FA4452-08-R-0001-ATT5-past performance questionnaire.doc

FA4452-08-R-0001

Attachment 5

SECTION J ATTACHMENT 5: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

For use with the Applications Infrastructure and Systems Support (AISS) Source Selection

When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information iaw FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor: _____________________________________________________________

B. Cage Code of Contractor contract was awarded: ________________________________

C. Contract number: ________________________________________________________

Contract type: ______________________________________________________________

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No ___

F. Period of performance: ____________________________________________________

G. Initial contract cost: $_____________________________________________________

H. Current/final contract cost: $________________________________________________

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: _____________________________________________________________________________________

Description of service provided:____________________________________________________________

SECTION 2. CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name: __________________________________________________________

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): ____________________________________________________________________________________

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Command:

SECTION 3. EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name: __________________________________________________________________

B. Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ________________________________________________________

D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: _____________________________________

SECTION 4. EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the Contractor’s performance by circling the appropriate letter using the scale provided underneath each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE

PERFORMANCE LEVEL

B

BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the customer’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

P

PURPLE/VERY GOOD- The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the customer’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

G

GREEN/SATISFACTORY – The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Y

YELLOW/MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

R

RED/UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A

NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.

Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions below (use the remarks section or provide additional sheets, if necessary).

Mission Capability

Subfactor 1- Technical Approach S1.1: Contractor produced tailored, well defined and documented processes for software development and system integration.

Color Code:

B P G Y R N/A

Remarks:

S1.2: Contractor produced tailored industry best practices for implementing and sustaining configuration management of organizational systems.

Color Code:

B P G Y R N/A

Remarks:

S1.3: Contractor demonstrated competence in the creation and execution of developmental and operational test plans.

Color Code:

B P G Y R N/A

Remarks:

S1.4: Contractor developed and implemented an effective systems engineering management plan, system safety program plan and /or software development standard within cost and schedule constraints.

Color Code:

B P G Y R N/A

Remarks:

S1.5: Contractor demonstrated ability to manage and operate training, testing, and operational IT environments.

Color Code:

B P G Y R N/A

Remarks:

S1.6: Contractor demonstrated ability to design and develop (Level III) complex real-time and near real-time systems solutions to assist in ensuring that the systems maintain operational readiness.

Color Code:

B P G Y R N/A

Remarks:

S1.7: Contractor demonstrated quality workmanship as evidenced by high quality end services which met or exceeded contract requirements.

Color Code:

B P G Y R N/A

Remarks:

Subfactor 2 – Program Management S2.1: Contractor demonstrated appropriate responsiveness to customer’s problems in a timely manner.

Color Code:

B P G Y R N/A

Remarks:

S2.2: Contractor responded well by providing all necessary and sufficient management attention and resources to minimize performance, schedule, and cost risks.

Color Code:

B P G Y R N/A

Remarks:

S2.3: Contractor demonstrated its understanding of the customer’s organizational environment in its ability to tailor best practices to fit this environment.

Color Code:

B P G Y R N/A

Remarks:

S2.4: The Contractor successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations.

Color Code:

B P G Y R N/A

Remarks:

S2.5 Contractor demonstrated an effective quality control program resulting in performance meeting or exceeding contract requirements.

Color Code:

B P G Y R N/A

Remarks S2.6: Contractor provided effective control & cost management of complex, diverse & geographically dispersed projects.

Color Code:

B P G Y R N/A

Remarks S2.7: Contractor responded well to a fluctuating workload while executing from a variety of funding sources.

Color Code:

B P G Y R N/A

Remarks Subfactor 3: Transition Plan S3.1: Contractor effectively transitioned services from previous contract.

Color Code:

B P G Y R N/A

Remarks:

Subfactor 4 – Management of Subcontracting Plan

S4.1: Contractor provided a logical, cost effective, and beneficial plan for subcontractor participation.

Color Code:

B P G Y R N/A

Remarks:

Government Contracts Only:

G1: Were there incidents of cure notices, show cause notices or other remedial actions?

Yes___ (please explain in remarks below)

No____

Remarks:

G2: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? If yes, please explain in remarks below.

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___

No ___

Remarks:

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

What were the Contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?

What were the Contractor’s most negative aspects in the performance of the contract? ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this Contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this Contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature

Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to (preferably by e-mail):

E-mail: matt.bowen@scott.af.mil Or FAX: 618-256-5724

Or Mailing Address: HQ AMC/A7KQ

Attn: Matt Bowen

507 Symington Drive, Rm W202

Scott AFB, IL 62225-5022