MFRquestionsFBO.pdf

MEMO FOR RECORD 16 June 16

SUBJECT: FA4661-16-Q-0073 Financial Systems Administrator Support, Contractor Questions Amendment

1. The purpose of this memo is to document the questions and answers for the subject amendment.

2. Questions and Answers:

1. Solicitation states: 1 FTE. However, there appears to be two unique Job Descriptions.

Computer Systems Administration Support and Financial Systems Administrator Support. Is 1 FTE a minimum or is 1 FTE expected to provide services unique to the responsibilities outlined in each role? The requirement for 1 FTE has been removed. The contractor can provide more than one FTE so long as they meet the requirement based on the objective in the Performance Work Statement.

2. Any perceived potential for this contract to move beyond the potential 12 MONTHS stated in the solicitation? No.

3. Is this solicitation representing new work or a re-bid? This is a new requirement for Dyess AFB but was previously solicited as an ACC contract for multiple bases (FA4890- 13-C-0006 award)

4. If re-bid is there a current incumbent performing services today? Yes

5. If re-bid who is the current prime contract holder? Adjuvant Consulting, Inc. for

$693,964.80

6. How many FTEs historically support this work? 1

7. PWS Page 1 Sections skip from 1.2.1. to 1.2.3. – Is there a 1.2.2 section that is missing?

No.

8. PWS Section 1.2.4.7. “The contractor shall ensure efficient collaboration occurs between all 7th CPTS FSAs.” Are all CPTS FSAs contractor personnel? How many CPTS FSAs are supporting this work? There is currently only one FSA position at the CPTS.

9. PWS Section 1.3.1 “The contractor proposal shall clearly address the IAT Level I certification requirements.” Quote submission instructions only require the signed quote and representations and certifications. Can the government clarify if a technical proposal needs to be submitted to address the IAT Level I Certification and any other information?

Or, if needed, please provide instructions on how to submit this information?

10. PWS Section 1.4 – How much local travel off base does the government anticipate for this work? Will travel be expected daily, weekly, occasionally? No travel is anticipated.

11. PWS Section 1.6.1. – Is the Knowledge-based online tool a government developed tool that is already in place? Is it a requirement of this contract that the contractor develops and launches the online tool?

12. Section 2, 2.2.2.2. Refers to “Special Programs” and Task Order 0002, there is no Task Order 0002 attached. Will contractor personnel supporting this work be “involved in the Special Programs” ? Can the government provide Task Order 0002 if needed? No.

13. Section 2.2.2.4. Refers to “award of any task order.” Is it the intention of the government that this contract will be an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity contract? No.

14. Section 2.2.3.2 Refers to a DD 254, can the government please provide the DD254 or advise if the level of safeguarding required will be NONE or SECRET and if the contractor will be required to receive and generate classified material or fabricate, modify, or store classified hardware? See DD 254 attachment.

15. Offeror’s Information Form – Payment Terms & Delivery – As this is a quote for services and there are no ODCs, can the government remove the FOB Destination portion of the form? See updated PWS.

16. What is the government's plan to ensure that the background check process can be completed in a timely manner to ensure that there is no disruption or delay to the start of the expected period of performance?

17. If we do not possess a secret facility clearance, will the Government sponsor the offeror for a secret facility clearance?

ERIKA L. THORNTON, CAPT, USAF

Contracting Officer