FA330025R0004 RFI LOG v2.pdf

Solicitation

Number FA330025R0004

Title PNQS 24-2543 Int / Ext Refresh 842

RFI No. RFI OPR Response

RFI - 0001 Should it be anticipated that the HVAC units on the roof will be replaced? CES No, only repair of drainage overflow or if better solution exists design to implement that

RFI - 0002

“Refinishing the exterior of the facility” and “Design the interior refinishing of the facility” from the scope of work. Does this include the following:

CES Only the interior

a. Painting entire exterior CES no

b. Replacement or repairs to roof system / roof drainage system CES no

c. Painting entire interior of hangar and interior buildings CES yes

d. Painting hangar floor CES yes

e. Repairs to hangar ceiling CES yes

RFI - 0003

Please provide any original drawings, renovation drawings, and/or as-builts. Any format will be helpful.

CES attached

RFI - 0004

Please confirm that "refinishing the exterior of the facility" includes refinishing the windows and not replacement of the windows.

CES

we are only doing the interior of the facility other than repairing the doors

RFI - 0005 Please confirm that the existing window glazing is to remain. CES yes

RFI - 0006 Please confirm if this renovation will be reviewed by the historical review committee. CES

If needed our Environmental section has a historical department and if they deem it needs SHPO approval it will be put before them.

RFI - 0007

Please confirm that "refinishing the exterior of the facility" does not include repair/replacement of the roof system.

CES

we are only doing the interior of the facility other than repairing the doors

RFI - 0008

The SOW at par. 4.4.3 requires only a 95% submittal and an RTA submittal.

However par 4.5.2 describes a 65% submittal & review process and par 4.5.3 describes a 100% submittal & review process. Par 5.1 lists a 65%, 95%, and RTA submittal. Please advise the correct submittal process.

CES 65%, 95%, RTA are the required submittals.

RFI - 0009

Are CPARs/PPQs for each of our Section F projects required as part of the SF330 submission?

CONS

CPARS will not be required, but contract numbers for past performance will be required.

RFI - 0010 Total Square Footage on building CES 32,927

RFI - 0011 We will need building plans (floor, roof, etc.) and elevations CES attached

RFI - 0012 Has there been any asbestos and lead paint studies completed on the building? CES No, part of the request is to have a complete lead based paint study completed

RFI - 0013

Do we have all the paint (interior & exterior removed (remediation) to raw metal before recoating?

CES

No exterior work. •Op on one aligns with the scope outlined in the SHPO/AHC packet that has been approved, to scrape and paint. With this option, you will scrape the paint to collect on plastic and when all scraping is done the paint chips go into a drum for Haz waste disposal as paint waste.

•Op on two, is to do a full abatement. With this op on, you will need an abatement contractor who specializes in lead abatement and the metal would have to be fully striped of paint. This option has potential to be approved if this is the option chosen.

Option two requires a lead abatement contractor that has been certified.

RFI - 0014 Will the building be occupied during work? CES We should proceed as if it will be occupied, other than the remediation.

RFI - 0015

Define scope for work involving the internal building structure (ei. offices inside the hanger)?

CES

the internal building, only working the finish on the outside and the HVAC Drainage.

RFI - 0016

User said she wanted to get rid of the EFIS/Stucco wall finish and replace with something (metal panels) they can attached signage and other equipment.

CES yes or paint

RFI - 0017 Will there be work in the attic above the wood plank ceiling? CES just the painted side

RFI - 0018 Will there be reroof work involved for main structure? CES no re-roofing

RFI - 0019

Will any of the windowpanes be replaced? Noted that several were broken and of wire glass?

CES no

RFI - 0020

With “price” being listed as a primary evaluation factor, please confirm you would like a fee proposal included with both SF330 responses.

CONS

Price has been removed as an evaluation factor. Proposals shall be submitted IAW Brooks Act.

RFI - 0021

Please confirm the number of Section F projects and number of Section E Resumes you would like included in each of the SF330 responses.

CONS

Contractors submitting a proposals will submit a minimum of three (3), maximum (5) projects with comparable/relevant experience. Past performance should not be greater than 5 years old from 31 Mar 2025.

RFI - 0022

Drawings/Records Availability: Are there more recent or more detailed as-built drawings available (structural, mechanical, electrical) for Bldg 842 that are not in the RFP attachments?

CES will be provided to awardee

Request for Information Tracker Log

RFI - 0023

Historic Preservation Status: Is Bldg 842 considered historic or part of a historic district? If yes, are there special requirements (State Historic Preservation Office approvals, architectural style constraints, etc.)?

CES

Yes, the building was built in 1931 and the reason we are only doing interior work. Not usually for interior work but our historical POC will elalute whether SHPO will be need coordination.

RFI - 0024

Existing Surveys: Can the Government provide any past lead-based paint or asbestos surveys beyond those included in the solicitation documents?

CES those were all I could find

RFI - 0025

Abatement Protocols: Should the design include detailed abatement plans, or only testing and identification services? Is there a preferred specification section or approach for LBP abatement?

CES

see RFI 0013 and attached LBP Specs

RFI - 0026

Door Manufacturer & Spare Parts: Are original manufacturer’s specifications or spare-part details available for the existing hangar doors/rollers?

CES

the CE shops used for repairs but no one has parts anymore so they woul need to fabricate the parts. CE Operations has the name of the company that would fabricate them

RFI - 0027

Load Requirements for Tracks: Are there any updated structural load requirements or known issues with the overhead track structure?

CES

I have not seen anything on that unless the are on the as-builts but I doubt that would be on them

RFI - 0028 Existing HVAC Documentation: Is there any existing design documentation or shop drawing for the rooftop HVAC unit over the Honor Guard area?

CES no I cannot find anything. There could be more in drawings in the vault but as said before I have no way to scan them

RFI - 0029

Access and Maintenance Requirements: Are there special maintenance or clearance requirements that need to be incorporated into the new design?

CES

no

RFI - 0030 Utility Drawings: Where can we find the most current utility site plan(s)? CES they are available for contract awardee

RFI - 0031

Emergency Power or Backup Systems: Is there any existing generator or backup power feed that the design needs to integrate?

CES

no

RFI - 0032

Interior Partition Types: Are there known restrictions on the materials or thickness of partitions to maintain egress or code requirements?

CES

just to meet the current life safety code and NFPA

RFI - 0033

Fire Protection Upgrades: Should we assume any new or upgraded fire alarm / fire suppression equipment is required if we alter interior spaces?

CES

no

RFI - 0034 Applicability of UFC 4-010-01: To what extent do the DoD minimum antiterrorism standards apply to this specific renovation project (given it’s an existing hangar)?

CES

not applicable to the interior

RFI - 0035 Waivers or Exceptions: Are there existing waivers that exempt certain upgrades for older facilities?

CES

the state historical preservation office has considered this a historic building so there are not waivers, we have to run most changes through them

RFI - 0036

Access and Security Clearance: Will contractors need special base passes or escorts?

CONS

Awarded contractor will have to request in writing desire to visit site 14 days in advance to the Contracting Officer (CO). CO will issue an Entry Authorization Letter to Security Forces. Upon approval Contractor will be issued a temporary pass to gain access.

RFI - 0037

Staging and Laydown Areas: Where can contractors stage equipment/materials during construction?

CES

those would be decided after award

RFI - 0038

Review Turnaround Time: Can we assume the Government will adhere to a standard 10-day review window for each submittal phase (65%, 95%, etc.)?

CES

Yes

RFI - 0039

On-Base Design Meetings: Will face-to-face design review meetings be required, or are virtual meetings acceptable?

CES

Prefer face to face, but can do virtual

RFI - 0040

Coordination with Base Personnel: Should we coordinate directly with certain

Maxwell AFB facility managers for interior access?

CONS

Contractors will coordinate interior access with CO and CES representative.

RFI - 0041

Point of Contact for Site Visits: If additional site inspections are needed, who will be the Government’s point of contact to arrange them?

CONS

The Contracting Officer

RFI - 0042

Preferred Format for Deliverables: Confirm any specific digital deliverable format requirements (beyond what’s stated in the SOW)—for instance, do they want

SpecsIntact files or just PDFs?

CES MS Word, .pdfs and at RTA, CADD files. No SpecsIntact files required

RFI - 0045

Regarding the Description Item 7. Evaluation Factors, a. Price – we plan to submit qualifications in accordance with the Federal Brooks Act. If selected based on those qualifications, we will negotiate a fair and reasonable fee based on the project’s parameters. Please confirm this is acceptable.

CONS

Yes

RFI - 0046

Regarding the submittal of qualifications, what is the method of submission for the

Standard Form 330, A-E Qualifications?

CES

I accept paper or electronic versions.

RFI - 0047

Please clarify what is meant by the term “Technical Acceptability” under Selection

Criteria and if there are specific items you would like submitted for this factor.

CONS

Technical Acceptability is defined by the proposal that best fits the SOW as issued by the Government. Proposals will be evualated to determine which technical approach best fits the need of the Government.

RFI - 0048

Is Price truly an item reviewed? As it has to comply with the Brooks Act? Or is this truly a qualifications based SF330 review? CONS

Price has been removed as an evaluation factor. Proposals shall be submitted IAW Brooks Act.