Attachment 6 - Section L SP-104.pdf

Section L - Instructions, Conditions and Notices to Bidders

PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS:

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, Offerors must follow the instructions contained herein.

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of three (3) separate parts, Part I –Technical Proposal, Part II - Past Performance, and Part III - Price Proposal.

B. The Contracting Officer (CO) has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the CO will review this determination and if, in the CO’s opinion, adequate price competition exists, no additional price information will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the CO determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the CO to determine the reasonableness of the price.

C. Specific Instructions:

1. PART I – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL:

a. Limited to no more than 10 pages as defined in paragraph (D). Technical Proposals will be rated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis by sub-factor. The page limitation includes any cover page, charts, graphs, drawings, diagrams, supporting illustrations, spreadsheets, etc., but excludes any table of contents or list of acronyms (if utilized). Offerors are cautioned that any pages that exceed the page limitations shall not be read but shall be removed and either retained in the contract file without being considered in the evaluation, or, sent back to the offeror.

b. The written technical proposal shall be clear, concise, and include all the information required by this provision in sufficient detail for effective evaluation. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government’s requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Offerors shall assume the Government has no prior knowledge of their capabilities, work processes, facilities, and experience and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror’s technical proposal. The written technical proposal shall address the following sub-factor to describe the offeror’s proposed approach to performing the requirements set forth in the Statement of Work to determine whether the proposal is acceptable or unacceptable.

Sub-factor 1 - Work Plan

Description: This sub-factor evaluates the offeror’s work plan.

Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when the offeror’s proposal provides a Gantt chart (or similar) highlighting a breakdown of the items/tasks (milestones) identified in the Specifications / Drawings and how the offeror plans on accomplishing each individual task within the performance period specified for the project. Additionally, the offeror shall clearly and thoroughly depict the critical path to complete the project within the performance period.

2. PART II – PAST PERFORMANCE: Will be rated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis.

a. A Past Performance Information Form (PPIF), Attachment 5 (five) is provided with the solicitation for offerors to send to a maximum of three (3) references of their choice. PPIF references who have returned the questionnaires will be used in the past performance evaluation. Please note that the PPIF will only be accepted if it is received directly from the reference.

b. The US Government will consider and evaluate offeror's past performance information, to include the

Attachment 6

FA4528-20-R-0011

PPIF, which are deemed recent and relevant for the requirements of this RFP. The Government will also use information submitted by the offeror and other sources, such as other Federal Government offices and commercial sources, to assess performance. Recent and Relevant is defined in the subparagraph below:

i. Recency Assessment: An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. To be recent, the effort must be ongoing or must have been performed during the past five (5) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.

ii. Relevant performance information obtained to determine whether the products provided/services performed under those contracts relate to the technical sub-factor and price factor. For each recent past performance citation reviewed, the relevance of the work performed will generally be assessed for the Technical sub-factors and Price Factor (however, all aspects of performance that relate to this acquisition may be considered). Consideration will be given to:

The offeror performed as the prime contractor for renovation and alteration projects with a contract dollar value of at least $500,000.00 and similar in scope, magnitude, and complexity to the effort required by this solicitation.

In determining the relevancy of effort performed under individual past performance contracts, the Government will only consider the specific effort or portion consistent with that proposed by the prime, subcontractor or teaming partner. The PPIFs and information obtained from other sources will be used to establish the relevancy of past performance.

c. Teaming arrangements are characterized by two or more business entities that are working together under the representation of one of the existing business entities for the duration of a contract. A teaming arrangement is not a formal merger of two or more business entities. The Government recognizes the validity and integrity of teaming arrangements as detailed in FAR 9.6. All offerors are encouraged to review FAR 9.6 to acquaint themselves with its details. Since the Government can only determine the responsibility of the prime contractor per FAR 9.604(b), IAW FAR 9.1, Responsible Prospective Contractors, offerors must identify in their offer any teaming arrangement to be considered and completely identify the relationships/responsibilities of the teaming members, to include relevant and recent past/present performance information on a maximum of three (3) projects teamed with the same partner. If unable to submit three (3) past/present performance information questionnaires with the same partner, submit past/present performance information on the prime contractor for a maximum of three

(3) projects total.

d. Joint ventures are characterized as two or more business entities that have been merged to create one business entity with equal responsibility during the course of the contract. If this is a first time Joint Venture, please submit past/present performance information on a maximum of three (3) projects total by any business entity in the arrangement as identified in paragraphs (a) and (b) above.

e. Subcontractor Consent: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor’s written consent. Provide a letter of consent to release past performance information to the prime offeror from each subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement.

f. Return completed Past Performance Information Forms NLT the offeror due date and time specified in block 13 of the solicitation SF1442. Have PPIFs sent to:

5 CONS/PKA

Attn: James Moore & Walnerge Uran-Ochoa, FA4528-20-R-0011 165 Missile Ave Minot AFB, ND 58705

-OR-

james.moore.45@us.af.mil / walnerge.uran_ochoa@us.af.mil / 5CONS.PKA.Proposals@us.af.mil

3. PART III – PRICE PROPOSAL: Submit original and one (1) copy.

a. Complete blocks 14 through 20C of the RFP Section A, SF1442. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in RFP Sections A through K. These sections constitute the model contract. The offeror shall submit only those pages that require a fill-in.

b. Insert proposed price in Section B for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN).

c. Other than certified cost or pricing data may be requested by the Government.

D. General Information:

1. Format for proposal parts I, II, and III shall be as follows:

a. The proposals will be 8 1/2” x 11” paper or standard A4 paper, except for fold-outs used for charts, tables, or diagrams, which may not exceed 11” x 17”.

b. A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information.

c. Typing shall not be less than 10 point.

d. Elaborate formats, bindings or color presentations are not desired or required.

e. Electronic Submission – IAW FAR 52.215-1 – Instructions to Offerors, emailed proposals will be accepted. Emailed proposals must be sent to james.moore.45@us.af.mil, walnerge.uran_ochoa@us.af.mil, and 5CONS.PKA.Proposals@us.af.mil. Note email size must not exceed 10 MB. If the proposal is more than 10 MB, please submit as email 1 of 2, etc. Format must be a Word Document, PDF, or Excel sheet. The offeror must request and obtain an acknowledgement of receipt for electronic submission.

f. A letter of authorization for the Contracting Officer to verify offeror’s financial responsibility (Attachment 4). Include name, address and phone numbers for financial institutions to include points of contact.

g. Acknowledgement of all amendments to the solicitation IAW the instructions on the SF30 (amendment form).

2. A pre-proposal site visit will be conducted as specified in 52.236-27 Alternate 1.

3. Offerors should allow sufficient time to arrive and submit the proposals to the Contracting Office prior to the closing time. Late proposals will be processed IAW the provisions established in FAR 15.208 “Late Submission, Modifications, and Withdrawals of Proposals”. If gate access is not granted, please contact the CO immediately. The contractors are responsible for coordinating and processing gate pass requests in a timely manner. The USAF shall not be held accountable. The USAF shall not be responsible for delays due to in-processing or out-processing the base.

4. All contractors’ questions in response to this solicitation must be emailed to james.moore.45@us.af.mil, walnerge.uran_ochoa@us.af.mil, and 5CONS.PKA.Proposals@us.af.mil no later than 18 March 2020 at 2:00 pm CST. The US Government will not be held responsible for answering any questions after this time.

All questions/answers resulting from this solicitation will be posted to beta SAM (contracting opportunities) https://beta.sam.gov/.

5. This section provides general guidance for preparing proposals. Offerors’ proposals must include all data and information requested by this solicitation and must be submitted and conducted in strict accordance with these instructions. Non-conformance with the specific organization, content, and page limitations may result in misevaluation of proposals or, depending on the magnitude of the nonconformance the proposals may be eliminated from further consideration.

6. The proposal must be completed and returned NLT the offeror due date and time specified in block 13 of the solicitation SF1442.

To: 5 CONS/PKA Attn: James Moore and Walnerge Uran-Ochoa, FA4528-20-R-0011

165 MISSILE AVENUE

MINOT AFB ND 58705-5027