FA462522R1006 Airfield Grnds Mx Combo.pdf

Notice to Offeror(s)/Supplier(s): Funds are not presently available for this effort. No award will be made under this solicitation until funds are available. The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an Offeror for any costs.

This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for Airfield Grounds Maintenance services (base year plus four option years) prepared in accordance with the format in FAR Subpart 12.6 and FAR 13, as supplemented with additional information included in this notification. This solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2022-02, Defense Acquisition Circular 30 Dec 2021, and Air Force Acquisition Circular 2021-0726 27 October 2021.

This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; proposals are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued. This solicitation is issued as a Request for Proposal (RFP), solicitation number FA462522R1006. This procurement is a 100% small business set-aside.

The applicable North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is 561730, Landscaping Services. The small business size standard is $8M.

Paper copies of the RFP will not be made available. Proposals shall be e-mailed to the following e-mail address: 509CONS.PKA.Services@us.af.mil (Attn: SSgt Ryan Hopkin).

NOTE: proposals must be received by 15 Feb 2022, 10:00 AM Central Time; late proposals will not be considered for award. Offerors must be registered and have an active status in the System for Award Management (SAM) (www.sam.gov) in order to be eligible for award. Responsible sources may submit a proposal, which, if timely received, shall be considered by this agency. Proposals shall be valid for 181 days from RFP close date.

The services required in the contract are to provide airfield grounds maintenance services for Whiteman AFB in accordance with (IAW) the Performance Work Statement (PWS) dated January 13, 2022 (Attachment 1). The growing season on Whiteman AFB is from 1 April until 31 October. The government has written into this requirement the option to request services from the Offeror during the months of March and November, if necessary. The Offeror will be given a one-month notice when services will be requested for the month before or after the traditional growing season.

Site Visit Information: A site visit for this solicitation will be held on 2 February 2022 at 2:00 PM Central Time. All attendees will meet at Whiteman AFB Visitor’s center by 1:00 PM Central Time. Attendance will be limited to two persons per Offeror. Only one site visit will be offered/provided. Interested Offerors are highly encouraged to attend the site visit. Offerors are able to provide a proposal without site visit attendance. Site visit RSVP shall be sent to 509CONS.PKA.Services@us.af.mil (Attn: SSgt Ryan Hopkin), no later than 31 January 2022 at 1:00 PM Central Time. Provide name, phone number, and company name for attendance. A valid Government issued ID will be required for entry.

Questions shall be submitted not later than 7 February 2022 at 2:00 PM Central Time.

Answers will be posted to the solicitation as an attachment as soon as all answers have been mailto:509CONS.PKA.Services@us.af.mil http://www.sam.gov/ mailto:509CONS.PKA.Services@us.af.mil reviewed by the Contracting Officer. Watch for the update on beta.SAM.gov.

Service Contract Act applies, Department of Labor Wage Decision Number WD 2015- 5089 (Rev. 18) dated 27 December 2021 is hereby incorporated by reference and can be found at the following internet address: http://www.beta.sam.gov

To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, Offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Alternate proposals will not be accepted. The response shall consist of three (3) separate parts, Part I – Price Proposal, Part II

– Technical Capability, and Part III – Past Performance Information.

For the purposes of this solicitation, Technical Capability and Past Performance is significantly more important than Price.

Evaluation for this acquisition will be based on best value considering price, technical capabilities, and past performance. Award will be made to the best-valued Offeror meeting the requirements of the PWS with acceptable technical capabilities and past performance.

Relationship between Solicitation FAR 52.212-1 and FAR 52.212-2. Your attention is directed to the functional relationship between FAR 52.212-1 and FAR 52.212-2 of this solicitation.

FAR 52.212-1 provides information for the purpose of organizing the proposal and is not intended to be all-inclusive. FAR 52.212-2 describes the evaluation factors for award, to include the evaluation procedures for the ranking of the Price Proposals, and the assessment of Technical Capability and Past Performance information. Since the Government evaluation of proposals will cover areas identified in FAR 52.212-2, proposals should address all such areas of evaluation. Proposals that do not contain the information required risk rejection.

**Prepare your proposal in accordance with the addenda to clause 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items** http://www.beta.sam.gov/

Specific Instructions

Addendum to FAR 52.212-1:

1. PART I – PRICE PROPOSAL

a. Complete Price Schedule to include all option periods. The unit prices must be rounded to the nearest cent. The extended amount must equal the unit price multiplied by the number of units and rounded to the nearest cent. The proposal must be submitted for a base period plus four option periods. An official having the authority to bind your company contractually must sign and date the Price Schedule.

NOTE: An Offeror’s proposed prices will be determined by multiplying the quantities identified in the Price Schedule by the unit price for each item to confirm the extended amount for each. Unit prices shall prevail in the event the extended price is calculated incorrectly.

b. Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in provisions. See Attachment 3.

2. PART II – TECHNICAL CAPABILITY

a. Submit the proposal as one original copy and one sanitized copy identifying Offeror by

CAGE code only. A sanitized copy removes all direct references that can identify an Offeror by name, logo, photograph, or other easily recognizable characteristics. The sanitized copy will only contain a CAGE code as an identifier. The sanitized copy will be used during evaluation procedures as detailed in 52.212-2 of the solicitation. This will also apply to Part III – Past Performance.

b. At minimum, the technical capability proposal shall consist of the following:

1) Sub-factor 1 – Quality Control Plan (QCP): QCP shall identify approach to ensure airfield is maintained to the standard outlined in the PWS. Offeror shall provide a QCP in sufficient detail to demonstrate how they will provide adequate manpower, equipment, and ensure mowing standards are maintained. QCP shall identify approach to ensure airfield is maintained to the standard outlined in the PWS. Plan shall detail means and methods to maintain each of the tasks – semi-improved grounds, surface drainage ditches, and trees. Include in the plan courses of action for contingencies; for example, significant or recurring weather, equipment servicing and routine maintenance, etc. Provide a basic outline of the method(s) for hiring and retaining skilled manpower. Indicate the number of personnel projected for employment during the mowing season. Identify how personnel will be allocated among the various tasks required by this contract.

a) The minimum standard is met when the Offeror submits a Quality Control Plan that clearly indicates how they will hire and retain skilled manpower sufficient to execute the requirement, a detailed approach to mowing and trimming that will ensure standards are maintained, and shall indicate how personnel will be allocated among tasks for the requirement.

2) Sub-factor 2 – Mobilization Plan and Equipment List: Offeror shall provide a Mobilization Plan complete with an Equipment List of existing equipment or plan to have the equipment necessary to perform the work. The Equipment List shall show the make and model of the equipment as well as the year of manufacture. Within the Mobilization Plan, include a narrative section of how the equipment will be mobilized in order to start performance for this requirement, to include the number of days needed for mobilization.

a) The minimum standard is met when the Offeror submits a Mobilization Plan and

Equipment List that shows a chronological outline from time of award to contract start date to include the length of time the Contractor will need to assemble and coordinate all personnel and equipment to perform to the requirements of the

PWS.

3) Sub-factor 3 – Mission Essential Contractor Services Plan: Offeror shall provide a

Mission-Essential Contractor Services Plan (MECSP), describing how it will continue to perform the essential contractor services listed in Section 2 of the PWS during periods of crisis. This plan will be incorporated into the contract.

a) The minimum standard is met when the Offeror submits a MECSP complying with the requirements of the Section 2 of the PWS.

c. Format for the proposal shall be as follows:

1) The entire Technical Capability shall not exceed ten (10) pages.

2) A page is defined as one face of an 8 ½” x 11” sheet of paper containing information.

3) Typing shall not be less than 12-point font.

4) Do not include cover pages for Parts I, II, and III.

5) Each section (Part I, Part II, and Part III) shall start at the top of a new page.

3. PART III – PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

Limited to no more than two pages per contract listed. Only references for the same or similar type contract desired. Submit original plus one sanitized copy (see Part II – Technical Capability).

a. Quality and Satisfaction Rating for Contracts Completed in the Past Five Years: Provide any information currently available (letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.) which demonstrates customer satisfaction with overall job performance and quality of completed product for same or similar type contract. In addition, explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, numerous warranty calls, etc. In addition, the Government will evaluate the quality and extent of

Offeror’s performance deemed relevant to the requirements of this RFP. The Government will use information submitted by the Offeror and other sources, such as other Federal Government offices and commercial sources, to assess performance.

Provide a list of no more than five (5) of the most relevant contracts performed for federal agencies and commercial customers within the last five (5) years. Past Performance includes contract efforts that are currently being performed. Relevant contracts include work of a nature, magnitude, and scope similar to that required for this contract within the past five years from date of this solicitation. Relevant contracts include Airfield Grounds Maintenance contracts with year round mowing/maintenance of at least 1500 acres. Past performance regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or sub-contractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement will not be considered as highly as past performance information for the principal Offeror. Past performance regarding minor members of joint ventures or teaming arrangements will be considered as highly as the majority member of those arrangements will. Furnish the following information for each contract listed:

1) Contracting agency/customer

2) Contract number

3) Contract type

4) Project title and brief description of contract effort

5) Period of performance

6) Contract value at time of award

7) Current value, including all changes and exercised option

8) Contracting Officer’s name, address and telephone number

b. Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ): The Offeror shall forward a copy of Attachment

4, Past Performance Questionnaire, to not more than five of their most recent references, for whom the Offeror has contracted similar services with the commercial sector, federal, state, or local governments. If the Offeror does not have government references, the Offeror shall provide references from private industry sources that are not prohibited from furnishing information to the Government. The questionnaires must be forwarded to a verified point of contact at each of those agencies or business organizations for completion. Prior to forwarding the questionnaire to each reference, the Offeror shall complete Section 1 entitled “Contract Identification”. Offerors may include with their proposal information, problems encountered on the identified contracts, and the Offeror’s corrective actions. The Government will consider this information as well as information obtained from any other sources when evaluating the Offerors past performance information. Past Performance Questionnaires will only be accepted from project owners or their authorized representatives. Past Performance Questionnaires will not be accepted from prime contractors, subcontractors, or manufacturers.

1) Once completed, the Past Performance Questionnaire can be emailed to

509CONS.PKA.Services@us.af.mil (Attn: SSgt Ryan Hopkin), with receipt no later than the proposal due date. Offerors are responsible for ensuring that their reference sources receive the questionnaires in time to complete and return the questionnaire no mailto:509CONS.PKA.Services@us.af.mil later than the solicitation close date.

2) If the Offeror claims there is no past performance, then that status must be identified to the Contracting Officer not later than the date/time proposals are due from all Offerors. Lack of any past performance will not automatically disqualify an Offeror.

See Addenda to FAR 52.212-2 for more information.

If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, provide complete information as to the arrangement, including any relevant and recent past/present performance information on previous teaming arrangements with same partner. If this is a first time joint effort, each party to the arrangement must provide a list of past and present relevant contracts.

Offerors are cautioned that the Government will use information provided by the Offerors and information obtained by other sources in the development of the performance confidence assessment.

Subcontractor Consent: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime Offeror without the subcontractor’s consent. Provide with the proposal a letter from all subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime Contractor.

End of Addendum to 52.212-1

Evaluation Criteria

Addendum to FAR 52.212-2:

BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD:

• The Government intends to award one contract.

• The Government will evaluate Price, Technical Capability, and Past Performance, and use these factors to make a best value determination.

• For the purposes of this solicitation, Technical Capability and Past Performance is more important than Price.

1. PRICE PROPOSAL:

a. Price evaluation will be conducted as follows:

1) Offers will be ranked from lowest to highest according to price, to include option pricing.

2) Evaluated Amounts for Base Period and Option Periods: The extended amounts for all Base Period CLINS will be added together to calculate the total Base Period Evaluated Amount. This process will be repeated for Option Periods 1 through 4 to derive Evaluated Amounts for each of those periods.

a) NOTE: An Offeror’s proposed prices will be determined by multiplying the quantities identified in the Price Schedule by the unit price for each item to confirm the extended amount for each. Unit prices shall prevail in the event the extended price is calculated incorrectly.

3) Evaluated Amount for Extension of Services: The Unit Prices for items 4001 and 4002 will be summed and multiplied by six to derive the Evaluated Amount for Extension of Services: 6 x [(Unit Price for Item #4001) + (Unit Price for Item # 4002)] = Evaluated Amount for Extension of Services

a) NOTE: Although the price evaluation uses Option 4 prices to calculate Extension of Services Amount, in the event the Government extends services under the authority of FAR 52.217-8, “Option to Extend Services”, the unit pricing of the last exercised option period, which preceded the extension, shall remain in effect.

4) Total Evaluated Price:

The Evaluated Amounts for Base Period, Option Periods 1 through 4, and Extension Period will be summed for a Total Evaluated Price (TEP):

(Total Evaluated Amount for Base Period) + (Total Evaluated Amount for Option Period 1) + (Total Evaluated Amount for Option Period 2) + (Total Evaluated Amount for Option Period 3) + (Total Evaluated Amount for Option Period 4) +

(Evaluated Amount for Extension of Services) = Total Evaluated Price.

b. The Contracting Officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the Contracting Officer will review this determination and if, in the Contracting Officer’s opinion, adequate price competition exists, no additional information will be requested. However, if at any time during this competition the Contracting Officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, Offeror’s may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the Contracting Officer to determine the reasonableness of price.

c. An Offeror’s proposal may be rejected if the Contracting Officer determines the lack of reasonable price information contained in any portion of an Offerors price proposal, or if a proposal is deemed unbalanced.

2. TECHNICAL CAPABILITY:

a. Next, the technical capability of the three lowest priced Offerors will be evaluated on an

ACCEPTABLE / UNACCEPTABLE basis. Proposals will be evaluated to determine the Offeror’s compliance with the technical requirements of this RFQ. All sub-factors will be rated ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE. Technical capability sub-factors of Quality Control Plan, Mobilization Plan/Equipment List, and Mission Essential Plan must have an ACCEPTABLE rating. An overall Technical Capability rating of ACCEPTABLE will be required in order to be considered for award. Those offers not meeting the minimum standard of acceptability will not be considered for award. If at any time an offer is determined UNACCEPTABLE and, therefore, not considered for award, the next highest priced offer will be presented for technical capability evaluation.

RATING DEFINITION

Acceptable Based on the Offeror’s technical proposal, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Unacceptable Based on the Offeror’s technical proposal, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort

b. Evaluators will assign a rating of ACCEPTABLE / UNACCEPTABLE based on the minimum requirements stated below.

c. Sub-factor 1: Quality Control Plan (QCP)

1) CRITERIA: QCP shall identify approach to ensure airfield is maintained to the standard outlined in the PWS. Offeror shall provide a QCP in sufficient detail to demonstrate how they will provide adequate manpower, equipment, and ensure mowing standards are maintained. QCP shall identify approach to ensure airfield is maintained to the standard outlined in the PWS. Plan shall detail means and methods to maintain each of the performance objectives (PO) – semi-improved grounds, surface drainage ditches, and trees. Include in the plan courses of action for contingencies; for example, significant or recurring weather, equipment servicing and routine maintenance, etc. Provide a basic outline of the method(s) for hiring and retaining skilled manpower. Indicate the number of personnel projected for employment during the mowing season. Identify how personnel will be allocated among the various tasks required by this contract.

2) MINIMUM STANDARD OF ACCEPTABILITY: The minimum standard is met when the Offeror submits a Quality Control Plan that clearly indicates how they will hire and retain skilled manpower sufficient to execute the requirement, a detailed approach to mowing and trimming that will ensure standards are maintained, and shall indicate how personnel will be allocated among tasks for the requirement.

d. Sub-factor 2: Mobilization Plan and Equipment List

1) CRITERIA: Offeror shall provide a Mobilization Plan complete with an Equipment

List of existing equipment or plan to have the equipment necessary to perform the work. The Equipment List shall show the make and model of the equipment as well as the year of manufacture. Within the Mobilization Plan, include a narrative section of how the equipment will be mobilized in order to start performance for this requirement, to include the number of days needed for mobilization.

when the Offeror submits a Mobilization Plan and Equipment List that shows a chronological outline from time of award to contract start date to include the length of time the Contractor will need to assemble and coordinate all personnel and equipment to perform to the requirements of the PWS.

e. Sub-factor 3: Mission Essential Contractor Services Plan (MECSP)

1) CRITERIA: Offeror shall provide a MECSP, describing how it will continue to perform the essential contractor services listed in Section 2 of the PWS during periods of crisis. This plan will be incorporated into the contract.

when the Offeror submits a MECSP complying with the requirements of the Section 2 of the PWS.

3. EVALUATING PAST PERFORMANCE:

a. Finally, the Evaluation Team will conduct the past performance evaluation on the three lowest priced technically acceptable offers.

b. The Evaluation Team will primarily rely on information provided by Offeror’s References, completed Past Performance Questionnaires, and/or from the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). However, the Government may use information previously obtained from Past Performance Questionnaires or data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources in the evaluation process. In the event an Offeror submits a Past Performance Questionnaire and it is subsequently determined that the referenced project was formally evaluated in the CPARS, CPARS ratings shall take precedence.

c. First, each past performance reference and questionnaire shall undergo a recency determination. In order to be determined recency, the contract effort shall have been performed during the past five (5) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation.

Offerors who do not meet the recency determination will not be evaluated further for relevancy.

d. Next, each recent past performance reference and questionnaire shall undergo a relevancy determination. Relevant contracts include work of a nature, magnitude, and scope similar to that required for this contract. Relevant contracts include Airfield Grounds Maintenance contracts with mowing/maintenance of at least 1500 acres.

e. In determining relevancy for individual contracts, consideration will be given to the effort, or portion of the effort, being proposed by the Offeror, joint ventures, subcontractors and/or teaming partners whose contract is being reviewed and evaluated.

The following relevancy definitions apply:

1) RELEVANT: Present/Past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

2) NOT RELEVANT: Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

f. A relevancy determination of the Offerors present and past performance, including joint ventures, subcontractors and/or teaming partners, will be made.

g. The Past Performance Evaluation will be accomplished by reviewing aspects of an Offerors recent and relevant past performance.

h. As a result of an analysis of those positive and negative aspect indicators identified, each Offeror will receive an integrated Performance Confidence Assessment, which is the rating for the Past Performance factor. The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to allow the Government to assess the Offeror’s ability to perform the effort described in the solicitation, based on the Offeror’s demonstrated past performance.

i. When relevant performance record indicates performance problems, the Government will consider the number and severity of the problems and the appropriateness and effectiveness of any corrective actions taken (not just planned or promised). The Government may review more recent contracts or performance evaluations to ensure corrective actions have been implemented and to evaluate their effectiveness.

j. The assessment process will result in an overall performance confidence assessment rating of Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, No Confidence, or Unknown Confidence. The three Offerors that have the lowest pricing and are considered technically acceptable will receive one of the ratings described below for the Past Performance factor.

TABLE 1 - PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENTS

k. The Government reserves the right to seek information on higher priced Offerors if none of the lower priced Offerors receive a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment rating. Past performance regarding minor members of joint ventures or teaming arrangements will be considered as highly as the majority member of those arrangements.

Offerors with no relevant past or present performance history or the Offerors performance record is so limited that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned shall receive the rating “Unknown Confidence”, meaning the rating is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably.

l. If none of the three lowest priced Offerors is judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment rating, the next lowest priced Offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order by price) until an Offeror is judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment rating or until all technically acceptable Offerors are evaluated. Then, the Government will perform an integrated assessment of the Offerors to determine the best value to the Government. The Government reserves the right to award a contract to other than the lowest priced Offeror if the lowest priced Offeror is judged to have a performance confidence assessment of other than “Substantial Confidence”. In that event, the Evaluation Team shall make an integrated assessment best value award decision.

RATING Description

Substantial Confidence

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

The Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

m. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in in this solicitation. Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal (for example, the relevance of past performance information) or respond to adverse past performance information to which the Offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. Communication conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the Contracting Officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision.

n. A written notice of award or acceptance of an Offer mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful Offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

End of Addendum to 52.212-2

INFORMATION REGARDING SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS

Acknowledge any and all amendments to the solicitation. By submission of its offer, the Offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined unacceptable. Pages exceeding the page limitations set forth in this document will not be read nor evaluated and will be removed from the proposal.

Electronic submission of proposals is required. Proposals can be e-mailed to the following e-mail address: 509CONS.PKA.Services@us.af.mil (Attn: SSgt Ryan Hopkin).

NOTE: Proposals must be received by 15 February 2022, 10:00 AM Central Time; late proposals will not be considered for award.

Offerors must be registered and have an active status in the System for Award Management (SAM) (www.sam.gov) in order to be eligible for award. Responsible sources may submit a proposal which, if timely received, shall be considered by this agency. Proposals will be valid for 181 days from proposal close date.

NOTE: It is the responsibility of the Offeror to ensure timely receipt of the proposal.

Whiteman AFB network utilizes a firewall that may cause delays in receipt of e-mail/attachments. Late receipt of proposals due to a network firewall or outages will be considered late. Offerors should allow sufficient time for the email traffic to be delivered. E-mail received in the Government office after the closing time will be considered late and not considered for award and processed in accordance with FAR 52.212-1(f) “Late submission, modifications, revisions, and withdrawal of offers.”

Please see Attachment 3: Provisions and Clauses. FAR Clauses and Provisions are hereby incorporated by reference into this solicitation with the same force and effect as if incorporated by full text.

For the site visit, all personnel requesting access to Whiteman AFB must possess a valid State or Government picture identification card. Furthermore, individuals presenting identification cards from a state that is non-compliant with the REAL ID Act will require additional documentation to gain unescorted base access. Additional documentation include a valid U.S.

or foreign government issued passport, an employment authorization document that contains a photograph, or identification cards issued by federal state or local government agencies that include a photo and biographic information. A full list of REAL ID Act compliant and non-complaint states can be found at https://www.dhs.gov/real- id. Personnel requesting vehicle access to Whiteman Air Force Base must provide a valid driver's license, current vehicle registration, and valid vehicle insurance.

Attachments:

1. Performance Work Statement, dated 12 Jan 22

2. SCA Wage Determination 2015-5089 Rev 18, dated Dec 27, 2021 mailto:509CONS.PKA.Services@us.af.mil http://www.sam.gov/ https://www.dhs.gov/real-id https://www.dhs.gov/real-id

3. Provisions and Clauses, dated 13 Jan 22

4. Cover Letter and Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), dated 22 Jan 21

5. Price Schedule and Bid Acknowledgement, dated 22 Jan 21

6. Airfield Map, dated 24Jan22

7. Northwest Ditch Map, dated 24Jan22

8. Northeast Ditch Map, dated 24Jan22

9. South Ditch Map, dated 24Jan22

10. WSA Ditch Map, dated 24Jan22

END