PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx

DOCX document 22 KB Posted

Attached to
Improvements to Main Gate Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4659-11-R-0017
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command

About this file

Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Improvements to Main Gate, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment 1 - Questions Answers.doc DOC document
Amendment 0002 - Q A.doc DOC document
Attachment 2 - JFSD200829AB Spec Revised.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - NDDH Summary of Asbestos Requirements.pdf PDF
11-R-0017-0001 Proposal Due Date Extension.doc DOC document
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION REFERENCE SHEET.docx DOCX document
JFSD200829AB Drawings.pdf PDF
RFP 11-R-0017.pdf PDF
Climatological.pdf PDF
JFSD200829AB Submittal Schedule.pdf PDF
Solicitation Cover Letter.docx DOCX document
JFSD200829AB Spec.pdf PDF
Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA4659-11-R-0017

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation

TO:

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a contract for the construction of a brick wall, fencing, lane closing barriers generator connections, and all other support consturction as required at Grand Forks AFB, ND.

Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, contact SrA Nathan Blackmer at 701-747-3904, Email: nathan.blackmer@us.af.mil and myself at 701-747-5299 or by email: jeremiah.snedker@us.af.mil.

//Signed// JEREMIAH SNEDKER Contracting Officer

1 Atch Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________Telephone Number: ____________________
Address: __________________________Fax Number: _________________________
__________________________Point of Contact: ______________________
__________________________
__________________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________*

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________* Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________

Address: _____________________Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________Fax Number:_____________________
_____________________________Email Address: _____________________

C. FAX COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: SSgt Malinda Sowards or Jeremiah Snedker 701-747-4215

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________

Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
E
G
S
M
U
N
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3.
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4.
Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5.
Followed approved quality control plan.
6.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
9.
Identified problems as they occurred.
10.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
12.
Developed realistic progress schedules.
13.
Met established project schedules.
14.
Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
15.
Was responsive to contract changes.
16.
Provided adequate project supervision.
17.
Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
18.
Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
19.
Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
20.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
21.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
22.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO

23.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

24.
Is the contractor rated in CPARS?
YES/NO

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER __________

Remarks:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Attachment 5

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .