Past_Performance.pdf
PDF 128 KB Posted
- Attached to
- AFICA AIR COMPRESSOR MAINTENANCE Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4484-18-Q-0001
About this file
Updated Past Performance
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions_and_Answers__2.pdf | ||
| Questions_and_Answers.pdf | ||
| Appendix_F_Safety_Guide.pdf | ||
| Air._Com._Bid_Schedule_-.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Wage_Determination_Burlington_Rev._3.pdf | ||
| 52-212-3_for_combo.pdf | ||
| Air_Compressor_Inventory.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Maintenance_Inspection_Requirements.pdf | ||
| Air_Compressors_PWS_NOV_2017.pdf | ||
| Wage_Determination_Ocean_Rev._3.pdf | ||
| SEC_FORCES_APPENDIX.pdf | ||
| Past_Performance.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.
Past Performance Questionnaire
For Official Use Only Page 1 of 5
The 87th Contracting Squadron of the Air Force in the process of competitively selecting a source for Air Compressor Maintenance.
One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.
Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than December 15, 2017 at 3:00pm EST.
To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to amber.molina@us.af.mil or by hand and faxed to 609 754-4948 (Attention: Mrs. Amber Molina).
Please call Mrs. Molina at 609 754-4408 prior to fax transmission or if you have any questions.
Your assistance and your prompt response will be is greatly appreciated.
CHRISTINE T. LEHTINEN
Contracting Officer
1 Atch http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836
For Official Use Only Page 2 of 5
Section 1: Contract Identification
A. Contractor (Company/Division):
B. Contractor Cage Code:
C. Contract Number:
D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):
E. Period of Performance
F. Contract Dollar Value
G. Description of work performed:
H. How is this requirement relevant to the solicitation?
I. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No
L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel
Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification
A. Customer or agency name:
Section 3: Respondent Identification
A. Respondent’s name:
B. Respondent’s title:
C. Respondent’s phone number / fax number / e-mail address:
D. Respondent’s position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO, etc.):
Section 4: Performance Information
In the tables below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:
Code Performance Rating
For Official Use Only Page 3 of 5
E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the
Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.
For Official Use Only Page 4 of 5
Performance E V S M U N/A
1. Did the contractor provide preventive maintenance/inspections and service of the various air compressors?
SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
2. Was the contractor knowledgeable about the various air compressors?
3. Was the contractor able to maintain air compressors at various locations?
4. Did the contractor perform the preventive maintenance and/or inspections on time?
5. Did the contractor respond to service calls in timely manner?
6. Did the contractor adhere to Occupational Safety and Health Standards?
7. How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive Government guidance?
8. How successfully did the contractor respond to emergency and/or surge situations?
9. Overall, how would you rate this contractor?
For Official Use Only Page 5 of 5
Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?
☐ Yes ☐ Default ☐ Convenience ☐ Pending Terminations ☐ No
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).
SECTION 5: GENERAL COMMENT
Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I ___________________ award to him today given that I had a choice.
REMARKS:
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Respondent’s Signature & Phone Number Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
File details come from the government source that posted it.