Attch 7 PP Questionairre.docx
DOCX document 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4887-11-R-0005
About this file
Attch 7 PP Questionairre
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 11-R-0005-P0002.doc | DOC document | |
| Questions Asked.docx | DOCX document | |
| Post Sign-in Sheet.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Avante lights cut sheet.pdf | ||
| revised shop drawings bldg 978.pdf | ||
| 11-R-0005-0001.doc | DOC document | |
| B978 mail shop sketches.pdf | ||
| Attch 6 PP Information.rtf | RTF text file | |
| Attch 5 MIL-HDBK-419Apdf.pdf | ||
| Attch 4 AFOSHSTD91-501.pdf | ||
| Attch 3 AFOSHSTD91-66.pdf | ||
| Solicitation.doc | DOC document | |
| Attch 1 Base Specs.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attch 2 AFI32-1065.pdf |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA4887-11-R-0005, Attachment 7
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
WHEN COMPLETED THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
1. Contractor:
1. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to:
1. Contract number:
Contract type:
1. Was this a competitive contract?
1. Period of performance:
1. Initial contract cost:
Current/final contract cost:
1. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:
1. Description of service provided:
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
1. Customer or agency name:
1. Customer or Agency description (if applicable):
1. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
1. Evaluator's name:
1. Evaluator's phone/fax number: PHONE:
FAX:
Number of year’s evaluator worked on subject contract:
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the |
contractor were effective.
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Neutral |
| Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against. |
E
G
S
M
U
N
Technical Performance T1 Quality & repeatability of operations & maintenance.
T2. Quality of technical system testing and certification efforts
T3 Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts
T4 Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements
T5 Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures
Program Management P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)
P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
P4. Ability to understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements
P5. Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations
P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts
P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)
P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management
P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer
P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.
E
G
S
M
U
N
Transition/phase-in T1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.
T2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.
Employee Retention/Attraction E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.
E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.
E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.
Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation S1. Ability to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan
S2. Ability to effectively manage small business participation to meet technical performance.
Cost Performance C1 Accuracy in forecasting contract costs
C2 Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs
C3 Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur
C4 Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting
1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or U (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.)
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?
What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
| Mailing Address: | 56th Contracting Squadron |
| 14100 W. Eagle Street | |
| ATTN: SSgt William Silvers | |
| Luke AFB, AZ 85309-1217 |
Or FAX to: 623-856-3438
Or e-mail to: william.silvers@luke.af.mil
Telephone: 623-856-7179 ext 254
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .