Attachment 6 PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.doc
DOC document 79 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Watercraft Operations and Maintenance Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4819-09-R-0011
About this file
Attachment 6 Psat and Present Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 7 DOL WD 04-0047 Rev 9.doc | DOC document | |
| Questions and Answers.doc | DOC document | |
| Site Visit Meeting Minutes.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement 5 Jun 09 Amendment 01.doc | DOC document | |
| Revised Watercraft Pre-Proposal Conference Slides.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| Attachment 7 DOL WD 07-0134 Rev 5.doc | DOC document | |
| FA4819-09-R-0011 Request For Proposal Amendment 001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 WD 2005-3007 Rev 8.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 2 DD254.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 Draft WC Performance Plan.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA4819-09-R-0011 Request for Proposal.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 3 DOL WD 1994-0196 Rev 22.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement 5 Jun 09.doc | DOC document |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND
CREATED: January 1994
OPR: HQ ACC/IMPSP (W. Bryson)
5 Jun 2009
MEMORANDUM FOR:
FROM: 325 CONS/LGCB
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
1. You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a Watercraft Operations and Maintenance contract at Tyndall AFB, FL.
2. Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact Lt John Purcell at (850) 283-8668 or via e-mail at john.purcell@tyndall.af.mil or the undersigned at (850) 283-2974 or via e-mail at angela.maher@tyndall.af.mil.
ANGELA M. MAHER
Contracting Officer 1 Attach.
Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________
Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________
__________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________
(The government enters the following information based on list of references provided by the offeror. The offeror will enter this information if the solicitation requires him to submit questionnaires to the references.)
Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________* Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________* Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent:
_____________________ Title: ____________________________
Address: _____________________
Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________
Fax Number:
Email Address: _____________________
C. FAX OR E-MAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:
_John Purcell 850-283-8491__or john.purcell@tyndall.af.mil______ D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________
Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| Were you satisfied with the quality of services received? |
| 2. |
| Did the contractor maintain accurate records and submit timely reports that were part of the contract requirements? |
| 3. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies |
| 4. |
| Was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems |
without extensive guidance from government counterparts
| 5. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 6. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 7. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 8. |
| Did the contractor provide the necessary equipment and materials to meet the contract requirements? |
| 9. |
| Did the contractor maintain government/ contractor equipment in a safe and usable manner? |
| 10. |
| Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. |
| 11. |
| Did the contractor provide effective Quality Control/ inspection |
procedures throughout the duration of awarded contract?
| 12. |
| The contractor demonstrated the ability to quickly remedy deficiencies in management and overall contract performance. |
| 13. |
| Provide an experienced manager, and key personnel with the technical and administrative abilities to meet contract requirement. |
| 14. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 15. |
| The contractor demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain and replace in a timely manner, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 16. |
| Allow site manager sufficient authority to make decisions or take |
actions during project performance.
| 17. |
| Contractors ability to meet the terms of the contract within the |
contractually agreed price.
| 18. |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
| 19. |
| Has the contractor demonstrated unreasonable and uncooperative behavior |
in resolving technical or contractual issues?
YES/NO
| 20. |
| Did this offeror have a necessary experience in "watercraft Operations |
or similar type services"?
YES/NO
| 21. |
| Did modifications require extensive negotiations? |
YES/NO
| 22. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in "remarks" |
YES/NO
| 23. |
| Did the contractor follow through after contract award on the terms outlined in their proposal (i.e. organizational plan, staffing plan, quality control plan)? |
| YES/NO |
| 24. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not explain in "remarks" |
YES/NO
| 25. |
| Is the contract rated in CPARS? |
| YES/NO |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER __________
Remarks:___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When Filled in This Document is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104
FA4819-09-R-0011
Attachment 6
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .