Copy_of_2016_GC-MACC_RFI_Responses_10_June_2016_PDF.pdf

Question Answer

RFI #

There is a discrepancy between the number of days allotted for the contractor to respond to the government design review. Page 9 under point A, pargraph 3 has a 7 day time frame. Page 12 table E has a 5 day timeframe. Which is correct?

No discrepancies exists. Pg 9 Point A states you have 7 days to setup a design review meeting after the government provides responses. Pg 12 table E, states that you have 5 days to respond to the comments.

RFI

#110

Has Beale AFB determinded a Construction Cost Limitation (CCL) for the Seed Project, if so. If so, please provide CCL.

The CCL or magnitude for the SAMPLE project is Between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000.

RFI

#111

L‐3.1.2.5 Subfactor 4: Key Personnel states ‐ a 5 page limit, can you plase confirm if the 5 page limit is per employee or 5 pages total?

5 page limit per employee

RFI

#112

The As‐Built drawings for dormitory bldg 24114, provided as part of the Seed Project documentation, does not provide any dimensions for reference or use in the evaluation of the overall scope for this work.

Please provide dimensional drawings for use in this effort

The As‐builts are drawn to scale, use scale for all required dimensions.

RFI

#113

Can the Offeror's proposal package be sumbitted electronically? See Pg 85 L‐2.12 Distribution

RFI

#114

Is the Sample Project ( Repair Fire Protection System, Dormitory B24114) being awarded as the first Task Order (TO) for this GC‐MACC?

No, It is a SAMPLE project used for evaluation purposes and a Task Order will issued for B24114.

RFI

#115

Please confirm the intent of ITO 1.0 is to list the Offereor's team only, no subcontractors associated with the sample project are part of this document.

Please see ITO Attachment 1.1 for more information on the Past Performance Information Tool (PPIT)

GC‐MACC RFI's 10 June 2016

RFI

#116

The solicitation documents are unclear on how and Offeror compirsed of a Joint Venture should submit past performance projects. If the joint venture, as an entity, does not have the relevant past performance, however, one and/or both of the joint venture memebers do have past performance that meets and/ or exceeds the solicitation requirements would it be acceptable to submitpast performance projects from that particular joint venture member. Please verify this is acceptable.

It would be acceptable for each member of the Joint Venture to submit past performance information if the Joint Venture itself does not have a past performance history.

RFI

#117

Is Microsoft Access absolutely necessary for the download of the tool? If it is, what version is appropriate?

Please see ITO Attachment 1.1 for more information on the Past Performance Information Tool (PPIT). Contact the contract administrator for assistance.

RFI

#118

Are we limited to default font size? Yes

RFI

#119

Are we allowed to adjust font appearance of insert tables, figures, or images into the PPIT for the project examples we are submitting?

Please use default settings for the PPI Tool

RFI

#120

Fire Alarm/MNS RFI – The SOW section 2.02A indicates to provide non supervised single station smoke detectors in the living units. This requirement is in conflict with UFC 3‐600‐01, section 5‐6.7, which requires 24VDC addressable smoke detectors in the units with sounder bases and that annunciate as an alarm at the FACP, but does not activate audible/visual throughout the building. Please confirm that 24VDC addressable smoke detectors as required per section 5‐6.7 of UFC 3‐600‐ 01 are not required.

The smoke detectors will be addressable system smoke detectors on a sounder base in each room. They will not activate the building alarm but will show up on the fire alarm as a supervisory. The smoke detectors will report to the fire station according to UFC 3‐600‐01, Chapter 5‐8.

5‐8.2 Distinct Signals Where the base reporting system has the capability, alarm of any sleeping room smoke detector for barracks, dormitories, lodges, and temporary or transient living facilities must send a separate and distinct signal via the base fire reporting system.

RFI

#121

Sprinkler & Fire Alarm General RFI – The SOW references UFC 3‐600‐01 and UFC 4‐021‐01 as applicable design standards; however, sections 2.02 A and 2.02B do not require the fire alarm/mns and fire sprinkler systems to be designed in accordance with the UFC 3‐600‐01 and UFC 4‐021‐01.

These sections indicate design of the sprinkler and fire alarm/mns systems to be designed per NFPA 13 and NFPA 72 respectively. Please confirm these systems are to be designed in accordance with UFC 3‐600‐ 01 and UFC 4‐021‐01 as well.

Yes, the Mass Notification system designed in accordance with UFC 3‐600‐01, UFC 4‐ 021‐01, and local standards as well.

RFI

#122

Can we use previously submitted PPQ’s in lieu of submitting new ones to our clients?

No. See pg 88 L‐3.2.2.4 Past Performance Questionnaires(PPQ)

RFI

#123

The only references provided in Section M are FAR 15.404 and FAR 31.201‐3. These FAR sections do not contain actual evaluation criteria.

Would the Government please clarify what information, exactly, is required to demonstrate price reasonableness – even if just a list of items that you would like to see addressed to make evaluation easier?

Please see pg 88 L‐3.3 Factor 3 ‐ Price, ITO Attachment 1.6 and ITO Attachment 1.7.

RFI

#124

Please confirm the floorplan drawings provided in amendment 4 are the correct building. Comparing the drawings to the utility map also provided with amendment 4, it apprears it may not be the right building.

The attached floorplan drawings have been confirmed as B24114

RFI

#125

Is CPVC sprinkler pipe acceptable where allowed by NFPA 13 and NFPA 13R?

Yes

RFI

#126

Building construction type; wood, concrete, etc.? Type of the building as defined by NFPA 101/NFPA 220 ~ Hotels and Dormitories

RFI

#127

Preferred point of connection for fire sprinklers? The contractor may connect to the closest feasible point, to include connecting to the water main running through the parking lot to the north of B24114.

RFI

#128

Building attic: Is it accessible, constructed of combustible or non combustible ?

Review requirement for attic coverage in the UFC‐3‐600‐01 and NFPA 101 for hotels and dormitories.

RFI

#129

Removed N/A

RFI

#130

Please revert me with the Solicitation Number/Contract Number for GC‐ Beale AFB MACC which was awarded in 2010 or 2011.

FA4686‐11‐R‐0012