Overhead_Doors_and_Gates_-_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 279 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Preventative Maintenance, Inspection and Repair of Overhead/Automatic Doors and Electric Gates
- Solicitation number
- FA4417-16-T-0003
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 3)
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA4417-16-T-0003_-_Site_Visit_Attendees.pdf | ||
| FA4417-16-T-0003-0001.pdf | ||
| FA4417-16-T-0003_-_Questions.docx | DOCX document | |
| PWS_-_28_OCT_2015.doc | DOC document | |
| FA4417-16-T-0003.pdf | ||
| Wage_Determination_05-3033_Rev.-17.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA4417-16-T-0003 Attachment 3
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
1ST SPECIAL OPERATIONS CONTRACTING SQUADRON (AFSOC)
HURLBURT FIELD FLORIDA
MEMORANDUM FOR (Offeror please add reference information)
FROM: (Offeror insert your company name here) for 1 SOCONS/LGCA
350 Tully Street, Bldg 90339
Hurlburt Field, FL 32544fillin "Enter your THREE LINE ADDRESS (Press [SHIFT] + [ENTER] to start a new line)"
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Questionnaire Information for FA4417-16-T-0003, Overhead Doors and Gates Maintenance and Repair Services, Hurlburt Field, FLfillin "Enter the SUBJECT"
1. You have been identified as a reference point of contact for past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire form. This firm is currently interested in providing a proposal for Overhead Doors and Gates Maintenance and Repair Services at Hurlburt Field, FL.
2. Please complete the attached questionnaire and return no later than 2 April 2015. Please e-mail the survey to Mr. David Jesmain (David.Jesmain.1@us.af.mil) -AND- SSgt Kelly Martin (kelly.martin.12@us.af.mil).
3. If you have any questions, please contact SSgt Kelly Martin at (850) 884-7794 or Mr. David Jesmain at (850) 884-3262.
4. Your information MUST be submitted by 12:00 p.m. Central Standard Time (CST) on 8 February 2016. This information is vital when performing source selection. Your expedited attention regarding this matter is greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance.
<SIGNED>
DAVID P. JESMAIN
Contracting Officer
Attachment:
Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation Number FA4417-16-T-0003 Overhead Doors and Gates Maintenance and Repair Services at Hurlburt Field, FL
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104 Contractor please complete section A. General Information before sending to your reference:
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Contractor’s Name: ___________________________________ Address:
E-mail Address: _______________________________________ Telephone Number: ___________________________________ Point of Contact:
Project Title:
Description of Work: ___________________________________
Contract Number: ______________________________________ Dollar Amount: $ _______________per____________________ Contract Period:
*Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Contractor performed as the:
· Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel Contractor performance under this contract was for Overhead/Automtic Doors and Electric Gate Preventative Maintenance and Repair to include:
Yes No
1. Experience that includes inspection, maintenance, and repair services for overhead doors within the last five (5) years.
Yes No
2. Experience that includes inspection, maintenance, and repair services for automatic doors within the last five (5) years.
Yes No
3. Experience that includes inspection, maintenance, and repair services for electric gates within the last five (5) years.
Respondent please complete the remainder of this document and email to David Jesmain: David.Jesmain.1@us.af.mil -AND- Kelly Martin: kelly.martin.12@us.af.mil NLT 12:00 p.m. Central Standard Time (CST) on 8 February 2016:
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent:
Title:
Company Name/Address:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
C. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF “M” OR “U”.
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| VERY GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| NEUTRAL |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the respondents’ benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the respondents’ benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. |
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
The contractual performance of the element or sub- element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 2. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 3. |
| Hired, maintained, and replaced, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period without degradation in the quality of services provided. |
| 4. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 5. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 6. |
| Corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 7. |
| Identified and solved problems as they occurred with minimal Government/Employer assistance required |
| 8. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 9. |
| Maintained equipment in proper working order. |
| 10. |
| Met established project schedules. |
| 11. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 12. |
| Complied with all federal, state and local laws and regulations. |
| 13. |
| Complied with all DoD regulations (if applicable – leave blank if not a DoD requirement). |
| 14. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 15. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 16. |
| Was this project for an overhead door/gate contract where the contractor managed employees that commensurate with inspecting, maintaining, and repairing overhead doors, automatic doors, and electric gates and ensured that the standard was maintained? |
YES / NO
| 17. |
| Did the contract require routine or emergency service calls for repairs and maintenance within a specified timeframe? |
| YES / |
NO
| 18. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a letter of concern, deficiency report, cure or show cause notice or any other written negative performance documentation under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “Remarks” section. |
| YES / NO |
| 19. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “Remarks” section |
| YES / NO |
| 20. |
| Is the contractor rated in Contractor Performance Assessment Reports System CPARS (if applicable for Govt contracts)? |
| YES / NO |
| 21. |
| Did the contractor utilize a subcontractor in accordance with FAR Clause 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting? Only mark no if the contractor did not perform at least 50 percent of the cost of contract performance. If “NO” is marked please explain in “Remarks” section. |
| YES/ |
NO
N/A
Remarks:
Please sign and date below.
(Signature)
(Date)
� EMBED Word.Picture.8 ���
Attachment #3
Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
_1486451708.doc
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .