06_Vance_BOS__Past_Performance_(3_Nov_14).pdf

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

Be America’s Best…War-Winning Capabilities, on Time, on Cost

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Past Performance Vance AFB

Base Operations Support

Ms. Mariel Cortezano

338 SCONS/PKC

13 Nov 14

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

PAST PERFORMANCE

Organized by Sections IAW RFP L.2.1.

Table of Contents (Volume III) Past Performance Information Sheets Organizational Change Structure History Subcontractor Letters of Consent & Client Authorization

Letters

Carefully provide all information required by RFP paragraphs L.3.3 through L.3.3.5.

Presenter Presentation Notes Ensure the POC provided in the Past Performance Information Sheet is available and knowledgeable of the service provided under the contract; and the contract POC information is current.

UNCLASSIFIED

PAST PERFORMANCE

Past Performance Report & Information Sheets Past Performance Information Sheets, Attachment 5 Past Performance Information Tool Instructions, Attachment 6 Limited to no more than six (6) of the most recent and relevant contracts performed for federal and/or commercial customers Includes sub-contractors, teaming partners, joint venture proposed to perform 20% or critical aspects of the effort

Recent Within previous three years Ongoing programs must have begun no less than three (3) months from issuance of the RFP

UNCLASSIFIED

PAST PERFORMANCE

Relevant Ratings The scope, magnitude of effort, and complexity will be determined by the similarity to the Offerors’ experience in the following functional areas: Civil Engineering, Logistics, Communications and Information Technology, Community Services, Local Purchase, and Visual Information Services.

In determining the relevancy of effort performed under individual past performance contracts, the Government may consider an Offeror’s contracts in the aggregate in determining relevancy should the Offeror’s present and past performance lend itself to this approach. That is, an Offeror’s six (6) contracts may by definition represent only a rating less than relevant when each contract is considered as a stand-alone effort. However, when these contracts are performed concurrently (in whole or in part) and are assessed in the aggregate, the work may more accurately reflect a relevant rating.

UNCLASSIFIED

PAST PERFORMANCE

Past Performance Evaluation Team (PPET) Evaluate performance of recent and relevant efforts

Information provided in the Past Performance Volume Information obtained from other sources

Assess performance relative to the effort the solicitation requires

May also consider the past performance of affiliated companies or operating divisions within the parent company or joint ventures of the parent company, key personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement

The proposal clearly demonstrates the resources (e.g. financial resources, overall oversight and management, or other resources) of the parent or affiliated division will meaningfully affect performance of the instant acquisition.

UNCLASSIFIED

PAST PERFORMANCE

Past Performance Ratings An “Unacceptable” integrated past performance rating will render the entire proposal unacceptable and therefore un-awardable

QUESTIONS?