Questions and Answers.pdf
PDF 69 KB Posted
- Attached to
- East Water Tower Pump Station Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA303020Q0027
About this file
This document contains questions and answers related to solicitation number FA303020Q0027 for a pump station project at Goofdellow Air Force Base. The solicitation is for a turn-key, factory built, pre-engineered duplex pump station to be enclosed for weather protection. It must be large enough to allow operational maintenance access. The period of performance is 150 days from award, which is anticipated to occur on or around September 28, 2020. The response is a 100% service-disabled veteran-owned small business set-aside with a NAICS code of 333914 and size standard of 750 employees. All clarification questions must be directed to the named contracting staff by phone or email. The government will award a firm fixed price purchase order to the responsible offeror providing the most advantageous quote meeting requirements.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 0002 - FA303020Q0027.zip | ZIP file | |
| East Tower Booster Pump SOW_11Sept20.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001 - FA303020Q0027.zip | ZIP file | |
| Solicitation - FA303020Q0027.pdf | ||
| Pictures of Site.pdf | ||
| AF Form 66 Repair East Water Tower Booster Pump.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| East Tower Booster Pump SOW 09Sep20.pdf | ||
| Base Access Letter template.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions and Answer
FA303020Q0027
Q1: In reference to the enclosure requirements SOW 3.3.4 – Please advise if the owner expectations for this would be a fiberglass enclosure or a “Walk‐in” style or just a canopy over the pumps and controls.
See attached PDF file showing an examples of fiberglass enclosure and walk in style enclosure.
Answer: Enclosure should be large enough to enter pump station enclosure with tools and equipment for operational maintenance. Should have removable doors/panels for easy access/overhaul/replacement of major components if needed. Not a walk‐in style steel/brick building. See section 3.3.4 A‐D
Q2: Refer to the SOW 3.3.1, H, Item 7 on page 22 of 39. Would the new altitude valves be installed on the new pump assembly or would the new altitude valves be installed inside the existing concrete pit?
Answer: The altitude valves are part of the pump station.
Q3: Are all the valves located inside the existing concrete pit need to be removed and replaced inside the same pit?
Answer: Valves inside the valve vault are not in the SOW.
Q4: The RFP has some language in the scope regarding “NESHAP trained and certified efficient mechanics/tradesmen”. NESHAP specifically relates to Asbestos but the RFP also clearly states that Asbestos is not expected to be found. We do not have any members of our crews that have this training.
So how do we get through this situation? My approach would be that if any of the piping is insulated or if the vaults have insulation that needs to be removed, we would need to bring in an Asbestos Removal Company. Since it does not look as though this is even an issue, we would consider this a Change Order situation.
Answer: NESHAP language was removed from Statement of work with amendment 1.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .