Solicitation Amendment FA480026Q00230001 SF 30.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

J

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

19 Mar 2026

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE

REQUISITION NUMBER

5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE FA4800

FA4800 633 CONS LGCP

14 BURRELL ST BLDG 67, CP 757 225-1669

LANGLEY AFB, VA 23665

UNITED STATES

Lester Yearwood, Email: lester.yearwood.1@us.af.mil Vanity Wright, Email: vanity.wright@us.af.mil Telephone: 7577642313

7. ADMINISTERED BY (if other than Item 6)

CODE

SCD: PAS:

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE: FACILITY CODE:

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

FA480026Q0023

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

17 Mar 2026

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER

NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; 1 or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (if required) See Section G - Contract Administration Data

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK

ONE

A.THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NUMBER IN

ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.)

SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The reason for this amendment is to remove the site visit requirement from the Instructions to Offerors; no site visit will be held.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

Vanity L. Wright

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

19 Mar 2026

Computer generated. Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA-FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Evaluation Factors for Award

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

Evaluation Factors for Award

52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services. (Nov 2021)

(a) Evaluation factors. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

The following factors will be used to evaluate offers:

Price, Technical and Past Performance

(b) Options (if applicable).The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement.

The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(1) This competitive best value award will be conducted using an 100% Small Business Set-Aside. One award will be made to the offeror whose proposal conforms to the solicitation requirements and has the lowest evaluated price with an "Acceptable" rating in all technical subfactors. Proposals that exceed the evaluation criteria will not receive higher ratings. If an offeror fails to meet all solicitation requirements, the Government may not make an award to that offeror. The best value process does not permit tradeoffs between price and non-price factors. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer (CO) later determines them to be necessary.

(2) The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers. Technical and past performance are equal in importance to price.

Factor 1: Price

Factor 2: Technical

Factor 3: Past Performance

EVALUATION OF PRICE

Price will be evaluated in accordance with RFO FAR 12.204(a) to ensure the Government receives a fair, reasonable and balanced price. If the Government cannot determine the proposed pricing to be fair and reasonable, then "Other Than Certified Cost and Pricing Data" will be obtained from the offeror.

There is an expectation of competition for this requirement; offeror is cautioned to present their best price proposal upfront. The offeror's price proposal shall represent the offeror's best effort to respond to the solicitation.

EVALUATION OF TECHNICAL

The technical rating reflects the degree to which the offeror's proposal meets or does not meet the minimum performance or capability requirements. The focus is on the ability of the offeror proposal to meet the minimum requirements of the Statement of Work (SOW). The offeror shall submit information clearly identifying how they will meet the following technical criteria:

Subfactor 1 - Offerors shall detail their procedures for ensuring accurate laboratory analysis and reporting in accordance with SOW 1.1.3 and 1.1.

Technical proposals will be evaluated on an "Acceptable/Unacceptable" basis. To receive a rating of "Acceptable," the offeror must adequately address their plan to meet the above-mentioned technical criteria. The offeror must receive a rating of "Acceptable" for technical in order to be eligible for award.

Table 1. Technical

Adjectival Rating Description

FA480026Q00230001

Acceptable The offer clearly meets the minimum technical requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable The offer does not clearly meet the minimum technical requirements of the solicitation

EVALUATION OF PAST PERFORMANCE

Past Performance will be rated on an "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" basis at the overall factor level using the ratings shown below.

Past Performance Evaluation Ratings

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offerors performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offerors performance record is unknown

Unaccepta ble

Based on the offerors performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort

Offerors without a past performance rating will receive a neutral, or "Acceptable" rating.

EVALUATION PROCESS

For purposes of efficiency, the Government will evaluate a minimum of the three (3) lowest priced offerors for technical acceptability. If the three lowest priced offerors are evaluated with an "Acceptable" rating in past performance and are determined to be responsible in accordance with FAR 9.104, the evaluation process will stop at this point. If one of the three (3) lowest priced offerors is determined to be "Unacceptable" in technical or is determined to be non-responsible in accordance with FAR 9.104, the next lowest priced offeror will be evaluated for technical acceptability, and the process will continue (in order of price ranking) until three offerors are evaluated as having "Acceptable" technical are determined responsible.

(End of Section)

FA480026Q00230001