Atch_6_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 108 KB Posted

Attached to
AFFSC Support Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4690-19-R-0001
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

About this file

Attachment 6: Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to AFFSC Support Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
FA4690-19-R-0001_Amendment_03_SF30.pdf PDF
Atch_9_Additional_Questions_Amendment_3.pdf PDF
Atch_1_PWS_Amendment_2.pdf PDF
FA469019R0001_SF30_Amendment_2.pdf PDF
Atch_8_Questions_and_Answers_Amendment_2.pdf PDF
SF30_Amend_1.pdf PDF
Atch_4_Bid_Schedule_Rev._1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA469019R0001;_SF1449.pdf PDF
Atch_2_Composite_Accuracy_Table_(Appendix_A).pdf PDF
Atch_7_AFFSC_QASP.pdf PDF
Atch_1_Performance_Work_Statement.pdf PDF
Atch_5_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_Letter.pdf PDF
Atch_4_Bid_Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch_3_WD_15-5367_(Rev._8).pdf PDF
DRAFT_PWS.pdf PDF
Composite_Accuracy_Table.pdf PDF
DRAFT_RFP.pdf PDF
Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 6 Solicitation: FA4690-19-R-0001

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

28TH CONTRACTING SQUADRON (AFGSC)

ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE SOUTH DAKOTA

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

1. GENERAL INFORMATION:

Contractor’s Name:Telephone Number:
Address:Point of Contact:
Email:
CAGE Code:DUNS Number:
Contract Number:Dollar Amount:
Contract Type:Date of Award:

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:

Project Title and Brief Description of Work or Services performed: ** Contractor performed as the |_| Prime Contractor |_| Sub-Contractor *Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: __________________________ Title: ____________________________

Address: ________________________________Telephone Number: ___________________
________________________________Email Address: _______________________

C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: Bernard.clemens@us.af.mil and kathleen.green@us.af.mil.

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (A, U and UNK) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. Please provide an explanation for any ratings of U.

Rating
Definition
Acceptable (A)
Based on the offeror's performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror's performance record is unknown.
Unacceptable (U)
Based on the offeror's performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Unknown (UNK)
In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so spars that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _________________ CONTRACT NUMBER: ________________

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above. Explain the circumstances of any “unsatisfactory” rating or general comments in the “Remarks” area of each item.

A
U
UKN
1
Rate how well the contractor provided adequate, competent and qualified personnel capable of meeting contract requirements throughout the performance period of the contract.

Remarks:

A
U
UKN
2
Rate how well the contractor perform(s/ed) the terms of the contract within the contractually agreed price.
A
U
UKN
3
Rate how timely and sufficient the contractor’s resources (manning levels, etc.) were/are to meet contract requirements (technical, management, and contractual).

Remark:

A
U
UKN
4
Rate how well the contractor respond(s/ed) to and act(s/ed) on customer feedback.
A
U
UKN
5
Rate how well the contractor demonstrate(s/d) a reasonable and cooperative business relationship with the Government’s Program Management and Contract Management teams.
A
U
UKN
6
Rate the effectiveness of the contractor’s security and safety program to ensure compliance with federal, state and local regulations.
A
U
UKN
7
Rate how timely and effective the contractor’s responses to and resolution of problems were/are.
A
U
UKN
8
Rate how flexible, cooperative, and reasonable the contractor was/is in meeting mission requirements, particularly during short-notice mission changes.
A
U
UKN
9
Rate how responsive the contractor’s quality program was/is in identifying, correcting, and preventing initial and recurring contract discrepancies.
A
U
UKN
10
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice, or was the contract terminated? If yes, please explain.

YES

(remarks below)

NO

11
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, please explain.
YES
NO

E-Mail to: bernard.clemens@us.af.mil kathleen.green@us.af.mil

For Official Use Only Page 1 of 3 image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it.