Washer and Dryers Addendum-21Q0073.docx

Addendum 52.212-1

1. Instructions for preparation of proposals Proposal Specifics:

All proposals must include the following information:

1. Proposal shall include the contractor’s Technical Capability as follows:

a) A technical description/illustration of the appliances being offered in sufficient detail to evaluate compliance with the requirements of the attached PWS. This includes, but is not limited to product literature, specification sheets, drawings, or other documents, as found necessary to indicate the vendor’s ability to perform the requirements in the PWS.

b) Contractor shall indicate ability to achieve the stated period of performance.

c) Contractor must indicate that Energy Star rated equipment is being proposed in accordance with section 4.5 of the attached PWS.

2. Proposal shall include the contractor’s Price Quotation as follows:

a) Contractor’s unit and total price relating to each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN). To include a detailed breakdown justifying contractor’s proposals, including but not limited to profit, taxes, labor hours, equipment cost, maintenance cost and materials.

1) Vendor must note that separate CLINs, are not prescribed for the purpose of associated costs entailing taxes, fees, transportation, delivery, etc. Accordingly, proposals unit pricing for requirements at the CLIN level under this solicitation, shall be all inclusive of all associated costs (i.e. all material, transportation, labor, delivery, etc.)

b. discount for prompt payment-if any

3. Company Point of Contact with name, address, email address, and telephone number.

4. Proposals must be valid for a period of no less than 90 days.

NOTE: Vendor specific terms and conditions that may be contingently proposed for subsequent inclusion into the contract will not be considered by the Government in its evaluation of the quotations. This aspect also includes the Government’s exclusion from requests by vendor to enter into supplemental agreements from their respective company in order to conduct business under a resultant contract award. Vendors that are not able to comply with aforementioned conditions will be determined as noncompliant with the solicitation requirements and therefore may be removed from consideration for award.

NOTICE TO OFFERORS:

PLEASE BE ADVISED- Offerors should not expect more than a 10 day mobilization/transition time between the release of the actual award of the contract and the anticipated start of performance 1 Oct 2021. Offeror needs to factor this into their decision to proposed, as the awardee shall be expected to be fully operational to perform the requirements in the PWS.

All questions are due by August 9th at 9:00 a.m EST.

(End of Addendum)

Addendum 52.212-2 Evaluation

a) The Government intends to award a purchase order resulting from this Request for Quotation (RFQ) to the vendor whose quotation conforms to the solicitation and is considered the most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate quotations:

1. Price

2. Technical Capability

b) The Government will establish each offeror’s total proposed price for the base period by adding the proposed price for all base year CLINs. The proposed price for each option period will be added together to establish the total evaluated price (TEP). The resultant pricing will be added to the offer schedule as calculated above.

c) Basis of Award: The award will be made to the vendor whose quotation represents the best value to the government. As allowed by FAR 13.106-2(b)(1), the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) shall be applied. Award will be made to the vendor who is deemed responsible and responsive, and represents the best value to the government based on selection of the lowest evaluated price that is deemed technically acceptable. To be eligible for award, the proposal must meet all the technical requirements, conform to all required terms and conditions, and provide all information required. The technical data will be evaluated on an “acceptable” or unacceptable” basis. If the proposal received is determined “unacceptable” in the technical factor, the vendor will be excluded from the competition and will not be considered for award. Only those proposals with “acceptable” ratings for the technical evaluation will be considered for award.

(End of Provision)