QandA_Bldg_886.docx
DOCX document 13 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Renovate Bldg 886 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA282319RA012
About this file
Questions and Answers-FA282319RA012 05 July 2019
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 29
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA2823-19-R-A012/FTFA 17-1100
Renovate Bldg. 886 Solicitation- Contractor Questions
1. Keynote 19 on sheet A201 indicates a pre-engineered metal canopy at the North loading dock and South ramp however no specification is provided. Please provide this specification.
2. The last sentence states “Bid Option will include construction of south side dock as noted in the construction documents.” The SF 1442 does not provide for a line item for this option. Please advise.
3. Reference sheet S-4, Enlarged Plans- Bid Option. The plan view indicates an 8” thick SOG whereas the Legend is calling for a 7” thick SOG which matches the other loading dock thicknesses. Please confirm that the correct thickness is 7”.
4. Reference drawing sheet FP-101 indicates a new 6” fire line from existing 12” Main. What is the distance from the existing 12” Main to the building location? No drawing of the site has been provided for measuring the correct distance.
5. Is it acceptable for the new pre-engineered canopy (13/A301) to be aluminum? Should the finish be Kynar or baked enamel? What color should it be?
a. On sheet A301 the pre-manufactured stairs are shown as aluminum, but the railings along the deck are labeled as galvanized steel (note 11), is this correct?
File details come from the government source that posted it.