Attachment 5_Questions Answers.pdf
PDF 135 KB Posted
- Attached to
- XTLF 25-1023, REPLACE ROOF F542
- Solicitation number
- FA302925R0011
About this file
This document is a Questions and Answers (Q&A) attachment for the FA302925R0011 roof repair project at Vance AFB, Enid, Oklahoma. The Q&A addresses eight key contractor inquiries, including project-specific details such as workforce role consolidation, lightning protection system requirements, roof design compliance, and potential deck and masonry replacement. Key answers include: triple-hatting SSHO, QC, and Superintendent roles is acceptable; the existing lightning protection system must be utilized; deck replacement is anticipated at 10% of total roof square footage; masonry repairs should be limited to those described in the statement of work; and record drawings will be provided to bidders. The project is a 100% HUBZone set-aside with a project magnitude between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000, involving a full roof replacement for Facility 542, including gutters, downspouts, and brick face repairs.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA302925R0011 Repair Roof F542
Q1 Is it acceptable to triple-hat the SSHO, QC, and Superintendent roles on this project?
A1 Yes
Q2 Is a licensed architect or registered roof consultant required for this project in accordance with the UFC?
A2 This project should comply with all applicable UFC requirements. Reference UFC 3-110-03, Ch5
Q3 Is it acceptable to install the new lightning protection system externally and abandon the existing system in place?
A3 No, the contractor will utilize the existing system as it also bonded to the structure.
Q4 Is there an existing detail of the roof profile available? We have been unable to locate the required R-value for the new roof.
A4 Design shall comply with ASHRAE 90.1, zone 4
Q5 Should we anticipate any deck replacement as part of this project? While not specifically listed, it is commonly required. If so, would including an allowance equal to 10% of the total roof square footage be appropriate?
A5 Yes
Q6
Should we anticipate any masonry replacement or repair on this project? While exterior cleaning and localized repairs are noted, should contractors include a tuckpointing allowance of approximately 10% of the total masonry surface area?
A6 Limit masonry repairs to that as described in the statement of work.
Q7 Is a reflected ceiling plan available, and if so, can it be provided to bidders? This would be particularly helpful if the existing lightning protection system is to be fully removed.
A7 Record drawings will be provided.
Q8 Where are mentioned specifications appendix B or the as-builts appendix C
A8 Refer to addendum attachment
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .