requirements and Workload Analysis as described in Section 7, Evaluation Factors for Award.

Workload Analysis Charts – Offerors shall provide a workload analysis, based on PWS workload tables, that depicts the proposed labor categories for both full time and any part time positions, to include cross-matrixing of requirements, with full explanation of the offerors methodology for figuring personnel requirements. The analysis must address all direct, indirect and ancillary work hours. The Government also requires a Courseware Development Workload Chart to explain how staffing levels are determined to include estimated development times for each product. Offerors are encouraged to use the sample charts provided at (Appendix 3) in developing the breakdown to assist the Government in the evaluation process. Staff support positions specified as productive hours in Appendix 1 do not require workload analysis, but these positions must be reflected in the total manning proposed.

ii. Subfactor B: Training Management and Approach – The offeror shall describe their proposed understanding of the program requirements and demonstrate their ability to meet the evaluation requirement of, Aspect 1) Training Management and Approach, Aspect 2) Effective Management of Personnel Resources, and Aspect 3) RQ-4/U-2 Academic/Training Database.

iii. Subfactor C: Courseware Development Approach, Instructional Systems Development Plan (ISDMP) – The offeror shall describe proposed understanding of the program requirements and demonstrate their ability to meet the evaluation requirements of, Aspect 1) Courseware Development Approach and ISD Management Plan.

iv. Subfactor D: All Other Plans and Contractor Furnished Equipment – The offeror shall describe their proposed understanding of the program requirements and demonstrate their ability to meet the evaluation requirements of, Aspect 1) Phase-In/Phase-Out Plan, Aspect 2) Training and Certification Plan, and Aspect 3) Contractor’s Quality Control Plan as described in Section 7, Evaluation Factors for

Award.

7.3. Failure to include all information requested may adversely affect the evaluation and may result in a determination that the proposal is non-responsive. Award CANNOT be made to a nonresponsive offeror.

8. INSTRUCTIONS FOR VOLUME 2 -- PRICE PROPOSAL

8.1. The offeror shall complete Section 3 of the solicitation (Schedule of Supplies and Services (CLINS)) by inserting the price elements (unit price and extended amount) for all Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract line item numbers (CLINS) for Phase-In, Base Year and all Option Years. For ease of administration, all pricing should be rounded to whole dollar amounts and evenly divisible by 12. Cost Reimbursable Travel and Reproduction CLINS: A Not to Exceed (NTE) amount has been pre-established for these CLINS. These pre-established amounts are to be included in the offerors proposal. The price proposal shall also contain the following:

8.2. Complete in its entirety the "Offeror" portion of the Standard Form 1449. An official having authority to legally bind the company contractually must sign and date the Standard Form 1449. One copy of the Standard Form 1449 must bear an original signature and if applicable, all amendments. Failure to acknowledge any amendments to the solicitation can result in an offeror being deemed nonresponsive. Award CANNOT be made to a nonresponsive offeror. Note: Be sure to sign and date where required.

8.3. Representations and Certifications. Complete the required Representations and Certifications or indicate if information is contained in the System for Award Management (SAM) located at https://www.sam.gov.

8.4. Supporting Price Backup Data. Certified cost or pricing data is not required. However, supporting data is requested to verify that pricing is balanced per FAR 15.404-1(g). Supporting data should explain the methodology used in developing proposed CLIN prices. Supporting data shall be provided in a table format, to include, at a minimum, a breakdown (by CLIN) of labor (labor category, number of positions and productive hours), breakout of Other Direct Costs (ODC), direct and indirect rates, and subcontract costs. The Government reserves the right to request additional pricing information after receipt and evaluation of proposals.

9. DEBRIEFING OF OFFERORS

9.1. Debriefings are conducted with the goal of identifying to unsuccessful offerors where changes can be made to improve future source selection participation.

9.2. Successful or unsuccessful offerors may request debriefings by providing a written request to the Procuring CO.

Debriefings shall be conducted in accordance with FAR 15.505(a) (1) for pre-award debriefings and FAR 15.506(d) for post-award debriefings.

10. DISPOSITION OF UNSUCCESSFUL PROPOSALS

10.1. In compliance with FAR Subpart 4.8, the Government will retain one hard copy of all unsuccessful proposals;

all additional copies will be destroyed by the Government.

Appendix 3 to Section 6 Sample Manning Charts

Table 1 – Sample Overall Manning Chart ofr all contract years by CLIN

The following positions are for reference only; use what is required per the PWS I/SME – Instructor/Subject Matter Expert ID – Instructional Developer ET – Education Technologist GA – Graphic Artist IT – Information Technology

The CWD chart (Table 2) is to include the breakdown for Interactive Courseware (ICW) and Instructor-Led Non- ICW development. The breakdown should show the estimated development effort for a one-hour lesson package showing the percentage of work each specialty on the CWD team contributes.

Table 2 – Sample CWD Chart

Table 3 – Sample CWD Manning Chart

Note: Numbers and position information presented in the tables above are for clarifiction purposes only.

These tables are not representative profile of workload effort for this solicitation.

SAMPLE OVERALL MANNING CHART FY13

SITE

Category Site Manager I/SME ID ET GA IT Position as needed Position as needed

CAT 0.5 0.3 0.2

CWD 0.7 0.7 0.7

Administrative 1.0 0.3 0.1

Off‐Site 0.4 Total Proposed Manning 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0

Skill / Position

Syllabus Tests Total Hours 103 55 504 27 11 0

Courseware Development Effort per Hour/Unit

SITE

needed

Position as needed

Total Hours/Unit

New Equivalents*

Total Hrs Annual

IRC 1.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 0.4 4.8

Skill / Position

SECTION 7

SECTION 7 of the Solicitation

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (Oct 2014)

1. BASIS OF AWARD

1.1. This competitive best value source selection will be conducted using the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection process in accordance with Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15, Contracting by Negotiation, Department of Defense (DoD) Source Selection Procedures effective 1 Apr 2016 and Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFFARS) Mandatory Procedures

5315.3 Source Selection dated 27 Jan 2017. One award will be made as a result of this solicitation to the offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, whose proposal conforms to the solicitations requirements, is the lowest evaluated price with an “Acceptable” rating in all technical subfactors respectively. If an offeror fails to meet all solicitation requirements, the Government may not make an award to that offeror. The LPTA source selection process does not permit tradeoffs between price and non-price factors.

1.2. IAW FAR 15.306, Exchanges With Offerors After Receipt of Proposals, and 52.215-1, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and reserves the right to open discussions, or to award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.

1.3. The Government reserves the right to incorporate into this contract, by reference or full text, portions of the successful offeror’s proposal submitted in response to this solicitation and as revised and supplemented through the date of Final Proposal Revision (FPR). The Performance Work Statement (PWS) and the terms and conditions of this this contract take precedence over any ambiguity in the contractor’s proposal. In those areas where the contractor’s proposal exceeds the stated PWS requirements, the contractor’s proposal is binding and prevails. The contractor is expected and required to adhere to their proposed approach in meeting the contract requirements.

1.4. A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

2. FINAL PROPOSAL REVISION (FPR)

2.1. The Government reserves the right to open discussions, or to award without discussions based on the initial proposals submitted. Therefore, offerors are cautioned to submit their best proposal initially. However, discussions may be held and result in Final Proposal Revisions (FPRs). The intent of FPRs is for price changes only, however, technical changes will be evaluated. The Government cautions offerors not to change material aspects of their technical proposals as this could render the offeror’s proposal technically unacceptable and therefore unawardable.

This provision is not intended to restrict the offeror’s opportunity to revise figures (i.e., prices, discounts, percentages, rates, etc). Rather, it is intended to preclude any misunderstandings by the Government which could result if new or revised terms and conditions are submitted in the FPR that have not been fully disclosed, discussed and understood during discussions or negotiations. Hence, such new or revised terms and conditions are not solicited and, if submitted in the FPR, may render the offer unacceptable to the Government. The Government intends to award without obtaining any further revisions or conducting any further discussions.

3. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY

3.1. The award decision will be made on the basis of Lowest Price Technically Acceptable. In order to be eligible for award, offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions; representations and certifications; evaluation factor requirements; be deemed responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, and have a satisfactory performance record (see FAR 9.104-3(b) and Subpart 42.15). If an offeror fails to meet all solicitation requirements, the Government may not make an award to that offeror.

3.2. Proposals will be evaluated using two Factors: (1) Technical, and (2) Price. There are four subfactors under the technical factor. They are (A) Manning Requirements and Analysis, (B) Training Management and Approach, (C) Courseware Development Approach and Instructional Systems Development Management Plan (ISDMP), and (D) All Other Plans and Contractor-Furnished Equipment. All subfactors are equal in importance in regard to technical acceptability.

3.3. Technical acceptability will be determined, and the price will be evaluated to determine if it is fair and reasonable. The Government reserves the right to award without discussions, open discussions, or to establish the competitive range IAW FAR 15.306(c). If discussions are utilized, Evaluation Notices (ENs) will be issued to those offerors in the competitive range allowing them the opportunity to revise their proposals. Once the SSEB determines that all ENs have been satisfactorily answered, discussions will be closed. Once discussions have concluded, if an offeror’s proposal has an “Unacceptable” rating for any non-price subfactor, this proposal will be unawardable. Proposals shall meet the PWS requirements and the evaluation criteria requirements.

4. EVALUATION FACTORS

4.1. Factor 1 – Technical: The technical rating reflects the degree to which the offeror’s proposal meets or does not meet the minimum performance or capability requirements. The focus is on the ability of the offerors proposal to meet the minimum requirements of the PWS. Technical proposals will be assessed a rating of "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" at the subfactor level IAW Table C-1 of the DoD Source Selection Procedures effective 1 Apr 2016; an overall factor level rating will not be assigned. To be eligible for award, offerors are required to receive an “Acceptable” rating in each technical subfactor. Proposals that exceed the evaluation criteria will not receive higher ratings. In assessing the acceptability of each subfactor, any weaknesses or deficiencies will be noted in accordance with the definitions located in Chapter 5 of the DoD Source Selection Procedures. Proposals that receive weaknesses or deficiencies in an aspect under a subfactor will receive an “Unacceptable” subfactor rating.

Table C-1: Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

4.1.1. Subfactor A: Manning Requirements and Analysis

Aspect 1: Manning Requirements and Workload Analysis. The offeror’s proposed approach must provide an effective organizational structure to successfully accomplish mission requirements. This aspect is met when the offeror’s proposal thoroughly substantiates all of the following:

A. Manning calculations/charts accurately reflect all the CAT and CWD workload from PWS Appendix 1 for primary and optional CLINs.

B. Workload analysis sufficiently demonstrates how proposed CAT and CWD manning levels for primary CLINs were determined including all direct (PWS Appendix 1), indirect and ancillary workload

C. Proposal provides adequate manning levels and specialty mix to accomplish student training and courseware development requirements represented in the workload tables in Appendix 1.

4.1.2. Subfactor B: Training Management and Approach

Aspect 1: Training Management and Approach. The offeror’s proposal provides an effective organizational structure to successfully accomplish mission requirements documented in a Training Workload Management Plan IAW PWS paragraph 1.4.2. This aspect is met when the offeror’s proposal thoroughly identifies and explains their processes and understanding of the following:

A. Proposal contains an adequate management approach, methods and policies to ensure crewmembers are trained and courseware is developed in accordance with the PWS.

Aspect 2: Effective Management of Personnel Resources. The offeror’s proposal clearly demonstrates effective management of personnel resources. This aspect is met when the offeror’s proposal thoroughly demonstrates clear processes for all of the following:

A. Proposal clearly defines the duties and responsibilities of the Site Managers/Alternate Site Managers.

B. Proposal demonstrates clear lines of authority and lines of communication between key USAF and contactor personnel.

C. If subcontractor/ partner(s) are proposed, provide an organizational chart clearly defining the prime and subcontractor/ partner(s) roles, duties, percentage of work, and responsibilities.

Aspect 3: RQ-4/U-2 Academic/Training Database. The offeror’s proposed Academic/Training Database equipment/processes as described in PWS paragraph 1.7.10. This aspect is met when the offeror’s proposal satisfies the requirements of PWS paragraph 1.7.10.

4.1.3. Subfactor C: Courseware Development Approach and Instructional Systems Development Management Plan (ISDMP)

Aspect 1: Courseware Development Approach and ISD Management Plan. The offeror’s proposal provides an Instructional Systems Development Management Plan (ISDMP) IAW PWS 1.5.2. which demonstrates a thorough understanding of, and application of the principles and processes outlined in the AF’s current model of ISD. The reference is AF Handbook 36-2235, Information for Designers of Instructional Systems. This aspect is met when the offeror’s proposal thoroughly demonstrates all of the following:

A. Clearly describes the ISD activities to be performed during the analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation of the training materials.

B. Clearly describes how ISD tasks are correlated with the completion of deliverable products.

C. Clearly describe how the ISD effort is managed for each supported agency to include methods and procedures used in the application of the ISD process for tracking courseware development milestones and courseware delivery schedule production.

4.1.4. Subfactor D: All Other Plans and Contractor Furnished Equipment

Aspect 1: Phase-In/Phase-Out Plan. The offeror’s proposed approach provides an executable plan and sufficiently addresses Phase In and Phase Out per PWS paragraph 1.7.8. This aspect is met when the offeror’s proposed plan thoroughly covers the following:

A. Milestone chart with phased timelines for implementation to ensure transition is completed to support on-time full contract performance.

B. Clearly explains allocation of personnel and resources to ensure assumption of all contract responsibilities on the performance start date.

C. Provides detailed list of Contractor Furnished Equipment that is compliant with Air Force Network Integration Center (AFNIC) approved products list and sufficiently meets Base Communication Squadron system integration requirements.

Aspect 2: Training and Certification Plan. The offeror’s proposed approach provides for personnel that are qualified, trained and certified to successfully accomplish PWS requirements. This aspect is met when the offeror’s proposed plan demonstrates clear processes for the following:

A. Clearly defines initial employee training and instructor certifications and how these will be conducted for all CAT and CWD personnel IAW PWS para 1.8.2.2 & 1.8.2.3

B. Clearly defines instructor/subject matter expert (I/SME) employee continuation training currency and certifications and how these will be conducted to sustain mission requirements IAW PWS para 1.8.2.2.

Aspect 3: Quality Control Plan (QCP). Quality Control Plan (QCP). The offeror’s proposal provides a Quality Control Plan IAW PWS 1.5.2.8. This aspect is met when the offeror’s proposal thoroughly demonstrates all of the following:

A. QCP contains ISO 9001-based quality management systems.

B. Clearly explains the inspection system used to cover all services listed in the Service Summary (refer to PWS Section 2), with specifics as to the areas to be inspected on a scheduled and unscheduled basis, frequency of inspections, and the title and organizational placement of the inspectors.

C. Clearly explains the records documenting inspections and corrective or preventive measures taken and how these records will be maintained and made available to the Government.

4.2. Factor – Price

4.2.1. Price will be evaluated using techniques established in FAR 15.404-1 to ensure the Government receives a fair, reasonable and balanced price.

4.2.1.1. In addition to the price analysis as described at FAR 15.404-1(b), price proposals will be analyzed to identify any potential unbalanced pricing (See FAR 15.404-1(g)). If the Government sees a wide variation in proposed contract line item prices, the technical evaluation board will be informed as soon as possible during the initial evaluation of proposals so the appropriate personnel may seek clarity through offeror exchanges. Absent any issues related to the stated requirement, unbalanced pricing may pose an unacceptable risk to the Government and may be a reason to reject an offeror’s proposal

4.2.1.2. There is a great expectation of competition for this requirement; thus offerors are cautioned to present their best price proposal up-front. The offeror’s price proposal shall represent the offeror’s best effort to respond to the solicitation. In instances where an offeror receives acceptable technical rating, yet proposed prices appear exceptionally low, offerors may be requested to address this disparity, providing evidence of their capability and/or experience providing similar service(s) at similar price(s). An exceptionally or unrealistically low offer may pose an unacceptable risk to the Government and may be a reason to reject an offeror’s proposal.

4.2.1.3. If the Government cannot determine the proposed pricing to be fair and reasonable, other than cost and pricing data will be obtained from the offerors. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all CLINS including phase-in, basic period, option years, and fifty percent (50%) of the last option period price to cover the option to extend services IAW clause 52.217-8. This clause allows for up to an additional 6 months of continued contract performance if required. Offerors shall not include pricing in their proposal for this clause.

NOTE: Evaluation of the option periods, and option CLINs shall not obligate the Government to exercise such options.

(End of Summary of Changes)