4._FA4659-17-R-00070002_Questions_and_Answers_Amendment.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The pursose of the amendment to request for proposal FA4659-17-R-0007 is to:

1. Include questions and answ ers to the attachments (14 Pages).

2. Change the building address FROM 575 Tuskegee Amn Blvd, bld 418, GFAFB, ND 58205 TO 295 Steen Blvd, Bld 242, GFAFB, ND 58205.

3. Change the POCs FROM Darrell Haas and Ellen Reed to SrA Richard Walls and Jeremiah Snedker.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 10

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 02-Nov-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA465917R0007

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

19-Oct-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

02-Nov-2017

CODE

319 CONTRACTING FLIGHT

295 STEEN BLVD, BLDG 242

GRAND FORKS AFB ND 58205 6436

FA4659 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA465917R0007

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

List Of Attachments

Attachment 1- BTS PWS Attachment 2- Price Schedule Attachment 3- Past Performance Questionaire Attachment 4- Service Contract Act Wage Rates Attachment 5- Construction Wage Rates Attachment 6- Financial Institution Reference Sheet Attachment 7- RFP Cover Letter_BTS

NEW

Attachment 8- FA4659-17-R-0007- Base Telecommunications Grand Forks- Questions-Answers (14 Pages)

Recapitulation

Base Year (1 Feb 2018 – 31 Jan 2019) $__________________________ Option 1 (1 Feb 2019 – 31 Jan 2020) $__________________________ Option 2 (1 Feb 2020 – 31 Jan 2021) $__________________________ Option 3 (1 Feb 2021 – 31 Jan 2022) $__________________________ Option 4 (1 Feb 2022 – 31 Jan 2023) $__________________________ Option to Extend (1 Feb 2023- 30 Jul 2023) $____________________________

52.212-1 ADDENDUM

THIS SECTION IS FOR SOLICITATION PURPOSES ONLY. THIS SECTION WILL BE PHYSICALLY

REMOVED FROM ANY RESULTANT AWARD, BUT WILL BE DEEMED INCORPORATED BY

REFERENCE.

ADDENDA TO 52.212-1 PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

Addendum to 52.212-1(c), Period for Acceptance of Offers. The paragraph is tailored as follows: The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 90 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers.

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of two (2) separately bound parts, Part I - Price Proposal, and Part II - Past Performance Information.

B. The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer's opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional cost information will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists; offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the contracting officer to determine the reasonableness and affordability of the price.

C. Specific Instructions:

1. PART I – PRICE PROPOSAL – Submit original and one (1) copy.

(a) Complete blocks 12, 17a, 30a, b and c of the SF1449. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the RFP, with attachments.

(b) Insert proposed unit prices in Section B for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) or SubClin (SCLIN), including all option periods. The extended amount must equal the whole dollar unit price multiplied by the number of units.

(c) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in Provisions. Provision 52.212-3 shall be returned in its entirety.

(d) If If applicable, provide a letter from the Small Business Administration (SBA) showing proof of Section 8(a) status.

2. PART II – PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION – Limited to no more than 3 pages per contract listed.

Only references for same or similar type contract desired. Offeror will send Past Performance Surveys to references for completion. References will send completed Past Performance Surveys directly to the Contracting Office. The past performance survey to be completed is located within this solicitation.

(a) Quality and Satisfaction Rating for Contracts Completed in the Past Three Years: Provide any information currently available (letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.) which demonstrates customer satisfaction with overall job performance and quality of completed product for same or similar type contract. In addition, explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, numerous warranty calls, etc.

(b) Performance Surveys: The government will evaluate the quality and extent of offeror's performance deemed relevant to the requirements of this RFP. The government will use information submitted by the offeror and other sources such as other Federal Government offices and commercial sources, to assess performance. Provide a list of no more than five (5), of the most relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies and commercial customers within the last three (3) years from the date of the solicitation release date . Relevant past performance must demonstrate telephone switch operation and maintenance, such as installation/maintenance/troubleshooting of analog/digital/Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) telephones, as well as inside and outside plant work, to include the ability to run/install/terminate/splice/map copper fiber optic cable. Must exhibit Avaya telephone switch competencies to include the ability to staff a switch technician that has a Security+ certification. Must exhibit the ability to maintain and produce cable records for the entire installation communications infrastructure. Projects shall be similar in size, scope, and complexity to those anticipated under this contract and shall provide at least one example of past performance on a Government installation, and may include past performance from Federal, State, or local government agencies, as well as commercial sources. Relevancy is also defined as below:

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/af_afmc/far/FAR15.DOC#b154062 http://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/formslibrary.do?viewType=DETAIL&formId=E331497A1FE0AE1F85256A260055A47B

Very Relevant

Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant

Present/past effort involved much of the magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant

Past/Present performance contractual effort involved some of the magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Past/Present performance effort did not involve any of the magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information that closely relates to the work required in the statement of work. Offerors should furnish the following information for each contract listed:

(i) Company/Division name

(ii) Product/Service

(iii) Contracting Agency/Customer

(iv) Contract Number

(v) Contract Dollar Value

(vi) Period of Performance

(vii) Verified, up-to-date name, address, FAX & telephone number of the contracting officer

(viii) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions

(ix) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, provide complete information as to the arrangement, including any relevant and recent past/present performance information on previous teaming arrangements with same partner.

A signed and current teaming arrangement letter shall be provided. If this is a first time joint effort, each party to the arrangement must provide a list of past and present relevant contracts.

(c) Subcontractor Consent: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor’s consent. Provide with the proposal a letter from all subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor.

3. PART III- MISSION ESSENTIAL PERSONNEL PLAN. Mission Essential Plan will be required to be submitted with the proposal documents. The contractor's Mission Essential plan will be evaluated for completeness and accuracy with the rest of the proposal documents. It will not be evaluated as a "technical" aspect of the proposal, however will be a pass/fail IAW DFARS 252.237.7024 minimum requirements.

D. Documents submitted in response to this RFP must be fully responsive to and consistent with the following:

1. Requirements of the RFP (Contract Line Items Numbers (CLINs) & Performance Work Statement (PWS)), and government standards and regulations pertaining to the PWS.

2. Evaluation Factors for Award in addenda to 52.212-2 of this RFP.

3. Any limitation on the number of proposal pages. Pages exceeding the page limitations set forth in this addenda will not be read or evaluated, and will be removed from the proposal.

4. Format for proposal Part II AND Part III shall be as follows:

(a) A page is defined as one face of an 8 ½” x 11” sheet of paper containing information.

(b) Typing shall not be less than 12 pitch

INFORMATION REGARDING SUBMISSION OF PROPOSAL: Hand carried or mailed proposals must be dropped off at 319 CONF, 295 Steen Blvd., Bldg 242, Grand Forks AFB, ND 58205-6436. The sealed envelope or package used to submit your proposal must show the time and date specified for receipt, the Solicitation Number, and the name and address of the offeror. Offers may also be sent in via email to SrA Richard Walls, Richard.Walls.1@us.af.mil or to Mr. Jeremiah Snedker, Jeremiah.Snedker@us.af.mil. Please be aware that there may be issues that cause the proposal to not be received. If choosing to email in a proposal please follow up with their of the Points of Contact mentioned in the solicitation to ensure its receipt.

Offerors are cautioned that Grand Forks AFB has visitor control procedures requiring individuals not affiliated with the installation to obtain a visitor pass prior to entrance. SOME DELAY SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED WHEN HAND CARRYING PROPOSALS. Offerors should allow sufficient time to obtain a visitor pass and arrive at 319 CONF PRIOR to the time specified for receipt. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 52.212- 1(f) “Late submission, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers.”

FEDERAL HOLIDAYS: The following Federal Legal Holidays are observed by this base:

New Year’s Day 1 January Martin Luther King’s Birthday Third Monday in January Presidents Day Third Monday in February Memorial Day Last Monday in May Independence Day 4 July Labor Day First Monday in September Columbus Day Second Monday in October Veterans Day 11 November Thanksgiving Day Fourth Thursday in November Christmas Day 25 December

(End of addendum)

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

(1) Past Performance

(2) Price

Past performance is significantly more important than price when being evaluated.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the CLINS and option prices are significantly unbalanced or determined to pose undue risk to the Government. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014) ADDENDUM

mailto:Richard.Walls.1@us.af.mil mailto:Jeremiah.Snedker@us.af.mil http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_000.htm http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_000.htm

BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This is a competitive selection in which competing offeror’s present and past performance history will be evaluated on a basis significantly more important than price. By submission of its offer in accordance with the instructions provided in clause 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors, the offeror accedes to the terms of this model contract and all such offers shall be treated equally except for their prices, and performance records. The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

A. Initially, offers shall be ranked according to price, including any option prices. An offeror’s proposed prices will be determined by multiplying the quantities identified in the Pricing Schedule by the proposed unit price for each item to reach the extended amount for each. The offeror’s price will be evaluated for balanced pricing, completeness, and reasonableness of the proposed evaluated price. Option to Extend Services (six month extension) pricing will be evaluated by dividing option year four (4) pricing by two (2) to reach the extended pricing and will also be evaluated for balanced pricing, completeness, and reasonableness and incorporated into the total evaluated pricing.

B. Next, offers shall be evaluated according to their performance confidence, beginning with the lowest-priced offeror in ascending order according to price. If the lowest priced acceptable evaluated offer is judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance rating, and the offeror is determined to be responsible, that offer represents the best value for the Government and the evaluation process will stop. Award shall be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers. If the lowest priced offeror is not judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment, the next lowest priced offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in ascending order by price) until an offeror is judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment or until all offerors are evaluated. The Source Selection Authority shall then make an integrated assessment best value award decision.

1. Performance Confidence Evaluation: the government past performance evaluation team shall evaluate each offeror’s past performance, assigning ratings of “Substantial Confidence”, “Satisfactory Confidence”, “Neutral Confidence”, “Limited Confidence”, or “No Confidence” based on the analysis detailed below.

(a) Using questionnaires, the contracting officer shall seek relevant past performance information based on the references provided by the offeror and data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources.

Relevant past performance includes efforts involving the performance of the services described in the PWS that are similar or greater in scope, magnitude and complexity than the effort described in this solicitation. The government reserves the right to seek information on higher priced offerors if none of the lower priced offerors receives a “Substantial Confidence” past performance assessment rating.

(b) The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to allow the Government to assess the offeror’s ability to perform the effort described in this solicitation based on the offeror’s demonstrated present and past performance.

The assessment process will result in an overall past performance confidence assessment rating of

Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Neutral Confidence, Limited Confidence, or No Confidence, as defined herein. All past performance information for the individual entities that comprise a joint venture will be considered as the principal offeror’s past performance for evaluation purposes. Additionally, the past performance evaluation may take into consideration the proposed distribution of effort between the parties for teaming arrangements, including joint ventures, in determining the weight of each participant’s individual past performance records in the overall performance confidence assessment rating. When no recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned, the rating will be “Neutral Confidence”, meaning the rating is evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably. A “Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” past performance confidence rating will be worth more than a “Neutral confidence” past performance confidence rating.

(c) Performance Confidence Assessment Rating: Past performance will be used as a measure of the Government’s confidence in the offeror’s ability to successfully perform based on previous and current contracts and support agreements. Past performance information may be obtained through the Past performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), questionnaires provided by the offeror (see external attachment 3), through Defense Contract Management Agency channels, through interviews with program managers and contracting officers, or other sources known to the Government. Data from previous source selections or contractor capability assessments will be used if the data is recent and relevant. A confidence assessment rating will be assigned to each offeror as follows:

TABLE 1 – Performance Confidence Ratings Adjectival Rating Description Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

(d) Performance Evaluation - Relevancy Ratings To assist the Government’s evaluation, each offeror’s supporting past performance will be evaluated for relevancy as follows:

TABLE 2 - Relevancy Ratings Adjectival Rating Description Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance contractual effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities than this solicitation requires Not Relevant Present/past performance contractual effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities than this solicitation requires

(e) Past Performance Evaluation – Recency:

Only past performance occurring or ending within the last three (3) years of the solicitation release date will be considered for recency. Any past performance occurring more than four years from solicitation release date shall be considered Not Recent.

(f) In evaluating past performance, the Government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those past performance references deemed most relevant to the effort described in this solicitation. Otherwise relevant past performance references with less than 6 months of actual (completed) services provided may not be considered as highly as relevant past performance references with more than 6 months of actual (completed) performance.

C. If the lowest priced offer is judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance rating, and the offeror is determined to be responsible, that offer represents the best value for the Government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award shall be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers.

D. If the lowest priced offeror is not judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment, the next lowest priced offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in ascending order by price) until an offeror is judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment or until all offerors are evaluated. The Source Selection Authority shall then make an integrated assessment best value award decision.

E. The contractor's Mission Essential plan will be evaluated for completeness and accuracy with the rest of the proposal documents. It will not be evaluated as a "technical" aspect of the proposal, however will be a pass/fail IAW DFARS 252.237.7024 minimum requirements."

F. The Government reserves the right to award a contract to the other than lowest priced offer. In that event, the Source Selection Authority shall make a decision based on a comparative assessment of proposals against all source selection criteria in the solicitation.

G. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in FAR 52.212-1, Instruction to Offerors – Commercial Item to permit a meaningful arrangement of past performance. Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal (for example, the relevance of past performance information) or respond to adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond.

Communication conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision.

H. The Government reserves the right to award a contract without discussions with respective offerors. The Government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in their best interest.

Joint Venture Agreements – Joint Ventures are allowable on competitive 8(a) set-asides; however, the joint venture agreement must be received by SBA prior to proposal due date and approved before award of any resulting contract.

If you are contemplating a joint venture on this project, you must advise your assigned SBA Business Development Specialist (BDS) as soon as possible. It is also recommended that the agreement be submitted as soon as practicable to ensure compliance with established regulations. Any corrections and/or changes needed can be made only when our BDS has adequate time for a thorough review before the proposal due date. NO CORRECTIONS AND/OR

CHANGES ARE ALLOWED AFTER TIME OF SUBMISSION OF PROPOSAL OR BIDS.

Mentor and Teaming Agreements- Mentoring or teaming agreements are allowable on competitive 8(a) set-asides, however the signed agreement must be submitted with the proposal.

(End of Provision)

52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)

(a) Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency, and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from

319 Contracting Flight 295 Steen Blvd, Bldg 242 Grand Forks AFB, ND, 58205

(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.

(End of provision)

252.232-7006 WIDE AREA WORKFLOW PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS (MAY 2013)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--

Department of Defense Activity Address Code (DoDAAC) is a six position code that uniquely identifies a unit, activity, or organization.

Document type means the type of payment request or receiving report available for creation in Wide Area WorkFlow (WAWF).

Local processing office (LPO) is the office responsible for payment certification when payment certification is done external to the entitlement system.

(b) Electronic invoicing. The WAWF system is the method to electronically process vendor payment requests and receiving reports, as authorized by DFARS 252.232-7003, Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving Reports.

(c) WAWF access. To access WAWF, the Contractor shall--

(1) Have a designated electronic business point of contact in the System for Award Management at https://www.acquisition.gov; and

(2) Be registered to use WAWF at https://wawf.eb.mil/ following the step-by-step procedures for self-registration available at this Web site.

(d) WAWF training. The Contractor should follow the training instructions of the WAWF Web-Based Training Course and use the Practice Training Site before submitting payment requests through WAWF. Both can be accessed by selecting the “Web Based Training” link on the WAWF home page at https://wawf.eb.mil/.

(e) WAWF methods of document submission. Document submissions may be via Web entry, Electronic Data Interchange, or File Transfer Protocol.

(f) WAWF payment instructions. The Contractor must use the following information when submitting payment requests and receiving reports in WAWF for this contract/order:

(1) Document type. The Contractor shall use the following document type(s).

2 in 1 (Services)

(Contracting Officer: Insert applicable document type(s). Note: If a “Combo” document type is identified but not supportable by the Contractor's business systems, an “Invoice” (stand-alone) and “Receiving Report” (stand-alone) document type may be used instead.)

(2) Inspection/acceptance location. The Contractor shall select the following inspection/acceptance location(s) in WAWF, as specified by the contracting officer.

F2A3C5

(Contracting Officer: Insert inspection and acceptance locations or “Not applicable”.)

(3) Document routing. The Contractor shall use the information in the Routing Data Table below only to fill in applicable fields in WAWF when creating payment requests and receiving reports in the system.

Routing Data Table* Field Name in WAWF Data to be entered in WAWF Pay Official DoDAAC F87700 Issue By DoDAAC FA4659 Admin DoDAAC FA4659

Inspect By DoDAAC F2A3C5 Ship To Code F2A3C5 Ship From Code N/A Mark For Code N/A Service Approver (DoDAAC) F2A3C5 Service Acceptor (DoDAAC) F2A3C5 Accept at Other DoDAAC N/A LPO DoDAAC N/A DCAA Auditor DoDAAC N/A Other DoDAAC(s) N/A

(*Contracting Officer: Insert applicable DoDAAC information or “See schedule” if multiple ship to/acceptance locations apply, or “Not applicable.”)

(4) Payment request and supporting documentation. The Contractor shall ensure a payment request includes appropriate contract line item and subline item descriptions of the work performed or supplies delivered, unit price/cost per unit, fee (if applicable), and all relevant back-up documentation, as defined in DFARS Appendix F, (e.g. timesheets) in support of each payment request.

(5) WAWF email notifications. The Contractor shall enter the email address identified below in the “Send Additional Email Notifications” field of WAWF once a document is submitted in the system.

Richard.Walls.1@us.af.mil Jeremiah.Snedker@us.af.mil As well as the Contracting Officer Representitive (COR) (Email will be provided)

(g) WAWF point of contact. (1) The Contractor may obtain clarification regarding invoicing in WAWF from the following contracting activity's WAWF point of contact.

Voice: 1-888-332-7411 Email: DFAS.INDIANAPOLIS-IN.JFL.MBX.AMPO-INQUIRIES@MAIL.MIL Fax: 317-275-0123

(Contracting Officer: Insert applicable information or “Not applicable.”)

(2) For technical WAWF help, contact the WAWF helpdesk at 866-618-5988.

(End of clause)

(End of Summary of Changes) mailto:Richard.Walls.1@us.af.mil mailto:Ellen.Reed@us.af.mil mailto:DFAS.INDIANAPOLIS-IN.JFL.MBX.AMPO-INQUIRIES@MAIL.MIL