Past Performance Questionaire Revision 10 April.pdf
PDF 80 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA4659-09-R-0006
About this file
Revised Past Performance Questionaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions and Answers 6 May 09.doc | DOC document | |
| Amend 7.doc | DOC document | |
| FA4659-09-R-0006-0006.pdf | ||
| JFSD970345 Questions and responses..docx | DOCX document | |
| Revised Drawings FA4659-09-R-0006.pdf | ||
| FA4659-09-R-0006-0005.pdf | ||
| amendment 0004.doc | DOC document | |
| DRWINGS FA4659-09-R-0006.pdf | ||
| amendment 0003.doc | DOC document | |
| Amend 2 North flight line elec.doc | DOC document | |
| FA4659-09-R0006 Specifications.pdf | ||
| Flight Lines North Drawings.zip | ZIP file | |
| RFP cover letter.pdf | ||
| Past Performance Questionaire R-0006.pdf | ||
| RFP 09-R0006.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 1 - YEARLY CLIMATOLOGICAL SUMMARY FOR 2007-2003.pdf |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA4659-09-R-0006
20 April 2009
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When filled in this document is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION(Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate):
Contractor’s Name: ________________________ Address:
Telephone Number: ________________________
Fax Number: _____________________________
Point of Contact: __________________________
Project Title or Brief Description of Work:
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ______________________________
Initial Dollar Amount: $_____________
Final Dollar Amount $_____________
If amounts for “initial” and “final” above are different, provide a brief explanation of the reason:
Date of Contract Award: _______________________
Period of Performance: ________________________
Completion Date:
1. Original Completion Date: ______________
2. Actual/Current Completion: _____________
3. How many times changed: ______________
4. Primary Causes of Change:
*Note: If offeror holds or has held other construction contracts for reparing electric lines with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Contractor performed as the [ ] Prime Contractor [ ] Sub-contractor [ ] Key Personnel
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
Name of Respondent: ______________________ Title:_________________________
Relation to this Contract: ___________________________________
Address: _______________________ Telephone Number: ____________
Contractor’s Name: _____________________ Contract Number:_______________
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator's name:
B. Evaluator's title:
C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:
Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: _____________________
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL
5 EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
4 VERY GOOD- The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
3 SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements.
The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
2 MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
1 UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.
Technical Performance 5 4 3 2 1 N
T1 Quality & repeatability of operations & maintenance.
T2 Quality of technical system testing and certification efforts
T3 Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts
T4 Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements
T5 Provided timely resolution of warranty defects
T6 Was responsive to contract changes and obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as a work-in-progress increased
T7 Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures
Program Management 5 4 3 2 1 N
P1. Effectiveness of overall management and supervisors in technical and administrative abilities to meet contract requirements
P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff
(including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)
P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements
P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations
P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts
P7. Deveolped realisitic progress schedules
P8. Met established progress schedules
P9. Paid Subcontractors/Suppliers in a timely manner
P10. Was the contractor ever issued or cure or show cause notice for delays in work progress? If yes please explain below.
Program Management 5 4 3 2 1 N
P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.
Employee Retention/Attraction 5 4 3 2 1 N
E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.
E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.
E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.
3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
Mailing Address: 319 th
Contracting Squadron
Attn: Shane Lind
575 Tuskegee Airman Blvd Bldg 418
Grand Forks AFB, ND 58204
Or FAX to: (701) 747-5281 Attn; Shane T Lind
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .