Attachment_4_-_Present-Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 703 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Transient Alert/Washrack Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4417-17-R-0015
About this file
Attachment 4 - Present Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment_1_-_22_Aug_Amendment_to_ADDENDUM_TO_52_212-1.pdf | ||
| SF30_Solicitation_Amendment.pdf | ||
| Attachment_6_-_Performance_Work_Statement_31_July_2017.pdf | ||
| Attachment_5_-_Wage_Determination_2015-4531,_Rev_4,_dtd_25_Jul_2017.pdf | ||
| Attachment_9_-_Financial_Institution_Reference_Sheet.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_-_18_Aug_ADDENDUM_TO_52_212-1.pdf | ||
| 01-SF1449_Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Attachment_7_-_Map.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| Attachment_2__-18_Aug__ADDENDUM_TO_52.212-2.pdf | ||
| Attachment_3_-_Cover_Sheet.pdf | ||
| Attachment_8_-_Sample_Wash_Rack_Schedule.pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 4
Present/Past Performance Questionnaire
The 1st Special Operations Contractng Squadron at Hurlburt Field, FL is in the process of competitively selecting a source for Transient Alert / Wash Rack Services.
One of the considerations within the evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. The Government depends on information received from organizations such as yours, who have had first-hand experience with the offeror, to provide an evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.
The areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, please provide a written response no later than 25 September 2017 at 1:00 CST. This schedule will allow sufficient time to analyze the data.
To assist in the preparation of your response and to further expedite a reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically e-mailed to both of the following individuals:
sarahanne.funkhouser@us.af.mil and david.jesmain.1@us.af.mil. For questions, please contact Sarah Funkhouser at (850) 884-3272 or David Jesmain at (850) 884-3262. The completed questionnaire will become part of the official Source Selection records.
Your assistance is greatly appreciated and a prompt response is one of the key elements to a successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.
MICHAEL WENWRICK
CONTRACTING OFFICER
FA4417-17-R-0015
Transient Alert / Wash Rack Services Hurlburt Field, FL
Attachment 4 Present/Past Performance Questionnaire http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836 mailto:sarahanne.funkhouser@us.af.mil mailto:david.jesmain.1@us.af.mil
Section 1: Contract Identification
A. Contractor (Company/Division):
B. Contractor Cage Code:
C. Contract Number:
D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):
E. Contract Title:
F. Brief Contract Description:
G. Period of Performance:
1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):
Beginning Date ____________ through ____________
Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):
Beginning Date ____________ through ____________
2. Reason for difference (if applicable):
H. Contract Dollar Value
1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised):
2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised):
3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):
I. Description of work performed:
J. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No
K. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel
Hurlburt Field, FL
Attachment 4 Present/Past Performance Questionnaire http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836
Section 2: Respondent Identification
A. Respondent’s name:
B. Respondent’s title:
C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:
D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:
Section 3: Performance Information
In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:
Code Performance Rating
E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.
Hurlburt Field, FL
Attachment 4 Present/Past Performance Questionnaire
The Contractor: E V S M U N/A
1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period without degradation in services.
3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5. Followed approved quality control plan.
6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
9. Identified problems as they occurred prior to Government identification.
10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.
12. Was responsive to contract changes.
13. Effectively managed sub-contractor efforts, if applicable.
14. Cooperated with government personnel after award.
15. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?
16. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?
Or has the decision ever been made not to exercise an option due to contractor’s performance?
If yes, please explain in “remarks”.
☐ Yes
☐ No
17. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, please explain in “remarks”.
☐ Yes
☐ No
18. Did the contractor provide Transient Alert Services? If yes, please select the most appropriate monthly or annual estimate range below:
Number of TA aircraft serviced monthly/annually:
51+ monthly / 601+ annually 16 - 29 monthly / 181 - 359 annually 30 - 50 monthly / 360 - 600 annually 15 or less monthly / 180 or less annually
☐ Yes
☐ No
FA4417-17-R-0015
Transient Alert / Wash Rack Services Hurlburt Field, FL
Attachment 4 Present/Past Performance Questionnaire
The Contractor: E V S M U N/A
19. Did the contractor provide Aircraft Wash Services? If yes, please select the most appropriate monthly or annual estimate range below:
Number of aircraft washed monthly/annually:
31+ monthly / 360+ annually 10 – 19 monthly / 100 - 239 annually
20 – 30 monthly / 240 - 359 annually 9 or less monthly / 99 or less annually
Please select the most appropriate size of airframe washed:
Large airframe (C-130 / C-5 / C-17 / B52 etc.)
Medium airframe (CV-22 / A-10 / Fighters / Helicopters) Small airframe (Cessna / U-28) Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs/Drones)
☐ Yes
☐ No
20. Has a CPARs been accomplished for this contract?
☐ Yes
☐ No
Please provide any additional remarks/comments or expand on questions above:
Respondent’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
Mailing Address:
1 SOCONS/LGCA
Attn: Sarah Funkhouser 350 Tully Ave Hurlburt Field, FL 32566
E-Mail to: sarahanne.funkhouser@us.af.mil
FA4417-17-R-0015
Transient Alert / Wash Rack Services Hurlburt Field, FL
Attachment 4 Present/Past Performance Questionnaire http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836 mailto:sarahanne.funkhouser@us.af.mil
| J Was this a competitively awarded contract: Off |
| Prime Contractor: Off |
| Subcontractor: Off |
| Key Personnel: Off |
| E1 Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements: |
| V1 Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements: |
| S1 Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements: |
| M1 Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements: |
| U1 Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements: |
| NA1 Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements: |
| 3 Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with: |
| undefined: |
| undefined_9: Off |
| 17 Would you award another contract to this contractor If not please explain in remarks: |
| undefined_10: Off |
| Yes_4: Off |
| undefined_11: Off |
| Yes_5: Off |
| undefined_12: Off |
| 20 Has a CPARs been accomplished for this contract: |
| undefined_13: Off |
| Please provide any additional remarkscomments or expand on questions above 1: |
| Please provide any additional remarkscomments or expand on questions above 2: |
| Please provide any additional remarkscomments or expand on questions above 3: |
| Please provide any additional remarkscomments or expand on questions above 4: |
| Please provide any additional remarkscomments or expand on questions above 5: |
| Please provide any additional remarkscomments or expand on questions above 6: |
| Please provide any additional remarkscomments or expand on questions above 7: |
| Date: |
| Respondent's Name: |
| Respondent's title: |
| Respondent's phone/fax number/email address: |
| Length of time and description: |
| Description of work performed: |
| Reason for contract dollar value difference: |
| Original max dollar value: |
| Current Max dollar value: |
| Reason: |
| Beginning Date: |
| Ending Date: |
| Contract Description: |
| Contract Title: |
| Contract Type: |
| Contract Number: |
| Contractor Cage Code: |
| Contractor: |
| 2 Demonstrated the ability to hire maintain and replace if necessary qualified: |
| undefined_2: |
| 6 Provided effective quality control andor inspection procedures to meet: |
| 7 Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control: |
| undefined_3: |
| 9 Identified problems as they occurred prior to Government identification: |
| undefined_4: |
| undefined_5: |
| undefined_6: |
| undefined_7: |
| undefined_8: |
| s overall performance on this contract: |
| Check Box24: Off |
| Check Box25: Off |
| Check Box26: Off |
| Check Box27: Off |
| Check Box28: Off |
| Check Box29: Off |
| Check Box30: Off |
| Check Box31: Off |
| Check Box32: Off |
| Check Box33: Off |
| Check Box34: Off |
| Check Box35: Off |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .