Amendment 1 SF30_FA448422R0007.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Supplies or Services & Prices or Costs

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. Introduction: The U.S. Air Force 87 Contracting Squadron (87 CONS), Joint Base MDL (JB-MDL), New Jersey has a requirement for operating, maintaining, and repairing the tertiary wastewater treatment facility, land application site, and tactical training base septic system in accordance with performance work statement (PWS) (attachment 1) dated 1 Feb 23.

2. Contracting Strategy: The government contemplates a single award of a firm fixed price (FFP) requirements IDIQ. The acquisition is based upon competition to represent the best value to the government. For proposal instructions and submittal information, see Section L, entitled Specific Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors. For the basis of award, see Section M, entitled Evaluation Factors for Award.

3. The anticipated period of performance (PoP) is as follows:

Base Period, 1 Feb 2023 through 31 Jan 2024.

Option Year 1, 1 Feb 2024 through 31 Jan 2025.

Option Year 2, 1 Feb 2025 through 31 Jan 2026.

Option Year 3, 1 Feb 2026 through 31 Jan 2027.

Option Year 4, 1 Feb 2027 through 31 Jan 2028.

4. Contract Kind/Type: This will be a FFP requirements IDIQ contract:

FFP: CLINS 0001, 0002, 1001, 1002, 2001, 2002, 3001, 3002, 4001, 4002

5. All options, if exercised, will be exercised in accordance with the terms and conditions of the task order.

Option clauses incorporated in the solicitation are as follows:

FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (Jul 1990) FAR 52.217-9, Option to Extend the Term of the Contract (Mar 2000) FAR 52-219-8, Option to Extend Services (Nov 1999)

6. See sections L (Instructions to Offerors - Addendum to FAR Clause 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors - Commercial Items) and M (Addendum to 52.212-2 - Evaluation - Commercial Items) for details pertaining to pricing.

7. A contracting officers representative (COR) will monitor contractor's performance in accordance with solicitation section J, Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP).

8.If offerors have questions they are requested to submit them grouped by solicitation section and make reference to the particular section / subsection number. Questions must be received not later than 31 May to Michael Petty at michael.petty.5@us.af.mil. Questions or requests for extension submitted after the cut-off date will not be considered.

FA448422R00070001

9. A site visit will be conducted on 19 May beginning at 9:00AM EST. Interested vendors must submit the names, date of birth and social security number of all attendees (even if you are a DoD cardholder), to michael.

petty.5@us.af.mil no later than 4:00PM on 17 May. This information must be provided in advance in order to ensure access to the military base/conference site and adequate seating for the conference attendees.

10. Contractors must have an active registration in the system for award management (SAM) in order to submit proposal and be awarded a Department of Defense (DoD) contract. If you need to register in SAM, please do so using the following link: https://www.sam.gov/sam.

11. This executive summary has been prepared as an aid to you, the potential offeror. The government has made every effort to accurately reflect the requirements and information contained in this solicitation. However, if there are any inconsistencies between the executive summary and the solicitation, the solicitation will govern.

PRICING SCHEDULE

Summary of Prices Base Year (1 Feb 23 - 31 Jan 24) $ Option Year One (1 Feb 24 - 31 Jan 25) $ Option Year Two (1 Feb 25 - 31 Jan 26) $ Option Year Three (1 Feb 26 - 31 Jan 27) $ Option Year Four (1 Feb 27 - 31 Jan 28) $ Grand Total (Base Plus 4 option years) $

Note 1: Complete unit prices and total amounts for CLINs 0001, 1001, 2001, 3001, and 4001. Total must be exact and will be limited to two spaces after the decimal point. Contractor shall not submit a separate price for CLINs 0002, 1002, 2002, 3002, and 4002; this line item is set at the "not to exceed price" of $180,000. This price must be included in the total proposed base year and option year pricing.

Note 2: In case of variation between the unit price and extension, unit price will be considered the offer.

Note 3: Failure to provide pricing on all CLINs will be considered a nonconforming proposal and will preclude the proposal from any further award consideration.

Note 4: Clauses and provisions in this document will be numbered in sequence, but will not necessarily appear in consecutive order.

Note 5: Instructions to Offerors for Commercial Acquisitions, Offeror Representations and Certification- Commercial Items and Proposal Preparation Instructions will be physically removed from any resultant award, but will be deemed to be incorporated by reference in the award.

The following CLIN(s) / SLIN(s) / ELIN(s) were modified:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Quantity 1,800 180,000

Option Line Item 1002

INFORMATION FROM TO

Quantity 1,800 180,000

Option Line Item 2002

INFORMATION FROM TO

Quantity 1,800 180,000

Option Line Item 3002

INFORMATION FROM TO

Quantity 1,800 180,000

Option Line Item 4002

INFORMATION FROM TO

Quantity 1,800 180,000

Description/Specifications/Statement of Work

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

SERVICE CONTRACT REPORTING (SCR)

The contractor shall report all contractor labor hours (including subcontractor labor hours) required for the performance of services provided under this contract via the government secure data collection site, the System for Award Management (SAM) web site. The contractor is required to completely fill in all required data fields using the following web address: https://www.sam.gov, and report all labor hours required. SAM.gov website provides access to SCR User Guide for support. Reporting inputs will be for the labor executed during the period of performance during the previous Government Fiscal Year (FY), which runs 01 October through 30 September. While inputs may be reported any time during the FY, all data shall be reported no later than 31 October of each calendar year. Contractors may direct questions to the Help Desk by clicking on: "Help" which is located under the Customer Service column on the bottom of the login page of the SAM.gov website.

List of Attachments

The following attachments were added:

Collective Bargaining Agreement

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

List of Attachments:

Performance Work Statement, 1 Feb 23 Technical Exhibit 1 Contract Data Requirements List Technical Exhibit 2 Security Forces Appendix Technical Exhibit 3 NPDES Permit Technical Exhibit 4 Emergency Generator Operations Log Technical Exhibit 5 TTBSS PDF Drawings Technical Exhibit 6 Confined Spaces Technical Exhibit 7 Fire Extinguisher Inventory Technical Exhibit 8 Layout of Plant Areas of Responsibility Technical Exhibit 9 DAFGM2021-32-01 Wage Determination No. 2015-4191 Revision No. 18, 15 Mar 22 Antiterrorism Statement Past and Present Performance Questionnaire Collective Bargaining Agreement_1 Jul 2020

Evaluation Factors for Award

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

Evaluation Factors for Award

Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 - Evaluation-Commercial Items (Oct 2014)

(a) The government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the government, price and other factors considered.

The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

1. Technical

2. Price

3. Present/Past Performance

4. Small Business Participation

In the evaluation process, technical is evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis and present/past performance is significantly more important than price.

(b) Options. The government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the government to exercise the option(s). FAR 52.217-8, Option To Extend Services, is included in this solicitation and will be evaluated. The government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced.

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

Addendum to FAR 52.212-2

BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD. This is a competitive best value source selection in which competing offerors' present/past performance history will be evaluated on a basis significantly more important than price considerations. By submission of its offer, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. All technically acceptable offers will be considered equal. The tradeoff will occur only between the present/past performance factor and the price factor. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined technically unacceptable. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

A. Technical Acceptability. Initially, the government technical evaluation team shall evaluate all the technical proposals on an acceptable/unacceptable basis. If determined unacceptable in any one area, the overall technical rating shall be rated unacceptable. The proposals shall be evaluated against the following 3 subfactors:

Subfactor 1: Continuation of Essential Contractor Services Plan

Description: In accordance with DFARS 252.237-7024, "Notice of Continuation of Essential Contractor

Services," the offeror shall provide a Continuation of Essential Contract Services Plan which shall describe how it will continue to perform the essential contractor services of the PWS. The plan shall identify provisions made for the acquisition of essential personnel and resources, if necessary, for continuity of operations for up to 30 days or until normal operations can be resumed. In accordance with DFARS 252.237-7024, the contractor shall address in the plan at a minimum:

Measure of Merit: The requirement is met when the offeror's Continuation of Essential Contractor Services Plan addresses all the requirements of DFARS 252.237-7024, Notice of Continuation of Essential Contractor Services

Subfactor 2: Small Business Participation Plan

Description: If the offeror is other than a small business, the offeror shall submit a small business subcontracting plan in accordance with FAR 52-219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns and FAR 52.219-9, Alternate II, Small Business Subcontracting Plan. Small businesses are not required to submit a small business subcontracting plan.

DFARS 215.304(c) requires evaluation of small business participation of all offerors for source selection /award evaluation purposes. Small business subcontracting plan will be evaluated as a subfactor under the technical factor and assigned a rating of acceptable/unacceptable basis in accordance with the below requirements. The small business subcontracting plan is required from offerors at the time offers are due and is to specifically address:

(1) Names of subcontractors to be utilized and the products/services they are to provide.

(2) The extent of participation of each subcontractor in terms of the value of the total acquisition.

Measure of Merit: The requirement is met based on the extent that participation by SBs complies with the DOD, FY22 small business subcontracting goal of 32.25%.

DoD also has these goals for the following small business subcategories:

Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB): 3% Woman Owned Small Business (WOSB): 3% Service Disabled Veteran (SDV) Owned Small Business: 3% Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) Zone Small Business: 3%

A target rate of 32.25% of the total contract value shall be subcontracted to small business for this solicitation /resultant contract. Small business subcontracting plan shall be evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis based upon this 32.25% target. The small business subcontracting plan shall also include positive percentage goals for each small business subcategory with an effort to reach the goals. If a small business subcategory does not meet the DoD goal, reasoning must be provided as to why one cannot be reached and what steps may be taken in the future to provide a positive goal.

Subfactor 3: Qualified Operator of Record and Alternate

Description: In accordance with N.J.A.C. 7:10A-1.1 and paragraph 4.2.1 of the PWS, the offeror must provide evidence of a qualified operator of record who possesses, at a minimum, valid (current) New Jersey State licenses S4 and C4. The contractor shall further provide an alternate licensed operator of record holding the same valid New Jersey State licenses to act in operator of record's absences.

Measure of Merit: The requirement is met when valid NJ State licenses S4 and C4 are submitted with the proposal for both the operator of record and his/her alternate.

B. Price Evaluation. Next, the government shall rank all technically acceptable offers by price, including any option prices if applicable. An offeror's proposed prices will be determined by multiplying the quantities identified in the pricing schedule by the proposed unit price for each Contract Line Item Number or Subcontract Line Item Number to confirm the extended amount for each. When applicable, the price evaluation adjustment for HUBZone small business concerns will be applied in accordance with FAR 52.219-4, Notice of Price Evaluation Preference for HUBZone Small Business Concerns, to arrive at an evaluated price. Offerors whose total evaluated price is unreasonable (in accordance with FAR 15.404 and FAR 31.201-3), unbalanced (in accordance with FAR 15.404-1), or unaffordable (not within any budgetary information included in the solicitation) may not be considered for award. For contract extensions in accordance with FAR 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, the government will evaluate the price of any possible extension as described in FAR 52.217-9, Option to Extend the Term of the Contract, by dividing the total extended proposed price in the last option year by two. This amount will be added to the total price of the base and all options.

C. Performance Confidence Assessment. The contracting officer shall seek recent and relevant performance information on all offerors based on (1) the present/past efforts provided by the offeror and (2) data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources. Recency is defined as having performed, or currently performing, on contracts for Federal agencies and/or commercial customers within five years from the release date of this solicitation. Relevant present/past performance includes operating, maintaining and repairing and tertiary wastewater treatment facility similar or greater in scope, magnitude and complexity than the effort described in this solicitation. Aspects of relevancy include, but not limited to: system design; gallons of water per day; operator license type; 24/7 operations; and simultaneously operate, monitor, maintain and repair multiple facilities.

The purpose of the present/past performance evaluation is to allow the government to assess the offeror's probability of meeting the solicitation requirements based on the offeror's demonstrated present/past performance. The assessment process will result in an overall performance confidence assessment of Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, No Confidence, or Neutral Confidence as defined in DoD Source Selection Procedures, Table 5. Present/Past performance regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement will not be rated as highly as present/past performance information for the principal offeror.

Offerors with no recent/relevant performance history or if the offeror's performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned shall receive the rating "Neutral Confidence," meaning the rating is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably.

Table 5. Performance Confidence Assessments Rating Method

In evaluating past performance, the government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this solicitation. The government will use the following relevancy definitions as defined in DoD Source Selection Procedures, Table 4, Past Performance Relevancy Ratings, when assessing recent, relevant contracts.

Table 4. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

D. If the lowest priced evaluated technically acceptable offer is judged to have a "Substantial Confidence" performance confidence assessment, that offer represents the best value for the government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award shall be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers.

E. If the lowest priced technically acceptable offeror is not judged to have a "Substantial Confidence" performance confidence assessment, the next lowest priced technically acceptable offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order by price) until an offeror is judged to have a "Substantial Confidence" performance assessment or until all offerors are evaluated. The source selection authority shall then make an integrated assessment best value award decision.

F. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in Addendum to 52.212-1, Instruction to Offerors. Offeror's may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal (for example, the relevance of present/past performance information) or respond to adverse present/past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Adverse present/past performance is defined as present/past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. Communication conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without discussions nor the opportunity for proposal revision.

G. If, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the government to hold discussions, offeror's responses to evaluation notices and the final proposal revision will be considered in making the source selection decision. If the offeror's proposal has been evaluated as acceptable at the time discussions are closed, any changes or exceptions in the final proposal revision are subject to evaluation and may introduce risk that the offeror's proposal be determined unacceptable and ineligible for award.

H. The government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective offerors. The government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest.

BLDG 2402 CP 609 754 2413

2402 VANDENBERG AVE

JBMDL, NJ 08641

UNITED STATES

Michael Petty, Email: michael.petty.5@us.af.mil

2. Correct the quantity under CLINs 0002, 1002, 2002, 3002, 4002 from 1,800 to180,000.

3. Add the current collective bargaining agreement, dated 1 Jun 20, to the solicitation package on SAM.gov.

4. Add site visit minutes and questions and answers to the solicitation package on SAM.gov.

5. Revise the service contract reporting language .