Solicitation Amendment FA465922R00030002 SF 30 (1).pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The purpose of this Amendment is to incorporate the following changes:Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification):

a. The solicitation due date has been extended from 04 Oct 22 to 12 Oct 22.

b. Attachment 5. MATOC Questions (FA465922R0003) - 16 Sep 22 was added.

c. Attachment 6. CSI Breakdown Example 16 Sep 22 was added.

d. Attachment 2A JFSD210011 Demonstration Project Specifications was updated to version Aug 2022.

e. The page limitation for Part II - Technical has increased from 40 pages to 50 pages.

e. All other terms conditions remain unchanged.

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

The following changes have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Contract Description

MATOC FOR GFAFB & CSFS

A. Project Title: (MATOC) Multiple Award Task Order Contract-Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) B. This acquisition is 100 Percent Total Small Business Set-Aside. The sample project is under NAICS Code 236220; Size Standard $36.5M C. Ordering Period is for five years with an Option to Extend Services IAW FAR 52.217-8.

D. The guaranteed minimum amount over the life of this contract is $1,000.00. The awardee's guaranteed minimum w ill be satisfied by attendance to the MATOC Post-Award Conference.

E. The Demonstration project magnitude is between $500,000 and $1M. The demonstration project is for evaluation purposes only.

F. The total aggregate maximum amount expendable under the entire MATOC program shall not exceed $75M G. Reference Section L- "Instructions, Conditions and Notices to offerors: for proposal preparation and Section M-Evaluation Factors for award".

H. A pre-proposal conference/site visit is scheduled for 22 August 2022 at 1000 CST. It will be held at:

295 Steen Blvd, Bldg 242, Grand Forks AFB, ND 58205.

The conference will include visiting the demonstration project location.

I. Offerors shall submit one electronic copy of each deliverable by email to both of the names listed below:

Ms. Carly Larson, carly.larson@us.af.mil TSgt Angelo Cabuang, angelomykael.cabuang.1@us.af.

mil

If the file size is too large to be delivered by email, the offeror must notify the contacts listed above, and a DoD SAFE link will be provided to drop-off files. The offeror is responsible to request the link timely so that proposals will be received by the proposal due date.

MATOC FOR GFAFB & CSFS

A. Project Title: (MATOC) Multiple Award Task Order Contract-Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) B. This acquisition is 100 Percent Total Small Business Set-Aside. The sample project is under NAICS Code 236220; Size Standard $36.5M C. Ordering Period is for five years with an Option to Extend Services IAW FAR 52.217-8.

D. The guaranteed minimum amount over the life of this contract is $1,000.00. The awardee's guaranteed minimum w ill be satisfied by attendance to the MATOC Post-Award Conference.

E. The Demonstration project magnitude is between $500,000 and $1M. The demonstration project is for evaluation purposes only.

F. The total aggregate maximum amount expendable under the entire MATOC program shall not exceed $75M G. Reference Section L- "Instructions, Conditions and Notices to offerors: for proposal preparation and Section M-Evaluation Factors for award".

H. A pre-proposal conference/site visit is scheduled for 22 August 2022 at 1000 CST. It will be held at:

295 Steen Blvd, Bldg 242, Grand Forks AFB, ND 58205.

The conference will include visiting the demonstration project location.

I. Offerors shall submit one electronic copy of each deliverable by email to both of the names listed below:

Ms. Carly Larson, carly.larson@us.af.mil TSgt Angelo Cabuang, angelomykael.cabuang.1@us.af.

mil

If the file size is too large to be delivered by email, the offeror must notify the contacts listed above, and a DoD SAFE link will be provided to drop-off files. The offeror is responsible to request the link timely so that proposals will be received by the proposal due date.

Response Due Date

04 Oct 2022 12 Oct 2022

Section J - List of Attachments

FA465922R00030002

The following attachments were added:

6. CSI Breakdown Example 16 Sep 22

5. MATOC Questions (FA465922R0003) - 16 Sep 22 2A JFSD210011 Demonstration Project Specifications Aug 2022 v2 1 JFSD210011 MATOC Technical Specifications - Aug 22

The following attachments were deleted:

2A JFSD210011 Demonstration Project Specifications Jul 2021 JFSD210011 MATOC Technical Specifications - Aug 22

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

L-1 GENERAL PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors shall follow the instructions contained herein.

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including, but not limited to: terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. Non- conformance with the instructions provided in this solicitation may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation and/or removal from consideration.

L-1.1 Submission of Proposal: Offerors shall submit one electronic copy of each deliverable by email to both of the names listed below:

Ms. Carly Larson, carly.larson@us.af.mil TSgt Angelo Cabuang, angelomykael.cabuang.1@us.af.mil

If the file size is too large to be delivered by email, the offeror must notify the contacts listed above, and a DoD SAFE link will be provided to drop-off files. The offeror is responsible to request the link timely so that proposals will be received by the proposal due date (see Page 1, Section 13a).

L-1.2 This is an all-electronic solicitation release. Hard copies of the solicitation are not available. The Government will post amendments to the solicitation to an Electronic Posting System (EPS), https://www.sam.

gov/. It is the responsibility of each offeror to review the web page for notice of amendments, updates, or changes to current information.

L-1.3 Pre-Proposal Conference: A pre-proposal conference will be held approximately twenty-one (21) days after the posting of the RFP. Contractors will meet at the 319th Contracting Squadron in building 242 on Grand Forks Air Force Base. All prospective offerors are highly encouraged to attend this conference. In order to make the conference as productive as possible, offerors should submit, no later than three business days before the conference, any questions they may have in writing to angelomykael.cabuang.1@us.af.mil and/or carly.

larson@us.af.mil. The submission of written questions will not preclude anyone from posing questions during the conference. All other questions arising from this Request for Proposal or pre-proposal conference must be submitted in writing to the above email addresses by 4:00PM three (3) business days after the pre-proposal conference. The Government strongly recommends all questions be submitted by the specified time.

Amendment 1: The deadline to submit questions in writing has been extended to Wednesday, 7 September 2022, at 4:00PM.

Information provided at the pre-proposal conference shall not qualify the terms and conditions of the solicitation and specifications. Failure of a prospective offeror to submit any questions or attend the conference will be construed to mean that the prospective offeror fully understands all requirements of the solicitation. Prospective offerors are advised that the pre-proposal conference will be held solely for the purpose of explaining the concepts involved in the project and the specifications, terms, and conditions of this solicitation.

Questions along with the answers will be posted to https://www.sam.gov/ within seven (7) to ten (10) business days following the pre-proposal conference. All prospective offerors are advised that this solicitation will remain unchanged unless it is specifically amended in writing. If an amendment is issued, normal procedures relating to the acknowledgement and receipt of any such amendment as described in FAR contract clause 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors- Competitive Acquisition, of this RFP shall apply.

L-1.4 Teaming Arrangements: Pursuant to FAR 9.603, the Government will recognize the integrity and validity of contractor team arrangements; provided, the arrangements are identified and company relationships are fully disclosed in an offer or, for arrangements entered into after submission of an offer, before the arrangement becomes effective.

L-1.4.1 Joint Venture Offerors: If the offeror is a joint venture, the offeror shall provide all required solicitation information for all parties including a copy of the signed joint venture agreement with proposal. The agreement shall include information, which identifies the responsibilities for each entity under this contract. The agreement shall demonstrate the relationship between firms and identify contractual relationships and authorities to bind each entity of the joint venture. If the joint venture is comprised of 8(a) firms, the Small Business Administration (SBA), prior to award, must approve the joint venture agreement.

Joint venture agreements must be received by the Small Business Administration (SBA) prior to proposal due date and approved no later than 60 days after the proposal close date. If a joint venture is contemplated, then the assigned SBA Business Opportunity Specialist (BOS) must be advised as soon as possible. Ensure the agreement is submitted in sufficient advance to the BOS to permit adequate time for a regulatory compliance review. Any corrections and/or changes requested must permit adequate review time by the BOS before the proposal due date. No corrections and/or changes are permitted after the time for submission of offers.

L-1.4.2 Teaming/Partnering Offerors: If the offer is based on a teaming/partnering arrangement, the offeror shall provide all required and complete solicitation information for all parties including a copy of the teaming /partnership agreement, and any relevant and recent past performance information on previous teaming arrangements with same partner. The agreement shall include information which identifies the responsibilities for each entity under this contract. The agreement shall demonstrate the relationship between firms and identify contractual relationships and authorities to bind each entity of the teaming/partnering arrangement. If this is a first time joint effort, each party to the arrangement must provide a list of past relevant contracts.

L-1.4.3 Mentor/Protege Program:

For information regarding the Small Business Administration's (SBA) Mentor-Protege Program see:

https://www.sba.gov/federal-contracting/contracting-assistance-programs/sba-mentor-protege-program/ For information regarding the Department of Defense (DOD) Funded Mentor Protege Program see: https://www.

acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfars/html/current/appendix_i.htm

L-1.5 Incurred Expenses: The Government is not responsible for any costs incurred or associated with preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation.

L-1.6 The demonstration project price proposal, contract forms, project summaries (past performance references), and offeror information shall include the documentation listed below. The price proposal shall be based on the offeror's proposal for the sample project as set forth in the task order solicitation documents (Attachment 2). The Government will evaluate the proposal in accordance with Section M.

L-1.7 In compliance with FAR Subpart 4.8, the Government will retain one (1) copy of all unsuccessful proposals and will destroy all extra copies. No destruction certificate will be provided.

L-1.8 All proposals must be complete, clear, concise, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation for effective evaluation and for sustaining the validity of stated claims. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements but rather must provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror's proposal. Any commitments made in the proposal shall become a part of the resultant contract. In no case shall words like "we will comply with the requirements of the contract," or equivalent statements, be acceptable to meet the requirements of this RFP. Failure to comply with these instructions may result in the Government summarily rejecting the offeror's proposal.

L-2 PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

L-2.1 The response shall consist of three (3) parts:

Part I-Price Proposal Part II-Technical Proposal Part III-Past Performance Information Each part shall be submitted in separate documents and labeled.

L-2.2 If at any time during this competition the Contracting Officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the Contracting Officer to determine the reasonableness of the price.

L-2.3 Specific Instructions:

PART I-PRICE PROPOSAL/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS

Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

i. Part I, Section A (SF 1442, Complete blocks 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, and 20A-C).

ii. Part I, Section B--Use Demonstration Project Bid Schedule.

iii. Part I, Section G--Persons Authorized to Negotiate or Conduct Discussions

iv. Part IV, Section K, Representations, Certifications, and other Statements of Offeror. Provision 52.204-8 will need to be submitted. (See directions for system for Award management (SAM) in section K)

v. Teaming/Joint venture arrangement information, as applicable

(b) The Government is not requesting certified cost or pricing information. Price will be evaluated using techniques established in FAR 15.404-1 to ensure the Government receives a price that is fair and reasonable.

The contractor shall include in the prices for the items listed in the Bid Schedule all costs for work in the specifications, whether or not specifically listed in the Bid Schedule.

PART II--TECHNICAL

Demonstration Project Proposal Accuracy:

-Limited to no more than 50 pages.

The technical proposal shall be prepared in accordance with these instructions and shall be evaluated in accordance with the evaluation criteria and evaluation standards in Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award.

Technical proposals shall include necessary information to enable the evaluators to form a definitive conclusion concerning the offeror's ability to perform the required construction and design-build services.

Sample Project

i. Sample Project: UAS Add/Repair utilities and Electrical Services Bldg. 516

ii. Project Number: JFSD 200976A & B

iii. Project Magnitude: $500,000.00 to $1,000,000.00

1. Project Content 48 Divisions of the Construction Specification Institute (CSI) evaluation (Subfactor 1):

Offeror shall use the 48 Divisions of the C.S.I. format, broken down to the component level, for the sample project proposal. The breakdown shall include all the necessary materials, labor, and equipment required to perform the contract successfully in the Grand Forks labor market. The C.S.I. shall not include pricing.

2. Technical Approach Narrative (Subfactor 2): Offeror shall provide a Technical Approach Narrative that consists of a detailed and project-specific summary of the technical approach the Contractor intends to employ in the construction of this project to include the following:

i. Technical methods and procedures that reflect a construction approach consistent with the Architectural Compatibility Guide and are specific to the site and facility.

ii. Methods and procedures that reflect current techniques and practices for construction to optimize site potential and address space utilization, operation and maintenance, safety, traffic flow and environmental conditions.

iii. A description of common construction solutions to overcome situations by the work environment such as protective measures for dust, debris, sound attenuation, work safety, power, water, disposal, HVAC interruptions, and smoke and fire alarm.

3. Gantt Chart (Subfactor 3): Outlining all major work elements showing a logical sequence of events, and complete construction for the full duration of the project.

PART III - PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Limited to no more than five (5) pages per contract listed.

(a) Provide past performance information, for each of the projects listed below, under heading "d. Relevant Construction Experience".

(b) Performance Surveys: The Government will conduct a survey of the offeror's performance references. The Government will use information submitted by the offeror and other sources such as other Federal Government offices and commercial sources, to assess overall performance. Using Attachment 4, Past Performance Questionnaire, provide a performance reference for each of the relevant projects submitted.

(c) Offerors shall complete Section 2 of the Past Performance Questionnaire and e-mail it to all points of contacts (POCs) the offeror has listed as past performance references. The POCs listed in the proposal should represent the individuals most knowledgeable about the Offeror's performance on the identified contract or program, such as the following: (1) Contracting Officer's Technical Representative; (2) Program/Project Manager; (3) Contracting Officer. For commercial contracts, send the questionnaires to the commercial equivalents of these individuals. The POCs will complete the questionnaires and forward them by email directly to the Attention of Ms. Carly Larson and TSgt Angelo Cabuang at carly.larson@us.af.mil and angelomykael.

cabuang.1@us.af.mil RESPONDENTS TO THE QUESTIONNAIRES SHALL NOT SEND THE COMPLETED INFORMATION SHEETS BACK TO THE OFFEROR! Failure to submit past performance information may result in offeror disqualification.

The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, and/or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the acquisition.

Construction Experience - Limited to no more than five (5) pages per contract listed.

(d) Relevant Construction Experience:

1. Provide a project summary for each construction project IAW the instructions found in Attachment 3, Past Performance Reference.

2. Description of applicable work must be detailed and include enough data in order for the Government to verify it was in the criteria and of sufficient quantity to meet or exceed the dollar threshold.

3. The submitted projects must have sufficient scope of the criteria to meet the minimum threshold and clearly define said work. For instance, if the offeror submits a $10M renovation project to meet the general project electrical criteria, he/she must break out the specific description of electrical work that met that requirement.

i. General Project Construction Experience (Subfactor 1): Based on past experience, we expect all projects executed with this MATOC contract to exceed $2,000.00, with a general range up to $4M, but can execute up to $9.9M. Some of the projects will be accomplished as design/build projects. To meet this requirement, the offeror must (1) have design/build project experience in the disciplines listed below of similar size and scope, or

(2) have a teaming/partnering agreement or a formal joint venture between a construction firm and design firm that has experience in each of the disciplines listed below of similar size and scope, or (3) have a combination thereof. The offeror may submit the variations of design/build experience under guidance in Part III, Factor 1, subfactor 1, paragraph i.a. below.

a. General Project Design/Build Experience: Offeror must provide no less than three (3) and no more than six

(6) construction projects of the ten (10) project disciplines identified below showing experience in design/build project execution of interior/exterior renovation and/or new construction. Offeror must have acted as the Prime Contractor, and managed both the design and construction efforts. Projects must be of similar scope and magnitude of the potential task orders under this contract (between $2,000-$9.9M), and completed within 5 years of the closing date of this solicitation.

If offeror cannot meet the minimum requirement of three (3) design/build construction experience projects, Offeror may supplement design and construction experience by submitting separate general project design and separate construction projects to make for a total of three (3) design/build projects. For example, offeror submits one (1) design/build projects, and as supplementation submits two (2) separate design and two (2) separate construction projects in order to meet the minimum requirement of three (3) design/build projects.

Electrical

HVAC

Fire Protection Asbestos abatement/removal Concrete masonry Plumbing Carpentry Concrete pavement Roofing Demolition

ii. Federal, State, Local Government and Commercial Contracts (Subfactor 2): Experience in construction as the Prime Contractor on no less than one (1) but not more than three (3) construction projects of varying disciplines equal to or greater than $300,000 each in scope and magnitude on DOD military installations, Homeland Security, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), other Federal Government agencies, State and local government agencies and commercial customers, within 5 years of release of this solicitation. The Department of Defense includes but is not limited to U.S. Department of the Army, U.S. Department of the Navy, U.S.

Department of the Air Force, and U.S. Space Force.

L-2.4 All information and documents submitted in response to this RFP must be responsive to and consistent with the following:

1. Requirements of the RFP (Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) & Statement of Work (SOW)), and Government standards and regulations pertaining to the MATOC program and sample project solicitation package.

2. Evaluation Factors for Award in Section M of this RFP.

3. Format for proposal submission shall be as follows:

(a) A page is defined as one face of an 8 1/2" x 11" sheet of paper containing information.

(b) Typing shall not be less than 12 point font and must be Times New Roman.

(c) Two columns of text per page are acceptable. Elaborate format and color representations are not desirable.

4. Technical proposals shall be limited to 40 pages excluding the Executive Summary and the Sample project specifications. The Government will remove pages in excess of 40 and will not evaluate them.

5. The price proposal is not limited to a specific number of pages.

6. Page limit does not include: appendices, charts, graphs, diagrams, tables, photographs, etc. The covers for each volume, table of contents, indices, title pages, cross reference indices, and section dividers/tales will not be included in the page count if they are inserted solely to provide ease to the reader in locating parts/sections of the proposal. These items will be counted if they contain any other information, i.e., diagrams, extraneous data, etc. Pages marked "This page intentionally left blank" will not be counted.

7. A page shall be an 81/2x11" sheet of paper (minimum of 1/2" margins). The Offeror shall number each page in order. In the event an offeror creates an ambiguity, the Government may exercise its own discretion in counting pages. Offerors are encouraged to number proposal paragraphs consistent with the instructions contained in Section M.

L-3 ON/OFF RAMP PROVISION:

(a) This provision prescribes the process by which the Government will ensure an adequate number of awardees are available at all times to achieve effective competition on all task orders. The Government intends to maintain a pool of up to five (5) small business contractors with a proven track record for competing on and then delivering quality construction projects.

(b) Awardees are expected, in good faith, to participate in the task order competitions, and if successful, to deliver quality projects on time and at cost, to include management and supervision of subcontractors. If for any reason, an awardee cannot participate in a competition, the awardee shall provide written notice to the Government of the reason(s) for non-participation prior to proposal due date. Failure to participate in good faith and/or an overall annual performance assessment rating of Marginal or Unsatisfactory may result in the awardee being off-ramped from the multiple award program. An off-ramp decision may result in implementing a termination for convenience, implementing a termination for default or taking any other action permitted by the contract terms and conditions.

(c) In the event awardee(s) are off-ramped within 30 months of initial contract award, the Government will reserve the right to on-ramp contractor(s) whom responded to this solicitation and were selected as on-ramp contractors in order to maintain a pool of up to five (5) small business awardees. On-ramp contractors will be selected based on initial proposal evaluation results from the basic multiple award solicitation in order of ranking. Selected on-ramp contractors will be subject to a performance validation review. Contractor(s) must be active in SAM and otherwise in compliance with the original multiple award solicitation. If found in compliance, on-ramp contractors may be offered a bi-lateral IDIQ contract with the original guaranteed minimum and allowed to compete on future task order projects as an awardee.

(d) The Government will not use on-ramp procedures beyond the 30 month mark from the initial awards. The original performance period for awardees will be five years, and a six (6) month extension; no contract will exceed five years with an Option to Extend Services regardless of when a basic contract is awarded.

(e) Annual Performance Review ("Off-Ramp): The Government will ensure that an adequate number of contractors are available at all times to achieve effective competition on all task orders. On an annual basis, the Government will evaluate all contractors' participation rates, reason(s) for nonparticipation, and performance evaluations for task orders completed or in effect. Failure to participate in good faith on at least 75% of the issued Task Order Proposal Requests (TOPR) and/or an overall annual performance assessment rating of Marginal or Unsatisfactory may result in the contractor being off-ramped from the multiple award program. An off-ramp decision results in the inability to participate in future TOPRs.

(f) Replacing MATOC Contractors ("On-Ramp"): Should one or more of the incumbent MATOC contractor gets off-ramped and occurs within 30 months of the initial MATOC award, the government may select up to two of the "on-ramp" awardees as a replacement. The "on-ramp" contractor(s) will be selected based on initial evaluation results from the basic multiple award solicitation in order of ranking. The "on-ramp" awardee that had the lowest priced, technical acceptable proposal with the highest past performance confidence assessment rating, will be selected to replace the previous MATOC prime contractor. The selected contractor will be subject to a performance validation review and must be active in SAM and found to be in compliance with the original MATOC solicitation. If the first selectee does not meet the previously stated requirements, the second "on-ramp" awardee that had the lowest priced, technical acceptable proposal with the highest performance confidence assessment rating, will be given the opportunity to replace the departing MATOC prime contractor.

This process will continue until an "on-ramp" awardee is selected as a prime contractor for the MATOC or until both "on-ramp" awardees have been evaluated. If found in compliance, the "on-ramp" contractor(s) may be offered a bi-lateral IDIQ contract with the original guaranteed minimum of $1,000.00 and allowed to compete on future task order projects.

L-4 Bonding: The offeror shall provide proof from the offeror's bonding company that their firm has, as a minimum, $9,999,999.00 in available bonding capability in accordance with Contract Clause FAR 52.228-1.

CP 701 747 5252

295 STEEN BLVD BLDG 242

GRAND FORKS AFB, ND 58201

UNITED STATES

Angelo Mykael Cabuang, Email: angelomykael.cabuang.1@us.af.mil Telephone: 701-747-4751