Att_3_Perf_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 85 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ALS Ambulance Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA440718R0007
About this file
Attachment 3 PPQ
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFI_Log_Amend3.pdf | ||
| Amendment_03.pdf | ||
| Amendment_02_(20180813).pdf | ||
| Att_1_RFI_Log_Amend2.pdf | ||
| Att_2_Addendum_to_Clauses.pdf | ||
| Amendment_01.pdf | ||
| Att_3_RFI_Log.pdf | ||
| Att_1_FA440718R0007_REVISED.pdf | ||
| Att_4_AMRDEC_SAFE_Training_(20170719).pdf | ||
| Att_1_PWS.pdf | ||
| Att_2_WD.pdf | ||
| FA440718R0007.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA4407-18-R-0007
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Offerors shall forward this attachment for completion to each contract reference the offeror wants the government to consider. Offerors shall ensure each respondent submits a completed questionnaire directly to the Contracting Officer by the closing date of the RFQ. Offerors are encouraged to have respondents submit the information prior to the closing date on the RFQ.
Contractor’s Name:______________________________________________
Project Title:____________________________________________________
Contract Number Assigned to the Contractor:__________________________
Contract Award Amount: $_____________ Contract Final Amount: $_______________
B. AGENCY INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent:_________________________ Title:_____________________________
Address:______________________________________________________________________
Telephone Number: _________________________________
Email Address:_____________________________________
C. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:
Respondent shall include information below regarding the work performed. Use the Confident Rating table to complete this section.
Were you the prime contractor?_______ Subcontractor?_____ Joint Venture?_________
Ambulance, EMS and ALS Services □Yes □No
Report of Run Logs Received □Yes □No
What was the measured response time in minutes?_________________________
Number of unacceptable performance occurences: _________________________
1 2 3 4 5 6 None Little Unknown Satisfactory Significant High
Performance did not meet the contractual requirements.
There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Performance did not meet some of the contractual requirements. There were some problems, some of a serious nature, for which the corrective action was marginally effective
The record is inconclusive or without comment or the contractor did not perform this effort.
Performance met the contract requirements.
There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance met the contractual requirements and exceeded some requirements.
There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely and effective manner
Performance met all of the contract requirements and exceeded many requirements.
Problems if any were negligible and were resolved in a timely and highly effective manner
Technical Expertise and Project Supervision 1 Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
1 2 N 3 4 5
2 Contractor hired and retained field workers with appropriate technical skills and training commensurate with those required for successful project completion.
1 2 N 3 4 5
3 Contractor delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
Project manager’s role was clear.
1 2 N 3 4 5
4 Provided on-site superintendent at all times, or as otherwise required by the specific contract.
1 2 N 3 4 5
Home Office/On-Site/Government Interaction
5 Identified risks/problems as they occurred and offered constructive and/or viable solution/alternatives.
1 2 N 3 4 5
6 Contractor was responsive and reasonable to contract changes from the standpoint of timeliness, suggested solutions, and price.
1 2 N 3 4 5
7 Contractor displayed a cooperative attitude with company/government personnel before and after award.
1 2 N 3 4 5
8 Contractor’s on-site supervisor displayed initiative to resolve problems on-site.
1 2 N 3 4 5
9 Were there any claims by subcontractors/suppliers for non-payment. If yes, please explain outcome in “Remarks”.
YES NO
Project Specific Questions
10 N/A
1 2 N 3 4 5
Service Quality
11 Contractor provided and followed effective quality control plan and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
1 2 N 3 4 5
12 Contractor’s emphasis on delivering a quality service was apparent in day-to-day operations.
1 2 N 3 4 5
13 Contractor corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
14 Contractor maintained a quality workforce and subcontractors through project completion.
1 2 N 3 4 5
Schedule
15 Developed realistic progress schedules and met established project milestones.
16 Contractor provided the required Reports/Documentation as required in the contract.
Other
17 Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in "Remarks."
YES NO
18 Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in "Remarks."
YES NO
OVERALL ASSESSMENT
19 Overall, on the scale of 1 – 5, how would you rate the contractor being surveyed
Remarks:
| YES |
| YES |
| YES |
File details come from the government source that posted it.