FA4625-15-R-0001 _COCESS_Solicitation.pdf

509 CONS/LGCA - FA4625

660 TENTH STREET, STE 222

WHITEMAN AFB MO 65305-5316

660-687-4291

660-687-7083

UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)

11. DELIVERY FOR FOB

RFQ

SEE SCHEDULE

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

IFB RFP

CODE

SEE ADDENDUM

BLOCK IS MARKED

DESTINATION UNLESS

12. DISCOUNT TERMS

(No Collect Calls)

7.5M

13b. RATING

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER

X

CODE

FA4625-15-R-0001 03-Jun-2015

b. TELEPHONE NUMBER

660.687.5416

8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME

02:00 PM 02 Jul 2015

5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV 3/2005)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

(TYPE OR PRINT)

(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER) 31c. DATE SIGNED

ADDENDA ARE

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )

22. UNIT 23. UNIT PRICE 24. AMOUNT21. QUANTITY

CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS

UNRESTRICTED

FAX: NAICS:

TEL:

CODE 18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BYOFFEROR

SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT

BELOW IS CHECKED

TEL.

FA4625

SIZE STD:

9. ISSUED BY

FACILITY

CODE

17a.CONTRACTOR/

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK

15. DELIVER TO CODE F4E3ZA 16. ADMINISTERED BY

509 CES - F4E3ZA

OPERATIONS FLIGHT

660 10TH STREET SUITE 211

WHITEMAN AFB MO 65305

TEL: 660-687-3204 FAX:

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

a. NAME

DERIC A. EBERSOHL

2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER

(TYPE OR PRINT)

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

1. REQUISITION NUMBER

19. ITEM NO. 20. SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES

SEE SCHEDULE

332510

TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND DELIVER ALL ITEMS

SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY ADDITIONAL SHEETS

SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED HEREIN.

SB

HUBZONE SB

SET ASIDE: % FOR

OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

ARE NOT ATTACHED

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

TEL: EMAIL:

1 COPIES

(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE

SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

.OFFER DATED YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN 29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REFERENCE

X

8(A)

SVC-DISABLED VET-OWNED SB

EMERGING SB

X

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(CONTINUED)

SEE SCHEDULE

19. ITEM NO. 20. SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES 21. QUANTITY 22. UNIT 24. AMOUNT

PAGE 2 OF

23. UNIT PRICE

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

RECEIVED INSPECTED

32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

37. CHECK NUMBER

FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE

36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

34. VOUCHER NUMBER

FINAL

33. SHIP NUMBER

PARTIAL

38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT

41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV 3/2005) BACK

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

FA4625-15-R-0001

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 12 Months Operate COCESS Store. Base Year

FFP

The contractor shall provide all necessary labor, supervision, equipment, supplies, and materials to support a Contractor Operated Civil Engineer Supply Store

(COCESS). Refer to Statement of Work and Exhibit A. Base Year. For the period of 1 Oct 2015 - 30 Sep 2016. This CLIN is Not Separately Priced. COCESS mark-up fee _________% for non-priced items.

FOB: Destination

SIGNAL CODE: A

NET AMT

1001 12 Months OPTION Operate COCESS Store. Option Year 1

FFP

The contractor shall provide all necessary labor, supervision, equipment, supplies, and materials to support a Contractor Operated Civil Engineer Supply Store

(COCESS). Refer to Statement of Work and Exhibit A. Option Year 1. For the period of 1 Oct 2016 - 30 Sep 2017. This CLIN is Not Separately Priced.

COCESS mark-up fee _________% for non-priced items.

2001 12 Months OPTION Operate COCESS Store. Option Year 2

FFP

The contractor shall provide all necessary labor, supervision, equipment, supplies, and materials to support a Contractor Operated Civil Engineer Supply Store

(COCESS). Refer to Statement of Work and Exhibit A. Option Year 2. For the period of 1 Oct 2017 - 30 Sep 2018. This CLIN is Not Separately Priced.

COCESS mark-up fee _________% for non-priced items.

3001 12 Months OPTION Operate COCESS Store. Option Year 3

FFP

The contractor shall provide all necessary labor, supervision, equipment, supplies, and materials to support a Contractor Operated Civil Engineer Supply Store

(COCESS). Refer to Statement of Work and Exhibit A. Option Year 3. For the period of 1 Oct 2018 - 30 Sep 2019. This CLIN is Not Separately Priced.

COCESS mark-up fee _________% for non-priced items.

4001 12 Months OPTION Operate COCESS Store. Option Year 4

FFP

The contractor shall provide all necessary labor, supervision, equipment, supplies, and materials to support a Contractor Operated Civil Engineer Supply Store

(COCESS). Refer to Statement of Work and Exhibit A. Option Year 4. For the period of 1 Oct 2019 - 30 Sep 2020. This CLIN is Not Separately Priced.

COCESS mark-up fee _________% for non-priced items.

CONTRACT MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CONTRACT VALUE

The minimum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not be less than the minimum quantity and contract value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not exceed the maximum quantity and contract value stated in the following table.

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

AMOUNT

$100,000.00 $15,000,000.00

CLIN DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CLIN ORDER VALUE

The minimum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task Order issued for this CLIN shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task Order issued for this CLIN shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.

CLIN

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

AMOUNT

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 Destination Government Destination Government

1001 Destination Government Destination Government

2001 Destination Government Destination Government

3001 Destination Government Destination Government

4001 Destination Government Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS UIC

0001 POP 01-OCT-2015 TO

30-SEP-2016

N/A 509 CES - F4E3ZA

OPERATIONS FLIGHT

660 10TH STREET SUITE 211

WHITEMAN AFB MO 65305

660-687-3204

F4E3ZA

1001 POP 01-OCT-2016 TO

30-SEP-2017

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

2001 POP 01-OCT-2017 TO

30-SEP-2018

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

3001 POP 01-OCT-2018 TO

30-SEP-2019

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

4001 POP 01-OCT-2019 TO

30-SEP-2020

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.202-1 Definitions NOV 2013

52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984

52.203-5 Covenant Against Contingent Fees MAY 2014

52.203-7 Anti-Kickback Procedures MAY 2014

52.203-11 Certification And Disclosure Regarding Payments To

Influence Certain Federal Transactions

SEP 2007

52.203-12 Limitation On Payments To Influence Certain Federal

Transactions

OCT 2010

52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber

Content Paper

MAY 2011

52.204-5 Women-Owned Business (Other Than Small Business) OCT 2014

52.204-7 System for Award Management JUL 2013

52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel JAN 2011

52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance JUL 2013

52.209-6 Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting

With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for

Debarment

AUG 2013

52.209-10 Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic

Corporations

DEC 2014

52.211-6 Brand Name or Equal AUG 1999

52.211-17 Delivery of Excess Quantities SEP 1989

52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions--Commercial Items DEC 2014

52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990

52.219-9 (Dev) Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Deviation 2013-O0014) OCT 2014

52.222-20 Contracts for Materials, Supplies, Articles, and Equipment

Exceeding $15,000

MAY 2014

52.223-3 Hazardous Material Identification And Material Safety Data JAN 1997

52.223-10 Waste Reduction Program MAY 2011

52.223-11 Ozone-Depleting Substances MAY 2001

52.228-5 Insurance - Work On A Government Installation JAN 1997

52.229-3 Federal, State And Local Taxes FEB 2013

52.232-1 Payments APR 1984

52.232-8 Discounts For Prompt Payment FEB 2002

52.232-11 Extras APR 1984

52.232-18 Availability Of Funds APR 1984

52.232-23 Assignment Of Claims MAY 2014

52.233-1 Disputes MAY 2014

52.233-4 Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim OCT 2004

52.237-1 Site Visit APR 1984

52.237-2 Protection Of Government Buildings, Equipment, And

Vegetation

APR 1984

52.242-13 Bankruptcy JUL 1995

52.243-1 Changes--Fixed Price AUG 1987

52.243-1 Alt II Changes--Fixed-Price (Aug 1987) - Alternate II APR 1984

52.243-4 Changes JUN 2007

52.244-6 Subcontracts for Commercial Items MAR 2015

52.245-1 Government Property APR 2012

52.245-1 Alt I Government Property (Apr 2012) Alternate I APR 2012

52.245-9 Use And Charges APR 2012

52.246-2 Inspection Of Supplies--Fixed Price AUG 1996

52.246-4 Inspection Of Services--Fixed Price AUG 1996

52.246-16 Responsibility For Supplies APR 1984

52.249-8 Default (Fixed-Price Supply & Service) APR 1984

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.209-5 CERTIFICATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (APR 2010)

(a)(1) The Offeror certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that-

(i) The Offeror and/or any of its Principals-

(A) Are ( ) are not ( ) presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, or declared ineligible for the award of contracts by any Federal agency;

(B) Have ( ) have not ( ), within a three-year period preceding this offer, been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for: commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) contract or subcontract; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes relating to the submission of offers; or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, violating Federal criminal tax laws, or receiving stolen property (if offeror checks “have”, the offeror shall also see 52.209-7, if included in this solicitation); and

(C) Are ( ) are not ( ) presently indicted for, or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity with, commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (a)(1)(i)(B) of this provision.; and

(D) Have , have not , within a three-year period preceding this offer, been notified of any delinquent

Federal taxes in an amount that exceeds $3,000 for which the liability remains unsatisfied.

(1) Federal taxes are considered delinquent if both of the following criteria apply:

(i) The tax liability is finally determined. The liability is finally determined if it has been assessed. A liability is not finally determined if there is a pending administrative or judicial challenge. In the case of a judicial challenge to the liability, the liability is not finally determined until all judicial appeal rights have been exhausted.

(ii) The taxpayer is delinquent in making payment. A taxpayer is delinquent if the taxpayer has failed to pay the tax liability when full payment was due and required. A taxpayer is not delinquent in cases where enforced collection action is precluded.

(2) Examples. (i) The taxpayer has received a statutory notice of deficiency, under I.R.C. Sec. 6212, which entitles the taxpayer to seek Tax Court review of a proposed tax deficiency. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek Tax Court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights.

(ii) The IRS has filed a notice of Federal tax lien with respect to an assessed tax liability, and the taxpayer has been issued a notice under I.R.C. Sec. 6320 entitling the taxpayer to request a hearing with the IRS Office of Appeals contesting the lien filing, and to further appeal to the Tax Court if the IRS determines to sustain the lien filing. In the course of the hearing, the taxpayer is entitled to contest the underlying tax liability because the taxpayer has had no prior opportunity to contest the liability. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek tax court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights.

(iii) The taxpayer has entered into an installment agreement pursuant to I.R.C. Sec. 6159. The taxpayer is making timely payments and is in full compliance with the agreement terms. The taxpayer is not delinquent because the taxpayer is not currently required to make full payment.

(iv) The taxpayer has filed for bankruptcy protection. The taxpayer is not delinquent because enforced collection action is stayed under 11 U.S.C. 362 (the Bankruptcy Code).

(ii) The Offeror has ( ) has not ( ), within a three-year period preceding this offer, had one or more contracts terminated for default by any Federal agency.

(2) Principal, for the purposes of this certification, means an officer, director, owner, partner, or a person having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity (e.g., general manager; plant manager;

head of a division or business segment; and similar positions).

(b) The Offeror shall provide immediate written notice to the Contracting Officer if, at any time prior to contract award, the Offeror learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

(c) A certification that any of the items in paragraph (a) of this provision exists will not necessarily result in withholding of an award under this solicitation. However, the certification will be considered in connection with a determination of the Offeror's responsibility. Failure of the Offeror to furnish a certification or provide such additional information as requested by the Contracting Officer may render the Offeror nonresponsible.

(d) Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render, in good faith, the certification required by paragraph (a) of this provision. The knowledge and information of an Offeror is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

(e) The certification in paragraph (a) of this provision is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when making award. If it is later determined that the Offeror knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Government, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract resulting from this solicitation for default.

(End of provision)

52.209-7 INFORMATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (JULY 2013)

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision--

Administrative proceeding means a non-judicial process that is adjudicatory in nature in order to make a determination of fault or liability (e.g., Securities and Exchange Commission Administrative Proceedings, Civilian

Board of Contract Appeals Proceedings, and Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Proceedings). This includes administrative proceedings at the Federal and State level but only in connection with performance of a Federal contract or grant. It does not include agency actions such as contract audits, site visits, corrective plans, or inspection of deliverables.

Federal contracts and grants with total value greater than $10,000,000 means--

(1) The total value of all current, active contracts and grants, including all priced options; and

(2) The total value of all current, active orders including all priced options under indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity, 8(a), or requirements contracts (including task and delivery and multiple-award Schedules).

Principal means an officer, director, owner, partner, or a person having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity (e.g., general manager; plant manager; head of a division or business segment; and similar positions).

(b) The offeror ( ) has ( ) does not have current active Federal contracts and grants with total value greater than

$10,000,000.

(c) If the offeror checked “has” in paragraph (b) of this provision, the offeror represents, by submission of this offer, that the information it has entered in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) is current, accurate, and complete as of the date of submission of this offer with regard to the following information:

(1) Whether the offeror, and/or any of its principals, has or has not, within the last five years, in connection with the award to or performance by the offeror of a Federal contract or grant, been the subject of a proceeding, at the Federal or State level that resulted in any of the following dispositions:

(i) In a criminal proceeding, a conviction.

(ii) In a civil proceeding, a finding of fault and liability that results in the payment of a monetary fine, penalty, reimbursement, restitution, or damages of $5,000 or more.

(iii) In an administrative proceeding, a finding of fault and liability that results in--

(A) The payment of a monetary fine or penalty of $5,000 or more; or

(B) The payment of a reimbursement, restitution, or damages in excess of $100,000.

(iv) In a criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding, a disposition of the matter by consent or compromise with an acknowledgment of fault by the Contractor if the proceeding could have led to any of the outcomes specified in paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (c)(1)(ii), or (c)(1)(iii) of this provision.

(2) If the offeror has been involved in the last five years in any of the occurrences listed in (c)(1) of this provision, whether the offeror has provided the requested information with regard to each occurrence.

(d) The offeror shall post the information in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (c)(1)(iv) of this provision in FAPIIS as required through maintaining an active registration in the System for Award Management database via https://www.acquisition.gov (see 52.204-7).

https://www.acquisition.gov/

THIS SECTION IS FOR SOLICITATION PURPOSES ONLY. THIS SECTION WILL

BE PHYSICALLY REMOVED FROM ANY RESULTANT AWARD, BUT WILL BE

DEEMED INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.

ADDENDUM TO FAR PROVISION 52.212-1, INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS--

COMMERCIAL ITEMS (INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE ON STANDARD FORM

1449) (APR 2014)

NOTE: All proposal preparation cost will be the sole responsibility of the Offeror. The

Government will not reimburse any firm for their proposal preparation cost.

A. FAR 52.212-1(b)(8), is changed to read:

(8) A completed copy of the representations and certifications at FAR 52.212-3.

B. FAR 52.212-1(b)(10), is changed to read:

(10) Past performance information, to include relevant and recent contracts and subcontracts over the past three years from the date of the solicitation, limited to the most recent 10 contracts, for the same or similar items, and other references (including contract numbers, points of contact with telephone numbers, and other relevant information); and

C. FAR 52.212-1(c), is changed to read:

(c) Period for acceptance of offers. The Offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for

120 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers.

D. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, Offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale.

The response shall consist of three (3) separately bound parts, Part I - Technical Capability, Part II – Price Proposal, and Part III – Past Performance Information.

E. Relationship between Solicitation FAR 52.212-1 and FAR 52.212-2. Your attention is directed to the functional relationship between FAR 52.212-1 and FAR 52.212-2 of this solicitation. FAR 52.212-1 provides information for the purpose of organizing the proposal and is not intended to be all-inclusive. FAR 52.212-2 describes the evaluation factors for award, to include the evaluation procedures for the Technical Capability acceptability, the ranking of the

Price Proposals and the assessment of Past Performance information. Since the Government evaluation of proposals will cover areas identified in FAR 52.212-2, proposals should address all such areas of evaluation. Proposals that do not contain the information required risk rejection.

F. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS:

1. PART I – TECHNICAL CAPABILITY: Limited to no more than 5 pages. Submit original with one (1) copy.

a. Sub-Factor 1 – Web-based On-Line Ordering System

(1) CRITERIA: Offeror shall provide system access to demonstrate they have a web

-based on-line ordering system.

(2) In order to remain eligible for award, Offerors shall provide 1 temporary login to allow evaluation of the on-line system and demonstrate the following capabilities:

(A) Ability to provide user access to functionality via a web browser without requiring client software.

(B) Ability to view order history, live order tracking/status and modify/cancel.

(C) Ability to attach notes to the purchase order.

(D) Ability to delete purchase orders.

b. Sub-Factor 2 – Key Personnel

(1) CRITERIA: Offeror shall provide information identifying the key personnel with a description of their work experience.

(2) In order to remain eligible for award, Offerors must submit the following as part of their Technical Capability:

(A) Project Manager. The individual’s name, title, duty, years of experience and experience level relating to similar contracts in size and scope.

2. PART II - PRICE PROPOSAL:

a. Complete the SF 1449, blocks 12, 17a, 20, 30 (a), (b), and (c). An authorized official of the firm must sign the Standard Form 1449. Submit original and one (1) copy of this part. In addition to the original and paper copy of this part, submit a copy of Exhibit A in Microsoft

Excel (version 2007 or current) format on a compact disc. One copy of the SF1449 must bear an original, authorized signature. In doing so, the Offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the RFP. All sections of the RFP, excluding Instructions to Offerors and

Evaluation Procedures Sections, constitute the model contract.

b. Bid Schedule – Complete all the CLINS on the SF 1449 Continuation Sheet Schedule, including all option periods. Provide the COCESS mark-up fee as a percentage on each CLIN for non-priced items. NOTE: Only input/provide the percentage. Offerors shall not perform the mark-up calculation nor input the evaluation calculation against the CLIN price. Provide complete pricing for all items listed in Exhibit A of this solicitation; substitutions are not acceptable for any items. Exhibit A unit prices shall be inclusive of any mark-up. Unit prices shall prevail in the event the extended price is calculated incorrectly.

c. Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in provisions. The FAR provision

52.212-3 shall be returned along with the proposal.

d. Acknowledge any and all amendments to the solicitation.

e. The Contracting Officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. All pricing received in response to this solicitation will be evaluated for price realism for the purposes of making a reasonableness determination. Upon examination of the initial offers, the Contracting Officer will review this determination and if, in the Contracting Officer’s opinion, adequate price competition exists, no additional cost information will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. If at any time during this competition the Contracting Officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, such as an event where multiple Offers are determined to be unrealistic; Offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the

Contracting Officer to determine the realism and reasonableness of the price.

3. PART III - PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION – Limited to no more than 2 pages per contract listed. Only references for the same or similar type contract desired. Submit original plus one copy.

a. When addressing past performance evaluation criteria set forth in this solicitation, the

Offeror shall provide recent and relevant information regarding an Offerors actions under previously awarded contracts. Quality and satisfaction rating for contracts completed in the past three (3) years from the date of issuance of the solicitation: Provide any information currently available (letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.) which demonstrates customer satisfaction with overall job performance and quality of completed product for same or similar type contract. In addition, explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, numerous warranty calls, etc.

b. The Offeror shall forward a copy of Attachment 8, Past Performance Questionnaire to their most recent references not to exceed ten (10), within the last three (3) years, for whom the

Offeror has contracted similar services with Federal, State, and Local Governments. With the

Past Performance Questionnaire at Attachment 8, in addition to para 3.a. above, the Government will evaluate the quality and extent of Offeror's performance deemed relevant to the requirements of this RFP. The Government will use information submitted by the Offeror and other sources such as other Federal Government offices and commercial sources, to assess performance.

c. Recent past performance is defined as contracts performed within the last three (3) years from date of issuance of solicitation, but limited to the most recent 10 contracts.

d. Relevant past performance is defined as contracts that required the Offeror to operate a supply store for resale using a similar complexity of effort as provided in the Statement of Work contained in this solicitation. At a minimum, previous efforts must have supported a multi-craft facility maintenance operation that provided building supplies, repair parts and system components to carpenters, electricians, heating, ventilation and air conditioning mechanics, plumbers, and entomologists. Total square footage of warehouse facilities supported must equal or exceed approximately 2,000 square feet with annual expenditures greater than $500,000.00 expended on a minimum of 500 separate and distinct commodities. A web-based system shall have been utilized for ordering, tracking orders and viewing order status.

e. Offerors with no past experience in operating a supply store for resale shall state so.

Past performance information shall include information on corporate experience and past performance which clearly demonstrates that the Offeror is capable of conforming to contractual requirements. Past performance regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or sub-contractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement will not be considered as highly as past performance information for the principal

Offeror. Past performance regarding minor members of joint ventures or teaming arrangements will be considered as highly as the majority member of those arrangements. Offerors with no relevant past or present performance history or the Offeror’s performance record is so limited that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned shall receive the rating

"Unknown Confidence," meaning the rating is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably.

f. A cover letter sent by the Offeror with the Past Performance Questionnaire should request the reference to complete the questionnaire and mail it to 509 CONS/LGCA, Attn: Deric

Ebersohl, 660 10th Street, Suite 222, Whiteman AFB, MO 65305-5316 ; or by fax to [fax number: (660) 687-7083]; or by email to 509cons.sollgca@us.af.mil, with receipt no later than the proposal due date. Offerors are responsible for ensuring that their reference sources receive the questionnaires in time to complete and return the questionnaire to the 509 CONS and be received no later than the proposal due date indicated on Standard Form 1449, Block 8. This requirement for the submission of questionnaires is in addition to the requirement for a list of consecutive contracts specified in paragraph 2.g. below.

g. Offerors shall submit a consecutive list of all past and present performance for the last three (3) years from the date of this solicitation. The list shall limited to the most recent 10 contracts. Offerors shall submit the list no later than the date and time indicated on the Standard

Form 1449, Block 8, to 509 CONS/LGCA, Attn: Deric Ebersohl, 660 Tenth St, Ste 222, Whiteman AFB, MO 65305-5316. This list may be provided by fax to (660) 687-7083 or email to 509cons.sollgca@us.af.mil. For all listed contracts, provide the following information:

(1) Company/Division name

(2) Contracting agency mailto:509cons.sollgca@us.af.mil mailto:509cons.sollgca@us.af.mil

(3) Contract number

(4) Brief description of contract effort, including the number of separate and distinct commodities supplied under contract and whether the effort supported a multi craft facility maintenance operation providing building supplies, repair parts and system components to carpenters, electricians, heating, ventilation and air conditioning mechanics, plumbers, and entomologists.

(5) Website available for use to order, track and order status

(6) Total occupied square footage of facilities supported

(7) Annual contract expenditures

(8) Period of performance

(9) Total contract value, including all modifications and options

(10) Contracting Officer’s name, address, and telephone number

(11) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions

(12) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

h. Offerors are cautioned that the Government will use information provided by the

Offerors and information obtained by other sources in the development of the performance confidence assessment.

i. Subcontractor Consent: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime Offeror without the subcontractor’s consent. Provide with the proposal a letter from all subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime Offeror.

j. If the Offeror claims there is no past performance, then that status must be identified to the Contracting Officer not later than the date/time proposals are due from all Offerors. Lack of any past performance will not automatically disqualify an Offeror, but it is a factor that is considered when assigning the confidence assessment described in 52.212-2.

k. Joint Venture/Teaming Arrangement. If applicable, Offerors must provide a consent letter executed by each teaming partner and/or joint venture partner authorizing release of past performance information so the Offeror can respond to such information. If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, Offerors must provide complete information as to the arrangement, including any relevant and recent past/present performance information on previous teaming arrangements with the same partner. If this is a first time joint effort, each party to the arrangement must provide a list of past and present relevant contracts.

4. Documents submitted in response to this RFP must be fully responsive to and consistent with the following:

a. Requirements of the RFP (i.e., Attachment 1, Statement of Work (SOW) &

Attachment 2, Exhibit A - Fixed Price List, Attachment 8, Past Performance Questionnaires), and

Government standards and regulations pertaining to the SOW.

b. Evaluation Factors for Award.

c. Any limitation on the number of proposal pages. Pages exceeding the page limitations set forth in 52.212-1 will not be read or evaluated, and will be removed from the proposal.

d. Format for proposal Part II & III shall be as follows:

(1) A page is defined as one face of an 8 ½” x 11” sheet of paper containing information.

(2) Typing shall not be less than 12 pitch.

G. GENERAL INFORMATION

1. INFORMATION REGARDING SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS: We will not accept emailed or faxed proposals. Hand carried proposals must be delivered to the 509

CONS/LGCA, Attn: Deric Ebersohl, 660 10th Street, Suite 222, Whiteman AFB, MO 65305-

5316. The sealed envelope or package used to submit your proposal must show the time and date for receipt, solicitation number, and name and address of the Offeror. Mailed proposals (USPS, FedEx, UPS, DHL, etc.) shall be sent to 509 CONS/LGCA, Attn: Deric Ebersohl, 660 10th

Street, Suite 222, Whiteman AFB, MO 65305-5316.

2. Offerors are cautioned that Whiteman AFB, MO has visitor control procedures requiring individuals not affiliated with the installation to obtain a visitor pass prior to entrance. SOME

DELAY SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED WHEN HANDCARRYING PROPOSALS. Offerors should allow sufficient time to obtain a visitor pass and arrive at the bid depository PRIOR to the time specified for receipt.

3. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 52.212-1(f) “Late submission, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers.”

4. FEDERAL HOLIDAYS: The following Federal Legal Holidays are observed by this base:

New Year’s Day – 1 January

Martin Luther King’s Birthday – Third Monday in January

Presidents Day – Third Monday in February

Memorial Day – Last Monday in May

Independence Day – 4 July

Labor Day – First Monday in September

Columbus Day – Second Monday in October

Veterans Day – 11 November

Thanksgiving Day – Fourth Thursday in November

Christmas Day – 25 December

(End of Addendum)

THIS SECTION IS FOR SOLICITATION PURPOSES ONLY. THIS SECTION WILL

BE PHYSICALLY REMOVED FROM ANY RESULTANT AWARD, BUT WILL BE

DEEMED INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

A. The Government will award a firm fixed price contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the

Government, price and other factors considered. This acquistion will utilize the Performance

Price Tradeoff (PPT) process to make a best value award decision. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

Part I – TECHNICAL CAPABILITY

Part II – PRICE

Part III – PAST PERFORMANCE

*Past Performance is significantly more important than Price, however cost/price will contribute substantially to the selection decision.

B. Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). In the event the Government extends services under the authority of FAR 52.217-8, “Option to Extend Services”, unit pricing for the last option year exercised preceding the extension shall remain in effect. These prices are already determined to have been evaluated at time of contract award.

C. A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful Offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the

Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

Addendum to FAR 52.212-2:

BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This is a competitive best value source selection in which competing Offerors' Past Performance history will be evaluated as being significantly more important than cost or price; however cost/price will contribute substantially to the selection decision. This may result in an award to a higher rated, higher priced Offeror where the decision is consistent with the evaluation criteria. By submission of its offer, the Offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined unacceptable. The Government intends to award one contract. The Government seeks to award to the Offeror who in the Government’s estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit in response to the requirements. All such offers shall be treated equally except for their technical capability, prices and performance records. The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

A. Evaluation Process:

1. Initially offers shall be considered for technical capability in accordance with the evaluation criteria described below in paragraph B.1..

2. Offers meeting technical capability will then be ranked according to price, including option prices.

3. The three lowest priced Offeror’s will then receive a performance confidence assessement in accordance with the evaluation criteria described below in paragraph B.2..

4. If none of the three lowest priced Offerors is judged to have a Substantial Confidence performance assessment, the next lowest priced Offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order by price) until an Offeror is judged to have a Substantial Confidence performance assessment or until all Offerors are evaluated. The Source Selection Authority shall make an integrated assessment best value award decision if the lowest priced Offeror is not judged to have a Substantial Confidence performance assessment.

5. Prior to award, a responsibility determination will be made as described in FAR Part 9.

B. Evaluation Criteria:

1. TECHNICAL CAPABILITY:

a. First, the technical capability of all offers will be evaluated on an ACCEPTABLE /

UNACCEPTABLE basis.

(1) ACCEPTABLE – Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

(2) UNACCEPTABLE – Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

b. Evaluators shall assign a rating of ACCEPTABLE / UNACCEPTABLE based on the minimum requirements stated below.

c. Sub-Factor 1 – Web-based On-Line Ordering System

1. CRITERIA: Offeror shall provide system access to demonstrate they have a web

-based on-line ordering system. Offerors shall provide 1 temporary login to allow evaluation.

2. MINIMUM STANDARD OF ACCEPTABILITY: The minimum standard is met when the following capabilities are demonstrated:

(A) Ability to provide user access to functionality via a web browser without requiring client software.

(B) Ability to view order history, live order tracking/status and modify/cancel.

(C) Ability to attach notes to the purchase order.

(D) Ability to delete purchase orders.

d. Sub-Factor 2 – Key Personnel

1. CRITERIA: Offeror shall provide information identifying the key personnel with a description of their work experience.

2. MINIMUM STANDARD OF ACCEPTABILITY: The minimum standard is met when the Offeror provides information for the following discipline:

(A) Project Manager. The individual’s name, title, duty, years of experience and experience level relating to similar contracts in size and scope. The narrative for the Project

Manager must show a minimum of three (3) years’ experience relating to similar contracts in size and scope.

e. Those offers not meeting the minimum standard for acceptability will not be considered for award.

2. PRICE PROPOSAL:

a. Next, offers that are deemed technically acceptable shall be ranked according to price, including option prices. The Offerors price proposal will be submitted in a separate volume. No price information is to be included in the past performance sections of the proposal.

b. For award purposes, the Government will evaluate offers by the total contract price.

The total contract price consists of the total price of all Base and Option Years of this solicitation. The total price of the Base or Option Year is the sum of: 1) the CLIN, to include the

COCESS mark-up fee multiplied against $500,000.00, and 2) Exhibit A extended unit prices for the applicable year. NOTE: The $500,000.00 figure will be used for Government evaluation purposes only. It does not represent a guarantee to the amount of non-priced item sales in any given year. Offerors shall not perform the mark-up calculation nor input that calculation against the CLIN price. The extended amounts for the base year, to include, all option years, mark-up fee calculations, and Exhibit A, will be added together for a total contract price and will be used for the ranking of Offerors. Unit prices shall prevail in the event the extended price is calculated incorrectly. Each Offeror’s price proposal will be evaluated for completeness and reasonableness. Unrealistically low proposed costs/prices may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition either on the basis that either the Offeror does not understand the requirement or the Offeror has made an unrealistic proposal. Proposed unit prices of the fixed price list, including options, will be evaluated for unbalanced pricing IAW FAR 15.404-1(g).

Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items or sub-line item(s) appear to be significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques.

c. The Offeror shall submit complete pricing data for all items listed in Exhibit A;

substitutions are not acceptable for any items for this evaluation. Exhibit A unit prices shall be inclusive of any mark-up. Proposed prices will become fixed prices on the contract. In the event the Government extends services under the authority of FAR 52.217-8, “Option to Extend

Services”, unit pricing for the last option year exercised preceding the extension shall remain in effect. These prices are already determined to have been evaluated at time of contract award.

Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

d. Price evaluation will be conducted as follows:

(1) Total evaluated amount for Base Year and Option Year CLINs (SF 1449

Continuation Sheet Schedule): The CLIN, plus mark-up fee calculation, are all added together for an extended total price for each specific year. Note: The mark-up fee will be multiplied against $500,000.00 for each year. The $500,000.00 figure will be used for Government evaluation purposes only. It does not represent a guarantee to the amount of non-priced items sales in any given year. Example: Base Year total = $____ [CLIN] + ___% [mark-up fee] *

$500,000.00. The “specific year” is defined as the Base Year or an Option Year.

(2) Total evaluated amount for Exhibit A, Base Year and Option Years: Each line item will be calculated by multiplying the quantity in the column titled “Used Last FY” against the unit price for each specific year. All line items will be added together for an extended total price for each specific year. The “specific year” is defined as the Base Year or an Option Year.

(3) Total evaluated Contract Amount: (Base Year = Total Evaluated Amount for

Base Year CLIN + Total Evaluated Amount for Exhibit A Base Year) + (Option Year 1 = Total

Evaluated Amount for Option Year 1 CLIN + Total Evaluated Amount for Exhibit A Option

Year 1) + (Option Year 2 = Total Evaluated Amount for Option Year 2 CLIN + Total Evaluated

Amount for Exhibit A Option Year 2) + (Option Year 3 = Total Evaluated Amount for Option

Year 3 CLIN + Total Evaluated Amount for Exhibit A Option Year 3) + (Option Year 4 = Total

Evaluated Amount for Option Year 4 CLIN + Total Evaluated Amount for Exhibit A Option

Year 4).

e. The Government will use various techniques and procedures described under FAR

15.404-1(b) as the primary means of assessing proposal reasonableness. The evaluation techniques described under FAR 15.404-1(c), as determined appropriate, may also be performed in further determining the reasonableness of the proposal.

f. The Contracting Officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the Contracting Officer will review this determination and if, in the Contracting Officer’s opinion, adequate price competition exists, no additional cost/price information will be requested. However, if at any time during this competition the Contracting Officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, Offeror’s may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the

Contracting Officer to determine the reasonableness of price.

g. An Offeror’s proposal may be rejected if the Contracting Officer determines the lack of realistic, balanced, or reasonable price information contained in any portion of an Offerors price proposal.

3. EVALUATING PAST PERFORMANCE:

a. Finally, the Past Performance Evaluation Team (PPET) will conduct the past performance evaluation on the three lowest priced technically acceptable offers. The PPET will primarily rely on information provided by Offeror’s completed Past Performance Questionnaires and/or from the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). However, the

Government may use information previously obtained from Past Performance Questionnaires or data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources in the evaluation process. In the event an Offeror submits a Past Performance Questionnaire and it is subsequently determined that the referenced project was formally evaluated in the CPARS, CPARS ratings shall take precedence.

b. First, each past performance reference shall undergo a recency determination. In order to be determined recency, the contract effort shall have been performed during the past three (3) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation.

c. Next, each recent past performance reference shall undergo a relevancy determination.

Relevant past performance is defined as contracts that required the Offeror to operate a supply store for resale using a similar complexity of effort as provided in the Statement of Work contained in this solicitation. At a minimum, previous efforts must have supported a multi-craft facility maintenance operation that provided building supplies, repair parts and system components to carpenters, electricians, heating, ventilation and air conditioning mechanics, plumbers, and entomologists. Total square footage of warehouse facilities supported must equal or exceed approximately 2,000 square feet with annual expenditures greater than $500,000.00 expended on a minimum of 500 separate and distinct commodities. A web-based system shall have been utilized for ordering, tracking orders and viewing order status.

d. In determining relevancy for individual contracts, consideration will be given to the effort, or portion of the effort, being proposed by the Offeror, joint ventures, subcontractors and/or teaming partners whose contract is being reviewed and evaluated. The following relevancy definitions apply:

(1) VERY RELEVANT: Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

(2) RELEVANT: Present/Past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

(3) SOMEWHAT RELEVANT: Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

(4) NOT RELEVANT: Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

e. A relevancy determination of the Offerors present and past performance, including joint ventures, subcontractors and/or teaming partners, will be made.

f. The Past Performance Evaluation will be accomplished by reviewing aspects of an

Offerors recent and relevant past performance.

g. As a result of an analysis of those positive and negative aspects indicators identified, each Offeror will receive an integrated Performance Confidence Assessment, which is the rating for the Past Performance factor. Although the past performance evaluation focuses on performance that is relevant to the Mission Capability Sub factors and price, the resulting

Performance Confidence Assessment is made at the Past Performance factor level and represents an overall evaluation of contractor performance. The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to allow the Government to assess the Offerors ability to perform the effort described in the solicitation, based on the…