Atch 4 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 32 KB Posted
- Attached to
- STARBASE Academy Services for PAFB, FL Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA252120QB006
About this file
This document includes a solicitation for STARBASE Academy services at Patrick Air Force Base in Florida. The solicitation seeks proposals from nonprofit organizations to provide all labor necessary to administer, operate, and manage the STARBASE Academy STEM program for children at the base. Services are required for one base year starting in February 2020 with four optional one-year extensions and an additional optional six-month extension. Quotes are due by December 16, 2019 with award anticipated by February 3, 2020. Pricing should be broken down monthly by CLIN for the base year, options, and total contract value. Proposals should include past performance, technical, and price volumes, and will be evaluated for technical acceptability, past performance risk, and price. The successful offeror must demonstrate relevant past performance rated Substantial Confidence and have an acceptable technical approach at the lowest evaluated price.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Atch 9 DoD STARBASE Lesson Plans Binder Sample.pdf | ||
| Atch 8 Answers to Questions Received (Posted 26 Dec).pdf | ||
| Atch 7 Vendor question & answers (posted 23 Dec).docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch 7 Vendor question & answers (posted 20 Dec).docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch 7 Vendor question & answers (posted 20 Dec).docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch 6 Vendor question & answers (posted 12 Dec).docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch 2 DoDI 1025.7 STARBASE Program.pdf | ||
| Atch 1 PWS STARBASE Rev4.pdf | ||
| Atch 3 WD 2015-4555 Rev8.pdf | ||
| Atch 5 Question and Answer Template.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
The 45th Contracting Squadron is requesting Past Performance information from non-profit organizations. One of these organizations has identified you as a reference to validate their past performance.
Solicitation no. FA252120QB0006 is for commercial, non-personal services to provide faculty and staff to manage and administer the STARBASE Academy (STEM school program for children) Program at Patrick AFB FL.
Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the non-profit contractor’s past performance, and return directly via email no later than 06 Dec 19, 4:30 PM EST to jose.plasencia.2@us.af.mil and jason.pominski@us.af.mil.
RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Agency/Organization Name:
Point of Contact (POC):
Title of POC:
Telephone:
Email:
NON-PROFIT CONTRACTOR’S REFERENCE INFORMATION:
Contractor Name:
Point of Contact (POC):
Telephone Number:
Email:
CONTRACT INFORMATION:
Contract Number:
Task Order No. (if applicable):
Type of Contract:
Performance Period: (Base plus any options):
Description of Services:
MAGNITUDE
Annual Contract Value:
Total Contract Dollar Value:
COMPLEXITY
Number of faculty and staff:
Number of students taught per year:
Hours of instruction per year:
Grade level(s) taught:
Contractor performed on this contract as:
| Prime |
| Subcontractor |
| Teaming Partner |
| Joint Venture |
Please refer to the following assessment definitions to assess the Contractor’s performance in each of the areas listed in this questionnaire:
(E) Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
(V) Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
(S) Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were resolved satisfactorily.
(M) Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
(U) Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
(N) Not Applicable – Unable to assess the area.
CPARS “Quality of Service” Rating Area
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Provided qualified faculty and staff IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
Provided a safe and welcoming teaching environment for all students.
Led the classroom, motivated students, and taught the curriculum.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeded or did not meet contractual requirements:
CPARS “Schedule” Rating
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Provide qualified staff on time IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.
Provided timely and complete reports and documentation IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
CPARS “Management” Rating
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Retained qualified staff without frequent turnover and minimal operations disruption IAW the terms of the contract.
Minimized amount of and/or resolved customer complaints or performance deficiencies.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
| PERFORMANCE SUMMARY |
| Yes |
| No |
Would you award this firm another contract:
If you answered “No” provide an explanation:
Was the contract terminated for default or cause:
If you answered “Yes” provide an explanation:
Additional Comments:
Signature: _________________________________________ Date: __________________
Print Name: ________________________________________
Title: ______________________________________________
Telephone: _________________________________________
Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .