Attachment_1_-_PPQ.doc
DOC document 60 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Education Advisor Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4608-16-R-0016
About this file
Attachment 1 - PPQ should have been added at initial upload.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Question_and_Answer.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA4608-16-R-0016-0002.pdf | ||
| Question_and_Answer.docx | DOCX document | |
| Question_and_Answer.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA4608-16-R-0016-P0001.pdf | ||
| FA4608-16-R-0016.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA4608-16-R-0016
SECTION 1: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION (to be completed by the contractor requesting evaluation prior to mailing)
A. Contractor’s name and address:
B. Point of Contact:
C. Phone Number:
D. Contract Number:
E. Project Title or Description of Work performed under this project:
F. Contract Type: FORMCHECKBOX Firm Fixed Price FORMCHECKBOX Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Task Order
FORMCHECKBOX
Cost Reimbursement
G. Project Award Date:
Schedule Completion Date:
Current/Final Completion Date:
H. Project Award Amount:
Current/Final Project Amount:
I. Contractor being evaluated performed as the FORMCHECKBOX Prime Contractor FORMCHECKBOX Subcontractor FORMCHECKBOX Supplier
J. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in SECTION B of this Questionnaire.
(Signature)
(Name and Title of Authorized Official)
(Date)
SECTION 2: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (to be completed by respondent)
EVALUATED BY:
(Signature)
(Date)
(Typed or Printed Name)
(Title)
(Phone Number)
(Address)
SECTION 3: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. Pleas Provide a Narrative Explanation For Any Ratings Of 1 or 2.
CODE
PERFORMANCE LEVEL
BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action.
PURPLE/VERY GOOD - During the contract period, contractor is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) some. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action.
GREEN/SATISFACTORY – During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action.
YELLOW/MARGINAL – During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required.
RED/UNSATISFACTORY – During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or failed) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered. Corrective actions were either ineffective or non- existent. Extensive Customer oversight and involvement was required.
WHITE/NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. Do not know.
1. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
| Customer would have no reservations in awarding another contract to the contractor. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
2. QUALITY
| a. |
| Contractor provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| b. |
| Contractor provided well researched and clearly identified submittals that matched contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| c. |
| Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| d. |
| Contractor corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control plan. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
3. TIMELINESS
| a. |
| Contractor met established project schedules to complete the project on time. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| b. |
| Contractor provided timely cost/design proposals. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| c. |
| Contractor submitted the progress schedule and progress reports as required. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| d. |
| Contractor provided on-time submittals as required. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| e. |
| Contractor provided payrolls for both their employees and their subcontractor employees as required. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| f. |
| Contractor provided timely resolution of all punch list items. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
4. RESPONSIVENESS
| a. |
| Contractor acted promptly to resolve problems, ensuring compliance with contract requirements and safety regulations. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| b. |
| Contractor was reasonable and cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings as needed, and maintained communication with the government to keep the project on schedule or minimize the delay. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| c. |
| Contractor identified problems as they occurred, suggested approaches to the problems; displayed initiative to solve problems and performed as a Team Member. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| d. |
| Contractor responded to warranty issues within the time frames specified in the contract. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
5. CHANGE/COST CONTROL
| a. |
| Contractor responsive to contract changes and provided accurate, reasonable and supportable cost proposals. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| b. |
| Contractor demonstrated the ability to control costs and/or design projects or modifications within the magnitude specified. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| c. |
| Contractor validated subcontractor cost proposals prior to submission to the Government. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
Overall Rating: (circle) Acceptable / Unacceptable
REMARKS:
SECTION 4: NARRATIVE SUMMARY:
1. What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?
2. What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?
3. Please provide any additional comment concerning the contractor’s performance.
4. GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS ONLY: Has or was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
FORMCHECKBOX
Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Default FORMCHECKBOX Convenience FORMCHECKBOX Pending Termination If yes, please explain.
5. Were there any performance issues regarding the contractor’s work? If yes, please explain.
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
Mailing address:
Attn: SrA Kent Pendleton
801 Kenney Ave, Suite 2301
Barksdale AFB, LA 71110
FAX: (318) 456- 2629
EMAIL: kent.pendleton@us.af.mil
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .