26QA216 Amend 1 SF30.pdf

EXCEPTION OF SF 30, APPROVED BY NARS 5/79

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

FA462026QA216

PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

13 AUGUST 2026

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

CODE

FA4620 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)

CODE

92nd Contracting Sq./PKA 110 W Ent St., Suite 200 SAME AS BLOCK 6

Fairchild AFB, WA 99011 Attn: kathleen.rauch@us.af.mil

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) () 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

X

FA462026QA216

All Offerors 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

28 JULY 2026

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER

NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

[X] The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers [X] is extended, [] is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning _1_ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACT/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor [] is not, [X] is required to sign this document and return _1_ copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

SEE SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10 A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

KATHLEEN L. RAUCH, Contracting Officer

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105-03 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA

FA462026QA216

Amendment 0001 Page 2

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The purpose of this Amendment is to provide responses to questions submitted by prospective contractors, to revise the Statement of Work, and to extend the RFQ due date/time.

1. Responses to Contractor Questions

All questions and answers are provided below. All applicable revisions have been incorporated into

Attachment 1: Statement of Work (REV1).

Q1. Can the government provide the previous AFTF and SFTF service reports for evaluation, or at least the most recent reports?

A1: The government will not be releasing previous service reports. Offerors should base their quotes strictly on the requirements and technical parameters outlined in the Statement of Work (SOW).

Q2. Are both trainers currently fully operational?

A2: Yes, both the Aircraft Fire Training Facility (AFTF) and the Gas Fired Structural Fire Training

Facility (SFTF) are currently fully operational.

Q3. Is this maintenance contract new or continuing from a previous maintenance contract? Has there been a break in service of the Training Grounds? If not, can you please provide the Contract Number for the previously held contract?

A3: There has been no lapse in service. The current contract number is FA462021D0014 awarded to

WRGA Fire Training Solutions Inc., which ends on 30 September 2026. This is for the re-procurement of the service contract to begin 1 October 2026.

Q4: Is there an Operation and Maintenance manual available for the AFTF and SFTF?

A4: No commercial Operation and Maintenance manuals are available beyond the Air Force Technical

Order (TO) 35E1-2-13-1, which is referenced in SOW Section 1.0. A public link to this TO is provided within the SOW text.

Q5: Many AFTFs throughout USAF have bypassed cathodic protection systems in recent years. Can the government include any more details about the cathodic protection system, if it is even still in use?

A5: Following a recent physical site inspection, the Government has verified that there is no cathodic protection system installed on this system. Consequently, all requirements, inspections, and references related to cathodic protection have been deleted and struck through in the SOW via this amendment.

Offerors do not need to price or account for cathodic protection maintenance.

Q6: Section 1.3.2 of the SOW requires an evaluation of the structural integrity of the live fire training structure by a licensed professional engineer at every site visit. NFPA only requires the full comprehensive report by a licensed structural engineer to be done every 5 years for non-gas fired, and every 10-years for gas-fired. Does Fairchild AFB wish to go beyond NFPA requirements and complete the comprehensive inspection every year?

A6: The structural integrity evaluation by a licensed professional engineer is not required at every site visit. It is a one-time requirement to be completed during the contract's Base Year of performance.

Section 1.3.2 of the SOW has been updated to clarify this frequency.

Amendment 0001 Page 3

Q7: What is the purpose of the Summer Inspection? The NFPA and TO as well as paragraph 1.2.2.1,

1.2.2.2 & 1.2.2.3 all refer to a “semiannual report”. Typically, the inspections are conducted in conjunction with the winterization and/or dewinterization. The AHJ of course can add a tri annual inspections above those required. Is there a specific concern for this AHJ to require a third non-required inspection?

A7: Due to the extremely high training volume and operational usage of the trainers following spring de-winterization, the local Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) has mandated a third, mid-summer inspection. The contractor must perform the same inspection checklist items outlined in the TO 35E1-2-

13-1 semi-annual report for this mid-summer check.

Q8: SOW Line 1.2.2.3 Summer Inspection (Complete approximately 90 days after de-winterization activities) After reviewing the TO 35E1-2-13-1-2015 the most current TO in the Air Force Library and it clearly does not identify a third “summer inspection”. The “TO” DOES clearly state that inspections/repairs shall be completed during the winterization and de-winterization process. (Reference

WP006 Section 3 Semi-Annual System Safety Inspection and Operational Checks) Is there a specific concern for this AHJ to require a third non-required inspection?

A8: See the response to Q7. The SOW has been edited to clarify that the summer inspection utilizes the standard TO 35E1-2-13-1 semi-annual inspection criteria, but is executed as a third, AHJ-mandated summer event to ensure safety and system reliability during peak training months.

Q9: Can you clarify what the SPRS is in the evaluation criteria. Is that the Supplier Performance Risk

System (SPRS) which has a score for NIST 800-171 assessment?

A9: Yes, SPRS refers to the Supplier Performance Risk System. As detailed in provision R-DFARS

252.204-7024, SPRS will be considered during evaluation. However, the NIST SP 800-171 assessment score is not an evaluation factor for this service acquisition.

Q10: Anchor Point and Rappelling System Inspection: the Anchorages shall be inspected annually by a qualified person. Anchors shall be load tested and re-certified at periods not to exceed five years, or whenever re-roofing or renovating occurs.

• NFPA 1403 does not address inspections for Anchor Point and Rappelling System inspections.

There is a reference to this in NFPA 1402

• Is the rappelling system built as part of the live-fire class B structural trainer?

A10: Yes, the anchor points are permanently installed on the roof of the SFTF. Annual visual inspections are required. Load testing/re-certification (not to exceed 5 years)(next required certification

September 2030) must be conducted in accordance with NFPA 1402, OSHA, and IWCA I-14.1 standards as outlined in Section 1.3.2 of the SOW.

Q11: Why is command specifying a licensed engineer to perform inspections? (Ref. SOW 1.3.2 Gas

Fired Structural Training Facility (SFTF) Inspection

• NFPA 1403 6.2.6.1 states “if structural defects are found, such as cracks, rust, spalls, or warps, the owner or AHJ shall have a follow-up evaluation by a licensed engineer with live-fire training structure experience.”

• NFPA 1403 6.2.7 states, “The structural integrity of the live-fire training structure shall be evaluated and documented by a licensed engineer with live-fire training structure experience, or

Amendment 0001 Page 4 another competent professional as determined by the AHJ, at least once every 10 years or more frequently if required by the evaluator.”

• NFPA 1403 7.2.5.1 & 7.2.6 repeat the language from 6.2.6.1 & 6.2.7

A11: See the response to Q6. Since there is no record of a structural integrity survey ever being accomplished on the 20+ year-old facility, a baseline professional engineering evaluation is required. It is a one-time base year requirement.

2. Revised Statement of Work

a. Attachment 1: Statement of Work is hereby replaced with Attachment 1: Statement of Work

(REV1). Attachment 1: Statement of Work (REV1) supersedes and replaces all previous versions of the Statement of Works.

3. RFQ Due Date Extension

a. The RFQ due date/time 14 August 2026 / 10:00 AM PT is hereby extended to 18 August 2026 /

10:00 AM PT.

All other items remain unchanged.

Fill out blocks 15a, 15b, and 15c and provide a copy with your proposal.

END SUMMARY OF CHANGES

List of Attachments:

• Attachment 1: Statement of Work (REV1)