Atch 4 Technical Performance Questionnaire 20240426.docx
DOCX document 43 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA461024Q0021
About this file
This document is a Technical and Past Performance Response Questionnaire related to a Request for Quote (RFQ) for Cable Television (CATV), Satellite Television (SATV), Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) Services, and Commercial Internet Services for Vandenberg Space Force Base. The RFQ requires at least 3 years of experience within the last 5 years providing these services, with detailed descriptions of the specific tasks performed. Offerors must provide references to support the claimed experience. The RFQ is a 100% Small Business Set-Aside under NAICS code 517111, with proposals due by May 25, 2024. The contract will be Firm Fixed Price. Offerors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) to be eligible for award.
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Cable, Satellite, IPTV and Commercial Internet Services
TECHNICAL & PAST PERFORMANCE RESPONSE QUESTIONNAIRE
Source Selection Sensitive (when filled-out) IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
Instructions: Fill-in offeror name in footer. For each factor below, in the first table provide a detailed description of specific tasks performed for that factor. Use the reference table to provide a minimum of one (1) and up to five (5) references per factor to support the experience claimed in the first table. Limited to a twenty-five (25) page submission.
Technical Experience. Three (3) years of experience within the (5) year period immediately preceding release of this Request for Quote (RFQ), providing Cable Television (CATV), Satellite Television (SATV), IPTV Services & Commercial Internet Services as more specifically described below in Factor 1. The experience called out in Factor 1 is for work which is the same or substantially like the work activities and tasks described in the respective factor. Provide reference and contact information to support the experience claimed by offeror. If offeror intends or proposes to use an entity other than offeror to fulfill a requirement or a portion thereof (e.g. a sub-contractor or other teaming partner), please provide ALL the requested information for that entity as well.
To Be Considered Technically Acceptable for Factor 1: The offeror’s responses evidence the offeror (or the entity other than offeror which offeror intends or proposes to use to fulfill a requirement or portion thereof) has three (3) years of experience within the five (5) year period immediately preceding the release of this RFQ, performing the same or substantially similar work to the work activities and tasks described in each of the factors and the referenced statement of work (SOW) paragraph(s). References provided must support the experience claimed by offeror.
Factor 1, Television and Commercial Internet Services. At least three (3) years of experience within the five (5) year period immediately preceding release of this RFQ. Use the narrative block to provide a detailed description of EACH task performed related to providing Cable, Satellite TV, and IPTV & Commercial Internet Services identified in the table immediately below (Reference SOW).
| Television & Commercial Internet Services |
| 3 Years of Experience Within the Last 5 Years |
- Experience providing high quality broadcast television signals and/or services to customers through Cable Television (CATV) and Satellite Television (SATV). Experience providing re-broadcasting through Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) services. At a minimum, programming shall include all local network channels, (ABC, CBS, NBC, & Fox) and major network new stations (CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, The Weather Channel, NASA Channel) -Experience providing commercial internet services to a similar size or larger installation with bandwidth options including 25 Mbps, 50 Mbps, 100 Mbps, & 200 Mbps.
- What Cable and Satellite TV Services/channels have you provided? Please describe in detail. Ensure number of years of specific experience is listed below.
- Where have you previously provided commercial internet? How many facilities were served/connections provided? What levels of bandwidth did you provided?
Reference SOW
|_|Yes |_|No
Narrative (please type in form and use as much detail as necessary to respond):
Past Performance Reference #1, Factor 1 (required)
| Contract # |
| Period of Performance |
| Total Value |
| Contract Type |
(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)
| Performed By (provide name of company) |
| Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)? |
Check as appropriate
|_| P |_| S
POC Name:
Phone #:
Email:
Past Performance Reference #X, Factor 1 Repeat this block as necessary up to maximum of five (5)
| Contract # |
| Period of Performance |
| Total Value |
| Contract Type |
(Firm Fixed Price [FFP] or Cost)
| Performed By (provide name of company) |
| Performed as Prime (P) or Sub (S)? |
Check as appropriate
|_| P |_| S
POC Name:
Phone #:
Email:
Sub-Contracting Arrangements (e.g. Teaming Arrangements).
If your company is not performing ALL the work, you must fill-in the contemplated sub-contracting arrangement in Table 1 below for percentage of work performed by sub-contractor(s) and then fill in the percentage of work in Table 2 that will be performed by your company as the Prime Contractor. Sub-contractor arrangements include, but are not limited to, the following types of relationships: prime/sub-contractor, mentor/protégé, joint venture, etc. If a sub-contractor arrangement is not applicable and ALL the work will be performed by your company as the Prime Contractor, please indicate 0% in Table 1 and complete all fields in Table 2 accordingly.
Standard Of Acceptability: The offeror’s responses provide sufficient information for the Government to determine whether or not the offeror contemplates a sub-contracting arrangement and, if so, indicates the name of each sub-contractor, identifies the task and the percentage of work to be performed by each party (E.g. prime and subcontractor), and provides sufficient information for the Government to determine that the offeror as a whole (E.g. Prime/sub combined) has the ability to perform the requirements of this solicitation. For example, if the offeror is claiming the experience of another entity to meet factor 1, it would follow that entity would be identified as a teaming partner below.
Table 1
| Name of Sub-Contractor(s): |
| Percentage of Work Performed by Sub-Contractor |
| Work Description Sub-Contractor(s) Would Perform |
Table 2 Prime Contractor (Name Here) Percentage of Work Performed by Prime Contractor Work Description Prime Contractor Would Perform
Offeror:________________________
RFQ FA461024Q0021
Attachment 4
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .