18R0004_Amend_2_Prior_Year_Lab_Analysis.pdf
PDF 471 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Lime Sludge Removal Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA462518R0004
About this file
Prior Year Lab Analysis. Results of analysis are subject to change depending on the sample.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 18R0004_Amend_Acknowledge.pdf | ||
| 18R0004_SOL_SV.pdf | ||
| 18R0004_Atch_3_Spent_Water_Permit.pdf | ||
| 18R0004_Atch_4_Clause_Full_Text_Info.pdf | ||
| 18R0004_Atch_2_Bid_Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 18R0004_Atch_1_SOW_5Jan18.pdf | ||
| 18R0004_Combo_9Jan18.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Laboratory Case Narrative for Laboratory WorkOrder # 1706179
The samples were received and processed using normal regulatory and laboratory protocols. Unless noted in the Final
Report, there were no significant data anomalies or failures noted during data assessment and reporting. The results within this report relate only to the samples received and reported for this project and this report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the approval of Empirical Laboratories, LLC. The test results meet all requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Data uncertainty is linked to the method and regulatory mandated quality control data associated with the sample.
Prior to accepting a Project, Empirical Laboratories, LLC verifies certification requirements and where applicable ensures that the requirements are in place prior to sample analysis. Many states do not carry matrix or program specific certifications. A listing of certifications held by Empirical Laboratories, LLC is included at the end of this report.
EMPIRICAL LABORATORIES, LLC Work Order: 1706179 Report Date: 07/18/2017
ResultAnalyte RL BatchAnalyzed Method Notes DilutionUnits
Client Sample ID: Lime Sludge
MDL
Lab Sample ID: 1706179-01
Sample Matrix: Solid
Sample Collection Date/Time: 06/26/2017 11:00
Sample Received Date/Time: 06/27/2017 08:50
Laboratory Analytical Results Report
Classical Chemistry Parameters
SM2540B36 7G0300507/05/17 15:05% 1% Solids 1.01.0
SW9045D10.2 7G1100607/11/17 13:55pH Units 1Laboratory pH 0.1000.100 H
Metals (Total) by ICP
SW6010C4430 7G0500507/10/17 21:13mg/Kg dry 2Aluminum 21754.1 D
ND SW6010C07/10/17 21:13mg/Kg dry 7G050052Arsenic 10.83.25 U
ND SW6010C07/10/17 21:13mg/Kg dry 7G050052Cadmium 5.412.17 MU
SW6010C2.23 7G0500507/10/17 21:13mg/Kg dry 2Chromium 10.82.17 DJ
ND SW6010C07/10/17 21:13mg/Kg dry 7G050052Copper 10.84.33 U
ND SW6010C07/10/17 21:13mg/Kg dry 7G050052Lead 5.411.62 U
ND SW6010C07/10/17 21:13mg/Kg dry 7G050052Molybdenum 21.75.41 U
ND SW6010C07/10/17 21:13mg/Kg dry 7G050052Nickel 10.83.25 U
ND SW6010C07/10/17 21:13mg/Kg dry 7G050052Selenium 10.83.25 U
SW6010C13.3 7G0500507/10/17 21:13mg/Kg dry 2Zinc 21.75.41 DJ
Mercury by CVAA
ND SW7471B07/07/17 14:36mg/Kg dry 7G050191Mercury 0.09290.0366 U
Result RL Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Classical Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
MDL
Batch 7G03005
Duplicate Prepared: 07/03/2017 Analyzed: 07/05/2017Source: 1706225-04
% Solids %83.29 1.0 85.16 202.221.0
Batch 7G11006
LCS Prepared & Analyzed: 07/11/2017
Laboratory pH pH Units6.080 0.100 6.630 80-12091.70.100
LCS Prepared & Analyzed: 07/11/2017
Laboratory pH pH Units6.090 0.100 6.630 80-12091.90.100
LCS Prepared & Analyzed: 07/11/2017
Laboratory pH pH Units6.090 0.100 6.630 80-12091.90.100
LCS Prepared & Analyzed: 07/11/2017
Laboratory pH pH Units6.100 0.100 6.630 80-12092.00.100
Duplicate Prepared & Analyzed: 07/11/2017Source: 1706141-01
Laboratory pH pH Units7.530 0.100 7.520 20 H0.1330.100
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Metals (Total) by ICP - Quality Control
MDL
Batch 7G05005
Blank Prepared: 07/05/2017 Analyzed: 07/10/2017
Aluminum mg/Kg wet
ND 40.0 U10.0
Arsenic mg/Kg wet
ND 2.00 U0.600
Cadmium mg/Kg wet
ND 1.00 U0.200
Chromium mg/Kg wet
ND 2.00 U0.400
Copper mg/Kg wet
ND 2.00 U0.800
Lead mg/Kg wet
ND 1.00 U0.300
Molybdenum mg/Kg wet
ND 4.00 U1.00
Nickel mg/Kg wet
ND 2.00 U0.600
Selenium mg/Kg wet
ND 2.00 U0.600
Zinc mg/Kg wet
ND 4.00 U1.00
LCS Prepared: 07/05/2017 Analyzed: 07/10/2017
Aluminum mg/Kg wet
402.7 40.0 400.0 80-12010110.0
Arsenic mg/Kg wet
50.44 2.00 50.00 80-1201010.600
Cadmium mg/Kg wet
26.31 1.00 25.00 80-1201050.200
Chromium mg/Kg wet
39.72 2.00 40.00 80-12099.30.400
Copper mg/Kg wet
49.16 2.00 50.00 80-12098.30.800
Lead mg/Kg wet
49.96 1.00 50.00 80-12099.90.300
Molybdenum mg/Kg wet
206.6 4.00 200.0 80-1201031.00
Nickel mg/Kg wet
106.2 2.00 100.0 80-1201060.600
Selenium mg/Kg wet
49.70 2.00 50.00 80-12099.40.600
Zinc mg/Kg wet
103.2 4.00 100.0 80-1201031.00
Matrix Spike Prepared: 07/05/2017 Analyzed: 07/10/2017Source: 1706180-01
Aluminum mg/Kg dry
17240 435 2176 11820 D80-120249109
Arsenic mg/Kg dry
277.1 21.8 272.0 ND D80-1201026.53
Cadmium mg/Kg dry
153.3 10.9 136.0 12.14 D80-1201042.18
Chromium mg/Kg dry
286.1 21.8 217.6 68.41 D80-1201004.35
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Metals (Total) by ICP - Quality Control
MDL
Batch 7G05005
Matrix Spike Prepared: 07/05/2017 Analyzed: 07/10/2017Source: 1706180-01
Copper mg/Kg dry
905.2 21.8 272.0 609.9 D80-1201098.70
Lead mg/Kg dry
301.9 10.9 272.0 36.80 D80-12097.53.26
Molybdenum mg/Kg dry
1114 43.5 1088 23.99 D80-12010010.9
Nickel mg/Kg dry
598.9 21.8 544.0 32.52 D80-1201046.53
Selenium mg/Kg dry
286.9 21.8 272.0 19.81 D80-12098.26.53
Zinc mg/Kg dry
2728 43.5 544.0 2122 D80-12011110.9
Matrix Spike Dup Prepared: 07/05/2017 Analyzed: 07/10/2017Source: 1706180-01
Aluminum mg/Kg dry
16710 444 2219 11820 20 D80-120220 3.09111
Arsenic mg/Kg dry
279.6 22.2 277.4 ND 20 D80-120101 0.8956.66
Cadmium mg/Kg dry
158.3 11.1 138.7 12.14 20 D80-120105 3.232.22
Chromium mg/Kg dry
290.3 22.2 221.9 68.41 20 D80-120100 1.464.44
Copper mg/Kg dry
884.5 22.2 277.4 609.9 20 D80-12099.0 2.318.88
Lead mg/Kg dry
311.2 11.1 277.4 36.80 20 D80-12098.9 3.033.33
Molybdenum mg/Kg dry
1151 44.4 1110 23.99 20 D80-120102 3.2611.1
Nickel mg/Kg dry
622.4 22.2 554.8 32.52 20 D80-120106 3.856.66
Selenium mg/Kg dry
296.0 22.2 277.4 19.81 20 D80-12099.6 3.126.66
Zinc mg/Kg dry
2646 44.4 554.8 2122 20 D80-12094.5 3.0411.1
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Mercury by CVAA - Quality Control
MDL
Batch 7G05019
Blank Prepared: 07/05/2017 Analyzed: 07/07/2017
Mercury mg/Kg wet
ND 0.0330 U0.0130
LCS Prepared: 07/05/2017 Analyzed: 07/07/2017
Mercury mg/Kg wet
0.3764 0.0330 0.3333 80-1201130.0130
Matrix Spike Prepared: 07/05/2017 Analyzed: 07/07/2017Source: 1706214-08
Mercury mg/Kg wet
0.3734 0.0319 0.3226 ND 80-1201160.0126
Matrix Spike Prepared: 07/05/2017 Analyzed: 07/07/2017Source: 1706214-08
Mercury mg/Kg wet
0.3520 0.0300 0.3030 ND 80-1201160.0118
Matrix Spike Dup Prepared: 07/05/2017 Analyzed: 07/07/2017Source: 1706214-08
Mercury mg/Kg wet
0.2393 0.0319 0.3226 ND 2080-12074.2 43.80.0126
Matrix Spike Dup Prepared: 07/05/2017 Analyzed: 07/07/2017Source: 1706214-08
Mercury mg/Kg wet
0.3483 0.0300 0.3030 ND 2080-120115 1.040.0118
Data Qualifiers
As applicable and where required, the following general qualifiers are associated with the sample results. Additional qualifiers will be specified within the reporting sections of the data package or within the body of the Case Narrative.
Analytical Report Terms and Qualifiers
DL: The detection limit (DL) is defined as the minimum concentration of a substance that can be measured and reported with 99% confidence that the analyte concentration is greater than zero. The DL is supported by the method detection limit (MDL) which is determined from analysis of a sample containing the analyte in a given matrix.
The Limit of Detection is an estimate of the minimum amount of a substance that an analytical process can reliably detect. An LOD is analyte- and matrix-specific and may be laboratory-dependent. This definition is further clarified in the DoD QSM as the smallest amount or concentration of a substance that must be present in a sample in order to be detected at a high level of confidence (99%). At the LOD, the false negative rate ( Type II error) is 1%.
LOD:
The Limit of Quantitation is the minimum level, concentration, or quantity of a target variable (e.g., target analyte) that can be reported with a specified degree of confidence. This term is further clarified within the DoD QSM as the lowest concentration that produces a quantitative result within specified limits of precision and bias.
LOQ:
The presence of a "B" to the right of an analytical value indicates that this compound was also detected in the method blank and the data should be interpreted with caution. One should consider the possibility that the correct sample result might be less than the reported result and, perhaps, zero.
B:
Exceeding quality control criteria are associated with the reported result.*:
When a sample (or sample extract) is rerun diluted because one of the compound concentrations exceeded the highest concentration range for the standard curve, all of the values obtained in the dilution run will be flagged with a
"D".
D:
E: The concentration for any compound found which exceeds the highest concentration level on the standard curve for that compound will be flagged with an "E". Usually the sample will be rerun at a dilution to quantitate the flagged compound. For Metals, the qualifier indicates that the serial dilution was outside of the control limits and the compound should be considered estimated due to the presence of interference.
H1: The result was analyzed outside of the EPA recommended holding time.
The result was extracted outside of the EPA recommended holding time
The sample for this analyte was received outside of the EPA recommended holding time .
H2:
H3:
J: The presence of a "J" to the right of an analytical result indicates that the reported result is estimated. The mass spectral data pass the identification criteria showing that the compound is present, but the calculated result is less than the LOQ. One should feel confident that the result is greater than zero and less than the LOQ.
M: Indicates that the sample matrix interfered with the quantitation of the analyte. In dual column analysis the result is reported from the column with the lower concentration. In inorganics, it indicates that the parameters DL/LOD/LOQ have been raised.
N: The MS/MSD accuracy and/or precision are outside criteria. The predigested spike recovery is not within control limits for the associated parameter.
P: The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity. There is greater than a 40% difference between the two
GC columns for the detected concentrations. The higher of the two values is reported unless matrix interference is obvious or for HPLC analysis where the primary column is reported.
Q: The relative percent difference (RPD) and/or % recovery exceeded limits in the associated Quality Control Criteria
S: The associated internal standard exceeded criteria.
U: The presence of a "U" indicates that the analyte was analyzed for but was not detected or the concentration of the analyte quantitated below the DL.
X:
Y:
Z:
The parameter shows a potential positive bias on a reported concentration due to an ICV or CCV exceeding the upper control limit on the high side.
The parameter shows a potential negative bias on a reported concentration due to an ICV or CCV exceeding the lower control limit on the low side.
The parameter shows lack of confirmation/detection, which may be due to a negative bias in the ICV or CCV which exceeds the lower control limit.
B1 The BOD Blank concentration was non-detect but DO depletion exceeded the method specified concentration of 0.20 mg/L
ANALYTICAL REPORT
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.
TestAmerica Nashville 2960 Foster Creighton Drive Nashville, TN 37204 Tel: (615)726-0177
TestAmerica Job ID: 490-131844-1 Client Project/Site: 1706179
For:
Empirical Laboratories, LLC 621 Mainstream Drive - Suite 270 Nashville, Tennessee 37228
Attn: Teri L Horsley
Authorized for release by:
7/11/2017 1:14:08 PM
Jennifer Gambill, Project Manager I (615)301-5044 jennifer.gambill@testamericainc.com
The test results in this report meet all 2003 NELAC and 2009 TNI requirements for accredited parameters, exceptions are noted in this report. This report may not be reproduced except in full, and with written approval from the laboratory. For questions please contact the Project Manager at the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page.
This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.
Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.
Table of Contents
Client: Empirical Laboratories, LLC Project/Site: 1706179
TestAmerica Job ID: 490-131844-1
TestAmerica Nashville
7/11/2017
Cover Page
Table of Contents
Sample Summary
Case Narrative
Definitions
Client Sample Results
QC Sample Results
QC Association
Chronicle
Method Summary
Certification Summary
Chain of Custody
Receipt Checklists
Sample Summary TestAmerica Job ID: 490-131844-1Client: Empirical Laboratories, LLC
Project/Site: 1706179
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID ReceivedCollectedMatrix
490-131844-1 Lime Sludge 1706179-01 Solid 06/26/17 11:00 06/28/17 15:00
TestAmerica Nashville
Page 3 of 14 7/11/2017
Case Narrative Client: Empirical Laboratories, LLC TestAmerica Job ID: 490-131844-1
Project/Site: 1706179
Job ID: 490-131844-1
Laboratory: TestAmerica Nashville
Narrative
Job Narrative
490-131844-1
Comments
No additional comments.
Receipt
The sample was received on 6/28/2017 3:00 PM; the sample arrived in good condition, properly preserved and, where required, on ice.
The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 1.9º C.
General Chemistry
Method(s) 351.2: Due to the high concentration of TKN, the matrix spike / matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) for 442495 could not be evaluated for accuracy and precision. The associated laboratory control sample / laboratory control sample duplicate (LCS/LCSD) met acceptance criteria.
No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page.
TestAmerica Nashville Page 4 of 14 7/11/2017
Definitions/Glossary
Project/Site: 1706179
Qualifiers
General Chemistry
Qualifier DescriptionQualifier
Glossary
These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.Abbreviation
DL
DLC
EDL Estimated Detection Limit (Dioxin)
MDA
MDC
MDL Method Detection Limit
ML Minimum Level (Dioxin)
NC Not Calculated
ND Not Detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
TestAmerica Nashville
Page 5 of 14 7/11/2017
Client Sample Results
Project/Site: 1706179
Lab Sample ID: 490-131844-1Client Sample ID: Lime Sludge 1706179-01 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 06/26/17 11:00
Date Received: 06/28/17 15:00
General Chemistry
RL MDL
Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N 11600 ^ 400 208 mg/Kg 06/30/17 09:53 07/03/17 16:18 20
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
TestAmerica Nashville
Page 6 of 14 7/11/2017
QC Sample Results
Project/Site: 1706179
Method: 351.2 - Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 490-441776/1-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 442495 Prep Batch: 441776
RL MDL
Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N ND 25.0 13.0 mg/Kg 06/30/17 09:53 07/03/17 16:05 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 490-441776/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 442495 Prep Batch: 441776
Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N 250 233.0 mg/Kg 93 80 120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
TestAmerica Nashville
Page 7 of 14 7/11/2017
QC Association Summary
Project/Site: 1706179
General Chemistry
Prep Batch: 441776
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 351.2Total/NA
Solid 351.2Total/NA
Solid 351.2Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 442495
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 351.2 441776Total/NA
Solid 351.2 441776Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 442496
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Solid 351.2 441776Total/NA
TestAmerica Nashville
Page 8 of 14 7/11/2017
Lab Chronicle Client: Empirical Laboratories, LLC TestAmerica Job ID: 490-131844-1
Project/Site: 1706179
Client Sample ID: Lime Sludge 1706179-01 Lab Sample ID: 490-131844-1 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 06/26/17 11:00
Date Received: 06/28/17 15:00
Prep 351.2 LDT06/30/17 09:53441776
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 0.25 g 20 mL
Analysis 351.2 20 442496 07/03/17 16:18Total/NA
Laboratory References:
TestAmerica Nashville
Page 9 of 14 7/11/2017
Method Summary
Project/Site: 1706179
Method Method Description LaboratoryProtocol
351.2 Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl
Protocol References:
MCAWW = "Methods For Chemical Analysis Of Water And Wastes", EPA-600/4-79-020, March 1983 And Subsequent Revisions.
Laboratory References:
TAL NSH = TestAmerica Nashville, 2960 Foster Creighton Drive, Nashville, TN 37204, TEL (615)726-0177
TestAmerica Nashville
Page 10 of 14 7/11/2017
Page 13 of 14 7/11/2017
OFFICE OF THE MISSOURI STATE CHEMIST
June 30, 2017
Teri Horsley
Empirical Laboratories, LLC
621 Mainstream Drive, Suite 270
Nashville, TN 37228
Dear Ms. Horsley:
The following report includes the analyses on the sample submitted to the Experiment Station
Chemical Laboratories on June 27, 2017. The sample is reported on an as received basis.
A University of Missouri Invoice will be sent to you by the Accounting Department for payment for the analysis of this sample.
ESCL Sample No. 09522
Sample ID Lime sludge
Free water, w/w% 72.0
ENM*, #/ton 189
CCE**, w/w% 23.6
US Std. Sieve, retained weight
% +8 0.0
% -8 +40 0.0
% -40 + 60 0.0
% -60 100.0
Fineness Factor 100.0
Reference standards were performed with these analyses. The original results will be on file in our office and are available for review by you on request. We are glad that we have been able to perform these tests for you and we look forward to being of service to you again. Please contact us if you have any questions.
Sincerely, Paul K. Eggeman Dr. Thomas P. Mawhinney
Supervisor Fertilizer Laboratory Director *ENM - Effective Neutralizing Value **CCE - Calcium Carbonate Equivalence
File details come from the government source that posted it.