Attch 7 PP Questionairre.docx

DOCX document 24 KB Posted

Attached to
Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4887-11-R-0005
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command

About this file

Attch 7 PP Questionairre

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER), newest first.
File Type Posted
11-R-0005-P0002.doc DOC document
Questions Asked.docx DOCX document
Post Sign-in Sheet.xls XLS spreadsheet
Avante lights cut sheet.pdf PDF
revised shop drawings bldg 978.pdf PDF
11-R-0005-0001.doc DOC document
B978 mail shop sketches.pdf PDF
Attch 6 PP Information.rtf RTF text file
Attch 5 MIL-HDBK-419Apdf.pdf PDF
Attch 4 AFOSHSTD91-501.pdf PDF
Attch 3 AFOSHSTD91-66.pdf PDF
Solicitation.doc DOC document
Attch 1 Base Specs.docx DOCX document
Attch 2 AFI32-1065.pdf PDF
Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA4887-11-R-0005, Attachment 7

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

WHEN COMPLETED THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

1. Contractor:

1. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to:

1. Contract number:

Contract type:

1. Was this a competitive contract?

1. Period of performance:

1. Initial contract cost:

Current/final contract cost:

1. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

1. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

1. Customer or agency name:

1. Customer or Agency description (if applicable):

1. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

1. Evaluator's name:

1. Evaluator's phone/fax number: PHONE:

FAX:

Number of year’s evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

Rating
Definition
Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the

contractor were effective.

Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Neutral
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

E

G

S

M

U

N

Technical Performance T1 Quality & repeatability of operations & maintenance.

T2. Quality of technical system testing and certification efforts

T3 Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts

T4 Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements

T5 Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures

Program Management P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

P4. Ability to understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements

P5. Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations

P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts

P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)

P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management

P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.

E

G

S

M

U

N

Transition/phase-in T1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

T2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

Employee Retention/Attraction E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.

Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation S1. Ability to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan

S2. Ability to effectively manage small business participation to meet technical performance.

Cost Performance C1 Accuracy in forecasting contract costs

C2 Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs

C3 Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur

C4 Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting

1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or U (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.)

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?

What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address:56th Contracting Squadron
14100 W. Eagle Street
ATTN: SSgt William Silvers
Luke AFB, AZ 85309-1217

Or FAX to: 623-856-3438

Or e-mail to: william.silvers@luke.af.mil

Telephone: 623-856-7179 ext 254

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .