Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 202 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA468624Q0531
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire that appears to be part of a federal contract opportunity. The questionnaire provides a template for assessing the past performance of a contractor across various categories such as quality of product/service, schedule, cost control, business relations, management of key personnel, reliability, customer support, and overall performance. The assessment allows the contracting officer to rate the contractor's performance as Unsatisfactory, Marginal, Satisfactory, Very Good, or Exceptional.
The related federal contract opportunity is for Air and Space Expo Parking and Traffic Management Plan services at Beale AFB. The contractor must have recent experience (within the past two years) managing traffic and parking for military open houses, air shows, or air expos with approximately 12,000 parking spots per day. The contractor must also demonstrate knowledge and experience working with local area authorities. The proposal is due by a specified date, with questions and concerns to be submitted by an earlier deadline. The contracting officer and points of contact are identified.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
9th Contracting Squadron Past Performance Questionnaire
1. COMPANY NAME:
PROJECT NAME:
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: CONTRACT TYPE (if applicable):
CONTRACT AWARD DATE: CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:
AWARDED VALUE: CURRENT CONTRACT DOLLAR VALUE:
2. NAME OF ASSESSING OFFICIAL:
EMAIL: PHONE NUMBER:
ASSOCIATION WITH FIRM BEING RATED (including role):
CONTRACT OR ORDER NUMBER:
3. ASSESS THE FOLLOWING AREAS: (Check the appropriate box for each assessment category)
4. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Assessment Categories Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Exceptional N/A
a. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE
b. SCHEDULE
c. COST CONTROL
d. BUSINESS RELATIONS
e. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL
f. RELIABILITY
g. CUSTOMER SUPPORT
h. OVERALL PERFORMANCE
i. OTHER AREAS:
(1)
(2)
5. ASSERTION OF RELEVANCY:
| 1 COMPANY NAME: |
| PROJECT NAME: |
| PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: |
| CONTRACT TYPE if applicable: |
| CONTRACT AWARD DATE: |
| CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: |
| AWARDED VALUE: |
| CURRENT CONTRACT DOLLAR VALUE: |
| 2 NAME OF ASSESSING OFFICIAL: |
| EMAIL: |
| PHONE NUMBER: |
| ASSOCIATION WITH FIRM BEING RATED including role: |
| undefined: |
| Assessment Categories: |
| Unsatisfactorya QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: |
| Marginala QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: |
| Satisfactorya QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: |
| Very Gooda QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: |
| Exceptionala QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: |
| NAa QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: |
| Unsatisfactoryb SCHEDULE: |
| Marginalb SCHEDULE: |
| Satisfactoryb SCHEDULE: |
| Very Goodb SCHEDULE: |
| Exceptionalb SCHEDULE: |
| NAb SCHEDULE: |
| Unsatisfactoryc COST CONTROL: |
| Marginalc COST CONTROL: |
| Satisfactoryc COST CONTROL: |
| Very Goodc COST CONTROL: |
| Exceptionalc COST CONTROL: |
| NAc COST CONTROL: |
| Unsatisfactoryd BUSINESS RELATIONS: |
| Marginald BUSINESS RELATIONS: |
| Satisfactoryd BUSINESS RELATIONS: |
| Very Goodd BUSINESS RELATIONS: |
| Exceptionald BUSINESS RELATIONS: |
| NAd BUSINESS RELATIONS: |
| Unsatisfactorye MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL: |
| Marginale MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL: |
| Satisfactorye MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL: |
| Very Goode MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL: |
| Exceptionale MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL: |
| NAe MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL: |
| Unsatisfactoryf RELIABILITY: |
| Marginalf RELIABILITY: |
| Satisfactoryf RELIABILITY: |
| Very Goodf RELIABILITY: |
| Exceptionalf RELIABILITY: |
| NAf RELIABILITY: |
| Unsatisfactoryg CUSTOMER SUPPORT: |
| Marginalg CUSTOMER SUPPORT: |
| Satisfactoryg CUSTOMER SUPPORT: |
| Very Goodg CUSTOMER SUPPORT: |
| Exceptionalg CUSTOMER SUPPORT: |
| NAg CUSTOMER SUPPORT: |
| Unsatisfactoryh OVERALL PERFORMANCE: |
| Marginalh OVERALL PERFORMANCE: |
| Satisfactoryh OVERALL PERFORMANCE: |
| Very Goodh OVERALL PERFORMANCE: |
| Exceptionalh OVERALL PERFORMANCE: |
| NAh OVERALL PERFORMANCE: |
| Unsatisfactoryi OTHER AREAS: |
| Marginali OTHER AREAS: |
| Satisfactoryi OTHER AREAS: |
| Very Goodi OTHER AREAS: |
| Exceptionali OTHER AREAS: |
| NAi OTHER AREAS: |
| 1: |
| Unsatisfactory1: |
| Marginal1: |
| Satisfactory1: |
| Very Good1: |
| Exceptional1: |
| NA1: |
| 2: |
| Unsatisfactory2: |
| Marginal2: |
| Satisfactory2: |
| Very Good2: |
| Exceptional2: |
| NA2: |
| 4 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: |
| undefined_2: |
| undefined_3: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .