FA2517-06-D-9002.docx

FA2517-06-D-9002

FA2517-06-D-9002-0002

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)

for

HEALTH PROTECTION & MEDICAL HOMELAND

DEFENSE AND MEDICAL STABILITY (CIVIL-MILITARY) OPERATIONS PROGRAM

ANALYSES & DEVELOPMENT

18 August 2008

1.0. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES: The HQ NORAD-USNORTHCOM Surgeon’s Office requires non-personal, technical, analytic, and programmatic support for Homeland Defense and Defense Support of Civilian Authorities (DSCA), and for OSD Health Affairs (Force Health Protection and Readiness) support for mission analysis of DoD international medical stability (civil-military) operations responsibilities. This task order provides for: a broad range of expertise and technical support for training and exercise; Force Health Protection (FHP); vulnerability assessments (health aspects); chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and high-yield explosives (CBRNE) risk management; critical infrastructure protection (CIP); and medical aspects of Homeland Defense and DSCA; ) expertise and analytic support in support of OSD Health Affairs (Force Health Protection and Readiness) for a mission analysis of DoD international medical stability (civil-military) operations in order to define and shape Military Healthcare System (MHS) operational roles and responsibilities.

1.2. MISSION: HQ NORAD-USNORTHCOM/SG (N-NC/SG) is responsible for planning and executing medical support for NORAD and USNORTHCOM, advising NORAD and USNORTHCOM Commanders (CDRs) on effects from CBRNE and directed energy threats; coordinating medical matters with both HQ NORAD and USNORTHCOM staffs, component commands, and supported/supporting commanders; and advising the NORAD and USNORTHCOM CDRs on all issues affecting health of assigned/attached forces. The Command Surgeon personnel serve as the USNORTHCOM liaison and Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) for all medical issues via response to tasks and requests from Federal agencies, DoD, Joint Staff, other Commanders, Service Surgeons, and Major Commands. The N-NC/SG staff provide medical guidance to CDR USNORTHCOM and component commands to ensure optimum medical support of USNORTHCOM operations through medical and FHP activities; advise on medical portions of the Operational Plans supported by USNORTHCOM; establish requirements for all medical assets needed to support the USNORTHCOM mission; provide guidance and medical intelligence summaries to CDR NORAD and CDR USNORTHCOM on all issues relating to command plans and operations; and provide direction for interagency planning for terrorism preparedness and response efforts.

1.3. OVERVIEW OF SERVICES REQUIRED: 1) The contractor shall provide subject matter expertise and technical knowledge in the areas of Homeland Defense, Homeland Security and DSCA. The primary areas of focus will be to aid in addressing the Joint Staff tasking for definition and refinement of the medical role in Homeland Defense and DSCA, and provide support to various FHP activities, such as: vulnerability assessments (health aspects), CBRNE risk management, and CIP. The contractor shall perform the tasks and provide the deliverables as defined in this PWS. Accomplishment of this work will assist the HQ NORAD-USNORTHCOM Surgeon’s Directorate in improving its processes and responses to real world catastrophic events and in defining the medical role in homeland defense and civil support. 2) The contractor shall provide subject matter expertise and technical/analytic support to OSD Health Affairs (Force Health Protection and Readiness) and the DoD Civil-Military Medicine Working Group (CMMWG; based in Washington DC) for a mission analysis of DoD international medical stability (civil-military) operations responsibilities and capabilities. The primary areas of focus will be to aid in researching and analyzing, past and current medical stability (civil-military) operations missions and emerging policy and procedures in order to assist OSD HA, FHP&R in defining the MHS roles and responsibilities associated with international medical stability (civil-military) operations.

2.0. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS:

2.1. REQUIREMENT 1. Provide subject matter expertise (SME) in the N-NC/SG and NC Force Health Protection-Medical Homeland Defense (FHP-MHLD) working group’s review and input into the Military Health System (MHS) Transformation: Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) Initiative #3a (Homeland Defense and Defense Support to Civil Authorities). The contractor shall initiate a study in FY06 to assist in defining the scope of the MHS’s role in DoD Homeland Defense and Civil Support. Subtasks 1-4, within Requirement 1, shall be completed seven months after the date of award for the Basic Contract period (i.e., if contract is awarded on 1 Oct 06, Requirement 1 deliverables would be due on 20 Apr 07), during the base year. Subtasks 5-7 requirements are outlined within the subtasks, below, beginning in the base year and completing at end of first option year. The Capability-Based Analyses (CBA) is the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS; CJCSI 3170.01F) analysis process that includes three phases: the FAA (Functional Area Analysis), the FNA (Functional Needs Analysis), and the FSA (Functional Solutions Analysis). Requirements 1 and 2 accomplish the FAA and CBA is completed via completion of the FNA and FSA. Subtasks 1-4 incorporate the requirements to identify the role of the MHS in HD/CS and development of the FAA. Subtask 5 requires development of an FNA, Subtask 6 requires development of the Joint Capabilities Document (JCD), and Subtask 7 requires development of the FSA.

2.1.1. Subtask 1. Review and analyze DoD’s MHLD-related documents and prepare report of findings/recommendations. (CDRL 0023)

2.1.1.1. Review all DOD, Joint, and Service doctrine, directives, policy, instructions and regulations pertaining to homeland defense, civil support, force protection, installation preparedness, and consequence management.

2.1.1.2. Review combatant command plans (validated and draft concepts) relating to HLD and CS.

2.1.1.3. Review lessons learned databases and reports for civil support exercises and operations.

2.1.1.4. Analyze the U.S. Joint Forces Command (JFCOM) Force Health Protection candidate Joint Integrating Concept and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and High-Yield Explosive (CBRNE) Installation Protection study.

2.1.1.5. Analyze national level strategy and policy documents related to Homeland Defense and Homeland Security.

2.1.1.6. Analyze each task for appropriateness as a MHS mission and make recommendations for inclusion, modification, or exclusion from the HLD and CS mission area.

2.1.2. Subtask 2. Perform literature search and analyze academic/peer-reviewed literature, and prepare report of findings/recommendations. (CDRL 0023)

2.1.3. Subtask 3. Interview representatives from DOD and other governmental and non-governmental organizations, and provide report of findings. (CDRL 0023)

2.1.3.1. Provide reviews and analyses of information obtained from NC Force Health Protection-Medical Homeland Defense Working Group in their efforts to address QDR 3a.

2.1.3.2. Provide basic analytic support to the managerial staff charged with integrating analysis and recommendations regarding QDR #3a.

2.1.4. Subtask 4. Develop monthly report(s) that combines and integrates the findings and analyses for Subtasks 1-3. This report must include sections that describes the analytical method, results, discussions/conclusions, and recommendations, and be supported by references. (CDRL 0023). The report shall also incorporate the following:

2.1.4.1.. Provide subject matter expertise for ongoing DoD efforts to define medical-specific Unified Joint Task List (UJTLs) and Mission Essential Task List (METLs) for Homeland Defense and DSCA operations to include attending meetings and providing meeting minutes.

2.1.4.2. Develop and maintain updates to a composite list of explicit and implied actions from above references, sources, and activities. Analyze each task for appropriateness to MHS; and current ability of MHS to conduct each task.

2.1.4.3. Establish framework for detailed Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) capabilities-based analysis of MHS role Homeland Defense and DSCA operations through initial assessment of MHS capabilities and initial, strategic DOTMLPF analysis and recommendations.

2.1.4.4. Prepare final, detailed mission analysis report outlining MHS role in Homeland Defense and DSCA operations, including initial recommendations and references.

2.1.5. Subtask 5, 6, 7, and 8. HD/CS Functional Needs Analysis, Joint Capabilities Document, Functional Solutions Analysis, and Initial Capabilities Document.

2.1.5.1. Subtask 5: Functional Needs Analysis.

2.1.5.1.1. The contractor shall develop a draft FNA for Military Health Services (MHS) support to Homeland Defense (HD)/Civil Support (CS) in response to Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) Initiative #3. The contractor shall accomplish a FNA to assist in defining the Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership and Education, Personnel and Facilities (DOTMLPF) requirements for the MHS. Tasks within Subtask 5 shall be completed by 6 Jun 08 using the FAA accomplished for MHS HD/CS as the baseline for the FNA.

2.1.5.1.2. The contractor shall incorporate technical input for the HD/CS FNA from the N-NC SG on behalf of the N-NC Force Health Protection-Medical Homeland Defense (FHP-MHLD) Working Group (WG). Official comments will be provided to the contractor in comment resolution matrices for adjudication and documentation purposes.

2.1.5.1.3. The contractor shall provide a draft FNA that assesses the ability of the current and programmed MHS to deliver the capabilities the FAA identified under the full range of operating conditions and to the designated measures of effectiveness. Using the capabilities and tasks identified in the FAA as primary input, the FNA shall produce a list of capability gaps that require solutions, indicate the time frame in which those solutions are needed, and explain the relative priority of the gaps identified. The FNA shall also identify any redundancies in capabilities that reflect inefficiencies. The FNA serves to further define and refine the integrated architectures. The FNA must assess the entire range of DOTMLPF and policy, as an inherent part of defining capability needs. (see Figure 1)

2.1.5.1.4. The contractor FNA shall evaluate the FAA, current and programmed capabilities, and desired vs. current capabilities integrated priority lists to:

2.1.5.1.4.1. Describe gaps in terms of the scenarios assessed and the effects on achieving the relevant military objectives (gaps must be linked to their operational context)

2.1.5.1.4.2. Assess the impact of the capability gap in terms of the risk to mission (the ability to achieve the objectives of the scenario), the risk to force (the potential losses due to the capability gap), and other important considerations, such as effects on allies and noncombatants.

2.1.5.4.3. Characterize whether the gaps are due to proficiency (inability to achieve the relevant effect in particular conditions), sufficiency (ability to achieve the effect, but inability to bring the needed force to bear due to force shortages or other commitments), or policy limitations (inability to use the force as needed due to operational constraints).

2.1.5.4.4. List a set of needs that the DOD should address, or conclude that no pressing needs exist.

2.1.5.4.5 Offer a prioritization of the gaps that is directly linked to priorities in the strategic guidance; completely document the significant driving factors behind the recommended priorities to give senior leaders the information they need if they choose to make adjustments

Figure 1. Overall FNA task flow (Source: CBA User’s Guide, V2, Dec 06)

2.1.5.6 Deliverables: The contractor shall provide the following FNA-related reports:

2.1.5.6.1. Identify best-understood scenario and provide draft report regarding scenario analysis (CDRL 0023).

2.1.5.6.2. Incorporate comments from WG into draft report that evaluates all scenarios and identifies needs for each scenario (CDRL 0023).

2.1.5.6.3. Refine capability and capacity estimates through input from DoD, interagency, non-government organizations, and other relevant sources (CDRL 0023).

2.1.5.6.4. Initial draft FNA (CDRL 0023)

2.1.5.6.5. Interim draft FNA incorporating comments from WG

2.1.5.6.6. Final draft FNA report and update FAA (CDRL 0023).

2.1.5.6.6. Cross-walk capabilities and tasks within the HD/CS and Civilian-Military FNAs (CDRL 0023)

2.1.5.6.7. Records of meetings/minutes (CDRL 0009)

2.1.6. Subtask 6: Joint Capabilities Document (JCD). The contractor shall develop a draft MHS HD/CS JCD to document the results of MHS HD/CS FAA and FNA (CJCSM 3170.01B, 2005, pp. A-3 –4). The draft JCD will be developed by 6 Jun 08 and the final JCD will be due within 15 working days after comments are provided from N-NC. (CDRL 0023)

2.1.6.1. The contractor shall ensure HD/CS JCD is linked with ongoing JCD efforts being accomplished by the Joint Forces Command (JFCOM) under QDR 2 and present capabilities/tasks in format and scope similar to those identified in the JFCOM JCDs (currently under development). The contractor’s draft HD/CS JCD shall identify capability/task capacity and mix differences for capabilities presented in the JFCOM JCDs and highlight and provide capability/task capacity for those capabilities identified in the HD/CS FAA and FNA, but not described in the JFCOM JCD.

2.1.6.2. Deliverables: The contractor shall provide the following JCD-related reports:

2.1.6.2.1. Initial draft JCD (CDRL 0023)

2.1.6.2.2. Interim draft JCD reporting incorporating comments from WG

2.1.6.2.3. Final draft JCD report (CDRL 0023)

2.1.7. Subtask 7: Functional Solutions Analysis (FSA). The contractor shall develop a draft FSA for Military Health Services (MHS) support to Homeland Defense (HD)/Civil Support (CS) in response to Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) Initiative #3. The contractor’s draft FSA will assist in defining the Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership and Education, Personnel and Facilities (DOTMLPF) requirements for the MHS. Subtask 7 shall be completed by 28 Sep 08. The FAA and FNA accomplished for MHS HD/CS will serve as the baseline for the FSA.

2.1.7.1. The contractor’s draft FSA shall be a joint assessment of potential approaches to solving, or at least mitigating, the capability gaps identified in the FNA. The approaches identified shall include the broadest possible range of joint possibilities for addressing the capability gaps, and solutions proposed by draft FSA must meet following three criteria: [ref: CJCSM 3170.01C, 2006, p. A-12].

2.1.7.1.1 be strategically responsive and deliver solutions when and where they are needed;

2.1.7.1.2 be feasible with respect to policy, personnel limitations, and technological risk; and

2.1.7.1.3 be realizable, enabling the DOD to actually resource and implement the solutions

2.1.7.2. The contractor shall accomplish the FSA analytic process tasks described in Figure 2, below. The six major tasks are generating alternatives, assessing the effectiveness of alternatives, assessing the feasibility of alternatives (affordability, technical risk, and strategic responsiveness), portfolio planning and generation, identifying game-changing capabilities, and excess analysis.

Figure 2. Overall FSA Task Flow (Source: CBA User’s Guide, V2, Dec 06)

2.1.7.3. Contractor shall include a game-changing capability in a portfolio if a reasonable CONOPS is developed or recommend an experiment, as an alternative.

2.1.7.4. Deliverables: The contractor shall provide the following FSA-related reports:

2.1.7.4.1. Initial draft FSA (CDRL 0023)

2.1.7.4.2. Interim draft FSA, incorporating comments from WG (CDRL 0023)

2.1.7.4.3. Final draft FSA (CDRL 0023)

2.1.7.4.4. Updated FAA, incorporating results of FSA (CDRL 0023)

2.1.7.4.5. Updated FNA, incorporating results of FSA (CDRL 0023)

2.1.7.4.4. Cross-walk solutions from HD/CS and Civilian-Military FSAs (CDRL 0023)

2.1.7.4.5. Records of meetings/minutes (CDRL 0009)

2.1.8. Subtask 8 : Initial Capabilities Document (ICD). The contractor shall draft an MHS HD/CS ICD to document the results of MHS HD/CS FSA (CJCSM 3170.01). The draft ICD will be developed within 15 working days after acceptance of the FSA and the final ICD will be due within 15 working days after comments are provided from N-NC. (CDRL 0023)

2.1.8.1. The contractor shall link the HD/CS ICD with ongoing JCD/ICD efforts being accomplished by the Joint Forces Command (JFCOM) under QDR Initiative #2. Capabilities/tasks shall present capabilities/tasks in format and scope similar to those identified in the JFCOM JCDs (currently under development) and ICDs. The contractor’s draft HD/CS ICD shall identify capability/task capacity and mix differences for capabilities presented in the JFCOM JCDs/ICDs and highlight and provide capability/task capacity for those capabilities identified in the HD/CS FAA and FNA, but not described in the JFCOM JCDs/ICDs.

2.1.8.2. Deliverables: The contractor shall provide the following ICD-related reports:

2.1.8.4.2.1. Initial draft ICD (CDRL 0023)

2.1.8.4.2.2 Interim draft ICD, incorporating comments from WG (CDRL 0023)

2.1.8.4.3.2 Final draft ICD (CDRL 0023)

2.2. REQUIREMENT 2. Provide subject matter expertise, technical, analytic, and administrative support to OSD Health Affairs (Force Health Protection) and to the DoD Civil-Military Medicine Working Group (which are based in Washington, D.C.). Provide assistance in defining the scope of the Military Health System’s role in international medical stability (civil-military) operations as part of the Military Health System (MHS) Transformation: Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) Initiative #3b (Medical Civilian-Military operations) and DoDD 3000.05 regarding stability operations. Initial tasks within Requirement 2 (2.2.1. – 2.2.2.11) shall be completed seven months after the date of award for the Basic Contract period, during the base year. (i.e., if contract is awarded on 1 Oct 06, Requirement 2 deliverables would be due on 20 Apr 07. Subtasks 1-4 are outlined in the PWS, below, beginning in the base year and completing at end of first option year.

2.2.1. The DoD Civil-Military Medicine Working Group (CMMWG) was chartered to address QDR Initiative #3b (as well as initiate implementation of DoDD 3000.05 re Medical Stability operations). The contractor shall support OSD Health Affairs (Force Health Protection and Readiness) and the CMMWG and associated subcommittees in all efforts described below regarding QDR Initiative #3b and the implementation of DoDD 3000.05.

2.2.2. The initial required action (Phase 1) under QDR Initiative #3b is to conduct a mission analysis regarding medical civil-military (stability) operations by defining the scope of the MHS’s role in medical civil-military (stability) operations. The contractor will provide direct support to OSD Health Affairs (Force Health Protection) and the DoD Civil-Military Medicine Working Group in this effort. Review USG, DoD, Joint, and Service policies, directives, doctrine regarding international medical civil-military (stability) operations.

2.2.2.1. Define international medical civil-military operations, medical aspects of stability operations (security, stability, transition, and reconstruction operations).

2.2.2.2. Determine ‘mandate’ for MHS role in international medical civil-military (stability) operations and DoD (MHS) role within United States Government (USG).

2.2.2.3. Define strategic mission areas/requirements for international medical civil-military operations/stability operations.

2.2.2.4. Review existing literature (civilian and military), after-action review and lessons learned databases for analysis and recommendations concerning international medical civil-military operations/stability operations; where required supplement with limited targeted interviews and site visits.

2.2.2.5. Support ongoing DoD efforts to define UJTLs and METLs for stability operations – ensuring development of medical-specific UJTLs and METLs for international, medical civil-military operations/stability operations to include attending meetings and providing meeting minutes..

2.2.2.6. Develop composite list of explicit and implied tasks from above references, sources, and activities. Analyze each task for appropriateness to MHS; and current ability of MHS to conduct each task.

2.2.2.7. Establish framework for detailed JCIDS/capabilities-based analysis of MHS role in international medical civil-military (stability) operations through initial assessment of MHS capabilities and initial, strategic DOTMLPF analysis and recommendations.

2.2.2.8. Support CMMWG committees: education and training; doctrine; and personnel/organization in these efforts.

2.2.2.9. Prepare final, detailed mission analysis report outlining MHS role in medical civil-military operations, including initial recommendations and references. (CDRL 0023)

2.2.2.10. Provide basic analytic and administrative support to oversight body– charged with integrating analysis and recommendations regarding QDR #3b – international/medical civil-military (stability) operations.

2.2.3. Subtasks 1, 2, 3, and 4. OASD/HA FHP&R Medical Stability (Civilian-Military) operations Functional Needs Analysis, Joint Capabilities Document, Functional Solutions Analysis, and Initial Capabilities Document.

2.2.4. Subtask 1: Functional Needs Analysis. (CDRL 0008,0009, 0023).

2.2.4.1. The contractor shall develop a draft FNA for Military Health Services (MHS) support to Medical Stability (Civilian-Military) operations in response to Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) Initiative #3 and DoDD 3000.05, in support of OASD HA FHP&R. The Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs Force Health Protection and Readiness will coordinate the Medical Stability (Civil-Military) operations efforts. The contractor shall accomplish a FNA to assist in defining the Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership and Education, Personnel and Facilities (DOTMLPF) requirements for the MHS. Tasks within Subtask 1 shall be completed by 6 Jun 08 using the FAA accomplished for Medical Stability (Civilian-Military) operations as the baseline for the FNA.

2.2.4.2. The contractor shall coordinate with OASD HA FHP&R who will serve as the conduit for technical and substantive input into the FNA process on behalf of the CMMWG. OASD HA FHP&R will consolidate input and edits from the CMMWG and other MHS stakeholders for inclusion by the contractor. OASD HA FHP&R will be the final arbiter for FNA content.

2.2.4.3. The contractor shall provide a draft FNA that assesses the ability of the current and programmed MHS to deliver the capabilities the FAA identified under the full range of operating conditions and to the designated measures of effectiveness. Using the capabilities and tasks identified in the FAA as primary input, the FNA shall produce a list of capability gaps that require solutions, indicate the time frame in which those solutions are needed, and explain the relative priority of the gaps identified. The FNA shall also identify any redundancies in capabilities that reflect inefficiencies. The FNA serves to further define and refine the integrated architectures. The FNA must assess the entire range of DOTMLPF and policy, as an inherent part of defining capability needs. (see Figure 1)

2.2.4.4. The contractor FNA shall evaluate the FAA, current and programmed capabilities, and desired vs. current capabilities integrated priority lists to:

2.2.4.4.1. Describe gaps in terms of the scenarios assessed and the effects on achieving the relevant military objectives (gaps must be linked to their operational context)

2.2.4.4.2. Assess the impact of the capability gap in terms of the risk to mission (the ability to achieve the objectives of the scenario), the risk to force (the potential losses due to the capability gap), and other important considerations, such as effects on allies and noncombatants.

2.2.4.4.3. Characterize whether the gaps are due to proficiency (inability to achieve the relevant effect in particular conditions), sufficiency (ability to achieve the effect, but inability to bring the needed force to bear due to force shortages or other commitments), or policy limitations (inability to use the force as needed due to operational constraints).

2.2.4.4.4. List a set of needs that the DOD should address, or conclude that no pressing needs exist.

2.2.4.4.5. Offer a prioritization of the gaps that is directly linked to priorities in the strategic guidance; completely document the significant driving factors behind the recommended priorities to give senior leaders the information they need if they choose to make adjustments

2.2.4.4.6 Deliverables: The contractor shall provide the following FNA-related reports:

2.2.4.4.6.1. Identify best-understood scenario and provide draft report regarding scenario analysis (CDRL 0023).

2.2.4.4.6.2. Incorporate comments from WG into draft report that evaluates all scenarios and identifies needs for each scenario (CDRL 0023).

2.2.4.4.6.3. Refine capability and capacity estimates through input from DoD, interagency, non-government organizations, and other relevant sources (CDRL 0023).

2.2.4.4.6.4. Initial draft FNA (CDRL 0023)

2.2.4.4.6.5. Interim draft FNA incorporating comments from WG

2.2.4.4.6.6. Final draft FNA report and update FAA (CDRL 0023).

2.2.4.4.6.6. Cross-walk capabilities and tasks within the HD/CS and Civilian-Military FNAs (CDRL 0023)

2.2.4.4.6.7. Records of meetings/minutes (CDRL 0009)

2.2.5. Subtask 2: Joint Capabilities Document (JCD). The contractor shall develop a draft Medical Stability (Civilian-Military) operations JCD to document the results of MHS Medical Stability (Civilian-Military) operations FAA and FNA (CJCSM 3170.01B, 2005, pp. A-3 –4). The draft JCD will be developed by 6 Jun 08 and the final JCD will be due within 15 working days after comments are provided from OASD HA FHP&R. . (CDRL 0023)

2.2.5.1. The contractor shall coordinate with OASD HA FHP&R who will serve as the conduit for technical and substantive input into the JCD process on behalf of the CMMWG. OASD HA FHP&R will consolidate input and edits from the CMMWG and other MHS stakeholders for inclusion by the contractor. OASD HA FHP&R will be the final arbiter for JCD content.

2.2.5.2. The contractor shall ensure Medical Stability (Civilian-Military) operations JCD is linked with ongoing JCD efforts being accomplished by the Joint Forces Command (JFCOM) under QDR Initiative #2 and present capabilities/tasks in format and scope similar to those identified in the JFCOM JCDs (currently under development). The contractor’s draft JCD shall identify capability/task capacity and mix differences for capabilities presented in the JFCOM JCDs and highlight and provide capability/task capacity for those capabilities identified in the Medical Stability (Civilian-Military) operations FAA and FNA, but not described in the JFCOM JCD.

2.2.5.3. Deliverables: The contractor shall provide the following JCD-related reports:

2.2.5.3.1. Initial draft JCD (CDRL 0023)

2.2.5.3.2. Interim draft JCD reporting incorporating comments from WG

2.2.5.3.3. Final draft JCD report (CDRL 0023)

2.2.6. Subtask 3: Functional Solutions Analysis (FSA). The contractor shall develop a draft FSA for Military Health Services (MHS) support to Medical Stability (Civilian Military) operations in response to Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) Initiative #3 and DoDD 3000.05. The contractor’s draft FSA will assist in defining the Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership and Education, Personnel and Facilities (DOTMLPF) requirements for the MHS. Subtask 3 shall be completed by 28 Sep 08. The FAA and FNA accomplished for MHS Medical Stability (Civilian Military) operations will serve as the baseline for the FSA.

2.2.6.1. The contractor shall coordinate with OASD HA FHP&R who will serve as the conduit for technical and substantive input into the JCD process on behalf of the CMMWG. OASD HA FHP&R will consolidate input and edits from the CMMWG and other MHS stakeholders for inclusion by the contractor. OASD HA FHP&R will be the final arbiter for JCD content.

2.2.6.2. The contractor’s draft FSA shall be a joint assessment of potential approaches to solving, or at least mitigating, the capability gaps identified in the FNA. The approaches identified shall include the broadest possible range of joint possibilities for addressing the capability gaps, and solutions proposed by draft FSA must meet following three criteria: [ref: CJCSM 3170.01C, 2006, p. A-12].

2.2.6.2.1 be strategically responsive and deliver solutions when and where they are needed;

2.2.6.2.2 be feasible with respect to policy, personnel limitations, and technological risk; and

2.2.6.2.3 be realizable, enabling the DOD to actually resource and implement the solutions

2.2.6.3. The contractor shall accomplish the FSA analytic process tasks described in Figure 2, above. The six major tasks are generating alternatives, assessing the effectiveness of alternatives, assessing the feasibility of alternatives (affordability, technical risk, and strategic responsiveness), portfolio planning and generation, identifying game-changing capabilities, and excess analysis. Contractor shall include a game-changing capability in a portfolio if a reasonable CONOPS is developed or recommend an experiment, as an alternative.

2.2.6.4. Deliverables: The contractor shall provide the following FSA-related reports:

2.2.6.4.1. Initial draft FSA (CDRL 0023)

2.2.6.4.2. Interim draft FSA, incorporating comments from WG (CDRL 0023)

2.2.6.4.3. Final draft FSA (CDRL 0023)

2.2.6.4.4. Updated FAA, incorporating results of FSA (CDRL 0023)

2.2.6.4.5. Updated FNA, incorporating results of FSA (CDRL 0023)

2.2.6.4.4. Cross-walk solutions from HD/CS and Civilian-Military FSAs (CDRL 0023)

2.2.6.4.5. Records of meetings/minutes (CDRL 0009)

2.2.7. Subtask 4 : Initial Capabilities Document (ICD). The contractor shall draft a Medical Stability (Civilian-Military) operations ICD to document the results of MHS Medical Stability (Civilian-Military) operations FSA (CJCSM 3170.01). The draft ICD will be developed within 15 working days after acceptance of the FSA and the final ICD will be due within 15 working days after comments are provided from OASD HA FHP&R. (CDRL 0023)

2.2.7.1. The contractor shall link the Medical Stability (Civilian-Military) operations ICD with ongoing JCD/ICD efforts being accomplished by the Joint Forces Command (JFCOM) under QDR Initiative #2. Capabilities/tasks shall present capabilities/tasks in format and scope similar to those identified in the JFCOM JCDs (currently under development) and ICDs. The contractor’s draft Medical Stability (Civilian-Military) operations ICD shall identify capability/task capacity and mix differences for capabilities presented in the JFCOM JCDs/ICDs and highlight and provide capability/task capacity for those capabilities identified in the Medical Stability (Civilian-Military) operations FAA and FNA, but not described in the JFCOM JCDs/ICDs.

2.2.7.2. Deliverables: The contractor shall provide the following ICD-related reports:

2.2.7.2.1. Initial draft ICD (CDRL 0023)

2.2.7.2.2. Interim draft ICD, incorporating comments from WG (CDRL 0023)

2.2.7.2.3. Final draft ICD (CDRL 0023)

2.3. REQUIREMENT 3. Develop Force Health Protection measures and integrate into the Force Protection Condition (FPCON) system. (CDRL 0023)

2.3.1. The contractor shall analyze the existing FPCON system against both natural and man-made threats and develop recommendations for the inclusion of specific force health protection (FHP) measures into the FPCON system (DOD O-2000-12-H, DoD Antiterrorism Handbook). Each recommendation shall include a cost/benefit analysis that clearly articulates the risk reduction achieved along with associated costs to the installation/post (e.g., manpower and materiel) and suggest criteria for when it is appropriate and applicable to increase FPCON activities.

2.3.2 The contractor shall develop a report that describes the techniques used to obtain and analyze information regarding FHP measures, references information sources, include analytical results (including cost/benefit analyses of FHP actions), and provide recommendations for inclusion of FHP measures into FPCON system.

2.4. REQUIREMENT 4. Develop Individual Medical Readiness Interim Situational Awareness System.

2.4.1. The contractor shall analyze the existing requirements and systems for tracking individual medical readiness of NORTHCOM assigned forces. The contractor shall pay particular attention to those NORTHCOM deploying forces with short notice response, based on OPLANs, and Services’ installation medical response forces. This analysis shall include examination of Joint systems currently under development or planned/proposed by the Services or ASD(HA). Based on this analysis, the contractor shall develop an interim system for providing the command IMR situational awareness within each population defined and develop capabilities requirements for advocacy to ASD(HA) and the Joint Staff J8 for a definitive system (CDRL 0023).

2.5. REQUIREMENT 5. Document review and analyses for ongoing N-NC/SG efforts

2.5.1. The contractor shall support the N-NC/SG through technical reviews and input of ongoing efforts, such as pandemic influenza plans and related guidance. This will include such activities as reviewing and commenting on documents that are of interest to the N-NC/SG. The contractor shall develop a report documenting the review, findings, and recommendations. (CDRL 0023) The contractor may be required to do as many as five reviews. Examples of upcoming reviews include: JFCOM JCDs/ICDs and N-NC SG Capabilities Handbook (to include linkage with QDR 3 CBA results).

2.6 REQUIREMENT 6: MEDCOM CBA Support.

2.6.1. MISSION: MEDCOM is responsible to provide health service support to the Army Sustaining Base. MEDCOM provides health and medical care for beneficiaries of the Military Health System (MHS). MEDCOM is responsible for planning and executing medical support for Army forces and supports Army North (USNORTHCOM) in conduct of HLD and DSCA missions. The Surgeon General (TSG), as senior medical advisor to the Chief of Staff of the Army, is responsible for all Army medical care and health related matters. TSG is dual-missioned as Commanding General, MEDCOM, and as such is responsible for ensuring business continuity of the command, providing HSS on Army installations, supporting full spectrum operations by providing professional fillers (PROFIS), individual augmentees (IA), and specialized medical teams and capabilities in support of Combatant Commanders and Army requirements.

2.6.2. Subtask 1. Contractor shall evaluate existing Army medical capabilities and assess potential to execute capabilities/tasks identified within the MHS HD/CS CBA. (CDRL 0008,0009, 0023).

2.6.2.1. Contractor shall review, analyze, and report on prior or ongoing DoD, Army, and AMEDD studies and materials supporting US Northern Command (NORTHCOM) and Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense Health Affairs (OASD-HA) Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) Transformation of the Military Health System (MHS) CBA, leveraging the existing FAA and avoiding or minimizing new or additional analyses to identify MEDCOM mission and capability requirements.

2.6.2.2. Contractor shall review, analyze, and report on relevant Army and MEDCOM doctrine, directives, policy, instructions and regulations pertaining to homeland defense, civil support, force protection, installation preparedness, and consequence management and evaluate relative to MHS HD/CS FAA capabilities and tasks.

2.6.2.3. Contractor shall prepare, conduct, and analyze surveys of Army medical assets to determine status of current and needed DOTMLPF capabilities in comparison to executing HD/CS FAA capabilities and tasks.

2.6.2.4. Contractor shall provide needs and solutions analysis outlining recommendations and courses of action (COAs) on both existing and potential solution sets to meet identified medical HD/CS and Medical Stability (Civilian-Military) operations capability and task requirements.

2.6.3. Subtask 2 Contractor shall evaluate MEDCOM Mission Essential Task Lists (METLs) at the HQ and Major Subordinate Command levels and compare to HD/CS CBA for Homeland Defense and DSCA operations. Contractor shall attend meetings and provide meeting minutes (CDRL 0008, 0009, 0023).

2.7 Requirement 7: Monthly Status Report: The contractor shall keep Quality Assurance Personnel (QAP) informed of all activities via verbal communication and status reports. (CDRL 0011, 0018).

3.0. SERVICES SUMMARY (SS)

Threshold

5.1 No security violations.

(SDS-4) Requirements/deliverables completed in an accurate timely manner in compliance with individual task order Requirements.

2.1 - 2.7 Contractor submits no more than three late documents per year per task order and no more than two working days late. No more than one set of corrections/edits per quarter per task order. All corrections must be accomplished within two working days, or other such time periods as established in the requirements.

(SDS-5) Maintain accurate electronic databases, organizational mail boxes, portal content, and records

2.1 - 2.7 Contractor receives no more than one formal customer complaint/ contract discrepancy report per year for each requirement.

4.0. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY. None.

4.1. MATERIALS AND OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODCs). The contractor may purchase reimbursable items costing less than $500. Reimbursable purchases must be submitted for approval by the Quality Assurance Personnel (QAP) prior to actual purchase. Items exceeding $500 shall require QAP and Contracting Officer approval prior to purchase. Purchases exceeding $500 shall not be broken into smaller purchases to in order to meet this dollar threshold of “less than $500.00.

5.0. GENERAL INFORMATION

5.1. SECURITY. Provisions outlined in the basic DD254 to this task order. Contractor shall provide personnel with clearances commensurate with the DD254, Department of Defense Contract Security Classification Specification. All personnel required frequent entry to Peterson AFB and Schriever AFB shall be provided access in accordance with AFI 31-101, The Air Force Installation Security Program. Access to other locations may be provided upon request for support of this contract. Based on subject matter, contractor is required to maintain a minimum security clearance of SECRET.

5.2. ACCESS TO GOVERNMENT PROPERTY AND FACILITIES. The Contractor will be allowed unescorted access to Government building 2 on Peterson AFB/Cheyenne Mountain and other sites consistent with Task Order requirements upon completing required building security requirements. The Contractor will require a Restricted Area Badge for access to building 2. Access to Government facilities, documents, and systems shall be in accordance with the contract DD 254.

5.3 GOVERNMENT REQUIRED TRAVEL

5.3.1. CONTINGENCY TRAVEL. Contingency support is not required under this PWS.

5.3.2. NON-CONTINGENCY TRAVEL. Travel required to fulfill the tasks in this PWS shall be performed in accordance with FAR 31.205-46, Travel Costs. A trip report will be required by the contractor within 5 duty days of trip return. Below are the anticipated trips for each year; however, actual required travel may vary based on Government requirements. (CDRL 0009)

Travel Estimates for Requirements 2.1. through 2.7.

5.4. PRODUCT OWNERSHIP. All products produced by the Contractor in the performance of this PWS are the property of the government

5.5. PROPRIETARY DATA.

5.5.1. The Contractor shall request government approval prior to the use of any proprietary data or software tools to fulfill the requirements of the PWS.

5.5.2. The Contractor shall be provided access to information required to accomplish assigned tasks commensurate with security clearance and on a need to know basis.

5.5.3. During the contract period, all data pertaining to this contract shall be returned to the Government upon contract expiration. The Contractor shall not retain classified or unclassified material generated or received under this contract after the contract ends without approval of the appropriate office of primary responsibility.

5.5.4. The Government has unlimited rights to all deliverables developed under this PWS. The Contractor shall not use any materials pertaining to this contract for business development or any other vendor strategic purposes.

5.5.5. Contractor personnel will be required to sign non-disclosure agreements prior to start of work.

5.6. HOURS OF WORK. Contractor shall provide coverage during normal N-NC duty hours, 0730-1630, Monday through Friday.

5.7. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE. Basic contract period beginning on date of award and ending after a twelve month period, plus 1 one-year option periods. Requirements 1 and 2 have a specific deliverable need to be accomplished within 7 months of performance start for the basic contract period and all options (completed). Requirements 1 and 2 have additional deliverables that will be due 31 Jan 08 & 27 Sep 08, as described, above.

5.8. MANAGEMENT. The contractor shall appoint a project manager to coordinate with the QAP to obtain and clarify contract requirements. The project manager will be responsible for the daily control and supervision of contractor's employees. The project manager shall ensure the contractor's employees understand the prohibitions imposed on the U.S. Government regarding personal services contracts and will report instances where the government attempts to control or supervise contractors' employees to the QAP and Contracting Officer (CO), immediately. Contractor shall ensure its personnel identify themselves as contractors in accordance with applicable N-NC directives and instructions. Notwithstanding any language in this Task Order that may imply otherwise, Contractor shall ensure its personnel do not perform any inherently governmental activities. Contractor shall ensure its personnel do not attempt to represent the Government of the United States or N-NC to any other person or entity, U.S. or Canadian, except for delivering a government-approved message or position.

5.9. PERFORMANCE OF SERVICE DURING CRISIS: Performance of Services during Crisis Declared by the National Command Authority or Overseas Combatant Commander -The performance of these services is not considered to be mission essential during times of crisis. Should a crisis be declared, the Contracting Officer or their representative will verbally advise the contractor of the revised requirements, followed by a written notification. A representative of the contracting officer will further notify the contractor verbally when the crisis has ended with written notification to follow. Any price changes resulting from this crisis will be negotiated in accordance with FAR clauses for “Changes”.

5.10. PLACE OF PERFORMANCE. The work is expected to be performed in the contractor’s facility with a QDR 3b technical expert located within local commuting access to OSD HA, FHP&R (Washington DC). All other requirements (Requirements 1, 3-7) can be accomplished at contractor’s facility of choice (i.e., location not critical to accomplish Requirements 1, 3-7).

FA2517-06-D-9002-0003

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

FOR

ENGINEER SUPPORT

FOR

HQ NORAD-USNORTHCOM

1 Aug 2008

1.0 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES:

1.2. MISSION: The mission of HQ NORAD and USNORTHCOM Command Support is to provide outstanding support to the Commander, Deputy Commanders, and the entire two-command staff in the areas of Multi-media, Security, Facility Management, Resources, and Information Management in order to facilitate the NORAD and USNORTHCOM missions.

1.3. OVERVIEW OF SERVICES REQUIRED

Program planning, management and coordination services are required to meet facility requirements for NORAD and USNORTHCOM related to infrastructure planning, new mission beddown, military construction (MILCON), Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC), real estate issues, and project prioritization. General tasks include requirements development, project management, technical analysis, task management in support of implementation, integration and operational support, administrative documentation, and project validation. Main objectives are to 1) identify and develop facility requirements and courses of action to support organizations/missions, 2) manage project planning and coordinate alteration efforts with occupants, and 3) support project development for Component and Subordinate Commands.

2.0 SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS

2.1. REQUIREMENT 1: Contractor Shall Provide Capabilities & Requirements Planning. Estimated new mission beddowns is two per year. (CDRL 0009, 0023, 0008)

2.1.1. Contractor shall assist in the development of plans for the transformation of the Cheyenne Mountain Directorate (formally known as the Cheyenne Mountain Operations Center) from Cheyenne Mountain Air Force Station to HQ NORAD-USNORTHCOM (N-NC) Building 2, Peterson AFB, the integration of Maritime Warning into NORAD, Maritime Homeland Defense within USNORTHCOM, and expansion of the Combined Intelligence Fusion Center. Subtasks include the following:

2.1.1.1. Contractor shall provide transitional planning by assisting in the development of logistical courses of action (COAs) for accommodating new beddown missions, organizational changes, expanding staff, planning & contingency cells, and new liaison offices.

2.1.1.2. Contractor shall provide Command Center support by coordinating potentially adverse activities with the Command Center Director to minimize mission disruption.

2.1.1.3. Contractor shall provide assistance in gathering end-user requirements and identifying facility and security requirements to meet organizational/mission needs.

2.1.1.4. Contractor shall assist in the development of evaluation criteria for course of action, evaluation of alternatives, and provide recommended course of action.

2.1.1.5. Contractor shall provide documents and/or presentations that include COA reports, meeting minutes with supporting data. Supporting data must explain the methodology used to develop COAs, and the analyses/evaluation process used to arrive at conclusions.

2.1.1.6. Contractor shall provide assistance with site assessments to support the unit beddown process.

2.1.1.7. Contractor shall provide transitional planning to facilitate timely mission and organizational changes.

2.1.1.8. Contractor shall analyze existing infrastructure, identify shortfalls, and propose technical solutions.

2.1.1.9. Contractor shall prepare informational and decision briefings and provide calculations, floor plans, profiles, graphics, and other drawings for these briefings.

2.1.1.10. Contractor shall assist in developing project programming documents, including assisting development of scope of work and project justification, to support emerging mission and facility requirements.

2.1.1.11. Contractor shall provide inputs for Environmental Analyses, and coordinate with host installation offices.

2.1.1.12. Contractor shall provide Economic Analyses Reports, attend meetings, and provide meeting minutes.

2.1.1.13. Contractor shall provide advice and assistance in the development of procurement strategies for necessary furnishings and equipment.

2.1.1.14. Contractor shall provide assistance in review of Support Agreements involving NORAD-USNORTHCOM occupied facilities and provide written reports describing potential issues/concerns. (CDRL 0009)

2.2. REQUIREMENT 2: Contractor shall provide Capabilities & Requirements Management. Subtasks include the following:

2.2.1. Contractor shall provide project coordination for organizational transitions and transformations.

2.2.2. Contractor shall assist with coordination of facility alteration/upgrade activities with building occupants. Estimate one major project per year. Tasks associated with this requirement include:

2.2.2.1. Contractor shall provide assistance with administering multiple purchases and installation of needed equipment and furnishings. This entails providing assistance to identify requirements and produce a logical written description of requirements, monitor the production and delivery process, deconflict installation schedules, coordinate the installation process with occupants, identify potential mission impacts, and…