Attachment 2- CATM Cleaining and Maintenance Past Performance Questionnaire PPQ - Amendment 3.pdf

PDF 137 KB Posted

Attached to
Combat Arms Range Cleaning & Maintenance Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA442724Q0042
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command

About this file

This solicitation is for combat arms range cleaning and maintenance services at Travis Air Force Base in California. The contractor shall provide all labor, materials, transportation, and services necessary to conduct weekly scheduled cleanings and monthly emergency cleanings of the firing range as needed. The contractor must coordinate all scheduled cleaning dates and times at least two weeks in advance with the 60th Security Forces Squadron to ensure the range is available. The contractor will be responsible for daily range servicing and cleanup that the 60th SFS currently performs in addition to the scheduled and emergency cleanings. The solicitation was issued by the Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command for an indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contract to provide these range cleaning and maintenance services.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 2 – CATM Cleaning & Maintenance Services MFT 24-29

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CATM Cleaning & Maintenance Services

The completed questionnaire can be emailed as a PDF file to: olivia.christiansen@us.af.mil, Contract Specialist, at 60 CONS, Travis AFB. The due date for completed questionnaires is no later than: 08 March 2024 at 12:00 PM Pacific Time. Your completed questionnaire will become part of the official source selection records.

A. OFFEROR’s REFERENCE INFORMATION:

Contract Name and/or Number (Include task order number(s) if applicable:

Company (Include task order number(s) if applicable:

Address:

POC of Contact (POC):

Title of POC:

Telephone Number:

Email:

Contractor performed as:

Prime Contractor ____ Sub-Contractor ____

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION: Offeror’s Information

Contracting Activity/Customer:

Address:

Telephone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contract (POC)

Title of POC:

C. CONTRACT INFORMATION: Filled out by Offeror’s Reference

Contract Name and/or Number

Task Order Number:

Type of Contract:

mailto:olivia.christiansen@us.af.mil

Performance Period (Base plus any options)

Annual Contract Value:

Total Contract Dollar Value: (base plus options)

Contract Description:

Contractor performed as: Prime Contractor: _____

Sub-Contractor: _____

If subcontractor: What percentage was performed by the evaluated Contractor

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Filled out by Offeror’s Reference)

Choose the appropriate number on the scale (1, 2, 3, 4, or 5) that most accurately describes the

Contractor’s performance or situation.

PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 4 OR 5

1 2 3 4 5

Substantial

Confidence

Satisfactory

Confidence

Neutral

Confidence

Limited

Confidence

No Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

The offeror may not be evaluated favorably nor unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

Offeror’s Reference – PLEASE Provide Comments Here:

Offeror’s Reference Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance.

Please return this completed questionnaire directly to:

TSgt Olivia Christiansen, Contract Specialist

Email: olivia.christiansen@us.af.mil

Phone: 707-816-3897

THE CONTRACTOR 1 2 3 4 5

1 The Contractor provided quality service that adhered to contract requirements.

2 The Contractor consistently responded to problems and took appropriate action to correct performance.

3 Contractor provided all materials needed for cleaning, maintenance, and hazardous waste disposal.

4 Contractor corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their contract requirements.

5 Contractor demonstrated an overall effective and quality management effort.

6 Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective solutions to critical contract issues.

7 Contractor maintained all necessary all specific training for operating and proper procedures (HAZWOPER, hazardous waste operations, certification, etc), as applicable.

8 How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance

9 Is the Contractor rated in CPARS? Yes No

Was the Contractor ever issued a CAR, Cure or Show Cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome below.

11 Would you award another contract to this Contractor? Please explain below.

mailto:olivia.christiansen@us.af.mil

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .