QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS.pdf
PDF 31 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Repair Base Water Mains Phase III Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4661-14-R-0014
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS.pdf | ||
| Amendment_1 _Attachment_5 _Question_Submission.pdf | ||
| FA4661-14-R-0014 _Amendment_1_(CWMIII).pdf | ||
| Amendment_1 _Attachment_5 _Question_Submission.pdf | ||
| Attachment_3 _Past_Performance_Questionaire.pdf | ||
| Attachment_4 _Site_Visit_Registration.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2 _Drawings.pdf | ||
| Attachment_5 _Question_Submission.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1 _SOW.pdf | ||
| FA4661-14-R-0014 _RFP_(CWMIII).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
1) ON SHEET 6D AREA 10&11 PLANS DO NOT INDICATE WHAT THE STREET CROSSINGS
ARE ASPHALT/ BORE OR CONCRETE
TYPE OF PAVEMENT FOR BORING PURPOSES SEEMS IRRELEVANT BUT MOST STREETS ON
BASE ARE ASPHALT AND SO IT IS IN THIS CASE. IN THE CASE OF TRENCHING THROUGH
PAVEMENT THE DETAIL NUMBER CALLED IN WILL DETERMINE WHAT TYPE OF PAVEMENT IT
IS.
2) ON SHEET 6C AREA 10 PLANS DO NOT INDICATE WHAT THE STREET CROSSINGS ARE
ASPHALT/BORE OR CONCRETE
TYPE OF PAVEMENT FOR BORING PURPOSES SEEMS IRRELEVANT BUT MOST STREETS ON
BASE ARE ASPHALT AND SO IT IS IN THIS CASE. IN THE CASE OF TRENCHING THROUGH
PAVEMENT THE DETAIL NUMBER CALLED IN WILL DETERMINE WHAT TYPE OF PAVEMENT IT
IS.
3) ON SHEET 9D THE PLANS DO NOT INDICATE WHAT THE STREET CROSSINGS ARE
ASPHALT/ BORE OR CONCRETE
TYPE OF PAVEMENT FOR BORING PURPOSES SEEMS IRRELEVANT BUT MOST STREETS ON
BASE ARE ASPHALT AND SO IT IS IN THIS CASE. IN THE CASE OF TRENCHING THROUGH
PAVEMENT THE DETAIL NUMBER CALLED IN WILL DETERMINE WHAT TYPE OF PAVEMENT IT
IS.
4) ON SHEET 8E THE PLANS DO NOT INDICATE WHAT THE STREET CROSSINGS ARE
ASPHALT/ BORE OR CONCRETE
TYPE OF PAVEMENT FOR BORING PURPOSES SEEMS IRRELEVANT BUT MOST STREETS ON
BASE ARE ASPHALT AND SO IT IS IN THIS CASE. IN THE CASE OF TRENCHING THROUGH
PAVEMENT THE DETAIL NUMBER CALLED IN WILL DETERMINE WHAT TYPE OF PAVEMENT IT
IS.
5) ON SHEET 6E THE PLANS DO NOT INDICATE WHAT THE STREET CROSSINGS ARE
ASPHALT/BORE OR CONCRETE
TYPE OF PAVEMENT FOR BORING PURPOSES SEEMS IRRELEVANT BUT MOST STREETS ON
BASE ARE ASPHALT AND SO IT IS IN THIS CASE. IN THE CASE OF TRENCHING THROUGH
PAVEMENT THE DETAIL NUMBER CALLED IN WILL DETERMINE WHAT TYPE OF PAVEMENT IT
IS.
6) AT THE JOBSITE WALK THRU IT WAS SAID THAT PORT-O-POTTY’S AND WASH
STATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR BUILDINGS USE DURING OUR FINAL SERVICE
CONNECTIONS IS THIS CORRECT? OR WILL THE JOBSITE ONES BE SUFFIECNT?
REFER TO SECTION 01 11 00 PARAGRAPH 2.10 FOR WASH STATIONS AND PORT-A-POTTIES
REQUIREMENTS
7) IS DENSITY TESTING REQUIRED FOR COMPACTED TRENCHES BY A GEO. TECH FIRM?
NO
8) ARE THERE ANY LEAD BASED PAINT CONCERENS WITH THE EXTG. FIRE HYDRANTS
TO BE REMOVED?
NO
9) ARE THERE ANY AREAS OF HIGH PRESSURE WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA THAT
REQUIRE PIPE TO HAVE PRESSURE CLASSIFICATIONS GREATER THAN 150 PSI?
REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR PIPE PRESSURE RATING REQUIREMENTS.
10) ARE THERE ANY SALVAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR VALVES, HYDRANTS, FITTINGS,
ETC.? IF SO HOW ARE THESE ITEMS TO BE DISPOSED OF OR DELIVERED?
THERE ARE NO SALVAGE REQUIREMENTS. ALL MATERIAL REMOVED SHALL BE DISPOSE OF
OFF BASE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS.
11) WHAT IS THE CONTRACTOR TO DO WITH EXCESS SPOILS GENERATED FROM THE
PROJECT? WILL THE EXCESS SOIL BE STOCKPILED SOMEWHERE ON SITE OR WILL IT
HAVE TO BE HAULED OFFSITE?
ALL EXCESS MATERIALS RESULTING FROM THIS WORK SHALL BE DISPOSE OF OFF BASE
FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS
12) ARE THERE ANY AREAS WHERE THERE MAY BE CONTAMINATED SPOILS ON THIS
PROJECT?
NOT TO OUR KNOWLEDGE
13) WILL THE DOD PROVIDE AN INSPECTOR FOR INSPECTIONS? IF SO HOW FREQUENT
WILL THE INSPECTOR VISIT THE SITE FOR INSPECTIONS (AS NEEDED, DAILY, WEEKELY)?
THIS WILL HAVE BEARING ON PRODUCTION RATES AS TRENCHES CAN’T BE
BACKFILLED UNTIL THE INSPECTOR HAS APPROVED THE PIPE ASSEMBLY AND
INSTALLATION.
INSPECTOR WILL VISIT THE SITE DAILY, USUALLY MORE THAN ONCE A DAY AND WILL BE
AVAILABLE WHEN NEEDED WHITHIN REASON. PROJECT MANAGER WILL ALSO BE AVAILABLE
IN CASE INSPECTOR IS NOT AROUND. WE USUALLY WORK IN CLOSE COORDINATION WITH
THE CONTRACTOR THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT.
14) ARE THERE ANY EVENTS PLANNED DURING THE PROJECT THAT MAY IMPACT
INSTALLATION THAT WILL CAUSE FOR WORK TO BE PAUSED?
NO
15) ARE THERE ANY REQUIREMENTS THAT WILL REQUIRE THE WORK TO BE PHASED?
YES, WORK NEEDS TO BE PHASED. REFER TO CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR PHASING REQUIREMENTS.
16) UNDER THE SPECS IT STATES ONLY WORK HOURS ARE MON-FRI. WILL WE BE
ALLOWED TO WORK WEEKENDS ON CLEAN UP & BACKFILL & COMPACTION / HAUL OFF
ONCE ALL PIPING HAS BEEN INSPECTED? OR WILL WE STILL BE REQUIRED TO REQUEST
AUTHORIZATION AND BE REQUIRED TO HAVE A INSPECTOR PRESENT
WEEKEND WORK WILL BE ALLOWED IN CASE BY CASE BASIS. REQUESTS ARE REQUIRED
AHEAD OF TIME FOR PROPER COORDINATION. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS.
17) ARE THERE ANY LIMITS ON HOW MUCH WATER LINE CAN BE DISINFECTED, TESTED
AND PLPACED IN SERVICE AT ONE TIME?
REFER TO REQUIREMENTS LISTED ON SHEET G-2 OF THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS.
18) AT THE AREAS OF SODDING OR RE-SEEDING WILL TOPSOIL NEED TO BE PROVIDED
FIRST OR WILL CLEAN SPOILS FROM THE SITE BE ADEQUATE?
NO TOPSOIL REQUIRED. CLEAN EXCAVATED MATERIAL FROM SITE IS ADEQUATE.
19) CAN WE UTILIZE TEMPORAY WATER OFF A EXTG. WORKING HYDRANT TO
REESTABLISH GRASS / VEGITATION?
YES AS LONG AS A BACKFLOW PREVENTER IS PROVIDED FOR THIS PURPOSE.
20) WILL THE DOD PROVIDE AS-BUILT DRAWINGS FOR ALL UTILITIES WITHIN THE AREA
OF WORK?
YES
21) IS THERE ANY AC PIPE THAT WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED ON THIS PROJECT? IF SO
WILL THE DOD HAVE AN AREA FOR US TO DISPOSE OF REMOVED AC PIPE.
NO
22) THE SOW STATES THAT ALL PIPE IS TO BE ABONDED IN PLACE AND ONLY THE ITEMS
ABOVE GRADE WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE REMOVED TO 18” BELOW GRADE ONLY IS THIS
CORRECT?
REFER TO CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
20) DOES THIS PROJECT INCLUDE REPLACEMENT OF ANY WATER SERVICE LINES TO THE
BUILDING? DO THE SERVICE LINES NEED TO BE REPLACED OVER THEIR ENTIRE
LENGTH, OR JUST ADJUSTED AND CONNECTED TO THE NEW MAIN?
REFER TO CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. MOST SERVICE LINES ARE
REQUIRED TO BE REPLACE UP TO 5’ FROM BUILDING.
21) WILL CATHODIC PROTECTION BE REQUIRED FOR THIS PVC WATER MAIN OR WILL
POLY WRAP OF THE FITTINGS & VALVES BE SUFFICENT? IF SO WILL THERE HAVE TO BE
A CERTIFIED ENGINEERED CATHODIC PROTECTION DESIGN PLAN INCLUDED IN OUR
COST?
REFER TO DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. I DON’T BELIEVE THERE IS ANY REQUIREMENT
FOR CATHODIC PROTECTION.
22) WILL THE DOD REQUIRE ANY SPECIAL TREATMENT OF THE CHLORINATED WATER
THAT WILL BE DISCHARGED WHILE FLUSHING OUR MAINS DURING TESTING OR WILL
STANDARD FLUSHING BE ACCEPTABLE?
NO
24) FITTINGS- WILL MEGA LUG RESTRAINTS SUFFICE OR SHOULD WE REFRENCE A
CERTAIN DOCUMENT FOR THRUST BLOCK DETAILS, DEMINSIONS AND BEARING AREAS?
REFER TO SHEET D-1 FOR THRUST BLOCKING REQUIREMENTS. REFER TO CONTRACT
DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOINT RESTRAINTS REQUIREMENTS.
25) FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLIES- DETAILS DO NOT MATCH SPECIFICATIONS IT STATES
THAT PUMPER & NOZZLE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE INDIVIDUALLY VALVED BUT DETAIL
DOES NOT INDICATE THIS AND EXTG. FIRE HYDRANTS ARE STANDARD HYDRANTS?
DISREGARD THE REQUIREMENT FOR INDIVIDUALLY VALVED PUMPER AND HOSE
CONNECTIONS AS STATED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS ARE THE
STANDARD TYPE.
28) BACKFILL- IS THERE ANY SPECIAL REQUIREMENT FOR BACKFILL MATERIALS OR
WILL THE EXCAVATED SOILS BE UTILIZED FOR BACKFILL?
EXCAVATED SOIL WILL BE UTILIZED FOR BACKFILL.ALSO REFER TO TRENCH DETAILS IN
CONTRACT DRAWING SHEET D-2.
29) WILL UTILITIES THAT ARE ENCOUNTERED AND OR DAMAGED DUE TO INACCURATE
OR ABSENT MARKINGS BE CONSIDERED A DIFFERING SITE CONDITION?
REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 01 11 10 “UTILITIES” FOR REQUIREMENTS
31) IS THERE A CERTAIN WORKING PRESSURE FOR THE WATER SYSTEM AROUND WHICH
WE SHOULD SELECT THE DIMENSION RATION (DR) AND/OR PRESSURE RATING FOR THE
PVC TO BE USED?
REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 33 11 00 FOR PIPE TYPE AND THICKNESS
32) DOES THE STATEMENT OF WORK REQUIRE THE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE FLOW
RATE DATA FOR THE FIRE HYDRANTS? IF SO WILL THIS BE BASED ON MATERIAL
SUBMITTAL DATA FROM THE MANUFACTURE OR WILL THIS INFO. BE REQUIRED TO BE
MEASURED IN THE FIELD?
YES. FIELD FLOW TEST IS REQUIRED TO RATE HYDRANTS AND PAINT BONNET PER COLOR
SCHEDULE SPECIFIED ON CONTRACT DRAWING SHEET D-4 AND SPECIFICATION SECTION 33
11 00
34) WHEN PRESSURE TESTING AND OR CHLORINATING CAN THE NEW LINE BE TIED INTO
THE EXISTING SYSTEM SO THAT WE ARE TESTING AGAINST VALVES? THIS WILL BE THE
BEST METHOD BECAUSE IT ALLOWS US TO TEST THE FINAL CONNECTION AS WELL.
WE WILL ONLY ALLOW CONNECTING NEW LINE TO EXISTING SYSTEM IF A BACKFLOW
PREVENTER IS INSTALLED BETWEEN OUR SYSTEM AND THE NEW LINE. CURRENT
BLACFLOW CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.
35) WE ARE ASSUMING THAT THE MATERIALS FOR THIS PROJECT ARE TAX EXEMPT IS
THIS CORRECT?
AS THE WINNING CONTRACTOR WILL BE WORKING AS A “PRIME CONTRACTOR” RATHER
THAN AN “AGENT” OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, THE MATERIALS PURCHASED UNDER
AND FOR THIS PROJECT WILL NOT BE TAX-EXEMPT.
36) WILL WE BE ALLOWED TO WORK EXTENDED HOURS AT ANY TIME DURING THIS
CONTRACT? IF SO WILL THERE BE ANY CHARGES FOR OVERTIME HOURS WORKED BY
THE INSPECTOR?
YES, EXTENDED TIME MAY BE ALLOWED IF REQUESTED IN ADVANCE AND AFTER
CONTRACTING OFFICER APPROVAL. WE WISH COULD CHARGE FOR EXTRA HOURS OF
INSPECTION BUT NO THERE IS NO CHARGE.
41) DURING THE DESIGN PROCESS DOES THE EXTG. WATER MAIN HAVE TO BE
EVALUATED FOR PRESSURE AND FLOWRATES AT SERVICES, HYDRANTS OR IS THE
SUPPLY PRESSURE KNOWN TO BE ADEQUATE?
DON’T UNDERSTAND QUESTION. THERE IS NO DESIGN REQUIREMENT AS THIS IS 100%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
SUPPLY PRESSURE IS KNOWN TO BE ADEQUATE.
42) ARE THERE EXTG. IRRIGATION COMPONENTS (IE. HEADS, LINES, ETC.) THAT COULD
BE DISTURBED AND WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED AS PART OF THE PROCESS? IF SO WILL
THEY BE MARKED?
REFER TO CONTRACT DRAWINGS FOR REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 01 11
10 FOR LOCATING EXISTING UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR IS TO CAREFULLY WORK AROUND
EXISTING STRUCTURES/APURTENANCE/EQUIPMENT TO PRESERVE EXISTING SITE
CONDITIONS AND IF DAMAGE OCCURS THEN TO RETURN IT TO ITS ORIGINAL CONDITION
45) WHAT DURATION OF WATER OUTAGES ARE WE GOING TO BE ALLOWED? WILL TEMP.
BYPASSES BE REQUIRED FOR BUILDINGS IF SO WHICH BUILDINGS?
REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 01 11 10 FOR REQUIREMENTS CONCERNING OUTAGES.
DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION ABOUT THE BYPASSES FOR BUILDINGS.
46) DOES THE DOD REQUIRE 6’ CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH FABRIC BARRIER AT
LOCATIONS OF THE NEW WATER LINE REPLACEMENT OR WILL TEMP. ORANGE
CONSTRUCTION FENCE WITH T-POST AND OR WARNING TAPE BE SUFFICENT?
TEMPORARY ORANGE FENCE IS SUFFICIENT
47) WILL WATER BE PROVIDED FOR TESTING PURPOSES AND COMPACTION? IF SO IS
THERE GOING TO BE A FEE OR CHARGE FOR WATER?
REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 01 11 10. ALL UTILITIES ARE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE
CONTRACTOR AT NO CHARGE. HOOKUPS AND REMOVALS ARE CONTRACTOR’S
RESPONSIBILITY.
48) IS THERE ANY GEO TECH REPORTS FOR THIS PROJECT SITE? WHAT IS THE SOIL
CONDITION WILL WE ENCOUNTER ANY ROCK?
NO GEO REPORT. SOILS ARE MOSTLY CLAY. NO KNOWN ROCK LAYER WITHIN PROJECT
EXCAVATION DEPTHS
49) WILL THE DOD CONSIDER ADDITIONAL DAYS TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT MORE
THAN 112 CALANDER DAYS? THE 112 CALANDER DAYS INCLUDES DESIGN, REVIEW AND
APPRORVAL THAT DOES NOT LEAVE MUCH TIME FOR THE ACTUAL INSTALLATION AND
TESTING OF THE NEW WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM.
DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION. WHERE DO 112 DAYS COME FROM? PERFORMANCE
PERIOD FOR THIS PROJECT IS 450 DAYS. THERE IS NO DESIGN REQUIREMENT AS THIS IS
100% CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
50) WILL THE DAVIS BACON HEAVY HWY SCALE BE USED FOR THE INSTALLING
CONTRACTOR?
NO. THE DAVIS BACON ACT WAGE DETERMINATION FOR THIS PROJECT WILL BE “HEAVY”,
PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING LINK FOR DESCRIPTIONS OF THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF
CLASSIFICATIONS: http://www.wdol.gov/usrguide/sectionc.aspx#c4b
51) THE 22” CASING REQUIRED IS NOT A COMMON SIZE AND IS VERY DIFFICULT TO FIND.
CAN 24” CASING BE SUBSTITUTED INSTEAD?
YES, 24” CASING IS ACCEPTABLE.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .